158, Construct a tennis court in fr, Resolutions & Approval Conditionsw
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
of
Mr. C. E. Gregory
Lot 170-A-3-MS
ZONING CASE NO. 158
FINDINGS AND REPORT
The application of Mr. C. E. Gregory, Lot 170-A-3-MS, Miscellaneous
Tract, for a conditional use permit under Section 3.01, Paragraph 3 (c)
of Ordinance No. 112 for construction of a tennis court came on for
hearing on the 27th day of July, 1976 in the Council Chambers of the
Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, Cali-
fornia, and the applicant, having submitted evidence in support of the
application, the Planning Commission, being advised, now makes its
Findings and Report as required by the Ordinances of the City of Rolling
Hills, California.
I.
The Commission finds that the applicant, Mr. C. E. Gregory, is the
owner of that certain real property described as Lot 170-A-3-MS, located
at 13 Johns Canyon Road in the City of Rolling Hills, and that notice of
the public hearing in connection with said application was given as
required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33 of the City of
Rolling Hills, California. The Commission finds, further, that no
communication, written or verbal, was received in opposition to the
request, and that letters from Mr. and Mrs. William R. Peters, Mr.
Walter Storm, Mr. and Mrs. Gordon W. Shultz and Mr. and Mrs. Donald
Williams, owners of properties in the area, approving the tennis court
have been entered into the file.
II.
The Commission finds that the applicant requests the conditional
use permit for construction of a tennis court in a legal location on
the property which consists of 2.00 acres in the RAS-2 zone. The
Commission finds that a conditional use permit should be granted in
order to preserve the property rights possessed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone, and that the granting of such conditional
use permit would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
nor injurious to other property in the same vicinity and zone. As a
condition of approval, the Commission requires that the fence surrounding
the tennis court not exceed 10 feet in height.
III.
From the foregoing it is concluded that a conditional use permit,
subject to conditions imposed, should be granted under Section 3.01,
Paragraph 3 (c) of Ordinance No. 112 for construction of a tennis court
to Mr. C. E. Gregory, Lot 170-A-3-MS, and it is, therefore, so ordered.
/s/ Forrest Riegel
Chairman, Planning Commission