121, Demo existing garage and Const, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
)
)
of )
Mr. Gordon Shultz
)
Lot 170A-1-MS )
FINDINGS AND REPORT
ZONING CASE NO. 121
The application of Mr. Gordon Shultz, Lot 170A-1-MS, Miscellaneous
Tract, for a conditional use permit under Article III, Front Yard Re-
quirements, Section 3.06 of Ordinance No. 33 came on for hearing on
the 17th day of January, 1973 in the Council Chambers of the Adminis-
tration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, California,
and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the appli-
cant, having submitted evidence in support of the application, the
Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its Findings and Report
as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. Gordon Shultz, is
the owner of that certain real property described as Lot 170A-1-MS
Miscellaneous Tract, located in the City of Rolling Hills, California,
and that notice of the public hearing in connection with said appli-
cation was given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance
No. 33 of the City of Rolling Hills, California.
II.
The Commission further finds that no person appeared at said
public hearing in opposition to the application for a conditional
use permit, and that no evidence was received by the Commission in
opposition thereto. Further, the Commission finds that Mr. Robert
Dunn, developer of the Shultz property, appeared to explain that
building regulations of the Rolling Hills Community Association
require that each residence have a garage; however, it is neces-
sary to remove an existing garage to permit grading of Johns Canyon
Road as required by subdivision of the property.
The Commission finds further that the applicant requests the
conditional use permit for construction of a garage in the front
yard of his property, as location is limited by the coutour of the
sand, and the garage would be hidden from view by an existing
building. The Commission finds that a conditional use permit should
be issued in order to preserve substantial property rights possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone.
IV.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a Conditional Use Permit
for a variance of Front Yard Requirements under Article III, Section
3.06 of Ordinance No. 33 should be issued to Mr. Gordon Shultz, Lot
170A-1-MS, Miscellaneous Tract, in accordance with the plot plan
marked Exhibit I on file in these proceedings, and it is, therefore,
so ordered.
/s/ Godfrey Pernell
Chairman, Planning Commission
Secretary, Planning Commission