Loading...
773, Construct a pool & a larger st, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• • RESOLUTION NO. 1082 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ACCEPTING THE WITHDRAWAL OF AN APPLICATION AND VACATING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL (RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 2010-02) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE, CORRAL AND A SWIMMING POOL IN ZONING CASE NO. 773, AT 1 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 1-FT), (HUH). THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Peter Huh with respect to real property located at 1 Crest Road East (Lot 1-FT), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review for grading of 185 cubic yards of cut and 185 cubic yards of fill to construct a 450 square foot stable with 260 square foot porch, a 544 square foot swimming pool, stable access and 1,000 square foot corral; a Variance to disturb additional area, in order to accommodate the stable and corral construction, (which would surpass the previously approved exceedance of the disturbed net lot area by 0.4%), and a Variance to permit 270 square feet of the proposed 544 square foot infinity pool at the edge of the expanded rear yard to encroach up to 14 feet into the rear setback, (which includes the spillway). A portion of the corral would also encroach into the rear setback. A 39 square foot spa and 48 square foot pool equipment area are also proposed to be constructed. Section 2. The Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on October 18, November 17 and December 15, 2009 and at a field trip on November 17, 2009. At the November 17, 2009 meeting, after visiting the site and receiving public input, the Planning Commission recommended that the applicant scale down the project. The applicants submitted revised plan. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff, and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The property owners and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2010-02 approving this case on January 19, 2010. It was presented to the City Council as a report on January 25, 2010, at which time the City Council took the case under jurisdiction and a public hearing was set for February 22, 2010. Pursuant to Section 17.54.015 of the Zoning Code, "the City Council may on its own initiative review all actions of the Planning Commission taken by resolution approving or denying a development project." Section 4. The review hearing was noticed in the Palos Verdes Peninsula News and notices were mailed to residents within 1,000 foot radius of subject property. ZC NO. 773 1 • • Section 5. On February 8, 2010, the applicants submitted a letter withdrawing their application for the project. Section 6. With respect to the request to withdraw the application the City Council hereby orders as follows: A. The letter of withdrawal by Mr. and Mrs. Huh of the application in Zoning Case No. 773 is hereby accepted by the City Council. B. The decision of the Planning Commission is hereby vacated, Resolution No. 2010-02, adopted by the Planning Commission and dated January 19. 2010 is hereby declared null and void and of no effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF FEBRUARY 2010. THOMAS HEINSHEIMER, MAYOR ATTEST: HEIDI LUCE, DEPUTY CITY CLERK ZC NO. 773 2 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 1082 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ACCEPTING THE WITHDRAWAL OF AN APPLICATION AND VACATING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL (RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL RESOLUTION NO. 2010-02) FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE, CORRAL AND A SWIMMING POOL IN ZONING CASE NO. 773, AT 1 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 1-FT), (HUH). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on February 22, 2010 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY CITY CLERK ZC NO. 773 3 MAGAUGD PAGE ..01. 10/12/2009 20:54 7607714138 • • Ci4f of JJ/I INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, I9$7 iNO. 2 PORTUGUESE BENQ ROAD ,,.,; ROLLING MILS. CALIF. 99274 VARIANCE (310377.I5f1 REQVEST FOR HEARING FAX: WO) 377.7268 E m®il; cilyoIrWaol.Com NOTE: According to Section 1 Z24.020 of the Rolling !rills ,lfunicipul Code, illcgn! uses o)- structures are required to be made conforming or shalt be removed Therc(,re, you inay be reequired to modify nr remove any unauthori;eel or unlawful use or structure on your properly prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant 0 Resolution No. 900 (Ville City Council, any use or .arrrctrrr•e which Is•ould require ct diseretionan' permit hut which it conducted' without the acquisition of said permit, shall he subject (0 retroacti►e rliscretionary permit proCesS, crud is subject to higher crupliccrtiorr fee. PROPERTY OWNER: P6 t e.- 14 0 t-i OWNER'S ADDRESS: G Q.. TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENTS NAME: n1 E c-r t /\2 I tq c-7 AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. c7vL)Ir✓roctA7(-i c9 1t i,ta/...0 A (^ ) C'J C. rs,(�.r_i� 14�tT1—ttA Str-) 41.4fxi 6bPuy 11Wi c,•.:1.4 •0•,t I°,µo-v MAGAUGD PAGE 02 10/12/2009 20:54 Criteria to be satkfied for unt of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the saute vicinity and zone. L _ rL> ��' tom' L ri 6 7607714139 i 'C/ 7 < 'rag- ;.1 r/ifeE A)rr2 R/7 / 'S` I.\?/ r`/-f/n? _re-/41 / /=%e1.)/26-'1q T... 7q 4/ /! r/ _.‘3 t' 5 'T C G, !ter✓/Yi p .� 7 r-/ /V( F/) cr , / 41/i1)t9 A CD L K NO r 7'441 Er1 lrer r, c)e "/? T Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because 72/C G,z,L FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS.. rklasters/Fvrm4/Varrnnce- ,Rer.20C 7567 I 1 200' �it.O 99� 41' 3 bSFC7 ' / 1A. 25 61 , +AI Por- /b oo 216.5/7Ac.of '1".y,a S.343/%... yx ( .1}'\V `"S`.,Ser-r ,,,„,1-,A„jFJsy 7084 xI•ss'=7PpORy,"' • ...' `.fj t'� ! f�A. 7571-18 619 J /35,727 •' 29.751 'fti/. SA. 125,976 ^• P: 6B 9 10 24 5Ac. 9.64 tA.. 7.06 4Ac. 0.531. P.4. 54, 6.53c A.. _ 374.90 0 132 /34.339 4. 17. 947 "P,4.51. 116,392 4 105,197 17.947 .1,1.5/. 84250 a 216.8/ 07, St.) '_ 4o TRAIL /83/9 ¢a9a RANCHERO % /% RD. ---r , 6.993A. / 9.dE=Pr/.51. 6.37! Ac. 22 133 WVa '5b 05/ .10.7a TRACT NO. 27516 M. B. 771-30— 31 RECORD. OF SURVEY _R. S. 57-4-8 L. A. C-A. „MAP„ NO..51 A. M. 1-•1 6.96 a Az. 4 96/Z/11/000/00//4 .%/49/000/ao3-0 o • 7, 30 DATE f D -& ~ 0 9 ZONING CASE NO. 7/ 2 ADDRESS t C l2ES ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. 9 8,960 sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. 671 . sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. i O 4-c sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. G1 2 sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. 46 sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. 14-4- sq.ft. CABANA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) sq.ft. sq.ft. 9DO sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES sq.ft. sq.ft. SS sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS sq.ft. sq.ft. 44) 1 sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD ( sq.ft. sq.ft. q h sq.ft. OTHER V 1L--- sq.ft. sq.ft. t q a sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. 76 S sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT 1 I c+ TOTAL STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. l 0,6 S 6 sq.ft. 1I Z 3 % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % % % 11,3C ° TOTAL STRUCTURES f �' Y 2ct- EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 600 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 10 ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ) 13 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % % 11, % ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) sq.ft. sq.ft. S 2 so sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO �# 2 S AREAS, COURTYARDS sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL DECKING sq.ft. sq.ft. 10 4 sq.ft. OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. TOTAL FLATWORK sq.ft. sq.ft. t 31 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE % % I -6.3 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 600 sq. ft. structures from previous page. sq.ft. sq.ft. 2_3 . S 5 c; sq.ft. % % Z4.,1 % sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE % TOTAL DISTURBED AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) sq.ft. sq.ft. py3)02 4% S9); L q44sq.ft. 0D sq.ft. 3. �- sq.ft. 6 % j (%# % S'S cubic yards All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 600 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. • • DATEIO"S—O9 Z.C. NO. I12- PAD NO. 1 ADDRESS ` CQ acE RD C, CALCULATION OF' BUILDING PAD COVERAGE BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD RESIDENCE GARAGE POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT CABANA/REC.RM GUEST HOUSE STABLE SPORTS COURT SERVICE YARD ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence Accessory structures AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES THAT EXCEED ro% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. (from i° page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES s9.ft. (from 1'` page not including allowed deductions) OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE To TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. I sq.ft. Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 1Q% of the size of the residencelaccs. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE To PROPOSED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. s q.ft. q.ft. sq.ft. To sq.ft. TOTAL C),e520 sq.ft. & 1 Z2 sq.ft. 1O4t sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 9 (D sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. �(01 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. q S`q.ft. 22,42 % sq.ft. (6ttAA-dt6i-de) 1.20 • DATE t O- S- O? Z.C. NO.7 i Z ADDRESS 1 C (2 E 5 T 12.0 C CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA. EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD s 1.ft. sq.ft. 2-Maq.ft. RESIDENCE s -1.fr. cq.fr. sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. 'fir' _..q.ft. 6 D9 POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. �] sq.ft. CABANA/REC.RM s q.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. 744sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. ____sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. cq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Accessory structures sq.ft. silk sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED IQ% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE!ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from rpage not including allowed sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. deductions) OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft. sq.ft. 14 0 t sq.ft. BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % % 1 O. 9 % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft_ sq.ft. sq.ft. Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/acts. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE • DATE 1.0 - 8 -Oq Z.C. NO. 1 l ADDRESS i C t2C-ST R C. 1 CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO.3 BUILDABLE PAD AREA. EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD sq.ft. sq.ft. 2400 sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GARAGE s j.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. c q.ft. CABANA/REC.RM sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. q U Q sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. 35.3 gq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED I O% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCEIACCS. STRUCTURE 2- 63 sg XI. EN'TRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) sift. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from i'page not including allowed sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. deductions) OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft. sq.ft. t 25 3 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD COVERAGE To To S 2 . Z % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2 sq.ft. sq.ft. 1 ) (o 3 sq.ft. Not incl, attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 1 O% of the size of the residence/acts. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE clo % 4`e'bC5 % CEIVET SEP $ 2009 REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW City of Rolling Hills By NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawfil use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: P I---1 Q ► OWNER'S ADDRESS: C, 12... TELEPHONE NO: (3 (0) 5 4 l- 3 3 1" EMAIL: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 33 © \/ E. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. I ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7 5 G 7 PAGE 0 1 1 PARCEL 0 I • AGENT'S NAME: 3 o ; o rJ EN) c-, AGENT'S ADDRESS: '7 v t Pti R Ca96 Z7 4 TELEPHONE NO: CT ► 0 1 4-4-- (., /7 I NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: t A/t i 0 CA Po o l 4 L/ RGt e- R i A LC 7-c-1 A L) PRC_--71o()e7->L0 ANDROl/Efl G-v9,A7c-t r31= tfEc'? r-nu -11- I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: - 14- 0 9 FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS -14- • Pq [0 AD itry'P2o\A9-cam DATE ./-2 7- L' 9 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS / 6'/-67. % / 2, ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON TFIE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES NET LOT AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT GUEST HOUSE CABANA STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) RECREATION COURT ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in tired, WATER FEATURES, ETC. EXISTING sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD OTHER BASEMENT AREA (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 600 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 10 ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % sq.ft. STRUCTURAL COVERAGE PROPOSED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. St&'1j sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. TOTAL 96,2GC) 722 /0 46- 74- sq.ft. L sq.ft.. I sq.ft. Age) " sq.ft —73 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. �'�'fSO 2 / 3 sq.ft. sq.ft. 44lo sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. g& sq.ft. (G 9- sq.ft. ' -- l e 76/5- sq.ft. �-7i6 sq.ft. sq.ft. % Flo sq.ft. %a P qq % sq.ft. olo w ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS sq.ft. POOL DECKING sq.ft. OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS sq.ft. sq.ft. 6, 7 2- sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. . P Z 7 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. TOTAL FLATWORK sq.ft. sq.ft. cH 4 7 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE % % Ci,1 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 600 sq. ft. structures from previous page. sq.ft. sq.ft. 1 ,218 sq.ft. 24 1 Lap % ()__/-qe/0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % DISTURBED AREA % % 5 4-, 2_ % GRADING QUANTITY c% 1 Z cubic yards (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 600 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. Masters/Forms/Variance- Rev 2006 '' DATE _ % `� "0 9 PAD NO. 1 • Z . C . NO . ADDRESS C C2-1) CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD sq.ft. sq.ft. Z9 5Z0 ;II/2- RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. .;s 7 22 sq.ft. q a'� 10 1O4-� sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft.q POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. CABALA A/REC. RM sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. 2- ( sq.ft. Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED to% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. "6 ) sq.ft. ATTACHED TRF.I.LISES cq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. 1 sq ft. (from 1" page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES Q,, sq.ft. sq.ft. �' sq.ft. (from l' page not including allowed deductions) OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. C-7 6 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. sq.ft. Et� 7 sq.ft. To X BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % o-/o %,q TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. l Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the arca of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/acts. structures. sq.ft. sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % 63 sq.ft. DATE I-2B-0 c) Z.C. NO. ADDRESS ( C. iLE T T: - , CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE. PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD RESIDENCE GARAGE POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPMENT CABANA/REC.RA-I GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. SERVICE YARD ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence Accessory structures AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED Cv6( 42)(5 (2-16. EXISTING PROPOSED /TOTAL sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. q.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq ft / q.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF HE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STR TURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHE / BREEZEWAY sq.f ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRU URES (from l"page) sq.ft. ALL DETACHED ST ► UCTURES (from 1"page not inc ding allowed sq.ft. deductions) OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STR - CTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.fr. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.fr. Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the arca of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/aces. structures. sq.ft. �f l 2.) C O sq.ft. sq.ft/ ' sq.ft. s5 ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 744- sq.ft. sq.ft.. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. .sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.fr. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. 74-4 sq.ft. sq.ft. go BUILDING PAD COVERAGE DATE Z.C. NO. PAI) NO.3 ADDRESS \ r::-QED t CALCULATION OP BUILDING PAD COVERAGE BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD sq.ft. sq.ft. 2 6 C) sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. CABANA/REC.RM 1 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.fr. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. `5 0 sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.fr. Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.fr. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) sq.ft. sq.ft.. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from I" page not including allowed sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. deductions) OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft. sq.ft. 41'5 0 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % % (7,6 4'0 TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the arca of covered porches that exceed 10`70 of the size of the resicence/aces. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE • • c;'261) 1611-) ei4, o/e0//i,11 JJ,F! INCORPORATED JANU; RY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 VARIANCE (310) 377-1521 REOUEST FOR HEARING FAX: (310) 377-7288 Email: cifyofrh@aol.com NOTE: According to Section 17. 24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Cocle, illegal uses or structures ore required to he made conforming.or shall be removed. Therefore, you may he required to modi6' or remove any unauthori:ed or unlalsjrl use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. in addition, pursuant to Resolution IVo. 900 of the City Council, any use or .structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of .said permit, shall he .subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject 10 higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: 6-1 /-/ / C/'g : 41? C l �� 2 (.a/0) 15- 3/3 A /) is�3 o ,/�_ LOT NO. / ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 756 7 PAGE 0 / / PARCEL 0/3 /3 0 / 0 ,.) c--A2(.7 //'/ I /r)/ & 70 7 5 /1 Vim/%' pc/A= (3/0) 5 4-4-- /() t7, (7 9 '27a Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. [ a A i C-72 /21 �. i � A (-? -rI-1 MT-) ) CD c:17 /-\ L_.0 i Criteria to be satisfied for Variance • Such change is based upulle following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. 1 (- t P G_ v\) \ Y-) t C-2-- i it -i i \ N G c_ Z7 rS " <<^ t �� lei`; >> 1= 1 A Lc iCi-\ i` AC()tA)i1S ",a 2fiJ A i) 1 f\) 1 Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because ( T FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. Masters/Forms/Variance- Rev.2006 DATE f -2 7- 6' `% ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS / ��/- .� % /?/2 ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTA L NET LOT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. 9e, 9,60 sq.ft. RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. 6 722 sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. /04 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. ^- sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. 74 4- sq.ft. CABANA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) sq.ft. sq.ft. 4:1-7- C sq.ft. RECREATION COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. —' sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES sq.ft. sq.ft. 2 / 3 sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS sq.ft. sq.ft. 4-O� / sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. high and over.120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. g� sq.ft. OTHER ap 9-ci'�-- sq.ft. sq.ft. (� 9- sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. 7 ' sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 600 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 10 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. 7 , sq.ft. ck % 9. % sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Flo ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SI-IOWVN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) sq.ft. PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 600 sq. ft. structures from previous page. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft. sq.ft. go sq.ft. 7 ZL sq.ft. sq.ft. Z e 2. 7 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. — sq. ft. sq.ft. C) 4- 7 sq.ft. �,go - sq.ft. sq.ft. 19,2l o sq.ft. %a lP,h % sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. go TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA go DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) sq.ft. sq.ft. ,66'0 sq.ft. To 9 1 2_ cubic yards All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 600 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. Masters/Forms/Variance- Rev.2006 DATE — 7 e, o Z . C . NO . ADDRESS I C RID CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD sq.ft. sq,fr. Zc) `?ZO sgilt. RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. 6 7 z 2 sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. 1 UPI 5 sq.ft. POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. `.... sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. ,-' sq.ft. CABANA/REC.RM sq.fc. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES ., Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. Z ,� sq.ft. Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED to% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCEIACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. 4I sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. --7(.-K sq.ft. (from 1" page) '- cc,-, ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES � \\, `-- sq.ft. sq.ft. (qc:9--sq.ft. (from l`` page not including allowed deductions) OTHER sq.ft.. sq.ft. ) 6 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. I Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, and incl. the arca of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/aces. structures. sq.ft. E27 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE o70 8) 2'4 sq.ft. FO7) 2132v RESOLUTION NO. 2010-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE AND CORRAL, WHICH REQUIRE GRADING; VARIANCE REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A POOL PARTIALLY IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK, A CORRAL IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED NET LOT AREA, ON A LOT THAT CONTAINS A CONDITION THAT ANY FURTHER DEVELOPMENT MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND WHICH IS DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, IN ZONING CASE NO. 773, AT 1 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 1-FT), (HUH). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Peter Huh with respect to real property located at 1 Crest Road East (Lot 1-FT), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review for grading of 185 cubic yards of cut and 185 cubic yards of fill to construct a 450 square foot stable with 260 square foot porch, a 544 square foot swimming pool, stable access and 1,000 square foot corral; a Variance to disturb additional area, in order to accommodate the stable and corral construction, (which would surpass the previously approved exceedance of the disturbed net lot area by 0.4%), and a Variance to permit 270 square feet of the proposed 544 square foot infinity pool at the edge of the expanded rear yard to encroach up to 14 feet into the rear setback, (which includes the spillway). A portion of the corral would also encroach into the rear setback. A 39 square foot spa and 48 square foot pool equipment area are also proposed to be constructed. Section 2. The Planning Commission held duly noticed public hearings on October 18, November 17 and December 15, 2009 and at a field trip on November 17, 2009. At the November 17, 2009 meeting, after visiting the site and receiving public input, the Planning Commission recommended that the applicant scale down the project. The applicants submitted revised plan, as approved by this resolution. During the filed trip and subsequent meeting a neighbor at 5 Crest Rd. E. expressed concerns regarding this proj ect. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff, and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The property owners and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. In 2005 the Planning Commission granted approval for grading consisting of 445 cubic yards of cut and 445 cubic yards of fill, 2,690 square foot addition to the existing residence, 976 square foot basement, 744 square foot guest house, 450 square ZC NO. 773 1 feet future stable with 550 square foot corral and 583 square foot swimming pool with spa. The disturbed area was approved at 36.9%. No Variances were requested at that time. Three building pads were approved that were separated by 2:1 slopes and the rear of the lot, where a pool was to be located was on a different level than the main house. A 2:1 slope continued past the pool pad towards Portuguese Bend Road to the rear. Section 4. In May 2009, the Planning Commission approved a modification to the 2005 approval. The request for modification was to permit additional grading of 467 cubic yards of cut and 467 cubic yards of fill for a total of 912 cubicyards, which was conducted prior to City's review and approval of the additional grading and which caused exceedance of the maximum allowed disturbance of the lot (54.2%), requiring a Variance. Section 5. With the May 2009 modification the property owners removed the swimming pool from the application, but now wish to construct the pool on the expanded rear yard. The applicants also propose to construct a stable and a corral. Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 7. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed. With respect to the request for a Site Plan application for additional grading for the stable, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed grading amount is not significant and it complies with and is consistent with the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance (with the granting of the variance below) because, among other reasons, the grading is for a stable and corral, which is desirous in the City and the City encourages construction of stables and corrals. The small quantity of grading will retain to the maximum extent feasible the natural terrain of the area of the property where the stable is proposed and previously approved. B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The project will be screened from the street and neighbors by trees and shrubs. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the additional grading will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the additional grading will be on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties and will be further screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs. ZC NO.773 2 C. The grading preserves and integrates into the site design existing topographic features of the site. D. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site to the greatest extent feasible and to minimize the amount of grading required for the building area. E. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course. A drainage plan has been approved by Los Angeles County Building and Safety and, which shows the drainage following natural terrain. F. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and will supplement these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping. Prior to issuing a grading permit, the applicant will be required to submit a landscaping plan to the City. G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 8. Section 17.16.110 of the Municipal Code requires that rear yard setback in the RAS-2 zoning district be fifty (50) feet from the rear property line, or from a roadway easement line. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Code when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. The applicant is requesting permission to allow 544 square foot swimming pool, of which 270 square feet would encroach 14-feet into the rear yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone. The lot size and configuration, together with the existing development on the lot creates difficulty in meeting the rear setback Code requirements. The property is unique in that three of its sidesabut a street, creating a much smaller area for determining setbacks. The entire width of Portuguese Bend Road roadway easement is located on subject parcel, and the rear setback is measured from the inside edge of the roadway easement line, and not from the property line, which lessens the rear yard by 30 feet. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the property owner of the right and benefits enjoyed by similarly situated properties in the same vicinity and zone. The encroachment permits the use of the lot to the extent allowed for other properties in the vicinity. Due to the configuration of the lot, topography and the location of the existing residence, the Variance would permit the development of the property in a most beneficial manner and least intrusive way. ZC NO.773 3 C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development in the rear setback would allow the remaining portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. The proposed pool would be not less than 220 feet to the nearest residence. The structural lot coverage, the total lot coverage and building pad requirements are within the requirements of the City code. The disturbed area exceeds the maximum permitted and was previously approved at 54.2%. D. Alternative locations were considered and studied by the applicant and the Planning Commission and it was found that the proposed location for a pool of such a small size would not be objectionable or violate the intent of the General Plan or the Zoning Ordinance. Section 9. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.070 (B) is required because it states that the lot disturbance shall be limited to 40.0% of the net lot area. The applicant is requesting a Variance because total disturbance of the net lot area is proposed to be 54.6%, of which 54.2% was previously approved. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property in the same zone. The property is unique in that three of its sides abut a street, creating a much smaller area for determining the amount of soil that can be disturbed than other properties that abut only one or two streets. The City's requirements for net lot area measurements disproportionately burden this property because two roadway easements, one of which wraps around a third side of the property, plus ten feet around the entire property are deducted from the gross lot area to come up with the net lot area for development purposes. Portuguese Bend Road wraps around the parcel along the east side and southeast side, where the roadway easement is 30 feet. The front of the property abuts Crest Road East, which has a 50-foot roadway easement. The gross lot area of this lot is 4.8 acres. Because land is deducted along the two major streets of the property for the easements instead of only one major street and one minor for most other properties, 2.53 acres are deducted for the net lot area measurements, resulting in a much smaller area than other lots for determining the amount of area disturbance. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, but which would be denied to the property in question absent a variance. The overage is not significant and the property owner should not be denied the privilege 'of constructing a stable and corral, which are required and encouraged by the City. The construction of the ZC NO.773 4 corral trigger the need for additional grading, which in turn exceeds the disturbed area of the lot previously approved. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The graded condition is on a portion of the lot which is not intrusive to surrounding properties, and will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs from nearby residences and from the street so that the graded condition will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting the variance, the spirit and intent of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance will be observed. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to regulate development in an orderly fashion and in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Approval of the variance will not impede any goals of the Zoning Ordinance or the General Plan. The variance will allow the property owner to enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity. E. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant because most properties have at most two sides of their property subject to the roadway easements. This variance merely allows this property to be developed as any comparable property would be that abutted only two streets. F. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Section 10. Section 17.16.200A of the Municipal Code allows stables, corrals and related uses to be located no less than 25 feet from the rear property line. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Code when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. The applicant is requesting permission to allow the corral to be located entirely within the. rear yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, and surrounding uses because the proposed corral complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures, and equestrian uses. The corral will remain an open area and no structures would be allowed on the corral. ZC NO.773 5 B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot. Very minor grading is required for the corral. The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the corral will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. Although the corral is adjacent to a street, it is in the rear yard area. With the entire width of the street crossing the subject property, the rear setback is less wide than in a normal situation where only a portion of a street would be located on a property. Due to this configuration of the road, the rear setback is located 30 feet closer than on other properties. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. A 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral were previously approved. With the enlarged corral the encroachment is necessary. D. The development plan incorporates the vegetation that was required for the grading of the pad for the residence, and with additional screening requirements described in this resolution will have no visual effect on adjacent properties. The project will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space. E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize an existing driveway. Access to the corral will be from Portuguese Bend Road. F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review and Variances applications for Zoning Case No. 773 for as shown on the Development Plans dated December 8, 2009 subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan and Variances approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section 17.46.080 and 17.38.070 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of this section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. ZC NO. 773 6 C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The grading and disturbance of the development, and the construction of the pool and stable and corral, shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated December 8, 2009. E. The working drawings, soils and geology reports if required, shall be submitted and approved by the Department of Building and Safety and Public Works Department. F. Grading shall not exceed 185 cubic yards of cut and 185 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 54,080 square feet or 54.6% of the net lot area. H. Building pads coverage shall be as follows: the residential building pad shall not exceed 29,520 square feet and have a coverage of 29.6 The guest house building pad shall be 12,800 square feet with coverage of 1,242 square feet or 10.7%; and the stable pad shall be 1,950 square feet (not in setbacks) with coverage of 713 square feet (450 sq.ft. stable w/ 215 sq.ft. of porch counted towards coverage and pool eqpm.), or 36.5%. Combined coverage on all pads is proposed at 23.9%. I. The disturbed areas shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray J. The stable structure shall be screened from the neighbor to the east with mature trees and shrubs. Plants shall be planted so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but to screen the stable on site. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in a manner, so that when mature, will not result in a hedge like screen. K. The pool shall be screened from the neighbor to the east and the roadway with mature trees and shrubs. Plants shall be planted so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but to screen the pool on site. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in a manner, so that when mature, will not result in a hedge like screen. L. The existing landscaping along Portuguese Bend Road may remain, but no other plants may be added, so that when mature, will result in a hedge like screen. M. A landscaping plan for the stable and pool shall be submitted for review by the Planning Department prior to obtaining grading and construction permits. Native ZC NO.773 7 trees and other native plants shall be utilized, and which are consistent with the rural character of the community. N. No irrigation or drainage device may be located on a property in such a manner as to contribute to erosion or in any way adversely affect an easement or a trail. The energy dissipaters shall be designed in such a manner as to not cross over or discharge water onto a trail or easements, unless otherwise approved by the Association. O. Perimeter easements and trails shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to, fences -including construction fences, grading (both cut and fill), landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, play equipment, parked vehicles, building materials, debris and equipment, unless otherwise approved by the Association. P. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. Q. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association. R. Access to the stable shall not exceed 10 feet in roughened and not paved. S. The stable shall be used exclusively for keeping animals and tools and equipment associated with said use. The converted to other uses. width and shall be permitted domestic stable shall not be T. The pool equipment, adjacent to the stable, shall be sunken additional 18" to 24" into the hillside and shall be screened from view. A sound attenuating equipment shall be installed within the pool equipment area to dampen the sound emanating from the equipment. U. A minimum of 50% of the demolition and construction material shall be recycled, pursuant to the City's Construction and Demolition Ordinance requirements. No final inspection shall be granted until the contractor provides all necessary documents and forms to the City. V. The stable shall be kept in sanitary conditions at all times. Manure shall be regularly removed from the property. W. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC NO.773 8 X. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and post construction maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. Y. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to this project or to the property, which would constitute additional structural development, grading or additional and any deviation from the approved plan, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. Z. The conditions of approval specified herein shall be printed on the Plans submitted to RHCA and to Building and Safety Department for plan check review and on all subsequent plans. AA. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review and Variances approvals, and record them, as required by the Municipal Code, the approvals shall not be effective. AB. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF JANUARY 2010. JILI(,SMITH, VICE -CHAIRPERSON HEIDI LUCE, DEPUTY CITY CLERK ZC NO.773 9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2010-02 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE AND CORRAL, WHICH REQUIRE GRADING; VARIANCE REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A POOL PARTIALLY IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK, A CORRAL IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK AND TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED NET LOT AREA, ON A LOT THAT CONTAINS A CONDITION THAT ANY FURTHER DEVELOPMENT MUST BE REVIEWED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND WHICH IS DEVELOPED WITH SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURE, IN ZONING CASE NO. 773, AT 1 CREST ROAD EAST, (LOT 1-FT), (HUH). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on January 19, 2010 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Pieper, Henke and Witte. NOES: Vice Chairperson Smith. ABSENT: Chairperson DeRoy. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. 4itucitka DEPUTY CITY CLERK ZC NO. 773 10 • RESOLUTION NO. 2009-03 < r,(OX- (110-la A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED NET LOT AREA, A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION IN ZONING CASE NO. 712, ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2005-29 AT 1 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 1-FT), (HUH). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Peter Huh with respect to real property located at 1 Crest Road East (Lot 1-FT), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a modification to previously approved grading quantities and lot disturbance granted in 2005 in an application for a Site Plan Review and Conditional Use Permit for grading and construction of a substantial addition, swimming pool and a guest house in Zoning Case No. 712. The request for modification is to permit the as graded condition on the lot to remain, (912 cubic yards of cut and 912 cubic yards of fill), which caused exceedance of the maximum allowed disturbance of the lot (54.2%), which requires a Variance. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on February 17, 2009, March 17, 2009 and at a field trip visit on March 10, 2009. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff, Los Angeles County staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The property owners and their representatives were in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. In September 2005, the Planning Commission approved a Site Plan Review application for grading of 445 cubic yards of cut and 445 cubic yards of fill, which included grading for a future stable, a 2,969 square foot addition to an existing residence and garage, a 976 square foot basement, a 583 square foot swimming pool and a Conditional Use Permit for a 744 square foot guest house. The disturbed net lot area for this project was approved at 36.9%. The house addition is under construction and the rough grading is completed. During the construction process staff administratively approved additional 129 square foot addition and reduction in the basement to 765 square feet, as well as relocation of the guest house approximately 8 feet back (south) from the previous approval. One of the reasons for moving the guest house was to save two mature trees on the property. ZC NO. 712 MOD. 1 • • The administratively approved modifications did not affect the previously approved coverage of the lot, grading quantities or changed the configuration of the structures, and were deemed minor by staff. According to the property owners and their representatives, during the grading process, the owners expressed desire to amend the grading of their lot to create a less tiered look, which they felt did not meet their aesthetic values or the City of Rolling Hills' goal to retain to the maximum extent practicable the natural topography of the property. They wanted to achieve a larger back yard with less terracing of the land. The property owners also decided not to construct the swimming pool and the deck off of the pool. With those changes, the contractor proposed gentler slopes with a less tiered configuration of the rear yard area, but which required more dirt and additional disturbance of the property. Section 4. According to the general contractor and engineer, the construction of the addition and remodel of the existing residence generated more dirt than was anticipated for the reason that the foundation had to be dug to up to 17 feet to bedrock in some places. In addition, the foundation of the existing house was inadequate and needed to be deepened to bedrock. All of this excavation generated much more dirt than previously anticipated or approved. Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption (Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 6. Section 17.46.070 of the Zoning Ordinance provides authority for modifications to previously approved applications. Modification of approved plans and/or conditions imposed, including additions and deletions, may be considered by staff under a minor modification and by the Planning Commission under a major modification. Staff determined that this request constitutes a major modification to the previously approved Site Plan application and therefore requires Planning Commission action. In addition, the applicants exceeded the maximum permitted disturbed area of the lot, and therefore require approval of a Variance. Section 7. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed. With respect to the Modification of the Site Plan application for additional grading the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The as graded condition complies with and is consistent with the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance (with the granting of the variance below) because, among other reasons, the as graded condition meet the City's goal to retain to the maximum extent feasible the natural terrain of the property. ZC NO. 712 MOD. 2 • • B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences because the as graded condition preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing tiering of the property. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The project will be screened from the street and neighbors by trees and shrubs. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the additional grading will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the additional grading was done on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties and will be further screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs. The resulting grading creates gentler slopes, with 3:1 steepness in several places rather than the 2:1 configuration previously approved, as well as increasing one of the building pads, which gently blends into a separate building pad rather than being separated by a 2:1 slope. The result is a more aesthetically pleasing look for the property, without compromising the stability of the lot. D. The modified grading preserves and integrates into the site design existing topographic features of the site. The end result is the creation of a more natural effect than previously approved. E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site to the greatest extent feasible and to minimize the amount of grading required for the building area. F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course. A drainage plan has been approved by Los Angeles County Building and Safety and, which shows the drainage following natural terrain. G. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping. A landscaping plan is on file with the City, which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. H. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 8. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. A Variance to Section 17.16.070 (B) is required because it states that ZC NO.712 MOD. 3 • • the lot disturbance shall be limited to 40.0% of the net lot area. The applicant is requesting a Variance because total disturbance of the net lot area is proposed to be 54.2%. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property in the same zone. The property is unique in that three of its sides abut a street, creating a much smaller area for determining the amount of soil that can be disturbed than other properties that abut only one or two streets. The City's requirements for net lot area measurements disproportionately burden this property because two roadway easements plus ten feet around the entire property are deducted from the gross lot area to come up with the net lot area for development purposes. Portuguese Bend Road wraps around the parcel along the east side and southeast side, where the roadway easement is 30 feet. The front of the property abuts Crest Road East, which has a 50-foot roadway easement. The gross lot area of this lot is 4.8 acres. Because land is deducted along the two major streets of the property for the easements instead of only one major street and one minor for most other properties, 2.53 acres are deducted for the net lot area measurements, resulting in a much smaller area than other lots for determining the amount of area disturbance. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone, but which would be denied to the property in question absent a variance. The overage is not significant and the property owner should not be denied the privilege of a larger, less terraced backyard due to the fact that it wrapped around by major streets on three sided and thus has less net lot area than a comparable property. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The as graded condition is on a portion of the lot which is not intrusive to surrounding properties, and will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs from nearby residences and from the street so that the as graded condition will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. D. In granting the variance, the spirit and intent of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance will be observed. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to regulate development in an orderly fashion and in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Approval of the variance will not impede any goals of the Zoning Ordinance or the General Plan. Rather, the variance will allow the property owner to enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity. In fact, the as graded condition meets the goals established by the City Council to encourage developers to create gentler than 2:1 slopes. ZC NO. 712 MOD. 4 • • E. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant because most properties have at most two sides of their property subject to the roadway easements. This variance merely allows this property to be developed as any comparable property would be that abutted only two streets. F. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review and Variance applications for Zoning Case No. 712 MODIFICATION for grading of 912 cubic yards of cut and 912 cubic yards of fill and a Variance to exceed the maximum permitted disturbed net lot area by 14.2% as shown on the Development Plans dated February 17, 2009 subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit approved by Resolution No. 2005-29, dated September 20, 2005 shall be in full force and effect, unless amended herein. B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The grading and disturbance of the development, as amended, shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated February 17, 2009. E. The working drawings, soils and geology reports shall be submitted and approved by the Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety and Public Works Department. Grading, as amended shall not exceed 912 cubic yards of cut and 912 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. The disturbed area of the lot, as amended, shall not e feet oi-2% of the net lot area. ZC NO. 712 MOD. 5 Residential building pad coverage as amended shall be as follows: the building pad shall not exceed 29,520 square feet and have a coverage of 29.6%, not including the covered porches, as the porches are less than 10% of the size of the residence and therefore do not count towards building pad coverage. The guest house building pad shall be 12,800 square feet with coverage of 744 square feet or 5.8%; and the future stable pad shall be 1,920 square feet with coverage of 23.4%. The basement, as amended, shall not exceed 765 square feet and all regits for the basements shall be met subject to Section 17.12.020 of the City of Rolling Hills Zoning Code and the Los Angeles County Building Code. J. (9 , The disturbed areas shall be landscaped. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray K. A revised landscaping plan for the disturbed areas shall be submitted for review by the Planning Department prior to the final grading of the lot. Native trees and other native plants shall be utilized, and which are consistent with the rural character of the community. If trees are to be used in the landscaping scheme for this project, they shall be mature when planted and which at full maturity shall not exceed the height of the structures. Trees and shrubs shall be planted so as not to impair views of neighboring properties but to screen the structures on site. No tress or shrubs shall be planted as to result in a hedge like screen. L. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review and Variance modification approvals, as required by the Municipal Code, the approvals shall not be effective. M. All conditions of the Site Plan and Variance approvals, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a final inspection from the County of Los Angeles. N. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. O. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modification to this project or to the property, which would constitute additional structural development, grading or additional excavation of dirt and any modification including, but not be limited to retaining walls, drainage devices, pad elevation, pool construction and any other deviation from the approved plan, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. Except that a not to exceed 450 square foot stable with a 550 square foot corral, previously approved may be constructed on the property in a previously approved location. mixd-plu) ZC NO.712 MOD. 6 • PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF APRIL 2009. eiLL(0i RICHARD HENKE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: HEIDI LUCE, INTERIM DEPUTY CITY CLERK ZC NO. 712 MOD. 7 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2009-03 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBED NET LOT AREA, A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION IN ZONING CASE NO. 712, ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 2005-29 AT 1 CREST ROAD EAST (LOT 1-FT), (HUH). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 21, 2009 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Smith, Witte and Chairman Henke. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioners DeRoy and Pieper. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. INTERIM DEPUTY CITY CLERK ZC NO. 712 MOD. 8