528, SFR addition, grading required, Correspondence41,
City opeolliny
NO, 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF, 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
July 25, 1997
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi
701 E. 28th Street, #415
Long Beach, CA 90806
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 528
23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, (LOT 88-1-RH)
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
Dear Dr. & Mrs. Rizi:
This letter is to inform you that it has been one year since , a time extension was
approved by the Planning Commission for Zoning Case No. 528.
Note that these approvals will expire on September 19, 1997 and unless you acquire
permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
you must refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
O4)Q,
LOLA UN AR
PLANNING DIRECTOR
Printed an Flecvcled Pepe,
•0/ Rolling
September 19, 1996
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi
701 E. 28th Street, #415
Long Beach, CA 90806
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 528
23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, ROLLING HILLS (LOT 88-1-RH)
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Rizi:
This letter shall serve as official notification that a one year time extension was
APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on September 17,
1996 for the subject case.
We have enclosed a copy of Resolution No. 96-17, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission.
Note that this approval will expire on September 19, 1997 and unless you acquire
permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
you must refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
SINCERELY,
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
Enclosed: RESOLUTION NO. 96-17
cc: Mr. Robert Mechielsen
.s
Printed on Recycled Paper.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-17
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-12 AND APPROVING AN
EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 528.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi with respect
to real property located at 23 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 88-1-RH), Rolling Hills,
requesting an extension to a previously approved Site Plan Review to permit the
construction of substantial additions to a new single family residence with attached
garage and to permit construction of a new driveway within the lot that requires
grading.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on
September 17, 1996 at which time information was presented indicating that the
extension of time is necessary in order to complete the plan check process with the
County.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 6 of Resolution No. 95-12,
dated September 19, 1995, to read as follows:
"A. The Variance approvals shall expire within two years of the approval
of this Resolution."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No.
95-12 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 1 . I AY OF SEPTEMBER, 1996.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
�-� ..ov J
MARILYN 'KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 96-17
PAGE 1 OF 2
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
)
§§
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 96-17 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 95-12 AND APPROVING AN
EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 528.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
September 17,1996 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommers, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
Q-. k
DEPUTY CIIY"CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 96-17
PAGE 2 OF 2
SEP p 5 1996
• C3TY OF Rc€L'C;° PILLS
ROBERT MECHIELSEN
& ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURAL•DESIGN
.September 4, -1996
To; Lola Ungar
Principal Planner,, City of Rolling Hills
2 Portugeese Bend - Road
Rolling Hills,, Ca 9027,4
Re; Extention Zoning Case 528
For Dr Roger rizi ,
23 Portugeese .Road
Rolling Hills, Ca 90274
Dear Lola,
Enclosed a •check . for $ 200.00.. for the one year extention. to ,the ,
Zoning Case # 528. -
Sincerely,
'Robert. Mechielsen'
604, S. TOPANGA.CANYON BOULEVARD . MALIBU' , CA 90290. . TEL 310:455.7504 FAX 310.455.7051
s •
Ci1y
August 6, 1996
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi
701 E. 28th Street, #415
Long Beach, CA 90806
INCORPORATED JANUARY 21i, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aoi.com
SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 528
23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD, (LOT 88-1-RH)
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
Dear Dr. & Mrs. Rizi:
This letter is to inform you that it has been almost one year since the approval of
Zoning Case No. 528. Approvals will expire on September 19, 1996.
You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning
Commission in writing to request an extension prior to the expiration date. The
filing fee for the time extension is $200 to be paid to the City of Rolling Hills.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
LOLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
Ci1y ol Rolling
CERTIFIED MAIL
September 28, 1995
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi
701 E. 28th Street, #415
Long Beach, CA 90806
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
ZONING CASE NO. 528, 23 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
(LOT 88-1-RH)
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
Dear Dr. & Mrs. Rizi:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 528 was
APPROVED by the Planning Commission and the enclosed resolution was
approved on September 19, 1995 at a regular meeting. The Planning Commission's
decision was reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on September 25,
1995.
The approval will become effective:
(1) Thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution if no
appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code attached), AND
(2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject resolution must be filed by
you with the County Recorder.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 95-12, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A
Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution,
please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the
signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and the Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $7.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional
page.
• •
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue
permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions
of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
SINCEI LY,
OLA UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO.95-12
EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE.
cc: MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE
•
414 / f u
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 528.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application has been filed by Dr. and Mrs. H. Roger Rizi with
respect to real property located at 23 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 88-
RH), Rolling Hills, requesting Site Plan Review for the construction of substantial
additions to a new single family residence with attached garage and to permit
construction of a new driveway within the lot that requires grading.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a public hearing on
July 18, 1995 and August 15, 1995, and at a field trip visit on August 5, 1995.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a
Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Section 17.46.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a
development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval for any grading
requiring a grading permit and before any building or structure may be constructed
or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made
which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the
building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six
month period. The applicants request Site Plan Review to construct a residence,
attached garage, guest house, and swimming pool. With respect to the Site Plan
Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies
with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential
development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The
project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has
a net square foot area of 109,400 square feet. The proposed residence (6,223 sq.ft.),
attached garage (640 sq.ft.), 96 square foot service yard and existing stable (1,210 sq.ft.)
will have 8,169 square feet which constitutes 7.5% of the lot which is within the
maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage
including paved areas and driveway will be 21,857 square feet which equals 20.0%,
which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
PAGE 1 OF 5
•
project is on a relatively large lot with most of the proposed structures located above
and away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site
design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the
lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and
land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is
proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away
from the proposed residence and existing neighboring residences.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to
minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at
the north side (front) of this lot.
D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native
vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan
preserves several mature trees and shrubs.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structures will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further,
the proposed project is designed to minimize grading. Significant portions of the lot
will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across the northerly portions
of the property.
F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated
in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed
project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this
irregular -shaped lot. Grading shall be permitted only to restore the natural slope of
the property.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the
proposed project will utilize the same driveway to Portuguese Bend Road for access.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental
review.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review for construction of a new single family
residence, an attached garage, and stable, and construction of a new driveway within
the lot that requires grading as indicated on the Development Plan dated September
14, 1995, and marked, Revised Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 6.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
PAGE 2 OF 5
Section 6. The Site Plan Review approved in Section 5 of this Resolution is
subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan Review approvals shall expire within one year from the
effective date of approval as defined in Sections 17.46.080.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approvals,
that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file marked, Revised Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided
in these conditions.
E. Grading shall not exceed 1,622 cubic yards of cut soil or 1,622 cubic yards
of fill soil.
F. All retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not be greater
than 5 feet in height at any one point.
G. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 33.5%.
H. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening
surrounding the proposed building pad.
I. Two copies of a landscape plan must be submitted for review by the
Planning Department and include native drought -resistant vegetation that will not
disrupt the impact of the views of neighboring properties prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit. The landscaping plan submitted must comply with
the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance, shall incorporate existing
mature trees and native vegetation, and shall utilize to the maximum extent
feasible, plants that are native to the area and/or consistent with the rural character
of the community.
A bond in the amount of the cost estimate of the implementation of the landscaping
plan plus 15% shall be required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading and
building permit and shall be retained with the City for not less than two years after
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
PAGE 3 OF 5
• •
landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City Manager after
the City Manager determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the
landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and
in good condition.
J. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
K. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
L. Notwithstanding Section 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code,
any modifications to the project which would constitute additional development
shall require the filing of a new application for Site Plan Review approval by the
Planning Commission.
M. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Review, pursuant to
Section 17.42.060, or the approval shall not be effective.
N. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approvals must be complied
with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1995.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
reR N ERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
PAGE 4 OF 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 95-12 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL
TO PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 528.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
September 19, 1995 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine, Witte, and Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 95-12
PAGE 5 OF 5
• •
1754.010
17.54 APPEALS
17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals
A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this
Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall
be filed in writing with the City Clerk.
B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day
after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on
the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as
required by Section 1730.030 of this Title.
C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a
resolution which approves or denies a development
application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a
report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council
may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take
jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City
Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning
Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council
completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions
of this Chapter.
17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal
Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of
the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with
the terms of this Chapter.
17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application
A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a
form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall
be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been
received by the City Clerk.
B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name
and address of the appellant, the project and action being
appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that
the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or
why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by
evidence in the record.
76
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
17.4.030
C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City
Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the
appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is
deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an
amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of
receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal
application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee
will be returned to the applicant.
17.54.040 Request for Information
Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee,
the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to
transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire
proceeding before the Planning Commission.
17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing
Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a
hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing
of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for
the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard
at the same time.
17.54.060 Proceedings
A. Noticing
The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 1730.030 of
this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed:
1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed;
2. The appellant; and
3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written
comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of
the public hearing on the project.
B. Hearing
The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall
consider all information in the record, as well as additional
information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action
on the appeal.
77
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 2993
• •
1734.060
C. Action
The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the
Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the
Council may remand the application back to the Planning
Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall
make findings to support its decision.
D. Finality of Decision
The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny an application shall be final and conclusive.
E. Record of Proceedings
The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a
resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the
applicant or the appellant.
17.54.070 Statute of Limitations
Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by
the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing
is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and
discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of
facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in
any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within
the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure,
Section 1094.6
78
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
• •
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: Recorder's Use
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to:
City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation).
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
§§
ZONING CASE NO.528 S1'1'E PLAN REVIEW •
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
23 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 88-1-RH)
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 528 S1'1E, PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Print Print
Owner Owner
Name Name
Signature Signature
Address Address
City/State City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
State of
) On this the _day of . 19_,before me,
County of )§§
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
❑ personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s)
subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged that
executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
Certified Fee
Special Delivery Fee
Restricted Delivery Fee
Return Receipt showing
to whom and Date Delivered
w
rn Return Receipt showing to whom,
Date, and Address of Delivery
m
3 TOTAL +er!'Y s ees
0
co P
M
E
0
LL
to
a.
P 8 5 2 - 865 1?1
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL
NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL
(See Reverse)
e.Srit to
r. r Pi m . l E'r - t
Street and No.
PPfO., State and ZIP Code �/�
o� UYlC s .x�o�i O9 90 go
Postage
I•ay
I•/�
3 .Yy
r..
ry SENDER:
;e
(7;• Complete items 1 and/or 2 for additional services. I also wish to receive the
• • Complete items 3, and 4a & b. following services (for an extra V
H • Print your name and address on the reverse of this form so that we can `afee): >
� return this card to you. y
> • • Attach this form to the front of the mailpiece, or on the back if space 1. E Addressee's Address ry
'- does not permit. a
N • Write "Return Receipt Requested" on the mailpiece below the article number. 2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
t 0
" • The Return Receipt will show to whom the article was delivered and the date
c todelivered. Consult postmaster for fee.
m 3. Article Addressed to: 4a. Article Number
to a 365 / 7 I
a • Mr' i°0Se-r i'er �� 4b. Service Type
CC
n'70 j ET. 2g-� �..h,.e�r/ #- `j/s El Registered ❑Insured c
N )� 7 Certified ❑ COD
2 �L.0yr^ �4 ..:4 C. ' '.&6 ❑ Express Mail ❑ Return Receipt for
1 a Merchandise o
° 7. Date of Delivery "-
0
° �� 0
Q ..C_ NP . Sae
r,0>.
E 5. Signature (Addressee) 8. Addressee's Address (Only if requested ,)4
and fee is paid) c
I— s
cc 6. S ture_(Agent)
6 �0,)c,
> PS Form 381 1, December 1991 *u.s. GPO: 1903-352-714
co
DOMESTIC RETURN RECEIPT
SOUTH BAY £NGINEERINAOMPANY
(M!AL< fib; WL L� U,�;V� (!toria-1,'1Lii r0 I 141161u ; O114,1Kr
September 15, 1995
Mr. Allan Roberts ,
Chairman Planning Commission
#2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Reference: Rizi Lot Coverage
Dear Chairman Roberts:
111 L:
SE13151995
CITY pF ROLL/NG
MILLS
While revising the Rizi presentation map I noted a discrepancy in the cove age-frgures
The existing garage is to, be converted into living quarters when the new garage is added to the
site. The existing garage square footage was not added into the total for percentage calculations.
It is all under one roof and was missed by everyone. I brought my error to staffs attention and
their suggestion was to show the revised figures on the revised, map.
Even with the addition of the garage space it is still within the guidelines.
I hope this oversight will not present a problem in the approval of the resolution.
Very truly.yours,
SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING COMPANY
Douglas K. McHattie
Vice President
❑ ; 304 TEJON PLACE • PALOS VERDES'ESTATES, CA 90274 • (310) 375-2556 IN L.A. (213) 772-1555" • FAX (310) 378-3816
0 822 HAMPSHIRE ROAD, SUITE H • WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361 • (805) 494'-4499,E FAX (805) 494-4211
Cuy oil R0fA JJ,ff
GODFREY PERNELL, D.D.S.
Mayor
JODY MURDOCK
Mayor Pro Tem
THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER
Councilmember
FRANK E. HILL
Councilmember
B. ALLEN LAY
Councilmember
August 24, 1995
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi
701 East 28th Street, #415
Long Beach, CA 90806
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 528
Request for Site Plan Review to permit the construction of substantial
additions to an existing single family residence with attached garage and to
permit construction of a new driveway within the lot that requires grading
for property at 23 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 88-1-RH).
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Rizi:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 528 was APPROVED
by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on August 15, 1995.
The final Resolution and conditions of APPROVAL will be forwarded to you after they
are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk.
The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular
meeting on September 25, 1995. You should also be aware that the decision of the
Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty (30) days after adoption of the
Planning Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code).
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincerely,
1/14
Craig R. Nealis
City Manager
CRN:mjs
sa
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
July 25,1995
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi
701 E. 28th Street, #415
Long Beach, CA 90806
SUBJECT:
• •
titcd
aiy O/ ie0ii Ii INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
ZONING CASE NO. 528
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi, 23 Portuguese Bend Road (Lot 88-1-RH)
Request for Site Plan Review to permit the construction of substantial additions
to an existing single family residence and attached garage and request for Site
Plan Review to permit construction of a new driveway within the lot that
requires grading for property at 23 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 88-
1-RH).
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Rizi:
We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to
view a silhouette of the proposed project on Saturday, August 5, 1995.
The Planning Commission will meet at 7:30 AM at 6 Meadowlark Lane and then proceed to your
project site. Do not expect the Council at 7:30 AM but, be assured that the field trip will take
place before 8:30 AM.
The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the
following requirements:
• A full-size silhouette must be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project showing the
footprints, roof ridges and bearing walls.
• Stake the limits of the building pad.
• Stake and flag the new driveway within the lot to show the width of the driveway and
the turn area.
The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the
proposal.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
Enclosure: Silhouette Construction Guidelines
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
ly O/ /EoIfini J/I1s INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1521
FAX: (213) 377.7288
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a
silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the
week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City
Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for
a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber.
Printed boards are not acceptable.
3. Bracing should be provided where possible.
4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to
delineate roof ridges and eaves.
5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire
or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed
construction.
6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete
silhouettes are constructed.
7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning
Department Staff at (213) 377-1521.
1.19
•
•
•
SECTION
tit
:
t
PLAN
9
City 0/ RO/fiPZ Jh//
STATUS OF APPLICATION
Ir;.:ORPORATID JANUARY i4, 195.7
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX: (310) 377.7288
July 6, 1995
Dr. and Mrs. Roger Rizi
701 E. 28th Street, #415
Long Beach, CA 90806
SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 528, Request for Site Plan Review to permit the construction of
substantial additions to an existing single family residence and attached garage
and request for Site Plan Review to permit construction of a new driveway
within the lot that requires grading for property at 23 Portuguese Bend Road,
Rolling Hills (Lot 88-1-RH).
Dear Dr. and Mrs. Rizi:
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application
noted above and finds that the information submitted is:
X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be
processed.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is
strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the
processing of the application.
Your application for Zoning Case No. 528 has been set for public hearing consideration by the
Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, July 18, 1995.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall
Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated
representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, July
14, 1995. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
j6/1. ' . -CZG j
LOLA M. UNGAR (
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
@ Printed on F E :yrlrad F',ipoi