523, Addition of a garage, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsC_. _ RECORDING REQUEST BY
•
• 95 449529
NAME
c.
WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO
MYUA y GKb1
MAIUNO ./1 W W. / sT ST,
ADDRESS Y"•1
CITY, STATE 1' /) J /'t • /
ZIP CODE L�H 7 r
RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
2:21 PM MAR 291995
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE RESERVED FOR RECORDER'S USE
TITLE(S)
• AcrzrrisAcg o M
I FEE $13 ?..
I. 3
NCPF Code 19 $
R428 8/94
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: Recorder's Use
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
OPP
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO. .523 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property
follows:
1 Maverick Lane (Lot 31-SK)
Rolling Hills
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions
said
described as
ZONING CASE NO.
523 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under
foregoing is true and correct.
Print
Owne r_0 N.SGOe2 Oil RSA l�J
Name
Signature_Ray.4r ."
Address /miv/Ai?wk LAt
City/State 630U_Md /JL r ,�f;�-
40274{
in
the penalty of perjury that the
Print
Owner /7 .49 /4-'2 /1/11 .SAW
Name
Signatures
Address l l'7,4 r ede-E4 f
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of
County of
On this the _day of
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
personally known to me
p proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) -
within instrument, and acknowledged that •
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Nc!arts Signature
/2c/7, i7%%%C cam.
cry
19__, before me,
subscribed to the
executed it.
ee:eae.r�ce.re-"
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
On i9u44' \ (p i(q91- before me, Y$& PIW l i4LU, ¥\Mti
personally appeared )1-44Y- Ktir it 1 L c'wi Moovvv tr9 ic1i —
D TE
❑ personally known to me - OR - Eproved
• MYRNA MARIEN a
a
COMM. #1039108
1 r• �1� NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIAKi
u, , SOS ANGELES COUNTY
• My Comm. Expires SEPT. 18.1998 ■
NAME. AND TITLE OF NOTARY - E.6.. *JANE DOE, NOTARY PUBLIC
NAMEIS) OF SIONER(S'
to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is re
subscribed to the within instru t and ac-
knowledged to me that he/she ey xecuted
the same in his/her/authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/i
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),
or the entity upon behalf of which the
person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
OPTIONAL
The data below is not required by law, however it may prove valuable to the person relying on the document and could
prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form.
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT .
1�
NUMBER OF PAGES . • %
DATE OF D UMENT
SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE
CTJ911010/94IIJ 2.e(
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
INDIVIDUAL
CORPORATE OFFICER
TITLE(S)
El PARTNER(S) a LIMITED
❑ GENERAL
❑ ATTORNEY -IN -FACT
❑ TRUSTEE(S)
❑ GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR
❑ OTHER:
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
NAME OF PERSON(S) OR ENTITY(IES)
1
d ON and certified copy of the record
ri it bears the seal, imprinted in purple ink,
of the Registrar-Recorder/County Cloth
MAR 291995
REGSTRARIRECORDERCOUNTYCLERK
LOS ANGEIES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
CeoV
ti
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 96-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION, NO. 95-2 AND APPROVING AN
EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A PORTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION, A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A ROOM
ADDITION, AND A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 523.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi with
respect to real property located at 1 Maverick Lane (Lot 31-SK), Rolling Hills,
requesting an extension to a previously approved Variance to encroach into the
south side yard setback to construct a portion of a garage addition, a previously
approved Variance to encroach into the south side yard setback to construct a room
addition, and a previously approved Variance to encroach into the north side yard
setback to construct a room addition.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on February
20, 1996 at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of
time is necessary in order to acquire a home improvement loan.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph B, Section 12 of Resolution No. 95-2,
dated January 17, 1995, to read as follows:
"A. The Variance approvals shall expire within two years of the approval
of this Resolution."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 95-2
shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH I AY OF ;: tfJ ARY, 1996.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
RESOLUTION NO. 96-4
PAGE 1 OF 2
ATTEST:
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 96-4 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-2 AND APPROVING AN
EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A PORTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION, A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A ROOM
ADDITION, AND A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 523.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
February 20,1996 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Raine, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None .
ABSENT: None .
ABSTAIN: None .
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
6\ .1.2. ., )
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 96-4
PAGE 2 OF 2
2
RESOLUTION NO. 95-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH
INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A
PORTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION, AND GRANTING A VARIANCE
TO ENCROACH INTO THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 523.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi
with respect to real property located at 1 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 31-SK)
requesting a modification to existing Variances: (1) a request for a minor Variance
to permit the construction of a portion of a garage addition that will encroach into
the south side yard setback; (2) a request for a minor Variance to permit the
construction of a room addition that will encroach into the south side yard setback;
(3) a request for a minor Variance for a room addition that will encroach into the
north side yard setback; and (4) a request for a Variance to widen and modify an
existing driveway that will cover more than twenty percent of the area of the front
yard at an existing single family residence. During the hearing process, the latter
request for a Variance to widen and modify the existing driveway was withdrawn by
the applicants.
Section 2. In 1989, a Variance was granted to construct residentialroom
additions 5 feet into the north side yard setback and a Variance was denied to
encroach 30 feet into the front yard setback for 242 square feet of additional garage
space. The Variance that was granted to construct residential room additions into
the north side yard setback expired.
Section 3. On June 21, 1994, Variances were granted (1) to encroach into the
front yard setback to construct an additional attached single car garage space, (2) to
encroach into the south side yard setback to construct the same attached single car
garage space, and (3) to encroach into the north side yard setback to construct a room
addition; and the applicants were permitted to modify the existing driveway and
parking area at the existing single family residence.
Section 4. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application on November 22, 1994, December 20, 1994, and
January 17, 1995, and at a field trip visit on December 10, 1994.
Section 5. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore
RESOLUTION NO. 95-2
PAGE 1
• •
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.120(B)(1) requires a side yard of 35 feet in the RAS-2 residential zone.
The applicant is requesting to add 172 'square feet for an additional attached 242
square foot single car garage space which will encroach a maximum of three and a
half (3-1/2) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot south side yard setback. With respect to
this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence on the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because by
allowing incursion into the angular side yard there will not be any greater incursion
into the front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 7 . Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 509 to permit the encroachment
of 172 square feet of additional garage space into the south side yard setback with a
maximum encroachment of three (3-1/2) feet into the thirty-five foot (35') south
side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this
application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the
conditions specified in Section 12 of this Resolution.
Section 8. Section 17.16.120(B)(1) requires a side yard of 35 feet in the RAS-2
residential zone. The applicant is requesting to construct 493 square feet of
residential additions that will encroach a maximum of three (3) feet into the thirty-
five (35) foot south side yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the
Planning Commission finds as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 95-2
PAGE 2
• •
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence on the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because by
allowing incursion into the angular side yard there will not be any greater incursion
into the front yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 509 to permit the encroachment
of 493 square feet of residential additions that will encroach a maximum of three (3)
feet into the thirty-five foot (35') south side yard setback, as indicated on the
development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by
reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 12 of this
Resolution.
Section 10. Section 17.16.120(B)(1) requires a side yard of 35 feet in the RAS-2
residential zone. The applicant is requesting to construct 352 square feet of room
additions that will encroach a maximum of one (1) foot into the thirty-five (35) foot
north side yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence on the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for ,the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because by
allowing incursion into the angular side yard the addition follows the existing side
wall of the residence and there will not be any greater incursion into the side yard
setback.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-2
PAGE 3
• •
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 509 to permit the encroachment
of 352 square feet of room additions into the north side yard setback with a
maximum encroachment of one (1) foot into the thirty-five foot (35') side yard
setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 12 of this Resolution.
Section 12. The Variance to the south side yard setback approved in Section
7, the Variance to the south side yard setback approved in Section 9, and the
Variance to the north side yard setback approved in Section 11 are subject to the
following conditions:
A. The Variances that were granted (1) to encroach into the front yard
setback to construct an additional attached single car garage space, (2) to encroach
into the south side yard setback to construct the same attached single car garage
space, and (3) to encroach into the north side yard setback to construct a room
addition; and the approval to modify the existing driveway and parking area at the
existing single family residence which were approved in Resolution No. 94-13 on
June 21, 1994 are hereby superseded by the approvals granted by this Resolution and
shall be of no further force or effect.
B. The Variance approvals shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070.
C. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance approvals, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
D. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
E. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated January 5, 1995 and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-2
PAGE 4
• •
F. The existing retaining wall and the reconfigured center portion of the
retaining wall behind the residence shall not exceed five (5') feet in height measured
from the downslope side of the wall to the surface of the ground. The retaining wall
shall be constructed in accordance with the approved Site Plan, identified as Exhibit
II A II
G. The parking area at the southern side of the proposed garage and all
astroturf shall be removed to the satisfaction of the Rolling Hills Community
Association Architectural Review Committee.
H. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
I. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
J. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of these Variance approvals, or the approvals shall not be effective.
K. All conditions of these Variance approvals must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1995.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
MARILYN I ERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 95-2
PAGE 5
• •
STATE OF, CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95-2 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH
INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A
PORTION OF A GARAGE ADDITION, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION, AND GRANTING A VARIANCE
TO ENCROACH INTO THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 523.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
January 17, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None .
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY C CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 95-2
PAGE 6