Loading...
677, Existing barn requesting mixed, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ ZONING CASE NO. 677 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE (MODIFICATION) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 04 1060529 I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 88-1-RH) CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 677 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE (MODIFICATION) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and corre Signature Name typed or printed 1 Address '2_3 q'o, U 2 l� , a, Rd... City/State LLt -u k.v j LL, e A lb 2,",11 Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On iF}-Ht( /4d (71 personally appeared Signature -W LA Name typed or printed Address XX XX XX XX R12.1 Y fir 3 City/State Rol I13 �►r115 , b2 �i T Recorder's Use Only before me, n Z G52-.12l L51- personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. LOLA FAMA Commission a# 1363957 Notary Public - California Orange County {� RRyComm. Expires Aun 3.2006 f9 Witness by hand a►.officia,,.. al. Signature of Notary 6";"1`"'` '4"''"""`—c-'' ' °`'"SEE'EJIHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • 0.1060529 .,0Nc6dt" RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING STABLE INTO A MIXED USE STRUCTURE AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE INTO THE FRONT SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 677, AT 23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, (LOT 88-1-RH) RIZI. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Dr. and Mrs. Rizi with respect to real property located at 23 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 88-1-RH) requesting a Conditional Use Permit to convert an existing 1,210 square foot stable into a mixed use structure, to be utilized as a stable and office, which will also include a bathroom, tack room, storage room, a loft and a 4-6 feet high storage area below the bathroom and tack room. The existing stable already encroaches into the front setback, and due to its change of use requires a Variance to remain in the setback. The conversion commenced prior to the applicant applying to the City for the CUP and Variance. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the applications on November 18, December 16, 2003, January 20, 2004, February 17, 2004 and at a field trip visit on December 13, 2003. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail and were in attendance. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal, and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. Section 3. In November 2001, the Planning Commission approved the construction of a new 5,200 square foot residence to replace an existing residence, with 600 square foot garage, and a 480 square foot indoor pool. The existing house measuring 3,348 square feet with a 625 square foot garage will be demolished. The applicants have demolished part of the structure and are in their final stages of County review process to obtain grading permits for the new residence. Section 4. The existing 1,210 square foot stable with access is located in the front setback. Records show that a building permit was issued in 1950 for a new two story stable. Neither the City nor the Rolling Hills Community Association (RHCA) has the original elevation or floor plans for the stable. Prior to 1969 there were no provisions in the Zoning Code relating to number of stories for stables. In June of 1969, the Zoning Code was amended to allow lofts above stables, without glazed openings. The RHCA at the same time amended their code, adding a requirement that lofts above a stable may be permitted without glazed openings and requiring that the hayloft plate heights not exceed RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 1 • 11 04 1060529 7'6", whereas the stable could be 8'6" high. According to the applicant, there were windows in the loft area of the original stable. Section 7. Pursuant to Section 17.16.080 Height Limitation, of the Zoning Ordinance "a building shall have no more than one story, meaning no interior habitable space shall exist over other habitable space. For the purpose of this section, interior habitable space includes lofts, mezzanines and storage areas." Paragraph 2 of this Section states that barns or stables may have a loft without glazed openings (windows) and that the loft be limited in use to storage of feed, tack and stable equipment. Section 17.12.080 defines Habitable Space, Interior, as " an area within a building, fully enclosed by walls, windows, doors, a roof or ceiling, and floors, which provides living, eating and/or sleeping quarters. Interior habitable space includes lofts, mezzanines and storage areas". Further, Section 17.16.210A6e, Mixed Use Structures, states that if a mixed use structure includes a stable, a loft area may be constructed only over a stable portion of the mixed use structure. Section 8. The "as built" (converted) floor plan and elevation plan for the stable/office shows a 4 foot to 6 foot high storage area, (not a full story), below that portion of the loft which was converted to a bathroom and tack room. The applicants have also constructed stairs leading from the upper level to the proposed office. The Municipal Code does not set a•minimum height to meet the definition of a story or habitable space, therefore, during the proceedings the Planning Commission determined that the 4 foot to 6 foot storage area below the bathroom and tack room does not constitutes a "story", and could remain. Section 9. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 4 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines, Section 15304 - Minor Land Alteration) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 10. Section 17.16.210(A)(6) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permits approval of a mixed use structure under certain conditions, provided the Planning Commission approves a Conditional Use Permit. The applicant is requesting to convert the existing 1,210 square foot stable to a mixed use structure, which would consist of stable, office, bathroom, storage room, tack room, loft and 4-6 feet storage area below the bathroom and tack room. With respect to this request for a Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the conversion of a stable would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because the use is consistent with similar uses in the community and is a permitted use with a CUP. The area proposed for the conversion already exists and such use will not change the existing configuration and number of structures on the lot. B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures have been considered, and the conversion of the stable to a mixed RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 2 • • 01:0.6O529 5 use will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed use will be nestled behind existing trees and is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the structure will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain, and surrounding residences because the structure, which houses the stable/office and related uses will comply with the low profile residential development pattern of the community and the structure already exists. D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development standards of the zone district, except for the encroachment, as approved by this Resolution, because it is a permitted use under the Municipal Code. E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the Zoning Code because a stable and corral will remain with the conversion. Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Conditional Use Permit for the conversion of the stable to a mixed use structure, subject to the conditions contained in Section 14 of this Resolution. Section 12. Section 17.16.110 requires that the front yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the roadway easement line. The applicants request a Variance to continue the encroachment into the front yard setback with the converted structure. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other'property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is irregular in shape, and is already developed with a structure in this location. The location of the mixed use structure is desired so as to preserve nearly all of the existing open space between the stable/office and the main house. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance will permit the development of the property in a manner similar to development patterns on surrounding properties. The location of the building pad and the development pattern of the remaining structures on site, especially the driveway dictate that RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 3 04 1060529 10 the mixed use structure be located in the front and does not replace the existing structure. C. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed conversion of the existing stable will not be visible to neighbors and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. Section 13. Based upon the foregoing findings and the evidence in the record, the Planning Commission hereby approves a Variance for Zoning Case No. 677 to permit the mixed use structure to remain in the front setback, subject to the conditions specified in Section 14 of this Resolution. Section 14 The Conditional Use Permit approval regarding the conversion of a stable into a mixed use structure approved in Section 11 of this Resolution, and the Variance regarding the location of the mixed use structure approved in Section 13 of this Resolution are subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance, and Conditional Use Permit approvals shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.38.070(A) and 17.42.070(A of the Zoning Ordinance unless otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections. B. If any conditions of approval are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Building Code, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with, unless otherwise set forth in this approval. D. The conversion shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the elevation and floor plan, dated February 12, 2004, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. There shall be no grading for this project and no expansion of the existing foot print of the structure is allowed. F. All conditions of Section 17.210(A)(6) for mixed use structure shall be complied with at all times as follows: a. Vehicular access to the garage or mixed use structure shall not occur within an easement or within twenty-five feet of the side or rear lot line. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 4 • • 04 1060529 b. If a portion of the structure is designed or intended to be used for a garage, that portion shall be separated by an interior common wall from the portion of the structure used as a stable, barn, office, study, recreational use or other use. The interior common wall shall be constructed in the same manner as found in attached townhouse construction. No access from the interior of the portion used for a garage to the interior of the portion used for the other use shall be permitted. c. If a portion of the structure is intended to be used as a stable or barn, that portion of the structure shall be used exclusively for the purpose of keeping horses or other permitted animals. d. There shall be no sleeping quarters, temporary occupancy or kitchen/cooking facilities or equipment in any portion of the detached garage or mixed use structure. e. A loft area may be constructed only over a stable area of the structure, pursuant to this title and the Building Code. f. Where the garage, stable or any other use that is specified on the approved plan is converted to another use, or if the proportions of any approved use is changed without required approvals, the permit granting the mixed use structure may be revoked, pursuant to Chapter 17.58, and the structure shall be removed at the cost of the property owner. g. If any conditions of the permit are violated, or if any law, statute or ordinance is violated, the permit may be revoked and the privileges granted by the permit shall lapse, provided that the property owner has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty days, and further provided that the owner has been given an opportunity for a hearing. G. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water Efficient Landscaping Requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. H. Landscaping shall be designed using native trees and shrubs. The trees, when planted, shall be mature and which at full maturity shall not obstruct views of neighboring properties but, shall obscure the mixed use structure. I. The "as built" conversion shall be reviewed by the Building and Safety Department and the applicant shall obtain all applicable building permits. The conversion shall comply with the County Building Code requirements. J. There shall be no heating vents in the loft area, except that ventilation vents are required. K. There shall be an open area in the floor of the loft to allow feed to be dropped to the stalls below. The stalls shall be developed for the purpose of RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 5 • • 04 1060529 keeping horses or other permitted animals only, and may have a concrete floor with neo-prene pads. L. All conditions of approval of Resolution No. 2001-24, dated November 20, 2001 for the construction of a new single family residence and retention of the 1,210 square foot structure shall be in full force and effect. M. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices. N. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property is not exposed to landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. O. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, storm water pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required. P. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. Q. project site. R. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. S. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tank facilities. T. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and storm water pollution prevention. U. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 6 • +� 04 1060529 V. Prior to granting a final inspection and/or certificate of occupancy, utility lines to the mixed use structure shall be placed underground. W. The City's and the Community Association's requirements related to outdoor lighting, roofing material, if the structure is to be re -roofed, and all other requirements shall be complied with. X. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department and County Building Department for review and approval. If an above ground drainage design is utilized, it shall be designed in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails. Any drainage system shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the function of the drain system. Y. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Variance and Conditional Use Permit approvals, or the approvals shall not be effective. Z. All conditions, when applicable, of the Variance and Conditional Use Permit approvals must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16h-D Y OF MARCH, 2004 ARV 1 y I' TE, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: . k MARILYN KE, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 7 • i0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS) I certify that the foregoing Resolution 2004-09 entitled: 04 1060529 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING STABLE INTO A MIXED USE STRUCTURE AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH WITH THE EXISTING STRUCTURE INTO THE FRONT SETBACK AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 677, AT 23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, (LOT 88-1-RH) RIZI. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on March 16, 2004 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer and Chairman Witte. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. DEPUTY atY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2004-09 8 • • RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 639. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An Application was duly filed by Dr. Rizzi with respect to real property located at 23 Portuguese Bend Road, (Lot 88-1-RH), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review to permit grading and construction of a new single family residence to replace an existing residence. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on September 18, 2001, October 16, 2001, and at a field trip visit on October 8, 2001. The applicant was notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicant was in attendance at the hearings. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a CIass 3 Exemption (The State of CA Guidelines, Section 15303) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting construction of the new house, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The net lot area of the lot is 105,280 square feet. The proposed residence (5,200 sq.ft.), garage (600 sq.ft.), indoor swimming pool (480 sq.ft.), and service yard (96 sq.ft.) will have 6,376 square feet of structures. The lot is also developed with an existing barn (1,210 sq.ft.) and an existing water tank (880 sq.ft.), for a total of 8,466 square feet of structures, which constitutes 8.0% of the net lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. No basement is 4 -A, proposed for this development The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 22,281 square feet, which equals 21.2% of the lot which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is screened from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The disturbed area of the lot will be 39.5%, which is within the 40% maximum permitted. B. The development. plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across the property. The structures proposed will not be visible from Portuguese Bend Road. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot have been considered, and the construction of the new house with indoor swimming pool will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed structure will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs which at maturity will not exceed 25 feet in height, is a sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed structure will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum set forth in the Zoning Code will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves dense brush and shrubs and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. E. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the south of this lot. Grading for this project will involve 1,140 cubic yards of cut and 1,140 cubic yards of fill and will be balanced on site. F. The development plan preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas. G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize the existing driveway approach at the northern portion of the property off Tally Hand Road for access. The existing driveway will be relocated approximately ten feet to the east of its current location and will be restored to its natural condition and will be landscaped. A portion of the existing driveway leading to the stable will also be removed and the area landscaped. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24 PAGE 2 • H. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is exempt. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 639 for grading for a new residence and a new driveway as shown on the Development Plan dated November 6, 2001, and marked Exhibit A, subject to the conditions contained in Section 6 of this Resolution. Section 6. The Site Plan Review approved in Section 5 of this Resolution is subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Section 17.46.080(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended the Site Plan pursuant to the requirements of that section. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated November 6, 2001, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. F. Grading shall not exceed 1,140 cubic yards of cut and 1,140 cubic yards of fill and shall be balanced on site. G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 8,466 square feet or 8.0%. H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 22,281 square feet or 21.2% in conformance with lot coverage limitations. I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 41,546 square feet or 39.5% of the net lot area in conformance with lot disturbance limitations. RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24 PAGE 3 • • J. Residential building pad coverage on the 22,880 square foot residential building pad shall not exceed 6,376 square feet or 27.9%; coverage on the existing 3,240 square foot water tank pad shall not exceed 880 square feet or 27.2%, and 100% coverage on the existing stable pad. K. The indoor swimming pool shall meet all requirements of the Los Angeles County Building Code for indoor pools. The location of the pool shall be as depicted on the Development Plan dated November 6, 2001 and marked Exhibit A. L. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. M. Two copies of landscape plan and a cost estimate for material, labor and irrigation to implement the landscaping plan must be submitted for review by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of building or grading permits. Landscaping for the entire project shall be designed using mature trees, which at full maturity shall not exceed 25 feet in height, and shrubs so as not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but, to obscure the residential structure on site. A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. After the two-year period, upon the request of the applicant, the retained bond will be released by the City Manager after the City Manager or his designee determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. N. The existing driveway to the residence shall be removed and returned to natural state to match the slope of the adjacent area and shall be landscaped. A portion of the existing driveway to the stable shall be removed and also returned to a natural state to match the adjacent slope and be landscaped. Those areas shall be vegetated with native trees and shrubs and shall include, but not be limited to the following species of flora: Toyon, Lemonadeberry, Huckleberry and similar native vegetation. O. The proposed retaining wall along the driveway shall not exceed 3 feet in height at any point. The exisitng five foot retaining wall along the rear yard setback may be replaced, but shall not exceed 5 feet in height at any one point. P. During construction, any soil disturbance shall preserve the existing topography, flora, and natural features to the greatest extent possible. Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24 PAGE 4 i • and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. R. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1996 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles. S. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby roadway easements. T. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. U. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. V. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. W. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. X. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards Ordinance, (Ordinance No. 287). Y. A drainage plan system shall be approved by the Planning Department and County District Engineer, to include any water from any site irrigation systems and that all drainage from the site shall be conveyed in an approved manner. Z. A detailed drainage plan that conforms to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review and approval. AA. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan described in Condition D. ' AB. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24 PAGE 5 Commission shall be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review and approval. AC. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. AD. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Los Angeles County Building and Safety and Public Works Department fees, including Parks and Recreation Fees. AE. The driveway to the property shall be 16 feet in width. AF. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review approval, as required by Section 17.42.070 the approvals shall not be effective. AG. All conditions of the Site Plan approval, that apply, shall be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit_from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2001. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: Y)Z(ot . k,_d•t/ MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24 PAGE 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-24 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL TO PERMIT GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TO REPLACE AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD IN ZONING CASE NO. 639. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on November 20, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioner Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. r £ . t< ,a_I .> DEPUTY C� ITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2001-24 PAGE 7