589, Construct a new SFR with garag, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
RESOLUTION NO. 99-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-3 AND APPROVING AN
EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 589.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ripley with respect
to real property located at 91 Crest Road East (Lot 69-B-MS), Rolling Hills, requesting
an extension to a previously approved Site Plan Review for the construction of a
new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on December
21, 1999 at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of
time is necessary because the applicants intend to start construction on their new
home in the spring of 2000, after the winter rains.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 7 of Resolution No. 99-3,
dated January 19,1999, to read as follows:
"A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within two years of
the approval of this Resolution."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 99-3
shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST D - C ER, 1999.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN RN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-20 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-3 AND
APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE
PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 589.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on December 21, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Hankins, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts.
None.
ABSENT: Commissioner Margeta.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
h e • IC ,
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
•
.•
UIUIH III ID 1 II II�IIIII IIIII IflYIIR
Deno sHser
NOVE §:IV
2 6 2&11
C17Y OFT
FEE
FEE $19 JJ
DAF $2
C-20 5
• CODE
20
CODE
19
CODE
9
•
01-1669597
RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
8:04 AM SEP 06 2001 •
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE
TITLE(S)
D.T.T.
Assessor's Identification Number (AIN)
To Be Completed By Examiner OR Title Company In Black Ink Number of Parcels Shown
THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED
•
O1-Iti69597
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO.5_89
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
91 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 69-B-MS), ROLLING HILLS, CA
This property is the subject of the above numbered case.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 589 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury
Slgnatur
iegv
Name ped or grin ed
A
that thelys true and correc
T;r� 1 cy
Name typed or printed 1 '
5—d040
5cNb4 j IC.,u C4 AM A c rU
L
L
City/State
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On kto ., 'LOQ 1 before me,
personally appeared `1 -Et7 �'-P ( -1 4- .1 A(t 1, F
T Recorder's Use Only
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s)
is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same. in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the erson(s), or the entity upon behalf
of instrument.
KRISTEN CROFT
Comm 111274855 g Witness) hand . nd officia
PUB
LIC BLIC CAUPORNU
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
4.4
My Comm Expires August 20, 2004
T
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
• 01 1669597 • £fHIB)T ti d
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE
AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
589.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ripley with
respect to real property located at 91 Crest Road East (Lot 69-B-MS) requesting Site
Plan Review to permit the construction of a new single family residence to replace
an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application on November 17, 1998, December 15, 1998, and
January 19, 1999 at a field trip visit on December 12, 1998. The applicants were
notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail. The applicants and the
applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 2 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15302] and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted
for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be
constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or
structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the
building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the
size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any
thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review
application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses
because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low
profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between
surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot
coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 147,610 square feet. The
proposed residence (7,910 sq. ft.), garage (1,600 sq. ft.), future stable (450 sq. ft.), and
service yard (100 sq. ft.) will have 10,060 square feet which constitutes 6.8% of the lot
which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total
lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 28,697 square feet which
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 1 OF 4
•
01 16695.
equals 19.4% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage
requirement.
B. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible,
existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms because a minimum
amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage
that will flow away from the proposed residential development and existing
neighboring residences.
C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
follows natural contours of the relatively flat site to minimize grading. The natural
drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the
southern side of this lot.
D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with the
conditions contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the
community.
E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a total buildable
pad of 69,450 square feet with 14.5% of pad coverage.
F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be
exceeded. The proposed project will be located on a relatively flat portion of a steep
sloping lot that is also consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate
neighborhood. Grading will be minor and required only to restore the natural slope
of the property. The ratio of the proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the
ratio found on several properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of
approval, is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience .and safety of circulation
for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will provide a safer
driveway accessway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental
review.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE2OF4
� 01 f 6111)597
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 589 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced
within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080.
B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated January 11, 1999, and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan
approved with this application.
F. The finished floor elevation on the residential building pad shall not
• exceed 1,437 feet.
G. Grading for the project shall not exceed 50 cubic yards of cut soil an
650 cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted.
H. The proposed project shall not include a basement.
I. The residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 14.5%.
The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed .19 % of the net lot
area. 3 YJ
K. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the buildings
and the .building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible
with the surrounding vegetation of the community.
L. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
J•
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 3 OF 4
• 01 1669597
•
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
M. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
N. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
development shall require the filing .of a new application for approval by the
Planning Commission.
O. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
P. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied
with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOAY OF JANUARY, 1999.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
r1 d- k M �
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-22 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
589.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 15, 1998 by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None .
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 4 OF 4
. k..
DEPUTY CITY C RK