Loading...
438, Demolish existing SFR, stable , Applicationa f The undersigned Rsgma IOR REARINQ 7'OR SITE P1» REVIEW CITY 07 ROLLING_ HILLS 110S'4/',J P%mft14.4 400 We y, q 1 r. } Naas (( CftsT P,%, J sT,, .o Lt .1 �' ({pus CA- qe27* 5; 2 -7* Street Address Telephone No. is/are the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of (2) has permission of the owner Legal description of property situated at 79 A Zs58 Lot Tract • (a ci45,7 PP. 10v , , DC.G IN( /(i-s • ai- qIo 27¢ Street Address )iATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of he project require a Site Plan Review. WE- W T° the n 'To rot-t-oWIde Wow cW 77 OQ 7 ': aTioWs14 Ext rn/4 Haase- Atio ST4 t z , P peat- 0 RuGRtvot- t•lr Ph-0 F n (igiv� J4>'s $Utop Nt W' ?SDD s f t! rrfAliff 12o 9F A s 'Ioirl /6od.'6 i1 sly fog .- 1141 t-'-teiJ , 'foot A-Jt' P'1- n'-Is SITE PLC REVIEW CRITERIA Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission gust sake an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's :onforaance to the below criteria: ►. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the zoning )rdinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to sizes, At -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses. 0126►1701741, “SE / 5 „J Cif (-11 i C` To �'(TCyz % e-o i g6 . ( T lfc c-t4a-Parr REf t 610u > 9mG.fi lc 3s; Wat oz. kr- O TQo4n,s4/4 tTit 'to S'riSFI cre CAST JJ6-161fpift (l/z. yo,►Jat a.) . (3) ( Ggi )9 reituse is o' , cnitOR-UoE= cf r O (fir LvewC p fur (J(,r6srN I oo' t i 6)-0 /Rcx C C 70 aokrur f into�r c us/ 1r 1 cif . Does the project preserve and integrate ithe site design, o the aaximua extent feasible, existing natural topographic features f the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature tress, cainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls? cplain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural 3atures. (j) " PRo.Pos.0 +-bticsC (5 pfTF)7 Crt r H miisr LrVF Pnr F 771t Pop -zy ,A -Alp /w - 1,s/ci s Ski' DiwAl war 77/6-- o€s ro tit 1N Misr 61Q11-01r$is G - W i t.t, Pec4rPv7 4s mew/ 114 rW ZE TP-L T AS P©Ss1 B Lc (3 (47-11-Iq-i►A MtdrH- OF ertfc t)CtsTirt6 P1WCWAYS r`h$/ tx;Si•PV6 �C1usF f"4P r� v1WtitC &PPM6; C. Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved? Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or rev -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed sinimization measures. (t) r^Y( oi.46 (Th r1446.1 in #g R) To'STri'1E s Y t-01-rs 1 5 % tlVW' ; -rftts s�"�;P' LvP�- HMGtNl t crri R Th-r i i (./!1t-t, 4-79rAci l ed PKettAt2F izrcotJTcarii r t Z t d,C r iQG TAR rp) To if)kau . /+!r KiN9 r 4mt, 7 A- ,- 04- rtOPdsep 1vi/C Wm- ramr y2 ovev /WV 14479 To 01-It0 XiS�►N6 Tagil-Pf-ia ). Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native legetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with nd enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping hould provide a buffer and transition zone between private and ubl is areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, ntegrat•s landscaping and creates buffers. Awf 41s PSr-OVE (( fEt- YF6Tali 0/14 Ppckit.=p 112 N/ t1l4 tu( fs W iC- - ! Q MLI? 02E 9. too' To 02oviO? R fur-M2- T `v r flan ft sc . Does the site development plan substantially preserve the tural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building forage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums 1 the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage posed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on ghboring lots. Ng- NET Lar UNcPz. - Zi 7 (s p 5s TtfkJ 111037..froPc -Tiffs cry. -4'1 Ik ()po POSE- ( 0- ` A -PP Ftot- PAlt tA,to i irn1 L IS NILT l/ ?e 0- f40` fit - A-WP fi-hrrt 7o ► i tr!1 vvitYcl Afk - te r Tor eqw, UTARtte,-R-f- of Tries-n renuNcTy. Is the site development plan haraonious in scale and mass with • Ate, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks t be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be s• l where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. in how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing .cks of neighboring properties. 6) o /4t6thW HH-kki1= 5'P Y 1 S1-s((44-e-r-5 t"wL I ijs To S'`n fp _ g r ei Tr fN6V r Y 'P 5 5 . -Wogs Tf(�T T1 ►7ws t7-M w NC) t' rini(L ofisr r tn/Tim/17 ' 5 c. LE' G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data and landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. 4) v,X- Waf ose A VY\ m wyr, 0-40t y $u;fr OF t s °o 64//c.# i P Nerocrif-elE �usT /F6O47 vff Ie/ 1l co rp I *1 woct-itig,- to (ir Y go, Sv Virr !Ts Afee t u= hAtot1 (Ms r 'P 4 c niiztrv. N. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality act? Explain bow the project impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. j 1-t 014 T rift vI t4vvIp-rrT ; 4.1110, , t I ST -t l i,r- w 1 u- frillosimirt, h 1rTU( ► W A P--,,M6 F STiLV -Non ss usli IG emAPIR. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, present the data and information required for the site plan =.view criteria *evaluation to be the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. DATZ: - / Pr6 • l c (404110/ 13df}si FOR *Sid . QfM/ f APPLICANT • • CN=CKI.IIT FOR JPIANARMIWAL (con' is . 17. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot vithin the area defined by the required minimum setbacks that has an average slope of ten (10%) percent or less. If there is not existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot vithin allowable setbacks that has an average slops of ten (10%) of less. COMPOTATION OF LOT COVERAGg CITY Of ROLLING RILLS LOT COVERAGE (Title 17 !fain buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable (vitb vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than tventy (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included vithin drivevays, parking space, walks, patios, decks.and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling *ills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35*) percent of the net lot area. Tor the purposes of this Section 'net area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag Oot. WILDING AREA ZXISTINQ fALCU1ATIONS ;ET LO? AREA :ESIDENCE WINNING POOL nuns &NNIS COURT ERVIC! YARD l Op/. P/viLl.tot/ TOTAL SQUARE LEST ,6bW w• 4000 sq, 'oo sq. Pd sq. ft. ft. ft. ft. tt. sq. it. sq. it. 0 sq. it. 6, 200 s STRUCTURE COVERAGE (,1 I ;IVEWAY 6d0Dsq. tt. VED WALKS AND PATIO RooAREA, sq. it. )OL VScZIltd iODO sq. ft. TOTAL SQUARE rams /060o .ATIIORZ COVERAGE %TOTAL COVERAGE (10,1'0 t 1(111)D4')/oli140 MIMEO 5tfrfl sq. ft. 751 a sq. ft. r(poo sq. ft. 690 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. 6190 sq. ft. to, 73n 713,o sq. ft. 25C Sq. ft. in0 sq. ft. 230CP /2,2: 2Z.$ % fo f 940 sq. ft. 7 sq. ft. /( oo sq. ft. ,3ic sq. ft. 2p v sq. tt. p sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.- /073o /o, (, % 7 /S10 sq. ft. 25(v sq. ft. 4,97o sq. It. • 2,2� Q2, 8+ I1 • COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn) and other accessory structures, proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area". A suggested coverage has been set forth by policy at 40 percent. For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS BUILDABLE PAD AREA total sq.ft. 4100 0 RESIDENCE sq. ft. 7 500 GARAGE sq. ft. /6700 STABLE (BARN) sq. ft. 700 OTHER sq. ft. S-00 BUILDING total sq.ft. (0%oO PERCENT (%) COVERAGE total sq.ft. (1.11C (%) • • The undersigned LIEWEST FOR HEARING FOR ZONE VARIANCE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Hussain M. Shaikh and Mohd. Y. Shaikh Name 16 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (213) 532-9291 Street Address Telephone Number (1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of (2) has permission of the owner Legal description of property situated at 74A 2558 Lot Tract • 16 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Street Address Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project. require a Variance. The proposed use will be a single family residence. The only part of the project which requires a variance will be 2 sets of masonry pilasters for wooden driveway gate supports. Criteria to be satisfied for.orant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. (1) Other residents in the neighborhood were permitted to build masonry pilaster driveway gate supports. (2) Masonry gate supports will be extremely durable and maintenance free. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property.is locatQ' Ilerwlse• Our minor variance request of masonry pilaster supports will not be materially .determined to the neighboring property value because there are .similar condition in the immediate area. FILING FEE A filing fee 0011011,0111Wmust accompany the application. Hake check payable to: • • OWNER'S DECLARATION • • • • I, (He), declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at , California, this day of Address , 19 NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Not_ry Public of the State where the signature is ffixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take . ricknovledgments, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information in the accompanying this application is true to the beat of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. FORMS ISSUED TO: NAME FILED • ORGANIZATION PEE $ JOE A,DDRES$ 0 RECEIPT NO.' SNN" DATE: DECISION OF PLANNING CO?RmISSION • 19______ The action of the Planning Commission will be final unless within twenty (20) days following the notice to the applicant of the decision, an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk by: A. The applicant: B. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record prior to the final vote of the Planniuy Commission on the natter and who, in addition, received or was'entitled to receive the written notice specified in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Section 17.40.060: or C. The City Council, upon the affirmative•vote of three members of the Council. In order to obtain a building permit, it will be necessary for the applicant to sign a copy of the findings that they understand and accept the conditons of approval. 1: • • • COMPUTATION or LOT COVERAGE CITY OF ROLLING RILLS LOT COVERAGE (Ordinance No. 188) Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section 'net area'ahall exclude all perimeter easements a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used :or roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which pro- vides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag lot. BUI:.DING AREA CALCULATIONS • NET LOT AREA • • RESIDENCE• GARAGE _ SWIMMING POOL STABLE TENNIS COURT • OTHER (Ft'ot, % COVERED (MAY NOT EXCEED DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA POOL DECKING (O(, a L sq. ft.- 7A .q._ ft. %loon 1 sq. ft. gte • sq. ft. 2O0 1.q. ft. sq. ft. . sq. ft . TOTAL SQUARE 20% OF NET LOT AREA) 7� - sq. ft. • 2 s & I _ 1 sq. ft. 4-210 sq. ft. FEET I /O ,'%RD lo.i0%Gs. TOTAL SQUARE FEET TOTAL COVERAGE (MAY NOT EXCEED 35% OF NET LOT AREA) '____ 1 Z'2.8• 2 • STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) CITY or POLLING HILLS LOWING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIS? AFFIDAVIT _, Edward L. ;Ng, (BOA. Architects)' , dealers under. penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll • of the County within the area described and.for a distance of, one thousand.. (1,000) • feet from the exterior_boundaries of property legally described'as: • .O • Executed at 1st San Pedro, Conditional Use Permit Variance Zone Change 3 ! California, this day of August ) 19 90. rid Sign Edward L. Ng, OA A hitecture • • • • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The .suggested sequence for property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and itsadmonition is completely understood. Executed at 4 ` P O O , California this day of , 19 6M By: By: (44)440/(-n. --7/;✓ 441 sow Address City 4 (tmv'd MO) • r• APPENDIX • ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CBECRLIST FORM (Initial Study) Date Submitted: t• I7, )��U No. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name .and address of developer or project sponsor: Hussain M. Shaikh and Mohd. y. Shaikh 132 132nd Street, Los Anaeles. California 9nf61 2. Address of project: 16 Crest Road West Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Assessor's Block and Lot Number Lot 74A, Tract 2558 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: BOA Architecture 279 West Seventh Street San Pedro, CA 90731 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: (1) Site plan review. (Q) Minor variance (for masonry gate supports). (3) Rolling Hills Community Association approval. (4) Building Permit. S. Existing zoning district: RAS-2 • 6. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): Single-family residence PROJECT DESCRIPTION, 7. Site size: 116.740 Sa. Ft. 8. Square footage: '7!0Q Sq. Ft. house size 9. Number of floors of construction: One-story KIM -17/0 10. Amount of off-street parking provided: cg garage stalls 11. (Attach plans.) 12. Proposed scheduling: Construction begins 3/91 and will end 12/91 13. Associated projects: pavilion and stable 14. Anticipated incremental development: - 15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected: Single-family residence not constructed for venture rn.it41. 16. If commercial., indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the., project: • •• . • • • • MS.If9-1SA 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: We are also applying for a minor variance to allow construction of masonry driveway gate supports. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 20. On a separate page, describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. 21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties, 'including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use, and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all 'yes" and •maybe answers are required on attached sheets.) 22. Earth. Will the proposal result'in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? , b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? x YES MAYBE NO c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? x g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? YES MAYBE NO 23. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 24. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? .x_ ' KLX -2OAe • h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure. of people or property to eater -related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? J. Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 25. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and of plants? b. A reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 26. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 27. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. increases in existing noise levels? YES MAYBE 1W 1 -5- • . $Llfi-21A• b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 28. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 29. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alter- ation of the present or planned land use of an area? 30. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or up- set conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emer- gency evacuation plan? 32. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,'or growth rate of the human population of an area? 33. Housing. Will the proposal af- fect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 34. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? • YES MAY?! NO X 1lLM9-Z2A� . • d. %iterations to present patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? e. .Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ' f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 35. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 36. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Ose •of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 37. Utilities: Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? -7- T ES MAYBE PO .1610 x L x x • • MLW9-23A• 38. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE N3 a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? x b. Exposure bf people to poten- tial health hazards? 39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal re- sult in the creation of an aesthet- ically offensive site open to public view? 40. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 41. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthet- ic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? x .x. X c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural •values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? • 42. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal commun- ity, reduce the number or restrict X X • 1 . ML1f,-24A* . the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate impor- tant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environ- mental goals? (a short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, defin- itive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) YES MAYBE- NO c. Does the project have impacts• which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate re- sources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the ef- fect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause sub- stantial adverse effect on human be- ings, either directly or indirectly? _ CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor- mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date DEC. t7, 11'10 (Sigma ure�/ / Edward L. Ng, BOA Ar tecture For (Applicant) Hussain M. Shaikh and Mohd. Y. Shaikh 11. 22.(b): 22.(c): RESPONSES TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FOR HUSSAIN PROJECT 16 Crest Road West Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Lot: 74A, Tract: 2558 This proposal will result in certain disruptions compaction or overcovering of the soil, because: the proposed residence is required to be moved southerly from the north property line @ Crest Road. - The original residence had a 50 ft. setback. The new required set back is 100 ft. min. The proposed project is replacing a non -conforming two story residence. This proposal proposes a lower mean level of living floors because the 100 ft. setback requirement moves the residence southerly which is in the direction of a lowering property slope. This establishes lower living levels and therefore changes topography. No special relief features are changed dramatically.