Loading...
720, Additions to the SFR will encr, Resolutions & Approval Conditions( This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD 06 0868626 RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS RECORDER'S OFFICE LOS ANGELES COUNTY CALIFORNIA 04/20/06 AT 09:21AM TITLE(S) : LEAD S-I E E T FEE D.T.T. Code 01 - 28.00 Code A005 - 001 Code 20 - 02.00 CODE 20 CODE 19 CODE 9 Grand Total = $30.00 Page Count = 8 Assessor's Identification Number (AIN) To be completed by Examiner OR Title Company in black ink. Number of AIN's Shown THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED ****413 • SECORD1NG REQUEST BY 'NHEN RECORDED MAIL. TO NAME Gc74r or 2bLL1n3C2 14(LL5 MAILING ()OP- U6zUCdc- '(3CS'D RD, ADRESS Cf Y,SfATE Teo Lc.i ,c) (47 /4 ZIP CODE 9 G Z 7 4 ter- /0 L.)/% 06 0868626 SPACE ABOVE -THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE TITLE(S) r- / ccE.= r07 ,-) cc. tb RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL1 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROM ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX 3 06 0868626 The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. T Recorder's Use Ony AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CAUFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 720 VARIANCE XX I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 87 Crest Road East, ROLLING HILLS, CA (LOT 69-C-2-MS), 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO.720 VARIANCE XX er the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signature `J Signature Tat-i1L S c_tt)t?,EQ.GI Name typed or printed Name typed or printed e7 C/ LZD. 67'4S7- Address Address RO Lz-r"Jri, ///GL . la, cl 0 2 74 City/State City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On #-/7-Oc before me, Per ye, c,A1s ieMc./-A7 /E. A/a7i-u241 d4.3L1G Personally appeared P t-( t t_ ; r=> r3 r-12 c, personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf o w is e . - son(s) acted, executed the instrument. DOUGtAS K. MCHATTE Witness byJnd and official seal. Commission se 1550273 Los Notary Public - California��-g21%% s Angeles Counntyty My Comm.EsplresFeb25,2009 Signature of Notary SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • dAtt M-1 u l RESOLUTION NO. 2006-03 06 0868626 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS PORTIONS OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE EAST AND WEST SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 720, AT 87 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 69 C-2-MS), (STEINBERG). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Phil Steinberg with respect to real property located at 87 Crest Road East, Rolling Hills (Lot 69 C-2-MS) requesting to construct 525 square feet of additions to the existing 3,529 square foot residence and 720 square foot garage, of which 120 square feet would encroach into the west side yard setback and 140 square feet would encroach into the east side yard setback. Two hundred eighty eight square feet of the existing garage will be converted into living space. When completed, the residence will be 4,222 square feet with a 552 square foot garage. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application at their regular meetings on January 17, 2006, February 21, 2006 and at a field trip on February 21, 2006. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Committee approved the proposed addition. Prior to issuance of building permits for the construction, the Los Angeles County Building Department requires approval of any project from the City. During the City's review, it was determined that a portion of the proposed addition encroaches into the required 35-foot side setbacks, thus the request for a Variance. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption, Existing Facilities, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from malting use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.120 is required because it states that every lot in the RAS-2 zone shall have a side yard of not less than 35 feet from the side property line. The applicant is requesting a Variance to construct 525 square feet of additions to the existing residence and garage, of which 120 square feet would encroach 06 0868626 up to sixteen feet into the west side yard setback and 140 square feet would encroac q up to fifteen feet into the east side yard setback. Two hundred eighty eight (288) square feet of the existing garage will be converted into living space. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to this property that do not apply generally to other properties or class of uses in the same zone because the subject lot is of an irregular shape and is narrowest at the building site. The configuration of the existing structure, which previously received approved with variances to encroach into the side yard setbacks, and which extends from side to side, prevent further expansion. In addition, the lot is zoned RAS-2 (2+ acres minimum lot size), which requires 35-foot side setbacks, but the lot does not meet the RAS-2 zone lot size requirement. The lot is adjacent to a RAS-1 zone, which requires 20-foot side setback. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the right and benefits enjoyed by similarly situated properties in the same zone. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties with similar lot configurations. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties and will square off and fill in already existing encroachment. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development in the side yard will allow the remaining portion of the lot to remain undeveloped, would minimize grading and would follow the existing line of encroachment. The areas of additions are screened from adjacent property owners and would not impair views. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the requirements of the City. The residential building pad coverage slightly exceeds the City's guidelines of 30%. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed addition will be orderly, attractive and shall protect the rural character of the community. The proposed addition will not encroach into potentially future equestrian uses on the property. A suitable stable and corral area has been set -aside on the site. E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The structural lot coverage and the total impervious lot coverage are within the requirements of the City. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance in Zoning Case No. 720 to encroach 120 square feet into Reso. 2006-03 Steinberg 2 • 06 0868626 the west side yard setback and 140 square feet into the east side yard setback with additions, subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated January 9, 2006 except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The property on which the project is located contains an adequate area for a future stable and corral. F. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of the Lighting Ordinance of the City of Rolling Hills, pertaining to lighting on said property. G. The property owners shall comply with the requirements of Section 17.16.190 of the Zoning Ordinance pertaining to roof covering. H. Utility lines serving subject residence shall be placed underground. I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 9,472 square feet or 13.6% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. J. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 23,610 square feet or 34.0% in conformance with total lot coverage limitations. K. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 27,400 square feet or 39.7% in conformance with disturbed area limitations. (See condition "0" for restriction on further disturbance). L. Residential building pad coverage on the 24,640 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 7,748 square feet or 31.4%, which includes 29 square feet of the 451 square feet covered porches; coverage on the 6,240 square foot existing swimming pool building pad shall not exceed 19.1%. Reso. 2006-03 Steinberg 3 • 06 0868626 M. There shall be no grading for this project. N. If the County Building and Safety Department require an above ground drainage system, the system shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails and water from the drainage system shall not be discharged onto a trail or adjacent properties. The system shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and shall be adequate in size to discharge in a sheet flow manner and be screened from any trail and neighbors' views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drainage system. O. The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall be retained to the greatest extent feasible. The areas within the residential building pad and the swimming pool building pad that are marked on the site plan, dated January 9, 2006, as "TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED" shall remain landscaped and shall not be disturbed. Otherwise, the property owners shall be required to apply to the Planning Commission for a Variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot. P. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to the property, which would constitute additional grading or structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. Q. If new landscaping is introduced for this project, the landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, .and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray. Further, landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as to screen the residence but not to obstruct views of neighboring properties. Any new trees and shrubs planned to be introduced in conjunction with this project shall, at maturity, not be higher than the ridge height of the residence. R. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. S. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. T. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. Reso. 2006-03 Steinberg 4 06 08ss62o U. If a construction fence is erected during construction, it shall not be located in any easement or cross over trails. V. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. W. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. X. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct surface water in an approved manner. Y. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. Z. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Variance pursuant to Section 17.38.060, or the approval shall not be effective. AA. All conditions of this Variance approval, that apply, must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF MARCH 2006. ATTEST: <71A MARIE LI'3 KERN, D Reso. 2006-03 Steinberg ol ?UTY CITY CLERK 5 LOREN DEROY, CHAII,iVOI AN • 06 0868626 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2006-03 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS PORTIONS OF WHICH WOULD ENCROACH INTO THE EAST AND WEST SIDE YARD SETBACKS AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 720, AT 87 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 69 C-2-MS), (STEINBERG). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 21, 2006 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Henke, Sommer, Witte and Chairwoman DeRoy. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. Reso. 2006-03 Steinberg ct DEPUXY CITY CLERK 6