444, Construct a recreational room, Correspondence� f
City ol RO/fi4
January 26, 1993
Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF EXTENSION APPROVALS
RESOLUTION NOS. 91-6 AND 92-14
ZONING CASE NO. 444
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 195
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd:
It has been almost two years since your project was approved by the
Planning Commission. We would like to remind you that your
extension approvals for the subject zoning case will expire on
March 17, 1993.
Section 17.34.080.B of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code states,
"Extensions shall not be granted for more than a total of one year
unless a'public hearing is held and approval granted in the same
manner and based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a
new permit."
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
47—
gt
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PL NER
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
City 0/ JII/h
March 24, 1992
Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 444
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377.7288
This letter shall serve as official notification that a one year
time extension was APPROVED by the Plannning Commission at their
regular meeting on March 17, 1992 for the subject case.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NOS. 92-14 and 91-6,
specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning
Commission.
Note that this approval will expire on April 6, 1993 and unless you
acquire permits before then, under Section 17.34.080.B you must
refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new
permit.
You should also be aware that there is still one requirement you
will need to take care of before building permits are issued and
that is:
1. ,You must prepare 2 copies of a preliminary landscape plan for
approval by the Planning Department as noted in Section 10,
Paragraphs G and H of Resolution No. 91-6 and post a bond in
the amount of the cost estimate of the landscaping plus 15%.
Feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
SINCERELY,
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson
RESOLUTION NO. 92-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
• HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 91-6 GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO THE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING SITE
PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 444.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND,
RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Howroyd with
respect to real property located at 7 Maverick Lane, Rolling Hills (Lot 28-SK)
requesting a modification to the condition of approval for a Variance to the front
and side yard setback and Site Plan Review. The modification requested is to
extend the allowable time period for proposed 2,246 square feet of residential
additions, including an 832 square 'foot subterranean garage.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at its meeting on March 17,
1992 at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of time
is necessary for financing of the project.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby modify Paragraph A, Section 10 of Resolution No. 91-6,
to read as follows:
"A. The Variance to the front and side yard setback and Site Plan
approval shall expire within two years of the approval of this
Resolution."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 91-6
shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 1992.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
5 UEP
DIANE YER, DEPU CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 92-14
PAGE 2
The foregoing Resolution No. 92-14 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 91-6 GRANTING
A VARIANCE TO THE FRONT AND SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING SITE
PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 444.
was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on March 17, 1992 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Lay, Frost and Chairman
Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raine
ABSTAIN: None r1► [1
DEPUTYCITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO THE FRONT
AND SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 444.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Bernie
Howroyd with respect to real property located at 7 Maverick Lane,
Rolling Hills (Lot 28-SK) requesting: (1) a Variance to the front
and side yard setbacks to construct residential additions; and (2)
Site Plan Review. for residential additions, including a
subterranean garage. (An application requesting a Conditional Use
Permit�fo., a guest house and recreation room has been withdrawn).
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the application for a Variance and a
Conditional Use Permit on December 18, 1990. Thereafter, an
expanded request for a Site Plan Review was submitted which the
Planning Commission considered at a duly noticed public hearing
held on January 15, 1991, February 19, 1991 and March 19, 1991 and
at field trip visits on January 12, 1991, February 16, 1991 and
March 9, 1991. (The application requesting a Conditional Use Permit
for a guest house and recreation room was withdrawn during these
proceedings.)
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.060 is required to
construct additions in the fifty (50) foot front yard setback.
The applicant is requesting additions which will encroach 27 feet
into the front setback. The Planning Commission finds:
A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is necessary because the lot is pie -shaped
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent
residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the
sloping rear portion precludes continued expansion of the house on
the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because there will
not be any greater incursion into the setback than already exists.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
PAGE 2
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the front
yard setback to a maximum of 27 feet as indicated on the
Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the
conditions contained in Section 10.
SECTION 5. A Variance to Section 17.16.070.A. is required to
'=construct additions in the thirty-five (35) foot side yard setback.
A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is necessary because the lot is pie -shaped
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent
residences. The existing development pattern on the lot and the
sloping rear portion precludes continued expansion of the house on
the lot.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because there will
not be any greater incursion into the setback than already exists.
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the side
yard setback to a maximum of 11 feet as indicated on the
Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the
conditions contained in Section 10.
Section 7. Section 17.34.010 requires a development plan to
be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building
or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition,
alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which
involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the
building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any
thirty-six month period.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
PAGE 3
Section 8. The Planning Commission makes the following
findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General
Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the
proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of
low profile, low density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to
Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a
net square foot area of 126,847 square feet. The proposed
residence (5,478 sq.ft.), garage (832 sq.ft.), swimming pool (623
sq.ft.), future stable (450 sq.ft.), and 96 sq.ft. service yard
will have 7,479 square feet which constitutes 5.9% of the lot which
is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The
total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be
14,672 square feet which equals 11.6% of the lot, which is within
the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed
project is on a relatively large lot with most of the proposed
additions located away from the road so as to reduce the visual
impact of the development and is similar and compatible with
several neighboring developments.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into
the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as
hillsides and knolls) and grading will only be done to accomplish
the subterranean structure.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the
site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will
continue to the canyons at the rear of this lot.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees
and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and
supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and
enhances the rural character of the community.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural
and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage
because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project will
have a buildable pad coverage of 33.9% which is within the City's
policy of 35% maximum pad coverage. Significant portions of the
lot, including the easterly slope, will be left undeveloped so as
to minimize the impact of development when viewed from across the
canyon.
F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass
with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences
because as indicated in Paragraph C, lot coverage maximum will not
RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
PAGE 4
be exceeded and the proposed project is of consistent scale with
the neighborhood, thereby grading will be required only to restore
the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the proposed
structure to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several
properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not
detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for
pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize
the existing vehicular access, thereby having no further impact on
the roadway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt
from environmental review.
Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review for residential
additions, including a subterranean garage as indicated on the
Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the
conditions contained in Section 10.
Section 10. The Variance to the front and side yard setbacks
approved in Sections 4 and 6 and the Site Plan Review for
residential additions, including a subterranean garage approved in
Section 9 as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, are subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Variance shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110
of the Municipal Code. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire
within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in
Section 17.34.080.A.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and
the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are
violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted
thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given
written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for
a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone
in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
PAGE 5
E. Access from the garage to the basement shall only occur
through one doorway that is 3 feet by 6 feet, 8 inches in size.
F. Alterations to the existing roof shall not be higher
than 8 inches above the existing roof line. The residential
structure shall not exceed a total height of seventeen feet, four
inches (17'4").
G. Trees and shrubs shall be planted and maintained on the
dounslope side of the property to screen the entrance of the
subterranean garage from view.
H. A landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by
the City of Rolling Hills Planning Department staff prior to the
issuance of any grading and building permit. The landscaping plan
submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan
Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and
native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent
feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with
the rural character of the community.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of
the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior
to issuance of a grading and building permit and shall be retained
with the City for not less than two years after landscape
installation. The retained bond will be released by the City
Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was
installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that
such landscaping is properly established and in
good condition.
I. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading
plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed
grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology
reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning
Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must
conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope
ratio.
J. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling
Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to
the issuance of any building or grading permit.
K. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the
development plan approved with this application.
L. Any modifications to the project which would constitute
a modification to the development plan as approved by the Planning
Commission shall require the filing of an application tor
RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
PAGE 6
modification of the Zoning Case pursuant to Section 17.34.070 of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
M. The building pad coverage shall not exceed 33.9%.
N. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions of this Variance, pursuant to Section 17.32.087,
or the approval shall not be effective.
0. All conditions of this Variance and Site Plan Review
approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building
or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS OF APRIL, 1991.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DIANE SAW#ER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 91-6
Page 7
The foregoing Resolution No. 91-6 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO THE FRONT AND
SIDE YARD SETBACK AND GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 444.
was approved and adopted at a regular adJourned meeting of the
Planning Commission on April 6, 1991 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS FROST, HANKINS, LAY, RAINE AND CHAIRMAN
` ROBERTS
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
CN
DEPUT CITY CLE
t'R.'
FEB 191992
CLT.1: aE ROLLING HILL£
IB7. .
,February 17, 1992
v eaum= gvt4rw ,
Rolling Hills Planning Commission
City of Rolling Hills
Rolling Hills, California
Regarding: Howroyd Residence
No. 7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, California
Zoning case no. 444
Dear Chairman Roberts,
Due to the recession, the Howroyds thought it to be prudent to wait and determine how the
recession_ would affect their business, thus their abilities to finance the improvements to their home.
They are looking forward to improving their home in 1992. Please grant the Howroyd's a one year
extension on their site review approval.
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Howroyd
253 5th Street, Suite C, Seal Beach, California 90740
Tel: (310) 594-9157
Fax: (310) 594-5553
H1Lj
4?)1k
February 14, 1992
ei,y al Rolling Jd,�PF
Mr. Bernie Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS
RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
ZONING CASE NO. 444
Dear Mr. Howroyd:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1521
FAX: (213) 377.7288
We would like to remind you that your approvals in the subject
zoning case will expire on April 6, 1992.
You can extend approvals for one) year only if you apply to the
Planning Commission in writing requesting the extension prior__to
the expiration date.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ted
LOLA UNGA
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect
C1iy `Rollin, .wee
CERTIFIED MAIL
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NOTICE TO RECORD
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
April 10, 1991
Mr. Bernie Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1521
FAX (213) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 444, RESOLUTION NO. 91-6
APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
Dear Mr. Howroyd:
This letter is to informyou that the City Council, at their
meeting on April 8, 1991, received and filed the Planning
Commission's approval of the subject application.
The approval will become effective:
(1) Twenty days after the receipt of this letter if no appeals
are filed within that time period (Section 17.42.140), AND
(2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form must be filed by you
with the County Recorder (Section 17.32.087).
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 91-6. specifying the
conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission.
Once you have reviewed the resolution, please complete the enclosed
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and
forward to the County Recorder. Room 15. 227 North Broadway. Los
Angeles, CA 90012 with a check in the amount of $ 7.00.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety
Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance
is received by us and any conditions of the resolution required
prior to issuance of building permits are met.
Please feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any
questions.
SINCERELY,
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO.91-6
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
•
Cuy (I!2 P! s Jh/to
April 5, 1991
Mr. Bernie Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX (213) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 444
7 MAVERICK LANE
REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE
PLAN REVIEW
Dear Mr. Howroyd:
Please forgive my error. I did not proof the letter I sent
carefully. The Planning Commission APPROVED the Variance and Site
Plan Review (but, the Conditional Use Permit was withdrawn) of the
subject case at their adjourned regular meeting of March 19, 1991.
The final resolution and conditions of approval will be forwarded
to you following execution by the Planning Commission Chairman.
The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City
Council at their regular meeting on April 8, 1991. The decision of
the Planning Commission may be appealed pursuant to Sections
17.32.140 and 17.32.150 of the Municipal Code within twenty days
from your receipt of the resolution.
Your cooperation is appreciated and I apologize for any
inconvenience the former letter may have caused.
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
CC: Criss Gunderson, Architect, 153 5th St., Seal Beach, CA 90740
1
W44.
March 26, 1991
•• O.
C14 aleffin9 �aee
Mr. Bernie Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 444_
Mr. Bernie Howroyd, 7 Maverick Lane (28A-SK)
Request for a Variance to the front and side yard
setback; Conditional Use Permit for a guest house and
recreation room; and Site Plan Review for residential
additions.
Dear Mr. Howroyd:
Pursuant to Section 17.32.090 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code,
this letter shall serve as official notification that the subject
Zoning Case application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at
their adjourned regular meeting of March 19, 1991. At that
meeting, the Planning Commission voted to...demIl.the above request.
The final Resolution and conditions of app okal will be forwarded
to you following execution by the Planning Commission Chairman.
The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City
Council at their regular meeting on April 8, 1991. The decision
of the Planning Commission may be appealed pursuant to Sections
17.32.140 and 17.32.150 of the Municipal Code. A py of.
Fesolut.izon=6-1 7establ sh g=th —fee or—f'i.LbLyuaa'enclosed for for your information.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
this office.
Sincerely,
Lola Unga
Principal
LU\bc
cc: Criss
lanner
Gunderson, Architect, 253 5th St., Seal Beach, CA 90740
•
C 44% 1
AA Cna Lg NealLA, C Lt y A]anagen
Cite off f?oLLLng /lLLIi
Dean An. NeaLLi:
games Bnogdon
Five MavenLck Ln.
Y oL L Lng /l Llls, Ca . 90274
February 25, /99/
legandLng the request Ion a vanLance on the llownoyd
property at #7 AJavenLch Ln, my house ovenloohs theLn
noo? Line, and when I saw the mode.[ attached to their
nool Line with pennants, I went oven to see An.
/lownoyd, and told /Lm I was cu/Lous because I Anew they
planned additions to them house, but had not seen
any planned additions to theirs noo? Line. //e told me that
they put up the pennants to that the 5LannLng Commission
people could vLew the proposed changes ?nom across the
canyon on Cast,LLeld. I was sunpnL.ed that there was
concern about vLew impairment /nom Cast?Leld since the
houses there arse much Lowers than ALA house, and they
would pno6a6Ly have no vLew above his present Line.
I returned to my back yard to view the proposed noo/
change, and was surpnLsed to see how much ALA
proposed noo? Line change would impede my vLew looking
north to the mountains, and the city.
The proposed /tool line would add 4-5 Meet to the top oI
the noo?, and the chLmney would have to be naLed
sevenaa2 Meet above that level, so that my vLew Ln that
dLnectLon would almost be LookLng only at a /tool and
chLmnei whene'now I have a decent vLew north oaf the
cLty, 'mountains, and sunnouhdLng area.
I can understand the de.Lne to Lncnea.e the house 'L3e
(I am plannLng that muse4l%, but I have not seen nool
Line AeLghts Lncneased to add to the tLge oaf a house
since I thought we aLLowed only one stony house heLghts.
Please vLew the proposed nool LLne Piom my back yand,
and see what Lt wLIL do to my vLew. I had /it. //ownoyd
come up to my backyard to vLew the proposed vLew
LmpaLnment, and Li sunpnL.ed ILm. //e saLd he would
talk to the anchLtect about the proposal.
5Lncene2y, l ,,
gLm Bnogdon
cc: Bernie llownoyd
• •
Ci1 0/ JUL
February 7, 1991
Mr. Bernie Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA
90274:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO.2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 230; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ESTABLISHING A MINIMUM SIZE FOR STABLES AND
CORRALS AND AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
Dear Mr. Howroyd:
Please find enclosed a copy of City Ordinance No. 230 adopted by
the City Council on January 28, 1991. This new Ordinance will take
effect on February 27, 1991.
Please note that this Ordinance may affect the progress of the
plans you have submitted because it stipulates that a minimum of
1,000 sq.ft. must be set aside for horsekeeping facilities (a
minimum of 450 sq.ft. for stable and 550 sq. ft. for corral). The
Ordinance further states that the stable and corral must be located
on property having a slope of no greater than 4:1, and that the
stable foot print will be included in calculation of structural
coverage of the lot.
If this new Ordinance does impact your project, you are advised to
contact your architect or project manager.
If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact Rolling Hills Principal Planner Lola Ungar at (213) 377-
1521.
Sincerely,
Craig R. Nealis
City Manager
CN:ds
City Rotting _AIL
February 6, 1991
Mr. Bernie Howroyd
7 Maverick Lane
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR ZONING CASE NO. 444
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX (213) 377.7288
Dear Mr. Howroyd:
Please be advised that the Planning Commission continued the
subject application to an adjourned meeting to be held Saturday,,
February 16. 1991 at 7:30 AM, so as to conduct a field inspection
of the site.
The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the,
proposed proiect"showing the roof ridge and bearing walls, and the.
owner and/or representative should be present.
Please call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
/2r/—
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
FLDTRP/LMU