Loading...
330, Construct a tennis court, with, Staff ReportsCity Council Agenda November 10, 1986 Item #3A TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Terrence L. Belanger, City Manager SUBJECT: Letter from Norman R. LaCaze RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council continue to/maintain the Moratorium on the construction of tennis courts in a uniform fashion. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council receive the letter from Mr. Norman R. LaCaze, regarding exception to the Tennis Court Moratorium, and file it in the appropriate manner. BACKGROUND: The City Council instituted an interim Urgency Ordinance which created a Moratorium on the construction of tennis courts within the City. Subsequently, on September 8, 1986, the City Council extended the Moratorium for an additional 10 months, 15 days. With the institution of a Moratorium, those applications for tennis courts which were then in progress, were placed in abeyance, as regards either their approval and/or implementation. Mr. Norman R. LaCaze was one of those applicants affected by the Tennis Court Moratorium. Also affected were the Hemmats, the Ceasars, and the Lams. Staff plans to have a preliminary draft report available for the Planning Commission at it's November 18, 1986 meeting. A report regarding tennis court policies and procedures should be available for City Council consideration in early 1987. Although it may be considered an inconvenience on the part of those applicants who have been affected by the Moratorium, it is recommended that the City Council apply the affects of the Moratorium uniformly, not only upon those who wish to make an application, but those who have already made application. In very basic terms, the issue is the same. At issue are the policies and procedures which govern the construction of tennis courts within the community. For the purpose of evaluating a Conditional Use Permit for tennis court construction, the matter of a new application or an application in progress is not distinguishable. FISCAL IMPACT: There is none.