589, Construct a new SFR with garag, Staff ReportsNOVEMBER 14, 2001
MEMO TO FILE:
RE: 91 CREST ROAD, MR. RIPLEY
ZC NO.589
The Planning Commission on 1/19/99 approved ZC NO. 589 by Resolution No. 99-3.
On 6/6/01 the applicant's representative submitted a revised site plan reducing the size of the
house from 7,910 sq.ft. and 1,600 sq.ft. garage to 5,430-sq. ft. house and 1,212-sq. ft. garage.
This request was approved by staff as a minor modification as the modification consisted of a
decrease in the structure and all other related coverage. In addition, due to an unforeseen
condition of the lot, the grading quantities will need to be increased from the previously approved
650 cubic yards to 790 cubic yards, which will be balanced on site. The grading quantities were
also approved administratively.
On 11/6/01 the applicant's representative requested another modification to move the house
approximately 35 feet to the south of original approval. City Manager requested that the area of
the new location be staked. During the course of the staking, the applicant realized that much
more grading would be required to move the house 35 feet. Therefore the applicant requested to
move the house 17 feet to the south from the original approval. City Manager and Planner
inspected the stakes and required that the applicant/representative inform the next door neighbor
of this change and get their approval.
On 11/08/01 staff received a phone call from Mrs. Steinberg stating that she and her husband do
not object to the relocation of the house at 91 Crest Road. A written approval from Mr. and Mrs.
Steinberg was received on 11/13/01.
Staff requested new calculations for lot disturbance and grading quantities for the change in the
location of the house.
Bolton Engineering recalculated the disturbed area and the grading quantities. The disturbed area
of the lot will be 34.5% (which was verified by YS), and the grading quantity increased to 980
cubic yards.
Originally, the grading quantity was proposed to be increased to 1,320 cubic yards. The City
Manager requested that that number be brought down, otherwise staff would not be able to
consider this change as minor modification, and the case would have to go back to the
Commission for Modification of the Site Plan. The applicant's representative was able to cut
down the grading to 980 cubic yards, by providing a crawl space underneath part of the house
(NOT A BASEMENT), instead of cutting and filling the natural lower area. of the lot.
On 11/14/01 staff administratively approved the changes as follows: move the house 17 feet in
the southerly direction and grading quantities of 980 cubic yards of cut and 980 cubic yards of
fill.
C1iy °Mo ltin9 JMS
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310)377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E math cityofrh@aol.com
Agenda Item No.: 3.A.
Mtg. Date: 2/18/99
DATE: FEBRUARY 18,1999
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
ATTN: CRAIG R. NEALIS, CITY MANAGER
FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN
EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 589.
Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ripley, 91 Crest Road East (Lot 69-B-MS)
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission adopted the attached Resolution No. 99-3 on January
19,1999 at their regular meeting granting Site Plan Review approval to construct
a new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence. The
vote was 5-0.
2. Mr. and Mrs. Ripley are requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a
new 7,910 square foot residence, 1,600 square foot garage, 450 square foot future
stable and 100 square foot service area to replace a 2,658 square foot residence
and 450 square foot garage. The 177 foot long residence and garage will be
located in the same general area as the existing residence at the central portion of
the irregular lot. The future stable will be located at the rear approximately 74
feet from the residence. A basement for the project is not proposed. Site Plan
Review and Nearby Properties tables are attached.
3. The existing residence and garage were constructed in 1949 and a small addition
was constructed in 1964.
4. The existing driveway access area at the north side of the lot off Crest Road East
will not be changed but the driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet
to 20 feet.
I;
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
5. The future stable will be 450 square feet with a 550 square foot corral. Access to
the stable will be from the easement at the west of the residence. The slope of the
accessway will range from 5% to 10% (25% maximum permitted).
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 10,060 square feet or 6.8% (20%
permitted). The total lot coverage proposed is 28,697 square feet or 19.4% (35%
permitted).
7. The 69,450 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is
10,060 square feet or 14.5% (30% maximum guideline).
8. Grading for the project will require 650 cubic yards of cut soil and 650 cubic
yards of fill soil.
9. Disturbed area of the lot will be 28,697 square feet or 19.4% overall (40%
maximum).
10. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive and file Resolution No. 99-3.
•
4
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement
line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear. 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURUS
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least
1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of
increasing the size of the structure
by more than 25% In a 36-month
period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE 2.1%
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
'RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
' GRADING
Site Plan Review required if
excavation and/or fill or
combination thereof that is more
than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded
building pad area, any remedial
grading (temporary disturbance),
any graded slopes and building
pad areas, and any nongraded
area where impervious surfaces
exist.
STABLE (450 SO.FT.
& 550 SO.FT. CORRAL1
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
12.5%
EXISTING
None
PROPOSED
None
Residence 2,658 sq.ft. Residence 7,910 sq.ft.
Garage 495 sq.ft. Garage 1,600 sq.ft.
Service Yard 0 sq.ft. Service Yard 100 sq.ft.
Stable 0 sa.ft. Stable 450 sa.ft.
Total 3.153 sa.ft, Total 10,060 sa.ft.
6.8%
19.4%
4.5% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad 14.5% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
N/A
12.5%
None
N/A
None
19.4%
Future 450 sq.ft. stable
Future 550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Crest Road
East W/slope of 5% to 10%
Existing off Crest Road No change
East
N/A Planning Commission
review
WA Planning Commission
review
Ir
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL 'PO
CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE
AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
589.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
fiction 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ripley with
respect to real property located at 91 Crest Road East (Lot 69-B-MS) requesting Site
Plan Review to permit the construction of a new single family residence to replace
an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application on November 17, 1998, December 15, 1998, and
January 19, 1999 at a field trip visit on December 12, 1998. The applicants were
notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail. The applicants and the
applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 2 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15302] and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted
for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be
constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or
structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the
building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the
size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any
thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review
application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses
because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low
profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between
surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot
coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 147,610 square feet. The
proposed residence (7,910 sq. ft.), garage (1,600 sq. ft.), future stable (450 sq. ft.), and
service yard (100 sq. ft.) will have 10,060 square feet which constitutes 6.8% of the lot
which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total
lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 28,697 square feet which
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 1 OF 4
• •
equals 19.4% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage
requirement.
B. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible,
existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms because a minimum
amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage
that will flow away from the proposed residential development and existing
neighboring residences.
C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
follows natural contours of the relatively flat site to minimize grading. The natural
drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the
southern side of this lot.
D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with the
conditions contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the
community.
E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a total buildable
pad of 69,450 square feet with 14.5% of pad coverage.
F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be
exceeded. The proposed project will be located on a relatively flat portion of a steep
sloping lot that is also consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate
neighborhood. Grading will be minor and required only to restore the natural slope
of the property. The ratio of the proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the
ratio found on several properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of
approval, is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation
for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will provide a safer
driveway accessway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental
review.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 2 OF 4
• •
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 589 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced
within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080.
B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated January 11, 1999, and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan
approved with this application.
F. The finished floor elevation on the residential building pad shall not
exceed 1,437 feet.
G. Grading for the project shall not exceed 650 cubic yards of cut soil and
650 cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted.
H. The proposed project shall not include a basement.
I. The residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 14.5%.
J.
area.
The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 19.4% of the net lot
K. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the buildings
and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible
with the surrounding vegetation of the community.
L. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 3 OF 4
• •
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
M. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
N. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the
Planning Commission.
O. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
P. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied
with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOP,AY OF JANUARY, 1999.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN FERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-22 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
589.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 15, 1998 by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None .
ABSENT: None .
ABSTAIN: None.
• and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 4 OF 4
//
DEPUTY CCITY RK
HEARING DATE: JANUARY 19, 1999
TO:
FROM:
•
90,w
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 589
91 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 69-B-MS)
RA-S-1, 4.00 ACRES
MR. AND MRS. FRED RIPLEY
MR. CRISS GUNDERSON, ARCHITECT
NOVEMBER 7, 1998
Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an
existing single family residence.
BACKGROUND
1. Plans were revised by the applicants to reduce the length of the residence by nine
feet (4.5 feet each from the east and west sides) and reduce the size of the residence
by 805 square feet from 8,715 square feet to 7,910 square feet. In addition, staff
added the residences at 60 and 62 Crest Road East to the Nearby Properties Table
(Page 4) and prepared draft Resolution No. 99-3 as requested by the Planning
Commission.
2. Mr. and Mrs. Ripley are requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new
7,910 square foot residence, 1,600 square foot garage, 450 square foot future stable
and 100 square foot service area to replace a 2,658 square foot residence and 450
square foot garage. The 177 foot long residence and garage will be located in the
same general area as the existing residence at the central portion of the irregular
lot. The future stable will be located at the rear approximately 74 feet from the
residence. A basement for the project is not proposed. Site Plan Review and
Nearby Properties tables are attached.
3. The existing residence and garage were constructed in 1949 and a small addition
was constructed in 1964.
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 1
®Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
4. The existing driveway access area at the north side of the lot off Crest Road East
will not be changed but the driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to
20 feet.
5. The future stable will be 450 square feet with a 550 square foot corral. Access to the
stable will be from the easement at the west of the residence. The slope of the
accessway will range from 5% to 10% (25% maximum permitted).
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 10,060 square feet or 6.8% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 28,697 square feet or 19.4% (35% permitted).
7. The 69,450 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is
10,060 square feet or 14.5% (30% maximum guideline).
8. Grading for the project will require 650 cubic yards of cut soil and 650 cubic yards of
fill soil.
9. Disturbed area of the lot will be 28,697 square feet or 19.4% overall (40%
maximum).
10. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 2
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement
line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least
1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of
increasing the size of the structure
by more than 25% in a 36-month
period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE 2.1 %
(20% maximum)
None
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if
excavation and/or fill or
combination thereof that is more
than 3 feet in depth and covers
more than 2,000 sq.ft. must be
balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded
building pad area, any remedial
grading (temporary disturbance),
any graded slopes and building
pad areas, and any nongraded
area where impervious surfaces
exist.
STABLE (450 SO.FT.
& 550 SO.FT. CORRAL\
STABLE ACCESS
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
EXISTING
Residence 2,658 sq.ft.
Garage 495 sq.ft.
Service Yard 0 sq.ft.
Staple 0 sa.fta
Total 3,153 sq.ft.
12.5%
IPREVIOUSLY
PROPOSED
None
Residence 8,715 sq.ft.
Garage 1,600 sq.ft.
Service Yard 100 sq.ft.
Stable 450 sa.ft.
Total 10,865sq.ft.
7.4%
20%
IPROPOSED
None
Residence 7,910 sq.ft.
Garage 1,600 sq.ft.
Service Yard 100 sq.ft.
Stable 450 sq.ft.
Total 10,060 sq.ft.
6.8%
19.4%
4.5% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad 15.6% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad 14.5% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
N/A
12.5%
None
N/A
Existing off Crest Road
East
N/A
N/A
None
20%
Future 450 sq.ft. stable
Future 550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Crest Road
East W/slope of 5% to 10%
No change
Planning Commission
review
Planning Commission
review
None
19.4%
Future 450 sq.ft. stable
Future 550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Crest Road
East W/slope of 5% to 10%
No change
Planning Commission
review
Planning Commission
review
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 3
4
ADDRESS
76 Easffield Drive
92 Crest Road East
88 Crest Road East
86 Crest Road East
62 Crest Road East
60 Crest Road East
91 Crest Road East
87 Crest Road East
85 Crest Road East
83 Crest Road East
67 Crest Road East
63 Crest Road East
LOT NO.
120-A-EF
121-EF
2-B-EF
4-B-EF
12-1-EF
12-2-EF
69-B-MS
69-C-2-MS
69-C-1-MS
69-C-3-MS
70-B-1-MS
70-B-2-MS
NEARBY PROPERTIES
OWNER
Tuffli
Walter
Heckman
Mahserediian
Frame
Sheen (formerly Robel)
Ripley (Existing)
Steinberg
Stringfellow
McLaughlin
Arai
Harman
AVERAGE I
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
3312
3447
2153
3056
7896
7021
2658
3529
4685
5587
2907
3986
4186
7,910
LOT SIZE
ACRES
(GROSS)
1.698
1.405
0.959
0.728
3.240
3.820
4.002
1.909
3.134
2.355
3.844
6.357
3.049
4.002
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 4
• •
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO
CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE
AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
589.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ripley with
respect to real property located at 91 Crest Road East (Lot 69-B-MS) requesting Site
Plan Review to permit the construction of a new single family residence to replace
an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application on November 17, 1998, December 15, 1998, and
January 19, 1999 at a field trip visit on December 12, 1998. The applicants were
notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail. The applicants and the
applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 2 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 153021 and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 requires a development plan to be submitted
for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be
constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings or
structures, which involve changes to grading or an increase in the size of the
building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the
size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any
thirty-six month period, may be permitted. With respect to the Site Plan Review
application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses
because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low
profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between
surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback, and lot
coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 147,610 square feet. The
proposed residence (7,910 sq. ft.), garage (1,600 sq. ft.), future stable (450 sq. ft.), and
service yard (100 sq. ft.) will have 10,060 square feet which constitutes 6.8% of the lot
which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total
lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 28,697 square feet which
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 1 OF 4
• •
DRAFT
equals 19.4% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage
requirement.
B. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible,
existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms because a minimum
amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage
that will flow away from the proposed residential development and existing
neighboring residences.
C. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
follows natural contours of the relatively flat site to minimize grading. The natural
drainage courses will be preserved and continue drainage to the canyons at the
southern side of this lot.
D. The development plan will, based upon compliance with the
conditions contained in this Resolution, supplement the existing vegetation with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the
community.
E. The development plan, as modified by the conditions of approval,
substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will have a total buildable
pad of 69,450 square feet with 14.5% of pad coverage.
F. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of approval,
is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be
exceeded. The proposed project will be located on a relatively flat portion of a steep
sloping lot that is also consistent with the scale of other homes in the immediate
neighborhood. Grading will be minor and required only to restore the natural slope
of the property. The ratio of the proposed structures to lot coverage is similar to the
ratio found on several properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development, as modified by the conditions of
approval, is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation
for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will provide a safer
driveway accessway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental
review.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 2 OF 4
• •
DRAFT
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 589 for a
proposed residential development as indicated on the development plan
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. This Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval if construction pursuant to these approvals has not commenced
within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080.
B. It is declared and made a condition of this Site Plan approval, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated , and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan
approved with this application.
F. The finished floor elevation on the residential building pad shall not
exceed 1,437 feet.
G. Grading for the project shall not exceed 650 cubic yards of cut soil and
650 cubic yards of fill soil, allowing for shrinkage of the soil when it is compacted.
H. The proposed project shall not include a basement.
I. The residential and total building pad coverage shall not exceed 14.5%.
J.
area.
The maximum disturbed area shall not exceed 19.4% of the net lot
K. Landscaping shall be provided and maintained to obscure the buildings
and the building pad with native drought -resistant vegetation that is compatible
with the surrounding vegetation of the community.
L. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 3 OF 4
• •
DRAFT
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
M. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
N. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the project which would constitute additional
development shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the
Planning Commission.
O. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of the Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
P. All conditions of the Site Plan approval that apply must be complied
with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1999.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
i §§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-22 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO.
589.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 15, 1998 by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 99-3
PAGE 4 OF 4
•
C1iy 0/ �eng wee
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 21,1999
TO: HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: LOLA UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 589
Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ripley, 91 Crest Road East (Lot 69-B-MS)
Request for a one-year time extension.
BACKGROUND
Attached is a request from Mr. and Mrs. Ripley's representative, Mr. Criss
Gunderson, Architect, requesting a one year time extension to a previously
approved Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an
existing single family residence in Zoning Case No. 589 that was approved by the
Planning Commission on January 19, 1999 by Resolution No. 99-3.
Mr. Gunderson says the time extension is necessary because "the Ripleys intend to
start construction on their new home in the spring of 2000, after the winter rains."
Draft Resolution No. 99-20 is attached.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the request.
®Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
CRISS C GUNDERSON ARCHITECT
2024 Via Pacheco, Palos Verdes Estates, California
TEL (310) 373-8077 FAX (310) 373-8277
November 20, 1999
Chairman Roberts
City of Rolling Hills Planning Commission
No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills California
Regarding: Ripley residence, zoning case 589, time extension
Dear Chairman Roberts,
The Ripleys intend on starting construction on their new home in the spring of 2000, after the
winter rains. Please extend the site review approval an additional year.
Thank you,
Criss Gun 8 rson Architect
•
RESOLUTION NO. 99-20
� DR
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-3 AND APPROVING AN
EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUE PLAN REVIEW
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN
ZONING CASE NO. 589.
FT
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ripley with respect
to real property located at 91 Crest Road East (Lot 69-B-MS), Rolling Hills, requesting
an extension to a previously approved Site Plan Review for the construction of a
new single family residence to replace an existing single family residence.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on December
21, 1999 at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of
time is necessary because the applicants intend to start construction on their new
home in the spring of 2000, after the winter rains.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 7 of Resolution No. 99-3,
dated January 19,1999, to read as follows:
"A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within two years of
the approval of this Resolution."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 99-3
shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1999.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-20 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-3 AND
APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE
PLAN REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 589.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on December 21, 1999 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
•City .1) leoffin9
HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 15,1998
TO:
FROM:
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 589
91 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 69-B-MS)
RA-S-1, 4.00 ACRES
MR. AND MRS. FRED RIPLEY
MR. CRISS GUNDERSON, ARCHITECT
NOVEMBER 7, 1998
Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an
existing single family residence.
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission viewed a silhouette of the proposed project on
Saturday, December 12, 1998.
2. Mr. and Mrs. Ripley are requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new
8,715 square foot residence, 1,600 square foot garage, 450 square foot future stable
and 100 square foot service area to replace a 2,658 square foot residence and 495
square foot garage. The 186 foot long residence and garage will be located in the
same general area as the existing residence at the central portion of the irregular
lot. The future stable will be located at the rear approximately 78 feet from the
residence. A basement for the project is not proposed. Site Plan Review and
Nearby Properties tables are attached.
3. The existing residence and garage were constructed in 1949 and a small addition
was constructed in 1964.
4. The existing driveway access area at the north side of the lot .off Crest Road East
will not be changed but the driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to
20 feet.
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 1
®Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
5. The future stable will be 450 square feet with a 550 square foot corral. Access to the
stable will be from the easement at the west of the residence. The slope of the
accessway will range from 5% to 10% (25% maximum permitted).
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 10,865 square feet or 7.4% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 29,504 square feet or 20% (35% permitted).
7. The 69,450 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is
10,865 square feet or 15.6% (30% maximum guideline).
8. Grading for the project will require 650 cubic yards of cut soil and 650 cubic yards of
fill soil.
9. Disturbed area of the lot will be 29,504 square feet or 20% overall (40% maximum).
10. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 2
•
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft.
and has the effect of increasing the size of
the structure by more than 25% in a 36-
month period.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
EXISTING
None
Residence 2,658 sq.ft.
Garage 495 sq.ft.
Service Yard 0 sq.ft.
Stable 0 sq.ft,
Total 3,153 sq.ft.
2.1 %
12.5%
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING PAD 4.5% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that is
more than 3 feet in depth and covers more
than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building pad
area, any remedial grading (temporary
disturbance), any graded slopes and
building pad areas, and any nongraded area
where impervious surfaces exist.
S, IABLE (450 SQ.FT. None
& 550 SO.FT. CORRAL\
N/A
12.5%
STABLE ACCESS N/A
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Existing off Crest Road East
N/A
N/A
PROPOSED
None
Residence 8,715 sq.ft.
Garage 1,600sq.ft.
Service Yard 100 sq.ft.
Stable 450 sq.ft.
Total 10,865sq.ft.
7.4%
20%
15.6% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
None
20%
Future 450 sq.ft. stable
Future 550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Crest Road East
W/slope of 5% to 10%
Existing off Crest Road East
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 3
11 •
ADDRESS
76 Eastfield Drive
92 Crest Road East
88 Crest Road East
86 Crest Road East
91 Crest Road East
87 Crest Road East
85 Crest Road East
83 Crest Road East
67 Crest Road East
63 Crest Road East
LOT NO.
120-A-EF
121-EF
2-B-EF
4-B-EF
69-B-MS
69-C-2-MS
69-C-1-MS
69-C-3-MS
70-B-1-MS
70-B-2-MS
NEARBY
PROPERTIES
OWNER
Tuffli
Walter
Heckman
Mahseredjian
Ripley (Existing)
Steinberg
Stringfellow
McLaughlin
Arai
Harman
AVERAGE
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
3312
3447
2153
3056
2658
3529
4685
5587
2907
3986
3532
8715
LOT SIZE
ACRES
(GROSS)
1.698
1.405
0.959
0.728
4.002
1.909
3.134
2.355
3.844
6.357
2.639
4.002
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 4
C1ty ol R0f/ Jh/h
HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 12,1998
TO:
FROM:
3a
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 589
91 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 69-B-MS)
RA-S-1, 4.00 ACRES
MR. AND MRS. FRED RIPLEY
MR. CRISS GUNDERSON, ARCHITECT
NOVEMBER 7, 1998
Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an
existing single family residence.
BACKGROUND
1. The Planning Commission will view a silhouette of the proposed project on
Saturday, December 12, 1998, beginning at 7:30 AM.
2. Mr. and Mrs. Ripley are requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new
8,715 square foot residence, 1,600 square foot garage, 450 square foot future stable
and 100 square foot service area to replace a 2,658 square foot residence and , 495
square foot garage. The 186 foot long residence and garage will be located in the
same general area as the existing residence at the central portion of the irregular
lot. The future stable will be located at the rear approximately 78 feet from the
residence. A basement for the project is not proposed. Site Plan Review and
Nearby Properties tables are attached.
3. The existing residence and garage were constructed in 1949 and a small addition
was constructed in 1964.
4. The existing driveway access area at the north side of the lot off Crest Road East
will not be changed but the driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to
20 feet.
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE1
®Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
5. The future stable will be 450 square feet with a 550 square foot corral. Access to the
stable will be from the easement at the west of the residence. The slope of the
accessway will range from 5% to 10% (25% maximum permitted).
6. The structural lot coverage proposed is 10,865 square feet or 7.4% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 29,504 square feet or 20% (35% permitted).
7. The 69,450 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is
10,865 square feet or 15.6% (30% maximum guideline).
8. Grading for the project will require 650 cubic yards of cut soil and 650 cubic yards of
fill soil.
9. Disturbed area of the lot will be 29,504 square feet or 20% overall (40% maximum).
10. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 2
•
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURESa
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft.
and has the effect of increasing the size of
the structure by more than 25% in a 36-
monthperiod.
STRUCTIJRAI_ LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOTAL BUILDING PAD
COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that is
more than 3 feet in depth and covers more
than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building pad
area, any remedial grading (temporary
disturbance), any graded slopes and
building pad areas, and any nongraded area
where impervious surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SQ.FT. None
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL).
None
Residence
Garage
Service Yard
Stable
Total
2.1%
12.5%
EXISTING
2,658 sq.ft.
495 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft..
3,153 sq.ft.
4.5% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
N/A
12.5%
STABLE ACCESS N/A
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Existing off Crest Road East
N/A
N/A
PROPOSED
None
Residence 8,715 sq.ft.
Garage 1,600sq.ft.
Service Yard 100 sq.ft.
Stable 450 sq.ft.
Total 10,865sq.ft.
7.4%
20%
15.6% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
None
20%
Future 450 sq.ft. stable
Future 550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Crest Road East
W/slope of 5% to 10%
Existing off Crest Road East
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 3
•
•
ADDRESS
76 Eastfield Drive
92 Crest Road East
88 Crest Road East
86 Crest Road East
91 Crest Road East
87 Crest Road East
85 Crest Road East
83 Crest Road East
67 Crest Road East
63 Crest Road East
LOT NO.
120-A-EF
121-EF
2-B-EF
4-B-EF
69-B-MS
69-C-2-MS
69-C-1-MS
69-C-3-MS
70-B-1-MS
70-B-2-MS
NEARBY
PROPERTIES
OWNER
Tuffli
Walter
Heckman
Mahseredjian
Ripley (Existing)
Steinberg
Stringfellow
McLaughlin
Arai
Harman
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
3312
3447
2153
3056
2658
3529
4685
5587
2907
3986
LOT SIZE
ACRES,
(GROSS)
1.698
1.405
0.959
0.728
4.002
1.909
3.134
2.355
3.844
6.357
AVERAGE I 3532 2.639
PROPOSED 8715
4.002
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 4
• •
City 0/
HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1998
TO:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: LOLA M. UNGAR, PLANNING DIRECTOR
APPLICATION NO.
SITE LOCATION:
ZONING AND SIZE:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
PUBLISHED:
REOUEST
ZONING CASE NO. 589
91 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 69-B-MS)
RA-S-1, 4.00 ACRES
MR. AND MRS. FRED RIPLEY
MR. CRISS GUNDERSON, ARCHITECT
NOVEMBER 7, 1998
Request for Site Plan Review to construct a new single family residence to replace an
existing single family residence.
BACKGROUND
1. Mr. and Mrs. Ripley are requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of a new
8,715 square foot residence, 1,600 square foot garage, 450 square foot future stable
and 100 square foot service area to replace a 2,658 square foot residence and 495
square foot garage. The 186 foot long residence and garage will be located in the
same general area as the existing residence at the central portion of the irregular
lot. The future stable will be located at the rear approximately 78 feet from the
residence. A basement for the project is not proposed. Site Plan Review and
Nearby Properties tables are attached.
2. The existing residence and garage were constructed in 1949 and a small addition
was constructed in 1964.
3. The existing driveway access area at the north side of the lot off Crest Road East
will not be changed but the driveway within the lot will be widened from 11 feet to
20 feet.
4. The future stable will be 450 square feet with a 550 square foot corral. Access to the
stable will be from the easement at the west of the residence. The slope of the
accessway will range from 5% to 10% (25% maximum permitted).
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 1
®Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
5. The structural lot coverage proposed is 10,865 square feet or 7.4% (20% permitted).
The total lot coverage proposed is 29,504 square feet or 20% (35% permitted).
6. The 69,450 square foot residential and total building pad coverage proposed is
10,865 square feet or 15.6% (30% maximum guideline).
7. Grading for the project will require 650 cubic yards of cut soil and 650 cubic yards of
fill soil.
8. Disturbed area of the lot will be 29,504 square feet or 20% overall (40% maximum).
9. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed plans and take
public testimony.
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 2
•
SITE PLAN REVIEW
RA-S-1 ZONE SETBACKS
Front: 50 ft. from front easement line
Side: 20 ft. from property line
Rear: 50 ft. from property line
STRUCTURES
Site Plan Review required if size of
structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft.
and has the effect of increasing the size of
the structure by more than 25% in a 36-
monthperiod.
STRUCTURAL LOT COVERAGE
(20% maximum)
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE
(35% maximum)
RESIDENTIAL & TOT& BUILDING PAD
COVERAGE
(Guideline maximum of 30%)
GRADING
Site Plan Review required if excavation
and/or fill or combination thereof that is
more than 3 feet in depth and covers more
than 2,000 sq.ft. must be balanced on site.
DISTURBED AREA
40% maximum; any graded building pad
area, any remedial grading (temporary
disturbance), any graded slopes and
building pad areas, and any nongraded area
where impervious surfaces exist.
STABLE (450 SO.FT. None
& 550 SQ.FT. CORRAL).
None
Residence
Garage
Service Yard
Stable
Total
2.1%
12.5%
EXISTING PROPOSED
None
2,658 sq.ft.
495 sq.ft.
0 sq.ft.
0 sa.ft.
3,153 sq.ft.
4.5% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
N/A
12.5%
STABLE ACCESS N/A
ROADWAY ACCESS
VIEWS
PLANTS AND ANIMALS
Existing off Crest Road East
N/A
N/A
Residence 8,715 sq.ft.
Garage 1,600sq.ft.
Service Yard 100 sq.ft.
Stable 450 sa.ft1
Total 10,865sq.ft.
7.4%
20%
15.6% of 69,450 sq.ft. pad
None
20%
Future 450 sq.ft. stable
Future 550 sq.ft. corral
Existing off Crest Road East
W/slope of 5% to 10%
Existing off Crest Road East
Planning Commission review
Planning Commission review
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 3
•
•
ADDRESS
76 Eastfield Drive
92 Crest Road East
188 Crest Road East
186 Crest Road East
91 Crest Road East
87 Crest Road East
85 Crest Road East
83 Crest Road East
67 Crest Road East
63 Crest Road East
LOT NO.
120-A-EF
121-EF
2-B-EF
4-B-EF
69-B-MS
69-C-2-MS
69-C-1-MS
69-C-3-MS
70-B-1-MS
70-B-2-MS
NEARBY
PROPERTIES
OWNER
Tuffli
Walter
Heckman
Mahseredjian
Ripley (Existing)
Steinberg
Stringfellow
McLaughlin
Arai
Harman
RESIDENCE
(SQ.FT.)
3312
3447
2153
3056
2658
3529
4685
5587
2907
3986
LOT SIZE
ACRES
(GROSS)
1.698
1.405
0.959
0.728
4.002
1.909
3.134
2.355
3.844
6.357
AVERAGE I 3532 I 2.639
PROPOSED
8715
4.002
ZONING CASE NO. 589
PAGE 4