241, To convert existing paddle ten, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application )
)
of ) ZONING CASE NO. 241
)
Mr. Phil Steinberg )
)
Lot 69C-2-MS )
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. Phil Steinberg, Lot 69-C-2-MS,
Miscellaneous Tract, for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 3.01 (D)
Paragraph 3 of Ordinance No. 170 came on for hearing on the 18th day
of December, 1979 in the Council Chambers of the Administration
Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the
applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the application,
the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and
Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills,
California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Phil Steinberg,
is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 69C-2-MS,
located at 87 Crest Road East in the City of Rolling Hills, and that
notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was
given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of•Ordinance No. 33 of the
City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds that no comment,
written or verbal, was received in opposition to the request, and that
letters were received from Mrs. F. C. Ripley Jr., 91 Crest Road East
and Mr. and Mrs. William R. Lennartz, 63 Crest Road East, stating that
they had no objection to the request.
II.
The Commission finds that the applicant wishes to convert an
existing paddle tennis court in his front yard to a full size tennis
court, and in order to do so it will be necessary to remove or relocate
the existing stable. The Commission finds that the applicant has
indicated that he does not intend to keep horses on the property and
requested permission to remove the stable and corral fencing, while
retaining sufficient area for horses, as required by ordinance. The
Commission finds that the request should be granted, and a Conditional
Use Permit should be approved, in order to preserve substantial property
•
rights in the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such
Conditional Use Permit would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare, nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a Variance of Front
Yard Requirements and a Conditional Use Permit should be granted to
Mr. Phil Steinberg, Lot 69-C-2-MS, 87 Crest Road East, for conversion
of a paddle tennis court in the front yard to a full size tennis court,
subject to the conditions that the fence surrounding the court be a
maximum of 10 feet above the surface level of the court; that a land-
scape plan be submitted showing existing trees which are to be re-
tained, with a provision that if any of the trees which screen the
court are removed for any reason, they will be replaced by trees of
comparable size or by material appropriate for landscaping; that the
existing stable be moved or removed, with sufficient area retained for
stable pruposes as required by the ordinances of the City; that the
owner sign an affidavit stating that he is aware of and accepts all
the conditions of approval, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
This approval shall expire one year from the date of grant,
if not acted on.
• 14Mb
irman, Plannin Commission•
(a,,,f0,0
S retary, Planning Commission
rr�