436, Addition of 2-bedrooms & 1-bat, Correspondence•
RICHARD M. LINDE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. a. i. a. architect
2200 AMAPOLA COURT, SUITE 200 • TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA 90501 • [.310] 320-B052
July 20, 1993
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Att: Mr. Craig Nealis
City Manager
Re: Frykman Residence Addition - Zoning Case No. 436
10 Crest Road West
Building Permit Status
Dear Craig:
JUL 21 1993
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
8Y
The purpose of this letter is to let you know the status of our
endeavor to obtain a building permit for this project.
At this time we have approval from the Architectural Committee,
the completion of the structural and energy plan check from the
County and we are planning to obtain the building permit this week.
The last remaining obstacle was the geology and soils section of
the County. Last Thursday, July 15, Mr. Montgomery, the County
geology inspector, reviewed the site and is asking for a soils and
geology review. Our geologist and soils engineer will immediately
provide this service which they estimate will take two more weeks.
Upon the completion of these reports we will hand carry them to
Mr. Montgomery for his approval.
The Owners and ourselves express our gratitude to the City,
Association and County offices for their assistance and understand-
ing of this matter.
We hope that this time table meets with your approval.
Sincerely,
RML:gll
Richard M. Linde AIA
•
City 0/ f2 Rolling ihild
July 1, 1993
Mr. and Mrs. Karl R. Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 436
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Just a note to let you know that while your plans are being
processed, your original approvals included certain requirements
that you could be working on during this time period.
(1) File the attached Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject
Resolution Nos. 91-16 and 92-24 with the County Recorder
(Section 17.38.060 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code).
Complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM by having
the signature(s) notarized, and forward to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $ 5.00 for the first page and
$3.00 for each additional page.
(2) Prepare a landscape plan (2 copies) and a plant cost estimate
for staff approval. Also, provide a bond in the amount of the
plant cost estimate of the implementation of the plan plus 15%
that must be posted prior to the issuance of a building permit
(Section 8, Paragraph E of Resolution No. 91-16).
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any
questions.
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Richard Linde, AIA
ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NOS.91-16 & 92-24, AND
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
Printed on Recycled Paper.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL -TO: Recorder's Use
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO.
436
I (We) the undersigned state:
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as
follows:
10 CREST ROAD WEST, ROLLING HILLS (LOT 2—CH).
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in
said
ZONING CASE NO. 436 SITE PLAN REVIEW X
VARIANCE X
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
SS.
On this the day of 19__, before me,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
❑ personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
w �City ofieolliny
June 2, 1993
Mr. and Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, Ca 90274
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF EXTENSION APPROVALS
RESOLUTION NO. 92-24
ZONING CASE NO. 436
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
It has been almost two years since your project was approved by the
Planning Commission. We would like to remind you that your
extension approvals for the subject zoning case will expire on July
13, 1993.
Section 17.34.080.B of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code states,
"Extensions shall not be granted for more than a total of one year
unless a public hearing is held and approval granted in the same
manner and based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a
new permit."
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Richard Linde
Printed on Recycled Paper.
c40//e0ffi4
July 24, 1992
Mr. and Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 436
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
( 310 ) (2X377-1521
FAX: (2XX377.7288,
This letter shall serve as official notification that a one year
time extension was APPROVED by the Plannning Commission at their
regular meeting on July 21, 1992 for the subject case.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NOS. 92-24 and 91-16,
specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning
Commission.
Note that this approval will expire on July 13. 1993 and unless you
acquire permits before then, under Section 17.34.080.B of the
Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must refile based upon the same
criteria as for the issuance of a new permit.
Feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Richard Linde
RESOLUTION NO. 92-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK TO
PERMIT A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 436.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1_ A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Karl
Frykman with respect to real property located at 10 Crest Road
West, Rolling Hills (Lot 2-CH) requesting a modification to a
previously approved site plan and a Variance to Permit the
encroachment of a living room addition into the rear yard setback.
The modification requested is to extend the allowable time period
for the residential additions.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at its meeting
on July 21. 1992 at which time information was presented indicating
that the extension of time is necessary for the applicants to
accumulate funds for building construction.
Section_3__ Based upon information and evidence submitted, the
Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A Section 5 of
Resolution No. 91-21 to read as follows:
"A. The Variance and Site Plan Review approvals shall expire
within two years of the approval of this Resolution."
Section 4. • Except as herein amended, the provisions of
Resolution No. 91-16 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21ST DAY OF JULY, 1992.
ALLAN ROB - S, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DIANE SAWYER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 92-24
PAGE 2
The foregoing Resolution No. 92-24 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE REAR YARD SETBACK TO
PERMIT A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 436.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of 'the Planning
Commission on July 21, 1992 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay and Chairman
Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Raine
ABSTAIN: None
DEPUTY ITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE
PLAN AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO THE REAR YARD SETBACK FOR THE
ENCROACHMENT OF A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN ZONING CASE NO. 436.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Karl
Frykman with respect to real property located at 10 Crest Road
West, Rolling Hills (Lot 2-CH) requesting a modification to a
previously approved site plan and requesting a Variance to permit
the encroachment of a living room addition into the rear yard
setback.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the applications for a modification to
a previously approved Site Plan Review and for a Variance to the
rear yard setback on May 21, and June 25, 1991, and at a field trip
visit on May 30, 1991.
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.080 is required to
construct a living room addition in the fifty (50) foot rear yard
setback. The applicant is requesting an addition that will
encroach a maximum of sixteen (16) feet into the rear yard setback.
The Planning Commission finds:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is necessary because of the unique
typography of the lot which is very steep at the front but gently
sloping at the rear. The residence is set well back from the
street and there is a spacious open feel to the property. There
are no residences close by to be effected.
B. This Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
existing development pattern on the lot precludes the requested
additions from being built into the front yard.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
PAGE 2
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the rear
yard setback to enlarge a living room to a maximum of 16 feet as
indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A
subject to the conditions contained in Section 8. The Planning
Commission also finds that the project conforms with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is
categorically exempt from environmental review.
Section 5. Section 17.34.070 provides for a subsequent
modification after a site plan review application has been
approved. Modification of the approved plans and/or any conditions
imposed including additions or deletions, may be considered. The
decision on the modification of plans and/or conditions shall be in
the same manner as set forth in Sections 17.32.030 and 17.34.040 of
the Municipal Code.
Section 6.
fact:
The Commission makes the following findings of
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General
Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the
proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of
low profile, low density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to
lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of
45,196 square feet. The residential structure, garage, and future
stable will have 5,528 square feet which constitutes 12.1% of the
lot, which iswithin the maximum 20% structural lot requirement.
The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be
11,933 square feet which equals 26.4% of the lot, which is within
the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed
project is similar and compatible with neighboring development
patterns.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the
site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native
vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as
hillsides and knolls) because minimal grading for the project is
required, thereby preserving most of the existing slope and mature
vegetation.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
PAGE 3
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site
to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue
to the canyons at the rear of this lot.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees
and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and
supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and
enhances the rural character of the community.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural
and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage
because the new structures will not cause the structural and total
lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, although the proposed
project will have a buildable pad coverage of 37.2%, the pad is
contiguous to gently sloping areas and significant portions of the
lot will be left undeveloped.
F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass
with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences
because as indicated in Paragraph A, lot coverage maximum will not
be exceeded and the proposed project is of consistent scale with
the neighborhood, thereby grading will be required only to restore
the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the proposed
structure to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several
properties in the vicinity.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not
detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for
pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize
the existing vehicular access, thereby having no further impact on
the roadway.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt
from environmental review.
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review for residential
additions, as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto as
Exhibit A subject to the conditions contained in Section 8.
Section 8. The Variance to the rear yard setback approved in
Sections 4 and the Site Plan Review for residential additions
approved in Section 7 as indicated on the Development Plan attached
hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A, are subject to the
following conditions:
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
PAGE 4
A. The Variance shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110
of the Municipal Code. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire
within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in
Section 17.34.080.A.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance and
the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are
violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted
thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given
written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for
a period of thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone
in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. A landscape plan must be submitted to and approved by
the City of Rolling Hills Planning Department staff prior to the
issuance of any grading and building permit. The landscaping plan
submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan
Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing mature trees and
native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent
feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with
the rural character of the community.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of
the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior
to issuance of a grading and building permit and shall be retained
with the City for not less than two years after landscape
installation. The retained bond will be released by the City
Manager after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was
installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that
such landscaping is properly established and in
good condition.
F. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading
plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed
grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology
reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning
Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must
conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope
ratio.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
PAGE 5
G. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling
Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to
the issuance of any building or grading permit.
H. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the
development plan approved with this application.
P. Any modifications to the project which would constitute
a modification to the development plan as approved by the Planning
Commission shall require the filing of an application for
modification of the Zoning Case pursuant to Section 17.34.070 of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
J. The building pad coverage shall not exceed 37.2%.
K. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions of this Variance, pursuant to Section 17.32.087,
or the approval shall not be effective.
L. All conditions of this Variance and Site Plan Review
approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building
or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF JULY, 1991.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DIANE 41AWYER, DEPUTY- CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
PAGE 6
The foregoing,Resolution No. 91-16 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED SITE PLAN AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO THE REAR
YARD SETBACK FOR THE ENCROACHMENT OF A LIVING ROOM ADDITION IN
ZONING CASE NO. 436.
was approved and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting of the
Planning Commission on July 13, 1991 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Lay, Raine and Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Hankins
U / ✓ �� ��
DEPUT' CITY CLERK \
1
ty 0/ ie0tinJ_ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
May 19, 1992
Mr. & Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills,. CA 90274
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS
RESOLUTION NO. 91-16
ZONING CASE NO. 436
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
We would like to remind you that your approvals in the subject
zoning case will expire on July 13, 1992.
You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the
Planning Commission in writing to request an extension prior to
the expiration date.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
r
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
•
c.
410
0/ leoffi j.g INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
CERTIFIED MAIL
July 17, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO ZONING CASE NO. 436
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
This letter is to inform you that the Planning Commission's
decision to approve the subject application will be reported to the
City Council at their meeting on July 22, 1991.
The approval will become effective:
(1) Twenty days after the receipt of this letter if no appeals
are filed within that time period (Section 17.42.140), AND
(2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject Resolution
must be filed by you with the County Recorder (Section
17.32.087).
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 91-16, specifying the
conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the
approved Exhibit A to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed
the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF
ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s)notarized, and forward to:
County Recorder, Room 15, 227 North Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012
with a check in the amount of $ 5.00 for the first page and $ 2.00
for each additional page.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety
Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance
is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required
prior to issuance of building permits are met.
Please feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any
questions.
SINCERELY,
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO. 91-16, EXHIBIT A, AND ACCEPTANCE FORM
cc: MR. RICHARD LINDE, ARCHITECT
GODFREY PERNELL
Mayor
GORDANA SWANSON
Mayor Pro Tem
GINNY LEEUWENBURGH
Councilwoman
JODY MURDOCK
Councilwoman
THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER
Councilman
City
0/ /?Of1fl I INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
June 28, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO ZONING CASE NO. 436
10 Crest Road West (Lot 2-CH)
Request for a Variance to encroach into the rear
yard setback and a modification to a previously
approved Site Plan Review.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Modification
No. 436 was APPROVED by the Plannning Commission at their regular
meeting on June 25, 1991.
The final Resolution and conditions of APPROVAL will be forwarded
to you after they are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman
and City Clerk.
The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City
Council at their regular meeting on July 22, 1991. You should also
be aware that the decision of the Planning Commission may be
appealed within twenty days after you receive the final Resolution
(Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code).
Feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions
regarding this matter.
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: MR. RICHARD LINDE, ARCHITECT
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
cp
O oRO iIt uinq i
o L` INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
_
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
May 23, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: MODIFICATION TO ZONING CASE NO. 436
10 Crest Road West (Lot 2-CH)
Request for a Variance to encroach into the rear
yard setback and a modification to a previously
approved Site Plan Review.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
We have arranged for'the Planning Commission to conduct a field
inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed
project on Thursday, May 30. 1991 at 5:30 PM.
The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of the
Proposed project showing the roof ridge and bearing walls. We have
enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines.
The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any
questions regarding the proposal.
Feel free to call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
FLDTRP/LMU
cc: Mr. Richard M. Linde, Architect
• •
City 0/ _Wills
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX (213) 377-7288
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a
silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the
week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City
Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for
a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber.
Printed boards are not acceptable.
3. Bracing should be provided where possible.
4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be
delineate roof ridges and eaves.
5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to
or twine to aid in the visualization of the
construction.
used to
the wire
proposed
6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete
silhouettes are constructed.
7. If you have any futher questions contact the
Department Staff at (213) 377-1521.
00
91
SECTION
la
Planning
R
City opeolii.9. _JUL
NOTIFICATION LETTER
May 8, 1991
Mr. and Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: Modification to Zoning Case No. 436
10 Crest Road West (Lot 2-CH)
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Frykman:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
Your application for Zoning Case No. 436, a request for a Variance
to encroach into the rear yard setback and a modification to a
previously approved Site Plan Review, has been set for, public
hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting
on Tuesday, May 21, 1991.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling
Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese. Bend Road,
Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend
to present your project and to answer questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City
Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, May 17, 1991. Please arrange to
pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing.
Please call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
NOTIFLET
cc: Richard M. Linde
TO :
•
Ci1y ofi2llin S �a�e
Richard M. Linde & Associates, Inc.
2200 Amapola Court, Suite 200
Torrance, CA 90501
oR
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1621
FAX (213) 377.7288
FROM: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The plan for: A nr000sed modification to Zoning Case No. 436
Applicant: Mr. & Mrs. Karl Frvkman
Address: 10 Crest Road West
(a) Complies with City Zoning requirements
(b) X Needs Variance (Proposed Addition encroaches into
rear yard setback). Contact City for application
and submittal requirements.
(c) Needs Conditional Use Permit
Contact City for application and submittal
requirements.
(d) Needs Site Plan Review
Contact City for application and submittal
requirements.
(e) Other (see below)
4-1-91
Date
Lola Ungar`,,
Principal Planner
410
Ct1 O/ /.Ef/n ill& INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX (213) 377-7288
September 26, 1990
Mr. & Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
RE: ZONING CASE NO. 436:
Request for a Variance to encroach into the rear yard
setbackto construct a residential addition, and Site Plan
Review for proposed residential additions located at 10
Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, Lot 2-CH
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Frykman:
This is to inform you that the City Council, at their meeting
on September 24, 1990, voted to ratify the Planning Commission's
approval of the above referenced planning/zoning case application.
Pursuant to Section 17.32.087, Ordinance No. 207, an Affidavit
of Acceptance form must be executed before the above approval
becomes effective. A copy of the Resolution of Approval, specifying
conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission, is
enclosed for your information. Once you have reviewed the
Resolution of Approval, please complete the enclosed Affidavit of
Acceptance form, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the
Affidavit to the Office of the County Recorder, Room 15, 227 North
Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012, with a check in the amount of
$ 9.00. When the Affidavit of Acceptance has been returned to the
City, duly executed and recorded, the Los Angeles County Department
of Building and_Safety will be notified that a permit can be issued.
Please feel free to call Mr. Ray Hamada, Principal Planner, at
377-1521, if you have any questions.
/jr
Encls.
Very truly,
#441
Hamada
Principal Planner
0 0
Ci 0/ R0f/ Jh/h
July 26, 1990
Mr. & Mrs. Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Subject: ZONING CASE NO. 436
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Frykman:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377-7288
The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of July 17, 1990,
continued the above stated application to an adjourned meeting on
Saturday, August 4, 1990, 7:30 A.M. in order to conduct a field
inspection of the site and surrounding properties. The property must
be prepared to exhibit the proposed project, and the owner and/or
representative should be present. Any further questions, please
contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
kA,AJA
Ray Hamada
Principal Planner
RH:jr
CC: Mr. Richard Linde, Architect
el,, ol,eo suns
TO: !r. Richard Linde
2200 Amapola Court, Ste. 200
Torrance, CA 90501
FROM:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The plan for: Variance and Site Plan Review
Applicant:
Address:
(a)
YY
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377-1521
FAX: (213) 377.7288
- Mr. & Mrs, Karl Frykman
10 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Complies with City Zoning requirements
Needs Variance (
Contact City for application
Needs Conditional Use Permit
Contact City for application
Needs Site Plan Review
Contact City for application
Other (see below)
•
and submittal requirements.
and submittal requirements.
and submittal requirements.
The City has reviewed your application for Variance and Site Plan
Review and has determined that the submittal is incomplete for the
reasons indicated on the attached sheet. Without the indicated
information, your application is subject to rescheduling to the'
August meeting of the Planning Commission. If you have any further
questions, please contact this office.
July 2, 1990
/jr
Attachment
4.4444
Roy Hamada
Principal Planner