471, New garage with relocation of , ApplicationPROPERTY OWNER:
OWNERS ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Mr.& Mrs. Y.N. Cho
20 Portuguese Bend Rd., Rolling Hills
(213) 541-3831
20 Portuguese Bend Dr.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO 58, Rolling Hills Tract
ASSESSORS BOOK NO PAGE PARCEL
AGENT'S NAME: Richard M. Linde AIA & Assoc. Inc.
AGENT'S ADDRESS: 2200 Amapola Ct., Torrance, CA
TELEPHONE NO: 320-8052
**********************************************************************
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review:
Proposed residence remodel and addition.
Proposed new garage and remodeling of existing guest house.
Relocate driveway access from Portuguese Bend Road.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make
an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance
with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the
sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
Proposed remodeling and additions to existing structures shall be
compatiblewith the community and will meet the requirements of the
zoning ordinance.
Site Plan Review
Application -9-
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic
features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature
trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and
knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing
natural features.
Proposed remodel project will not alter drainage courses, land
forms or native and existng vegetation.
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved.
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage
redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization on lots.
Residence remodel will be in the confines of the existing
graded pad. New garage shall require a minimum amount of grading.
New driveway shall follow the natural topography of the site.
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding
native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is
compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community?
Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between
private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
The existing and natural landscaped areas shall be maintained
around the dwelling and throughout the site, as well as preserving
the buffer areas.
Site Plan Review
Application -10-
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot
coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual
amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing
buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
The subject site is over four (4) acres. The proposed areas
of the addition and existing structures shall:bewell within the
allowable lot coverages as the per City ordinances. Proposed
lot coverage will be compatible with neighboring sites.
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the
site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall
be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
Existing setbacks will be compatible with neighboring sites.
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
Proposed project will eliminate one (1) driveway from Portuguese
Bend Road. This should provide a safer automotive circulation
pattern. (See site plan)
Site Plan Review
Application -11-
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
To the best of our knowledge, the proposed pro-iect shall
rlonfnrrajp the California, Environmental Quality Act.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the
facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: //- 4 - 9 /- 7 G`'z'`7� Z--,::::
Signa pre
P
For:
Applicant
Site Plan Review
Application -12-
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
ss
I, MR. & MRS. Y.N. CHO declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and
addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear
on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area
described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the
exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Lot 58 20 Portuguese Bend Rd.
Executed at
this
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
Nov. 4 1991
Site Plan Review
Application -15-
Tnrranr.a
,California,
day of , 19
r SIGNATURE
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of
the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions
enforced by the Rolling Hills Community Association ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are
completely independent and separate. Both must 'be satisfied and
approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in
Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean
or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City
approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has
been fully read and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at Torrance , California
this 4 day of Nov. , 1991.
r By:
By:
Address
City
Site Plan Review
Application -14-
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed at Torrance ,California,
this 4 day of
Nov.
•�-r/Lczj
(address)
1991
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is
signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of
the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of
that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it)
owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge
and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: DATE FILED 1//6/
REPRESENTATIVE: FEE:61-A,G
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: '97�
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: e1/Ji,.
ZONING CASE NO. iv
COMPANY PHONE NO.,( 1
PROJECT ADDRESS:
Site Plan Review
Application -13-
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: �Z��/`//
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE,
LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts,
swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or
an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of
a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover
more than twenty (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that
in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included
within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt
or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the
Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than
thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all
perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet (10') and that
portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway
purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway
which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of
land, and access strip portion of any flag lot.
BUILDING AREAS, EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 179,293 sq.ft. sq.ft. 179,293 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4231 sq.ft. 1769 sq.ft. 6000 sq.ft.
GARAGE To be -483 sq.ft. 1023 sq.ft. 1023 sq.ft.
removed
SWIMMING POOL 800 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 800 sq.ft.
STABLE 1000 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1000 sq.ft.
TENNIS COURT 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 100 sq.ft. sq.ft. 100 sq.ft.
OTHER Guest House 1113 sq.ft. 1523 sq.ft. 2636 sq.ft.
verandas
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 7244 sq.ft. 4315 sq.ft. 11,559 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURE COVERAGE 3.9 %
Site Plan Review
Application -6-
1.9 % 5.8
• •
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREA
POOL DECKING
TOTAL FLATWORK
o TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
(To delete)
5300 sq.ft. 10,200 sq.ft. 10,200 sq.ft.
1000 sq.ft. 1100 sq.ft. 2100 sq.ft.
1500 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1500 sq.ft.
2500 sq.ft. 11,300 sq.ft. 13,800 sq.ft.
. ..4 % 6.3
TOTAL COVERAGE 5.3 %
Site Plan Review
Application -7-
7.7
8.2 % 13.5
COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF
A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING
BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the
"footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and.
other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable
area".
For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as
stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which
declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that
constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion
of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten
percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall
mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average
slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
BUILDABLE AREA CALCULATIONS
TOTAL BUILDABLE PAD AREA 55,000± sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 6000 sq.ft.
GARAGE 1023 sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) 1000 sq.ft.
POOL 800 sq.ft.
OTHER Guest House 1113 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON BUILDING PAD 9936 sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 18 %
Site Plan Review
Application -8-
• •
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
Robert Vargo , declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names
and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they
appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within
the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet
from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
t
Tint-. R. Rnlling Tii11G Trani- M R 7O1l7Q-1;
Executed at
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
Hawthorne ,California, this
4th day of Nov. , 19 91 .
Robert,;Vargo/Westcoast Mapping