Loading...
509, Construct a new garage with en, Correspondence-1110 Ci,y °Mo fP,.g JUL CERTIFIED MAIL June 28, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi 1 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 509, 1 MAVERICK LANE (LOT 31-SK) RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Mirsaidi: This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 509 was APPROVED by the Planning Commission and the enclosed resolution was approved on June 21, 1994 at a regular meeting. The Planning Commission's decision was reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on June 27, 1994. The approval will become effective: (1) Thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution if no appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code attached), AND (2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject resolution must be filed by you with the County Recorder. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 94-13, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial. Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $7.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. ®Panted on Recycled Pape. • • PAGE 2 The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. SIRELY, ,6,ztt OLA UNGA PRINCIPAL PLANNER ENC: RESOLUTION NO.94-13, EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, AND APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. cc: Mr. Myung Chung • • RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITIONAL ATTACHED SINGLE CAR GARAGE SPACE, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT THE SAME ATTACHED SINGLE CAR GARAGE SPACE, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION, AND GRANTING PERMISSION TO MODIFY THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY IN ZONING CASE NO.509. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi with respect to real property located at 1 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 31-SK) requesting a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to construct an additional attached single car garage space, requesting a Variance to encroach into the south side yard setback to construct the same attached single car garage space, requesting a Variance to encroach into the north side yard setback to construct a room addition, and a request to modify the existing driveway and parking area at an existing single family residence. Section 2. In 1989, a Variance was granted to construct residential room additions 5 feet into the north side yard setback and a Variance was denied to encroach 30 feet into the front yard setback for 242 square feet of additional garage space. The Variance that was granted to construct residential room . additions into the north side yard setback expired. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on March 15, 1994, April 18, 1994, and May 17, 1994, and at a field trip visit on April 9, 1994. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard setback for every residential parcel to be fifty RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 • PAGE 2 • (50) feet. The applicant is requesting to construct an attached 242 square foot single car garage space, which will encroach a maximum of eighteen (18) feet into the fifty (50) foot front yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes continued expansion of the residence on the lot. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because there will not be any greater incursion into the front setback than already exists. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 509 to permit the encroachment of additional garage space into the front yard setback, to a maximum encroachment of eighteen (18) feet - into the front yard setback, as indicated on the development - plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section -13-of this Resolution. Section 7. Section 17.16.120(B)(1) requires a side yard of 35 feet in the RA- S-2 residential zone. The applicant is requesting to construct an attached 242 square foot single car garage which will encroach a maximum of nine (9) feet into the thirty-five (35) foot south side yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes continued expansion of the residence on the lot. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 . PAGE 3 • by allowing incursion into the angular side yard there will not be any greater incursion into the front yard setback than already exists. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 509 to permit the encroachment of 242 square feet of additional garage space into the south side yard setback with a maximum encroachment of nine (9) feet into the thirty-five foot (35') side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 13 of this Resolution. Section 9. Section 17.16.120(B)(1) requires a side yard of 35 feet in the RA- S-2 residential zone. The applicant is requesting to construct 490 square feet of room additions that will encroach a maximum of one (1) foot into the thirty-five (35) foot north side yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes - continued expansion of the residence on the lot. B. The Variance is necessary for ;the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because because by allowing incursion into the angular side yard the addition follows the existing side wall of the residence and there will not be any greater incursion into the side yard setback. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 10. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 509 to permit the encroachment of 490 square feet of room additions into the north side yard setback with a maximum encroachment of one (1) foot into the thirty-five foot (35') side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 • PAGE 4 • incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 13 of this Resolution. Section 11. Section 17.16.160(A)(2) requires that driveways be no wider than 20 feet, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. The applicant is requesting a driveway width of up to a maximum of 24 feet. With respect to the request for a driveway modification, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed driveway was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Traffic Commission. B. The proposed driveway will include hedge landscaping that will not be taller than two (2) feet in height for a distance of 10 feet on the southerly border of the driveway. C. The proposed driveway will be a maximum of 24 feet wide but, the applicant is allowed the discretion to reduce the width to a minimum of 20 feet. Section 12. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves a modification to the driveway to permit a width of a minimum of 20 feet and a maximum of 24 feet as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 13 of this Resolution. Section 13. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 6, the Variance to the side yard setback approved in Section 8, the Variance to the side yard setback approved in Section 10, and the approval for a driveway- modification - approved in Section 12 of this Resolution are subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance and driveway modification approvals shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and driveway widening approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 • PAGE 5 • D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated February 8, 1994 and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The proposed driveway shall include hedge landscaping that will not be taller than two (2) feet in height for a distance of 10 feet on the southerly border of the driveway. F. The proposed driveway shall be a maximum of 24 feet wide but, the applicant is allowed the discretion to reduce the width to a minimum of 20 feet. G. The parking area at the southern side of the proposed garage and all astroturf shall be removed to the satisfaction of the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee. H. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. I. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio. J. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of these Variance and driveway. modification approvals, or the approvals shall not _ be effective. K. All conditions of these Variance and driveway modification approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. ATTEST: PASSED, APPROVED and ADOP, ' D this st d of June,1994. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN %Rlisijler-11-N, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 94-13 • PAGE 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS SS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-13 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITIONAL ATTACHED SINGLE CAR GARAGE SPACE, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT THE SAME ATTACHED SINGLE CAR GARAGE SPACE, GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE NORTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A ROOM ADDITION, AND GRANTING PERMISSION TO MODIFY THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY IN ZONING CASE NO.509. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on June 21, 1994 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. • • RECORDING REQUESTED•BY AND MAIL TO: Recorder's Use CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation). ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss ZONING CASE NO. 509 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRIVEWAY WIDTH I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 1 Maverick Lane (Lot 31-SK) Rolling Hills, CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 509 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE X CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRIVEWAY WIDTH X I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Print Owner Name Signature Address City/State Print Owner Name Signature Address City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of County of SS. On this the day of 19_, before me, the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared O personally known to me 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) within instrument, and acknowledged that WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary's Signature subscribed to the executed it. , See Exhibit "A" attached bortml-n and marin a Hari lac - r f • • 17.54.010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 17.54.030 C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • 17.54.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 ROLLING HILLS ZONING 78 MAY 24, 1993 • • P 852 865 119 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Street and No. P. ., State and ZIP Code 902 7y Postage Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt showing to whom and Date Delivered °D Return Receipt showing to whom, — Date, and A,,�.� 9 elivery s TOTAL.'Ostaq _ P.,Fe� /p£`- �I: Po,ark or t " ., rE 1..:.` o' *' �`�.,c • , 7� LL to "v., elf 00 m SENDER: I also wish to receive the ?0 • Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. s7 • Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for an extra a y • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can fee): m return this card to you. L > • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. ❑ Addressee's Address e .m. does not permit. _ • Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. 0 Restricted Delivery •a « • The Retum Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date c delivered. Consult postmaster for fee. a o 13 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number {�,, t,,,, p g $0 F65- f / �} a 1)r . f MrS• /�/awsc, Pius Le: 4b. Service Type m u' / , J&r-fCk ❑Registered _ _.❑ Insured c ��jj� / J'/ �/ I�"Certified 0 COD c w )e0/7/ � /( ' '1 a7 / 0 Express Mail 0 Return Receipt for .: cc l Merchandise CI 2 7� riflei/ / l� ry c Z z.c. /!!/7 • �0� , cc 5. Signature ddressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested C H and fee is paid) ¢ 6. gnature (Agent) 5 i o qPS Form 3811, December 1991 * U.S.O.P.O.:1992-307-530 DOMESTIC. RETURN RECEIPT • C1ff 0/ ie0ti ng A INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 REVISED CITY COUNCIL NOTIFICATION DATE FAX: (310) 377.7288 May 24, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi 1 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 509, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed attached single car garage into the front yard setback, request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of the same proposed attached single car garage into the south side yard setback, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed room addition into the north side yard setback, and a request to widen the existing driveway and parking area at an existing single family residence for property at 1 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 31-SK. Dear Dr. and Mrs. Mirsaidi: This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 509 was APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on May 17, 1994. The final Resolution and conditions of APPROVAL will be forwarded to you after they are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on June 27, 1994. You should also be aware that the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty days after adoption of the Planning Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. r LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Myung Chung ®Printed on Recycled Paper • City ee Rolling .WA May 19, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi 1 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 509, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed attached single car garage into the front yard setback, request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of the same proposed attached single car garage into the south side yard setback, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed room addition into the north side yard setback, and a request to widen the existing driveway and parking area at an existing single family residence for property at 1 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 31-SK. Dear Dr. and Mrs. Mirsaidi: This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 509 was APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on May 17, 1994. The final Resolution and conditions of APPROVAL will be forwarded to you after they are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on June 13, 1994. You should also be aware that the decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty days after adoption of the Plannina Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGA PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Myung Chung ®Printed on Recycled Paper • c14' THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Mayor GODFREY PERNELL Mayor Pro Tem FRANK E. HILL Councilmember B. ALLEN LAY Councilmember JODY MURDOCK Councilmember Dr. and Mrs. Mansor Mirsaidi 1 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Mirsaidi: ID op2 Pti..a JJ,P May 11, 1994 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 At the special meeting of the Rolling Hills Traffic Commission held Monday, May 9, 1994, Traffic Commissioners recommended the following conditions of approval for your request to widen your existing driveway. This recommendation of the Traffic Commission will be incorporated into the Planning Commission Resolution of Approval on this case and will be forwarded to the City Council for final approval. Conditions for approval of your driveway are recommended as follows: • That the hedges for a distance of 10 feet on the southerly border of the driveway be amended with landscaping that will be no more than 24 inches high. • That the proposed driveway width of 24 feet is recommended for approval, however, the applicant is allowed the discretion to reduce this 24 foot width to 20 feet, if desired. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, 9/1. Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\mirsaidi.ltr cc: Traffic Commission Peggy Minor, RHCA Manager Mr. Myung Chung, Chung and Associates ®Printed on Recycled Paper. • • Cu, oe Rotting Jhfh FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION March 18, 1994 Dr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi 1 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 509, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed attached single car garage into the front yard setback, request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of the same proposed attached single car garage into the south side yard setback, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed room addition into the north side yard setback, and a request to widen the existing driveway and parking area at an existing single family residence for property at 1 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot. 31-SK. Dear Dr. and Mrs. Mirsaidi: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday. April 9. 1994. The Planning Commission will meet at 7:30 AM at your property. The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the proposed project showing the roof ridge and bearing walls. Use stakes and cloth. tape or flans to show the proposed driveway width. We have enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. You should also note that the next Planning Commission meeting following the field trip will be on Monday, April 18, 1994 at 7:30 PM for this month only. (Usually, regular Planning Commission meetings are held on the third Tuesday of the month). Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Myung Chung, Chung and Associates ®Printed on Recycled Pane,. i • CuR o 0ffn Jh/h� � g INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (213) 377.1521 FAX (213) 377.7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning Commission or City Council. 2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. 3. Bracing should be provided where possible. 4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. 5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. 6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. 7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (213) 377-1521. 41 is .. .• 04 SECTION R 11 PLAN • City 0/ /E?O/fLfl LLB INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 STATUS OF APPLICATION March 2, 1994 Mr. and Mrs. Mansoor Mirsaidi 1 Maverick Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 509, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed attached single car garage into the front yard setback, request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of the same proposed attached single car garage into the south side yard setback, a request for a Variance to permit the encroachment of a proposed room addition into the north side yard setback, and a request to widen the existing driveway and parking area at an existing single family residence for property at 1 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 31-SK. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Mirsaidi: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Additional Information/Requirements: 1. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. Your application for Zoning Case No. 509 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, March 15, 1994. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. @Printed on Rncycled P4pr•r • PAGE 2 The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, March 11, 1994. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ei,L LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Myung Chung, Chung and Associates