775, Enlarge Porch, construct outdo, Application10/13/2009 13:38 3103738277 CRISS GUNDERSON ARCH PAGE 02/03
• •
VARIANCE
REOUEST FOR HEARING
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made
conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mods or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or
structure on yourpropertyprior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the
City Council. any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition
ofsaid permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionarypermitprocess, and is subject to higher application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: f,.I LAraf .41
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 1 re f -t'
TELEPHONE NO.: EMAIL:
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5A1„ A%:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO.
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL
AGENT'S NAME: CV4N1D ttilsot
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a
Variance.
tivop... w 1 L L
LAATio 1,AUk212rfrt d' kii" L1 �.. ii ( 4— VT.
-11-
10/13/2009 13:38 3103738277
111/
CRISS GUNDERSON•ARCH PAGE 03/03
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone.
R 'M 1 .,emu' ":i' 13e. .#2.. •
Auve,"T1-fl• fFew ,t" Cf 'irk: tz
IN A I ( r'r?•LL
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because
e ts.tv ail E" Y.I w T 70 ge_ c NI "it#' ",�..
P Pg'T c. H J f k--
14... w `(6 Armco t 71-Ac t i A
FILING FEE •
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS.
-12-
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made
conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mods or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or
structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the
City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition
ofsaidpermit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee.
PROPERTY OWNER: eta-. gS . gaTe.m+- helfzL kfr y-
OWNER'S ADDRESS: ((r - lacolva
TELEPHONE NO: 544 -4403t EMAIL:
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 1 to ,rr tevtp w�,S1-
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 74--A
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 75491 PAGE 2.2. PARCEL 5
AGENT'S NAME: Gir-159
AGENT'S ADDRESS: Zc>24. VIA PAc.1-lco Pk/0- 416274-
TELEPHONE NO: 313 r s077
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan
Review:
E I.eaets V4p. -r
5i'(i i-e-ulmlh! getzt4 t sop Vx Ib P4zoyib(:ltol for-tioN
u tp PgoGd
-11-
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe
in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
�Xt CiNCx FbI2C44 I5 P aR55i V e.y -
SO. F. W44ic* Pa4i'nct.1 -ta -ii _plasTu4&
Fe5I flir l`I _ e-L-a51:sr SI: IS 1bL e. f r ric.oket 's$1,s1
14.51b41B 4.11J6 #-ice 1-P % e P Ll SIe.
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
rize)i fbiLei 5 kr Pc0 11 l.L 6r DEC / top 44 . 140 CA4G4M
l N t LoAcNi 1.1f . bM 1ovse- hX-s FPA 5tD.
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and
recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and
contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or rcdircct drainage flow
unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on lots.
146 { 'p11.16- 15 pRa?aeD.
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide
a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
-12-
• •
r lb 11akti ?D4& 15 PA4RASED eWILL ea > 3rD.
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot.
a1L/ty-UE4-hFit' . l5 PrtaPa m ofJ Md l Ilk 3tlt4U O , wHic.44.
l5 ABoY . - (p) G se . Nib 64- l[se • tnl • 13111LUlNG
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary
to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks
of neighboring properties.
o+l/h.16r1,i�s- . 1r i. liziofte5rop 1'6 Rot{ ?it 11..A•steieLil7N-rt •:
Ae. cSS lEtz.60.S h 'it►ff1Nd ois; ' TPX-.t SLI 4I004.0 .
1'1c4oP5'T1l✓5.
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and
vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, Landscaping and
other on -site parking or storage areas.
' 1CP D.
H. ! Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain
how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
146 IL4tL/tpr I No Mil- 1c no1,( zurP 'O.
-13-
. •
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above,
information required for the site plan review criteria eval
statements and other information presented are true and c
Date: 1.0 • 9 •09
Signature
in attac
ontot'•►'-s
ct to : •� st
For:
Applicant
FILING FEE
d
e i ibits, presents the data and
t / my ability; and, that the facts,
my knowledge and belief.
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
-14-
•
Go!'ii• GFiINGLE
ricaPri To f
�ct61' -t
r-
t1
Extorot _
_SIGerr,leo. 'PINE
txtl9r'. FIB►.
•
YAip
I JL711 .III1 �o:1d+..�� . neon min
_ ._.
if
1.
• +crd-tt
e-cY ecv-v
Pkno 15scrie7 pkno
ANPPITIoN 1 t6T1N& . API'
yifx•rrti eLeYAPnost
T%o'I=iI'OII
—oxl4a"VG GGriV. .
EAINGLL frazr
Ixa fits.
►n
•)Usti t•l&s Est j; c
C-f)
iWortCS erOh1 .
vt*V- 4z GtittatMY
1
11660
• Y. Tktl d .
_ -e- Ap'D1T1ot4 .
Ex«f Ne,
�cV3nrC> rya
omst , a1. vAt'loq
tisti=r11-01
r-
tI
pCpC G FIN • rL
e rvf4
�ohlri �11-6
1
5 v1NG (1YP
1
DATE I D • 0 CI ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS (rP
ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
AREA AND
STRUCTURES EXISTING
NET LOT AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL/SPA
POOL EQUIPMENT
GUEST HOUSE
CABANA
STABLE (dirt volume to be included
in grading quantities) ktui
RECREATION COURT
ATTACHED COVERED
PORCHEc=N
ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE,
BREEZEWAYS
ATTACHED TRELLISES
*DETACHED STRUCTURES:
(circle all that applies)
SHEDS, TRELLIS .S(nAZEB 5
BARBECUE, OUTDOOR. KITCHEN_,,,)
ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft.
high and over 120 sq. ft. in area,
WATER FEATURES, ETC. — sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD C.0 sq.ft.
OTHER FI P {'l.kt .• - sq.ft.
BASEMENT .e t Pow 4,1000 sq.ft.
(volume to be included in grading quantities)
DEPTH OF BASEMENT I
' poi 472sq.ft.
'1,74-sq.ft.
I moo sq.ft.
lobo sq.ft.
5 o sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
4.5a sq.ft.
%1 000 sq.ft.
PROPOSED
sq.ft.
- sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
- sq.ft.
- sq.ft.
- sq.ft.
22o sq.ft. - sq.ft.
55 5 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES
STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURES
EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO
800 sq. ft. detached structures that
are not higher than 12 ft.
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
20.4 2.%
1`0 ,343sq.ft.
'L•O.Cv%z%
2;
r
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
'2.20 sq.ft.
I215
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
3 a sq.ft.
o. ut %
sq.ft.
%
TOTAL
$510 2v sq.ft.
'7:142 sq.ft.
I 1 tioo sq.ft.
�3o sq.ft.
50 sq.ft.
— sq.ft.
— sq.ft.
f 5e7 sq.ft.
-7100o sq.ft.
55 5 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
400 sq.ft.
I "27'b sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
R Co sq.ft.
sq.ft.
4 10 U sq.ft.
1515$I sq.ft. — Zc-0
$E34sq.ft.
2o,C.0°v%
-15-
• •
ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) 515o sq.ft. — sq.ft. o 1 G° sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS, PATIO
AREAS, COURTYARDS 'Z Z5 no sq.ft. — sq.ft. Z - v sq.ft.
POOL DECKING 112-0 sq.ft. sq.ft. I 1 2-4-' sq.ft.
OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS,
ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING
PADS — sq.ft. sq.ft. sq. ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK 11, S 2-t sq.ft. sq.ft. (I, 52S sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE >?7. o % % f 3, o %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE
% TOTAL COVERAGE
2916l 1 sq.ft. sq.ft. �io +09 sq.ft.
33 ,CPS % % 3 4-.29 %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL &
FLATWORK COVERAGE 2" I t D7 lsq.ft.
Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. ft.
structures from previous page.
sq.ft. 211 ° l f sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE 33, Co n % % 3 3 . co , %
TOTAL DISTURBED
AREA 34•123 o sq.ft. —' sq.ft. 3 4-1 7-3gq.ft.
% DISTURBED AREA 35 - Cv % _... % 3 0. (p %
GRADING QUANTITY
(include future stable, corral and
access way; basement and all other
areas to be graded)
All structures (attached and detached) must be listed.
cubic yards
* Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue,
outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area
exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property.
-16-
• •
DATE 1° - c . Z.C. NO. ADDRESS ( 4 c -1. i YItEST
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BTTTT.T)ABLF. PAT) ARRA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAT,
ANT) STRT TC'TT TR RS
BUILDING PAD C Stsq.ft. sq.ft. 1014 S(Cq.ft.
RESIDENCE i g `I `q ft sq.ft. 1 Z- sq ft
—
GARAGE I too° cq.ft. sq.ft. t t/°d cq.ft.
POOL/SPA CP?'osq.ft. sq.ft. Co3 D cq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. _
50sq.ft. 5o cq.ft.
CABANAIREC.RM — sq.ft. — sq.ft. sq.ft.
GUEST HOUSE _ sq.ft. cq.ft. cq.ft.
STABLE — sq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft.
SPORTS COURT — sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 9 C' ci.ft. cq.ft. cq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary residence 'z �-v cq.ft. — cq.ft. 22Q cq.ft.
Accessory structures -' cq.ft. cq.ft. cq.ft.
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED O sift. cq.ft. 67 cq.ft.
PORCHES THAT EXCEED io% OF THE
SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/
BREEZEWAY 55 cq.ft. _ cq.ft. 550
ATTACHED TRELLISES cq.ft. — cq.ft. —" cq.ft.
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. (3 5 sq ft 13'O cq.ft.
(from 1' page)
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. C9 cq.ft.
(from 1``page not including allowed deductions)
OTHER — cq.ft. cq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 I o ”sq ft
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE GCm L� %
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 )191 I ci cq.ft.
Nnr inrl attached trellises,
Nnt inrl allowed deductions,
and inrl the area of covered porches that
exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 01 .5 l %
sq.ft.
cq.ft.
i Zl PCC2 sq.ft. I 03 icq.ft.
O. S4- % Cr7.05%
cq.ft. ,1 °, I l dlsq ft.
/r, 73
o %
-17-
• •
DATE 14'' o' oIZ.C. NO. ADDRESS CP Gf'--E>1- V\t ✓ST
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO.2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
AND STRUCTURES
BUILDING PAD $550s01. — sq.ft. d556.?q ft
RESIDENCE — sq.ft. sq.ft. cq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL/SPA —sq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL EQUIPMENT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
CABANA/REC.R— M sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GUEST HOUSE — sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SPORTS COURT .•71 p0 sq ft. sq.ft. -7/ O0Osq ft
SERVICE YARD — sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES
Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
—
Accessory structures sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
PORCHES THAT EXCEED 1O% QF THE
SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE
ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ _
BREEZEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ATTACHED TRELLISES — sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES
(from 1" page)
ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES
(from 1"page not including allowed
deductions)
sq.ft. 4°C sq.ft. d 1.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
O sq.ft.
OTHER — sq.ft. — sq.ft. cq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 10 sq ft 4 c sq.ft. ?l 4-04sq ft
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE $ ( 7 % ¢• & 5 % pf/. GG %
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 %"C"' sq.ft. o sq.ft. 100a sq.ft.
Nnr inrl attached trellises,
Nor inrl allowed deductions,
and inrl the area of covered porches that
exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE S ( . D7% O % 8 I . O t %
—18—
Millailaagna
NET LOT AREA
RUED NG !ADM
mamma
e
33.331'9•f
oARAGB. Ammo.
S►DIMIOG POOL/SPA % b30 tq0.
sT BIB
'SERVICE YARD
cram
�q$ 1.4 r
roll% .1941 N►s vr:
mums roma rant •
�.�. ate'
�.tt. 33. 1L'0.
.4s. I.k.0.0-
.'qa.. o__'4d
AIL
TOTAL STRUCL uns aim. .
/6 STRUCTURAL
COVERAGE
COVERAGB 30 *
DRIVEWAY • •$niLl NIA
PAVED WALKS AND
PATRO AREAS •
-
• POOL DECKING
Tara. nov ORuc 1 t. 5Zg
% TOTAL FLATW'ORR
COVERAGE 13.52
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FIATWORIC
COVERAGE 21,5,gla.'4R
Er TOTAL COVERAGE 24.3514
7 460:
722.42. ICA
94 so.
KO-
114.0 _ SO-
ft. 2 & L
sqic 1
___
KA. $4 .
% 32.75 ss
A xe cx? or !7/5 -�.426.4NCL- 3136, l
. 7•8•co (c_QE.S
.404,1 kart"
•
•
DATE 1 ' 1 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS I CP e.f- �,ji V►/E$r
ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
AREA AND
STRUCTURES
NET LOT AREA
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL/SPA
POOL EQUIPMENT
GUEST HOUSE
CABANA
EXISTING
sq.ft.
114'1-sq.ft.
&CO -sq.ft.
0 30 • .sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
-- sq.ft.
STABLE (dirt volume to be includedd
PROPOSED
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft:
TOTAL
t$ 41q.ft.
r2?sq:ft.
..Ve sq.ft.
6i 3 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
in grading quantities) . sq.ft. ISO sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT 7ceio • sq.ft.
ATTACHED COVERED niA'T& i. 0 k ° **WA'
a^/6 Cogi ee fa". sq.ft. 'UP sq.ft. 113 5. sq.ft. 0II5 et**. Clo re.)
ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE,
BREEZEWAYS
PORCHES
ATTACHED TRELLISES
*DETACHED STRUCTURES:
(circle all that applies)
SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO,
BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN,
ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft.
high and over 120 sq. ft. in area,
WATER FEATURES, ETC.
SERVICE YARD
OTHER
BASEMENT AREA ' 1000
(volume to be included in grading quantities)
DEPTH OF BASEMENT
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
1(, sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES atia sq.ft.
STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 2.0 . %
TOTAL STRUCTURES
EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO
- 800 sq. ft. detached structures that
are not higher than 12 ft. sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL COVERAGE
-15-
ammo
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.&
ft
sq.ft
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.&
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
-7 sq.ft.
S S S sq.ft.
sq.ft.
9�r
fi0
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft. 1 S, 343 sq.ft.
% Co 5 %
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
•
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at ! C C,- < -1" R—cL g a 11 ivj 4 , l l St , California,
this I day of c- o b t4.- , 20.0 `i
Ijk/\A—g'11')
I b Cv-u IZ x.J
By:
By:
Address
IZbR(.i: (1 ,itz. A 5t u2 ? 1
City
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this
application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the
State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take
acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying
this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment
here.
wi e. I II u +
APPLICANT: T u I .. a- R v‘o + DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: G'P-I55 67-4r`J7FP O FEE:
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
26 2-* >I I A ? 4-5 T U F ZONING CASE NO
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. (3 1 v 1 3/ 3"$ d
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1 (0 c 4-4 3 i `✓
-20-
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). •
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and
separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by
the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood. I n
Executed at / 6 C„e-i (LA,w , I ` c 11 �'" 5 ��C , California
this C day of �� -Q-V , 20 0 .
By:
/ 6 Ce-e_) %l, IV
Address
City
-21-
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738277
4111
CRISS GUNDERSONlliCH PAGE 02/18
geo Roelbt9 qieed,
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1857
NO..2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
' FAX (310) 377-7288
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
Date Filed 1C' • • 6� Zoning Case No.
' GENERAL Jt JFORMATIOM
1. . Applicants) Q . • t LIPS • tslA-L✓'t .rr Tel. ( ) 4 i ' 4(p3
Address j re VtiEsT tt- '
2. Legal Owner(s) s L t't" Tel. ( 1 •
Address
3. Project Address t 4' jM2___1 ;` r Assessor's Book No. 75Co9 - - GJ Lot No. 14 A
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those -required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies:
k-4-EeiE L A AttaYtYEJ-4L Lp((NI& tDM'et-
5. Existing zoning district.S "rL.
6. Proposed project/use of site Sf'I •
• PROTECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size '2 . c 3 --".
8. Net lot area . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot
or parcel of prope , exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the
area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement;' (b) the ten
(10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that
provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot"
9. Total square footage of structures (% SN S>'~
10. Number of floors of construction '7-
11. Basement square footage (E) 41
•
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738o
CRISS GUNDERSON H PAGE 03/18
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 74Dt�
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?�
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? it O
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? ki6
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? NO
17. Driveway Access and Parking:
a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? MC) (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 2. Proposed?
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission)!,,(
c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? IX) Proposed? `i'
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway haye a maximum grade of 7%7
(Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway require. 1
Existing? 574 Proposed? ¢�
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 5 fo Proposed? (44
(Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission).
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current
driveway access requirements? MO
Explain • Nb1 iLeck3
Doesdriveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located?
Explain rPisitt lA v 140 ( PtiV Al c 54 574, o 3q .7%
h, Does uncovered parkin area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? 0
Explain
2.
•
I. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or Tess?
N f F. `j Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 1 S % .
j. Does property have an aove grow—ri garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? "fa-5 With guest house -a minimum of 3 cars?
18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 6. . Amount fill
(Include any basement cut In grading quantities).
19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary
disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where
impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet M•17.3v Percentage of Net Lot Area 3 $. CP %.
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 7t? 4-2-
2
iiil
10/09/2009 17:29 31037382
CRISS GUNDERSONCH PAGE 04/18
21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
t
22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
23. If institutional, indicate 'the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
1114
24. Attach plans.
25. Proposed scheduling. ✓13 'C 15? Lcfl l As,sT .
26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application Is required.
S CCM 1vi Duo.'tb D rfohlS 6F Akrft-ouAl—
rcv16N5 S 1TE i'11rot
.
VAY-141 P c/V I4 w/hr 440 ._
eV r C.Ci.CJ1 LMcri N CT 44-t of -a- - f n t:*J 5
f xCn Sri Ot4
ENIQIiONMENTAt_ $ETTINS3
27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the strictures. Attach photographs of the slte. Snapshots or
polaroid photos will be accepted.
r/ - t, SLR Rorfi4 ssurrti w( pxts7't'kcs;
r s oi1 1L () 12.65/pFwce. t c us . i5- - ( ) . :tt1t5
G��t is r *i. i f u-ri4vrA0Le . SJ-f Js , l.(dt
c .. 5 rt 15 fu GOY LAri 1756041M5 Wl Lk
3
10/09/2009 17:29 31037382
CRISS GUNDERSON QRCH PAGE 05/18
28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of
land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set-
back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be
accepted.
r mPri l; ?ate- te- STt 'w
£ -mtres Sb t w / -SST -c5' ' � €�-5 vv
iS cnma f f ' Dow Fiv•Rsia
12 ;Pr la- -6 p tn-LS fiSIPX I
29. Is the proposed project consistent with:
City of Rolling•Hills General Plan
Applicable Specific Plan
City of Rolling Hilis Zoning Ordinance
South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
Congestion Management Plan
Regional Comprehensive Plan
30. Have any of the following studies been submitted?
4Geology Report icleig
7 Hydrology Report
Soils Report
Traffic Study
_ Noise Study
_.Biological Study
Native Vegetation
Preservation Plan
• _ Solid Waste Generation Report
_ Public Services/
Infrastructure Report
4
Yes No
_ Historical Report
Archaeological Report
Paleontological Study
_ Line of Sight Exhibits
_ Visual Analysis
_Slope Map
Fiscal impact Analysis
Air Quality Report
,�. Hazardous Materials/
Waste
N/A
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738277
•
CRISS GUNDERSON RCH PAGE 06/18
EVALUATION OF ENVJRONMENTAL•IMPACT$:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question.
A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
Impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors
as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based
on a project -specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation,
or Tess than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence
that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when
the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
Incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to•a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EiR, or, other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA
Guidelines Section 1 5063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from •the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by• mltlgatien measures based on the earlier
analysis.
c. Mitigation Measures. ' For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were Incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources .for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
Individuals contacted should be cited In the discussion.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects In whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the Impact to less than significance.
5 •
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738 7
u rile
,r,i ��.��,m. ,»,u� �•u,in r,•rr, ��r� i u:, .� i�.1,,.6falLl'
�;'ilil:'.:,4:"' ii.�S"! ;1 f',n�'��::.f;;1i'ifP��:�ulljl„•�� 1`�f�,.pll'•;II';'9 ndl�G "yl:.�� ,;�f.�
�'n��l..�i�, .j `,;k^Pr.{i4i.�-r;i:'ip�a.��yZt,�;;t,••�.�; 1
Issues;
AgSTHETICS — Would the project:
•
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway,?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑
would 'adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
CRISS GUNDERSON CH PAGE 07/18
419:91:' 1
L 'AGRICULTURE RESC?uRCES: •
In determining whether Impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservatiori as an
optional model to use In assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project: II ❑
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,:or . .
Farmland of Statewide Importance.(Farmland), as
•shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Prograc Iof
the
California
Resources Agency, to non•ag
se?
b) Conflict.with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract? 0
c) Involve other changes in the existing•environment
which, due to their location or 'nature, could result In
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
0
❑
❑ O ❑
0 ❑ 0
I, AR DUALITY,-- Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable'alr quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project i7
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
PAGE 08/18
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738
iii
r'e�,lj;ki''i` ""�I:Gm �{�f i 11!� Nnr;;�aiit.Y;u;r � ci;i•r-i�aq,, ,C`S.
un „Ciii'ir i�iiiptGiwii!µL'ul;f^giciC;i j i,�..,. If::i it',;i7iyinuinili .
b) Violate•any air qualitycted air quality violdard or bation? ute substantially
to an existing or prolected
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable prolect fe t In creis ane o
attainment under an app f any
criteria pollutant for which c�le federal or state ambient
(including releaSing emissions
air quality standard forthresholds ozone precursors?�ch
exceed quantitativesholds
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
CRISS GUNDERSONRCH
❑
3101P- g .AL REPaHRCES r Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either species
directly
or
ified
through habitat modifications, on any pgIn
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species
•
local or regional plans, to�°ash and Gamecies, or tor U•S rFlsh and
Californiathe
Departrner
Wildlife Service?
b) Have substantial a � a adverse
Identified In local habitat any riparian or
other sensitive n the California
reglonat plans, policies, regulations or by
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse Sec on 404 of the leer
Wa protected
wetlands as defined by
Act'(including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially
f sib �r wildlife species e movement of w with
nativeresident or migratory species
orre corridors,
established native resident or migratory sites?
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitatta&lion
Conservation Plan, Natural Community.
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
❑
❑ ❑ 17
. V
Q ❑
i
0 Q ❑
❑ i�
Q ❑
0 0 ❑ i
0 0 0 7
0 ❑ 0
0 ❑ 0 i
0 0 13
277
10/09/2009 17:29 31037388
CRISS GUNDERSON
-111
:ri�P@ni;,`u�!�I1iIS:IC;p�,fi_; 4�s;imii€?,• ..me�.
J rt.di �r, q JSi; Ytm: 'u;i;;IK"'P`fii�i7ri1; A1 i:IGJP'16'i'ti71 t' ;71d� 1'i;fe j Y;l: Cil :arx; IFi�niCjL'S;u•'r rn. r r,r tll '; il,f;,P,it1uPI
m 1W31,
re ;:!': me..t aq
yvSoillu �'iLRttj;i�;I'fi:i',hljl'I'1 Yhl6' li�Pa�ninni� {''rrrhf � it�.�{IY:�ul;ir�,'r�.�_,�......r
'irt�r:${;iu:.r'rvn'v,uiiii r h �o,,n,pp�,:�."13L,;�s;:a-....
vfJ,��;'a.�f�,1(..a,��......
jii� jr';h;?Irj!K' li„ji';6L;1„i^,:' „i 'k �; jiGn:,ra..�i� •� ..7 a.f
1_4 RAL RESQURCES -Would the pro ect: El El
Cause a substantial adverse change .1 � tossig5 if thece
of a historical resource.as defined in §
State CEQA Guidelines? ❑ II
of an archaeological
b) Cause a substantialal resource pursuant to §15064 5 of significance
aeologic
the State CEQA Guidelines? • ❑ ❑
c) Directly or indirectly destroy ealunic efeature?lntological
resource or site or unique geologic ❑ Q
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
y1, GOLOGY ANDS
ItWould the project:
-
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial''.
adverse effects, including the risk of loss,injury, or
death involving: ❑ CI
i Rupture of a known eatthquake fault, as delineated on ❑
the most recent Atquist-Prioio Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or
' based on other substantial evidence of Special
ai own fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology p a
Publication 42. ❑ ❑ /
11) Strong seismic ground shaking? II ❑ Q
Ili) Seismic -related ground failure, Including liquefaction? 0
iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑
❑
Of/
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the'loss of topsoil? ❑ ❑ 0
c) Be located on a geologlas a unit or soil that
ais f the project,
17
and
would become unstable
and potentially result in °nuefac liquefaction codllapse��ateral �
spreading, subsidence,q ❑ p
d) Be located on expButiding Code (1994)ansive soil, as �c crin eating 18-ble
iB of the Uniform
substantial risks to life and property? 1-1r7
e) Have soils incapable of adequately,supporting the use
' of septic tanks or alternative waste
ate wale foter di the al ,
systems where sewers are no
disposal of waste water?
o
Tir
PAGE 10/18
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738 7
ll'
the project:
a) Create a significant
to ghazard routine transport, use, or
c or the
environment
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
• and accident conditions
into the environment? the release of
hazardous ma
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials; substances, owaste
e
within one -quarter mile of an existing proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on ralit st to of
hazardous materials sites comp P
Government Code Sectionn ficant hazard to the public or the
would it create a significant the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use p an
or, where such a plan has not b d use ad, wit,
hin
two miles of a public airport or public
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area/
•
f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
) eo le
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
nte f emergency
with
an adopted emergency response plan,
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or'structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including •
where wildlands intermixed with w ldlands? ajacent to urbanized areas or
residences
where resideres are
CRISS GUNDERSON RCH
Cd
0 0
I
❑ 12(
CI°
0 I
CI CI
❑ °
Z(
0 d
❑ 7
Q CI
i3 °
19/(39/2099 17:29 31037382 7
yfll. HYDROLOGY AND WATPR QIJAL1TY —Would the
project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste
discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ❑ ❑ ❑
substantially with groundwater recharge such that
there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the
production rate of preexisting nearby wells would
drop to a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ ❑ 0
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ❑ ❑ ❑
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ❑ 0 ❑
the capacity. of existing or planned storm water
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? • ❑
g) Place housing within a 100-year.flood hazard area as ❑ ❑
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures d
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑
loss, injury or death involving flooding, Including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? .❑
CRISS GUNDERSON RCH
i7
CI
CI
❑ ❑
10
10/09/2009 17:29 .3103738277
410
CRISS GUNDERSON RCH
PAGE 12/18
IX.LANQ USE AND.ELANNING — Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
❑
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ • 0 0
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, orzoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 GI GI I/
•
natural community conservation plan?
X. MINERAL. RESOURCES — Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ 0 ❑ 12(
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of .the state? •
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important 0 CI CI1 •
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
XI. NOISE — Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation bf noise levels In El. 0 CI
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ 0 0 I/
groundbome vibration or groundborrie noise levels?
c)• A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑ ❑ 0 11(
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 Elnoise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
•
e) For .a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ CI CI
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport; would the
project expose people residing .or working In the project
area to excessive noise levels.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ ❑ d i
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
11
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738 7
•
CRISS GUNDERSONRCH,
PAGE 13/18
f7diu6a, [
XIII . JOPljLA11O11 AND HOUSIlk a - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth In an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, 0 ❑ ❑
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
Ihn
hkijl' f;Pfl,;jR ,dfSwL'jGriIRIiCi:f::"ireh
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
2c,11 PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered govemmental'facilities, need for new
or physically altered govemmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts; in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? - ❑ ❑ ❑
BicPolice protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ dz.
El • ❑ ❑
Pa
rks? ❑ CI ❑
Other public facilities? ❑ CI ❑ Q
XIV, RECREATION
a) Would'the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ❑ ❑ 0
the construction or expansion'of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical'effect on the
environment? •
❑ ❑ ❑
12 •
CRISS GUNDERSON ARCH
PAGE 14/18
10/09/2009 17:29 31037387
6k4RrA°,1,�,
I,%.�lull il��
113,,q" 1J a .,cumr,rci•ii.1 ,r, iu uc,rllriu anv. r, ml ,uu , n,:�
e•r•unr iv:. �cu�u, r 'a' un+aeiy nin'' ,i• , 4. 1,•, •a noun a nurnnn;:,.n k (11YcN'�E uu n �(��11 i 1 {•. ,1 �n ;G1,1 f-h 11 �. r, '� i u F� La
Cf'PFS
t., „:ggunw nwf mGi.lafnl`1e14;u,u.ai1 ii'I"i li i1"I. iL mi d. 1
n•�,:d+1, u.f�IF�r� ��n .m�r1,o „2�� , , ,���au ;;ii� „,i','I:;;S�'I'�,,, ,� aiFi1'.4G;S! ��u16t� l�i 16J.f}:.: •�n P.i...�,��r d �� �il4i f � 11,fi: iiil�mnnuuni�"•.� v
�P ,Ji�,l. 'i,� .,.�l�i �C•�.il,� I,,�(,,,h�,iia �� �`e.,,lld nllicmu1i;71?a'�Y%!��U Y�tl,i.•�:..t...
'p II ' � i jt u� �.:rn•i' i � ' �1� u ,P�4 � f a 1POlflI'PCt:�acGpadtu�'d ! ..:...... b
Ida,,�l .�.{i1i6�n•i}!t!tf`f.�. �Jirtuuu��n�.,,t�..� ppr i i4' 6,•� °,.J'q �` �l�'{ F
..,i �� I i it i I RI I F.18i �;)r..a�. •.'SJ.h•i......... ..
r,� ir�i� � � r --.: �� 5 , . .,, :'.{.6 �;,I�, :I�'_i�a�r � isJ��7�i,�,,,C.k.tu.F..: ,.'
XV. MANSPORTATION/TRAFFIQ — Would the project: o
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantialof the
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity
street system (i.e„ result In a substantial increase in
either the number ofn a is a trip ,te the
vol o s� to capacity
ratio on roads, or cog El 0b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways? ❑ 0
c) Result In a change In air traffic patterns, Including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change In location that
results In substantial safety risks? CI CId) Substantially increase hazards due to a'lesign feature
CI
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ❑ ❑
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? • ❑
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? CI CI
• I la
.g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs •
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
izz
VI, m: lL. T1ES-ANO SEP;yiCE YAMS —Would the
project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
of the
❑ Cl p 17
applicable Reional WteConol•Board?
p D ❑
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects? •
c) Require or result in the constructionof existing facllit es�the. .
ter 0 0 X
drainage facilities or expansion
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? ❑ ❑ ❑
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or are
new or expanded entitlements needed?
10/09/2009 17:29
3103738277
CRISS GUNDERSON�CH
PAGE 15/18
ICI) 11
e) Result In a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the.
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project's projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and 0 0 0
regulations related.to solid waste?
I>Y Ili6i11� c!tr l: dA gaTii`.a ii�{{iu
0 CI
gills ,STORM WATE QUALITY IMPACTS — Would the
project:
a) During construction result In potential impact on storm 0 0
in
water runoff?
b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm C1 0 0
water runoff
c) Result In potential for discharge of storm water from 0 0 0
areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment
fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including
washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir
or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other
outdoor work areas?
d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair 0 r 0 0
the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas tha
provide water quality benefit?
e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause t 1 0 0
significant harm on the biological integrity of the
waterways and water?
f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow ❑ 1a 0
velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause
environmental harm:
g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 0 0
the project site or surrounding areas?
14
ti
,I
n
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738
CRISS GUNDERSONPCH
PAGE 16/18
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the • G7 • " 0
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species; cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects and the effects of probable future
projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will ❑
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
15.
10/09/2009 17:29
3103738277
CRISS GUNDERSON�CH
PAGE 17/18
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared
pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the•Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and
any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTEAND_$IfBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed 'in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement
which contains the following Information:
1. Name of applicant:
2. Address:
3. Phone Number:
4. Address of Site (street name and number If available, and ZIP code):
5. Local Agency (city/county):
6. Assessor's book; page, and parcel number:
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS
WASTE AND SU@STANCIzS SITES LIST 1,ayailatAint City HO,
8. Regulatory identification number:
9. Date of List: JULY 1992
Date
For
signature'
Applicant
-16 -
10/09/2009 17:29 3103738 7
CRISS GUNDERSON*CH
PAGE 18/18
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section
65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
! have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the
development project and any alternatives proposed in this apptt>ration. are contained on these lists.
Date \ ' I
Signature
For ',,/efzL.G-
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits present the data and
information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 1 o ' `
Signature
For Wirtecth-l."C-
Applicant
Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hltls Envlronmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc
-17-