436, Addition of 2-bedrooms & 1-bat, Application• •
EEIVEST FOR HEARING
FOR ZONE VARIANCE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The undersigned MR. MRS. KARL FRYKMAN
Name
10 Crest Road West, City of Rolling Hills
Street Address
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at
541-7693
Telephone Number
Portion of Lot, "H" M.B. 201
Lot Tract
10 Crest Road West, City of Rolling Hills, CA
Street Address
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the
project require a Variance.
Owner wishes to construct a two (2) bedroom and one(1) bathroom addition
to their existing residence. Due to a preferred topographical area and
the existing building configuration it is necessary to reduce the rear
setback from fifty (50) feet to thirty-one (31) feet. This constitutes
a reduction of nineteen (19) feet.
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the
'same vicinity and zone.
The topography at westerly portion of the existing residence would provide
a more suitable area for construction. This area would require a minimum
of grading as opposed to other portions of the site.
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to
the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where pr-- y is lc.tated because.
The addition to the residence would be compatible to the existing structure,
as well as, requiring a minimum amount of grading. These major items•
would be conducive to the surrounding sites and the community.
FILING FEE
A filing fee d. must accompany the application. Make check payable to:
• •
.-v7ctiTI0 10? 00VERAGM
CITY 0? mum DILLS
LOT COVERAGE (ordinance Co. 100)
Rain buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools,
carvice yards (enclosed or unencloaod), stables, or an area of not lases than 200 cquar
foot for the construction of a stable (with vehicle accons th&roto) shall not cover
core than twenty (204) percent of the not lot areas proviALNI further that in addition
to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking
apace, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting
roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not covor gore
than thirty-five (35%) percent of the not lot area.
For the purposes of this Section 'not a: -a' shall exclude all perimeter easements
a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used
:or roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which pro-
vides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion
of any flag lot.
cur.DING AREA CALCULATIONS
ran LOT AREA
RESIDENCE "
GARAGE _
BIG POOL
IX/ABLE
N •
CIS COURT
_ 45,196 cq. ft.-
_ 2-812.50 cq. ft.
750.00 cq. ft.
-tq. ft.
200.00 eq. ft.
s q. ft.
% w W s.a.e.+J (MAY NOT EXCEED 20% OF NET LOT AREA)
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA
POOL DECKING
5202.00 eq. ft.
843.00 pg. ft.
seq. ft.
TOTAL SINARE FggT3762.50
. 8.3 t .
rya"; scomeg FEET 6045.00
• 13.3 t
TOTAL COVERAGE (MAY NOT EXCEED 35% OF MET LOT AREA)
21.6
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by
ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed
restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association
("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA
are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not
mean or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence for property development is to obtain
City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement
has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at , California
this day of , 19 y D
By:
By:
Address
City
BEQUEST FOR BEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The
undersigned MR. E1 MRS. KARL FRYKMAN
Name
10 Crest Road West, City of Rolling Hills
Street Address
541-7693
Telephone No.
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at
Lot
Pages 29-35 10 Crest Road West, City of Rolling Hills
Street Address
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of
aspects of the project require a
owners proposed to construct two
of the existing residence.
per cent of the existing,
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Portion of Lot
the proposed
Site Plan Rev
bedrooms, one
The total proposed
flip?
M.B. 201
Tract
project, including what
iew.
bathroom and remodel portions
new arP.q eXcee(1C twenty-five
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must
make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's
conformance to the below criteria:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the
ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to
set -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
Proposed new area is compatible with the community in scale
characteristics.
zoning
sizes,
and design
B. Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features
of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees,
drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)?
Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural
features.
The proposed project is orientated in the most desired area relative
to the topography. This then preserves the sites natural features.
5
C. Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved?
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or
re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization measures.
The proposed addition location affords a minimum amount of Qradanff and
will not modify existing drainage courses.
D. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native
vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping
should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and
public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
Proposed minimum grading will be a factor in preserving the native
vegetation and existing landscaping.
E. Does the site development plan substantially preserve the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums
and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon
the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage
croposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
The existing and proposed development is of a low percent coverage and
is compatible with the neighboring lots.
Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with
ze site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
tall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be
rposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
tplain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
tbacks of neighboring properties.
The existing and proposed setbacks are comparable to the adjacent sites.
6
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data and landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
The existing residence and family will not alter the vehicular or
or pedestrian traffic.
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
To best of our knowledge, the proposed development will not have an
impact on the environment and is compatible with the California
Environmental Quality Act.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, present the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria eevaluation to be the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
DATE: cc?z `-1- 2L (Q, I / f D
,dam FnAi,�..
FOR
SIGNA
APPLICANT
7
CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL (con't)
17. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot
that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous
portion of the lot within the area defined by the required
minimum setbacks that has an average slope of ten (10%) percent
or less. If there is not existing building pad, the buildable
area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks
that has an average slope of ten (10%) of less.
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
LOT COVERAGE (Title 17)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts,
swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an
area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable
(with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%)
percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the
above described improvements, the areas included within driveways,
parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of
any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community
Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the
net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all
perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the
lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also
exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress
to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag
lot.
BUILDING AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
CALCULATIONS
NET LOT AREA sq. ft. sq. ft. 45,196 sq. ft.
RESIDENCE 2812 sq. ft. 1242 sq. ft. 4054 sq. ft.
GARAGE 750 sq. ft. ,- sq. ft. 750 sq. ft.
SWIMMING POOL - - sq. ft. - sq. ft. - sq. ft.
STABLE sq. ft. 2.00 sq. ft. 200 sq. ft.
TENNIS COURT sq. ft. - sq. ft. - sq. ft.
SERVICE YARD sq. ft. _ sq. ft. - sq. ft.
OTHER sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 3562 1442 5004
% STRUCTURE COVERAGE 7.8 % 3.1 % 11.0 %
DRIVEWAY 5202 sq. ft. 200 sq. ft. 5402 sq. ft.
PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA sq. ft. 160 sq. ft. 843 1003 sq. ft.
POOL DECKING _ sq. ft. _ sq. ft. - sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 6045 360 6405
tFLATWORK COVERAGE 13.3 % 0.7 % 14 %
%TOTAL COVERAGE 21.1 % 3.8 % 25.0%
•
COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA
AND COVERAGE THEREOF
A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified
"EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the
calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence,
garage, stable (barn) and other accessory structures, proposed and/or
developed on said "buildable area". A suggested coverage has been set
forth by policy at 40 percent.
For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be
defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code which declares existing buildable area" as the
portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any
other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that
has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no
existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within
allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or
less.
BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS
BUILDABLE PAD AREA total sq.ft.13,639 S.F.±
RESIDENCE sq. ft. 4328.00
GARAGE sq. ft. 750.00
STABLE (BARN) sq. ft. 450.00 (future, not on pad area)
OTHER sq. ft. 0
BUILDING total sq.ft. 5078.00
PERCENT (%) COVERAGE total sq.ft.
37.2
(%)
••
CITT OF MOM= ELLS
BONI= Chit
41..i.;.: ZED PINDPERTY OWNERS' LIST
arrIDAVIT
STATE or CALIFORNIA) as.
CXXINTY OF LOS ANGELES)
1, MR. E MRS. KARL FRYKMAN • declare underpenalty of
perjury that the attached list contains the maces and addresses of all persons to
whoa all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessaent roll
••of the County within the area described and .for a distance of.one thousand(1,000)
feet from the exterior_boundaries of property legally described -as:
Survey - No. 1395, Sub-diVisicyn'of."MYrtign PF Tint "FT"
Rancho Los Palos Verdes - MB 201, pages 29-35 inclusive
• .• rt: .• :a.
Executed at
•••
• • •••• ••• ••• • 010 00
• • •• • • •
•
• . • • .
Hawthorne e California, thii
19th day of • June • En 9 0 4
...4 ••• • •• • • • • ••• •;• es • ••
VYWW. .. • '
signature
.0 Conditional Use Pend!
0 Variant*
ri ton:
• •
CC=M ' a CWCIAMYIc3
I, (10) , declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tru an4 greet.
Executed at
this a c day of 6.91070
Califcraia,
F
' tr4' G/K- 702�f
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in
California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant
should .acknowledge before a trot _ry Public of the State where the signature is
ffixed, or before another officer of that State autboiised by its laws to take .
acknowledgments, that be (it) owns the property described herein, and that the
information in the accompanying this application is true to the beat of hie (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.'
•
FOI S ISSUED TO: _ - _ - _
-
lH PILED • 1_
ORGANIZATION PEE $
oa ADDR $ Apr z0.
rftn‘1i.
DATE •
DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
•
The action of the Planning Commission will be final unless within twenty (20) days
following the notice to the applicant of the decision, an appeal in writing is filed
with the City Clerk by:
•
A. The applicant,
B. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record
prior to the final vote of the Planning Commission on the matter and wbe, in
addition, received or was entitled to receive the written notice cpocified
in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Section 17.40.060, or
C. The City Council, upon the affirmativo.vote of three hers of the Council.
In order to obtain a building permit, it will be necessary for the applicant to sign
a copy of the findings that they understand and accept the conditons of approval.
411
•� (tev'd 1,10)
• 1.
. 1 P .
APPENDIX •
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM
(Initial Study)
Date Submitted: No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name -and address of developer or project sponsor:
Mr. & Mrs. Karl Frykman
2. Address of project: 10 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills
Assessor's Block and Lot Number pnrt'ion of Lot "H<< M.B. 201
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted
concerning this projectvichard M. Linde € Assoc. Inc. AIA
2200 Amapola Ct. Suite 200, Torrance
(213) 320-8052
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies: Homes Association
5. Existing zoning district: RAS-1
6. Proposed use of site (Project for vhich this form is filed):
Single Family Residence
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size: 1.03 Acre
8. Square footage: 45,196 S.F.
9. Number of floors of construction:
one
10. Amount of off-street parking provided: 5 (5) cars
11. (Attach plans.)
12. Proposed scheduling: Construction, 1991
13. Associated projects: N/A
14. Anticipated incremental development:
15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit
sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size
expected:
one residence
16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities: N/A
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities: N/A
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community benefits to be derived from the project:
N/A
.
•
•
•
1f. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or
rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the
application is required: Proposed addition requires a minor
variance for reas yard reduction of sixteen (16) feet
See site plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING See Attached
20. On a separate page, describe the project site as it exists
before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site,
and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site.
21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties,
including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use, and
scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard,
etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all •yes' and 'maybe' answers are required
on attached sheets.)
22. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. .Any increase in rind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
YES MAYBE NO
ammaleaWa
x
x
x
20. There is a existing single-family residence and garage on the
site. The structure is located on the crown of the site with
5:1 slopes to the north and south of the development. The soil
condition appears stable and there are no known historical,
scenic or cultural aspects associated with the sight.
21. The surrounding sites are developed as single-family residences.
There are no known scenic, cultural or historical conditions.
Building heights, yard setbacks are compatible to this proposed
project.
•
N1.16-lfl►•
•
•
•
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth-
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
23. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
24. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements, in
either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course of
flow of flood waters?
LEI MAYBE NO
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? •
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? x
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? x
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations? x
x
x
UMIEnt
x
•
x
x
x
MIMMIIND
-4-
i
h. Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property
to water -related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
J. Significant changes in the
temperature, flow, or chemical
content of surface thermal springs?
25. plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or number of any species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
of plants?
b. A reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
•
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
26. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species• or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result in
a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish
or wildlife habitat?
27. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
YES MAYS!
• •
NLW9.11Ie
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
28. Light and Glare. Will the
proposal product new light or
glare?
29. Land Use. Will the proposal
result in a substantial alter-
ation of the present or planned
land use of an area?
30. Patural_Resources. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or
the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or up-
set conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an emer-
gency evacuation plan?
32. Population. Will the proposal
alter the location, distribution,
density,'or growth rate of the
human population of an area?
33. SousinS. Will the proposal af-
fect existing housing, or create
a demand for additional housing?
34. Transportation/Circulation. Will
the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial addi-
tional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c. Substantial impact upon
existing transportation systems?
YES
r
MAYPE
MbM!•23i1m . .
d. 4lterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne,
rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
35. Public Services. Will the
proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new
or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas:
LEI NAY111
a. Fire protection? x
b. Police protection? x
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? X
e. Maintenance of public
facilities, including roads? x
f. Other governmental services? x
36. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Ose'of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
37. Utilities: Will the proposal
result in afield for new systems,
or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Story rater drainage?
f. Solid caste and disposal?
x
x
0
r :. MILWf•2310
39. Human Health. Will the.proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to poten-
tial health hazards?
39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal
result in the obstruction of any
scenic vista or vier open to the
public, or will the proposal re-
sult in the creation of an aesthet-
ically offensive site open to
public view?
40. Recreation. Will the proposal
result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
41. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result
in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric
or historic archeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthet-
ic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure,
or object?
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact
area?
42. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number or restrict
in MAYBE NO
w
r
X
x
X
x
x
x
1/01110.
» . i` • MLI!•24k• •
A • 4 •• • • •
•
•
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate impor-
tant examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term environ-
mental goals? (a short term impact
on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, defin-
itive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the
future.)
/,ES MAYBE- MO
c. Does the project have impacts•
which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate re-
sources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small, but where the ef-
fect of the total of those impacts on
the environment is significant.)
d. Does the project have environ-
mental effects which will cause sub-
stantial adverse effect on human be-
ings, either directly or indirectly?
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor-
mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Date `1 I `
(Signatlite)
For
(Applicant)
x
x
x
x