Loading...
241, To convert existing paddle ten, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA In the Matter of the Application ) ) of ) ZONING CASE NO. 241 ) Mr. Phil Steinberg ) ) Lot 69C-2-MS ) FINDINGS AND REPORT The application of Mr. Phil Steinberg, Lot 69-C-2-MS, Miscellaneous Tract, for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 3.01 (D) Paragraph 3 of Ordinance No. 170 came on for hearing on the 18th day of December, 1979 in the Council Chambers of the Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California. I. The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Phil Steinberg, is the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 69C-2-MS, located at 87 Crest Road East in the City of Rolling Hills, and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said application was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of•Ordinance No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds that no comment, written or verbal, was received in opposition to the request, and that letters were received from Mrs. F. C. Ripley Jr., 91 Crest Road East and Mr. and Mrs. William R. Lennartz, 63 Crest Road East, stating that they had no objection to the request. II. The Commission finds that the applicant wishes to convert an existing paddle tennis court in his front yard to a full size tennis court, and in order to do so it will be necessary to remove or relocate the existing stable. The Commission finds that the applicant has indicated that he does not intend to keep horses on the property and requested permission to remove the stable and corral fencing, while retaining sufficient area for horses, as required by ordinance. The Commission finds that the request should be granted, and a Conditional Use Permit should be approved, in order to preserve substantial property • rights in the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such Conditional Use Permit would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare, nor injurious to property in the same vicinity and zone. III. From the foregoing it is concluded that a Variance of Front Yard Requirements and a Conditional Use Permit should be granted to Mr. Phil Steinberg, Lot 69-C-2-MS, 87 Crest Road East, for conversion of a paddle tennis court in the front yard to a full size tennis court, subject to the conditions that the fence surrounding the court be a maximum of 10 feet above the surface level of the court; that a land- scape plan be submitted showing existing trees which are to be re- tained, with a provision that if any of the trees which screen the court are removed for any reason, they will be replaced by trees of comparable size or by material appropriate for landscaping; that the existing stable be moved or removed, with sufficient area retained for stable pruposes as required by the ordinances of the City; that the owner sign an affidavit stating that he is aware of and accepts all the conditions of approval, and it is, therefore, so ordered. This approval shall expire one year from the date of grant, if not acted on. • 14Mb irman, Plannin Commission• (a,,,f0,0 S retary, Planning Commission rr�