Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
433, Construct an attached garage, Application
The undersigned REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW CITY OF ROLLING HILLS TERRY L_. E)11 N Name .523 EAsTF1 E'-c 'DZ.! tl E 1ZoLt-!1SC RILLS LZ13) Street Address Telephone No. (1) (Ware the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of (2) has permission of the owner Legal description of property situated at 1 O Z Lot Tract S'CP ESA' -rr= l t✓ L (D t I . 12:e, (AA 1 LLS , C Street Address Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review. S� t`1GL-E "F'/NMtc-`? S © TT AC 1 EO tzkre.psco6 Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance to the below criteria: Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the zoning ordinance and surrounding uses? YE , SIE6 is CA M PA-r ISLE . S 1 11/41A Le s7-0, a `? Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surroundingnative vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Y 5 . V/©c%S L' Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses. coMT P-oc..c _. 41> - '_ >E✓ELD M 6-MT. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. S (Tt i S &iECL SE-Pgie /-k r O r 2ar‘A A&j &. N F--r1 ye PL. t NX f LP �619 To SO 1l._E me MT EX ' STI Does the site development plan substantially preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. V►©dsc_.y t EV6L P6-0 Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. yes Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? • Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? ' b.k.e FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: City of Rolling Hills OWNER'S DECLARATION I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. /j Executed at - // a - 1i 4 - this 36 day of 472i lZ-- , California, 19 9 6% V /'(Add�cess _ 9 NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. FORMS ISSUED TO: NAME FILED 51Z-1 19 go ORGANIZATION FEE / i 00 JOB ADDRESS RECEIPT NO. 38 H.N.M. BY: pECISiON OF PLANNING COMMISSION The action of the Planning Commission will be final unless within twenty (20)'days following the notice to the applicant of the decision, an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk by: A. The applicant; H. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record prior to the final vote of the Planning Commission on the matter and who, in addition, received or was entitled to receive the written notice specified in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Section 17.40.060; or C. The City Council, upon the affirmative vote of three members of the Council. In order to obtain a building permit, it will be necessary for the applicant to sign a copy of the findings that they understand and accept the conditions of approval. • • CKLIST TOR PLAN SUBMITTAL (con't) 17. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot within the area defined by the required minimum setbacks that has an average slope of ten (10%) percent or less. If there is not existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten (10%) of less. COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGX CITY OF ROLLING HILLS LOT COVERAGE .(Title 17) Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portionof any flag lot. BUILDING AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL CALCULATIONS NET LOT AREA 54, 1 0 (o sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. RESIDENCE 1 / to $ sq. ft. (o V l (o sq. ft. sq. ft. GARAGE q. 5 1 sq. ft. 71160 sq. ft. sq. ft. SWIMMING POOL sq. ft. (944) sq. ft. sq. ft. STABLE ,�, sq. ft. % Op sq. ft. • sq. ft. TENNIS COURT SE! sq. ft. SERVICE YARD sq. ft. sq. ft. g sq. ft. 9 to sq. ft. sq. ft. ITHER sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. TOTAL SQUARE FEET 1315 11 L 0 % STRUCTURE COVERAGE 4. `L % 14 • $ >RIVEWAY 4595 sq. ft. 2.15i5 sq. ft. sq. ft. 'AVED WALKS AND PATIO%A1j sq. ft. 1 e 01 sq. ft. sq. ft. <OOL DECKING sq. ft. 1 4108 sq. ft. sq. ft. TOTAL SQUARE FEET SO 15 c 5 i 0 FLATWORK COVERAGE q,Z t 10,t $ % %TOTAL COVERAGE 13%4 % 2.4,$ % % • • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASF, CERTIFIED PRQPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) I, SGe'T'T L IV!MGSTot 1, , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at F. V. G • Conditional Use Permit Variance site Plan Review Zone Change ,California, this ..,...._.,....__day of /-kPT!ll_. , 191b. ignature MLW9-16A* • • (rev'd 1980) APPENDIX B ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM (Initial Study) Date Submitted: No. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name •and address of developer or project sponsor: 7-6-ER V G E P/A/E" . ,58 ,c ifl, 2/) ,'oGG/,e ,/G . C4. �/oZ74 2. Address of project: 5l e-'4bPl05, eeLL ktLL_S, cA Assessor's Block and Lot Number 7S 7 - DD¢-D/0' 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: .1) k' QUID 1-1 P�'t"Tlr; 4 13I\ F (E6RI cn GoRF 304 Tc Sow -pi_ , P. V. E. ) CA � Z13) 37 5- z SSA 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: L.A. �c.l NTt/ -- 5. Existing zoning district: 6. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): r✓� t d t✓ ,�1 � (At PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size: 14 2-(e) PG . 8. Square footage: 9 4. Z O 6, 9. Number of floors of construction: c04. . S T©P_L? MLW9-17A* 10. Amount of off-street parking provided: A!/A 11. (Attach plans.)' 12. Proposed scheduling: N44 13. Associated projects: AlO/t/e- 14. Anticipated incremental development:• it///% 15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected: /WA 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: /1///9 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: itl�i9 18. If institutional,lindicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: /09 MLW9-18A • • 19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: ,V€ t/c AEEQtj,',e ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 20. On a separate page, describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. 21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity. of land use, and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 22. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? X b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? sC SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING COLORATION • LEVINE 20. The site is developed; a single family house with detached garage is located near the westerly portion of the lot. The lot slopes gently to the northeast down to Eastfield Drive. 21. The site is in the RAS-1 zone, surrounded by single family homes. Native trees,bushes and wild grasses are growing sparsley. A large portion of the lot is taken up with pavement for the driveway, entrance and breezeway. A three foot cut exists around the driveway. This is held in place by a P.V. stone rubble wall. There was no evidence of any animal use. The site is over two thirds surrounded by street. It can be assumed, though, that skunks, possum, racoons and gophers that are indigenous to the area are present. 22c. A slight amount of grading will take place in order to locate the new residence, this will result in minor changes of slope to the existing site. 24b. The house and decking for the pool will be larger than existing. An insignificant amount of additional water will flow across the site due to less absorbtion. SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING CcORATION LEVINE 20. The site is developed; a single family house with detached garage is located near the westerly portion of the lot. The lot slopes gently to the northeast down to Eastfield Drive. 21. The site is in the RAS-1 zone, surrounded by single family homes. Native trees,bushes and wild grasses are growing sparsley. A large portion of the lot is taken up with pavement for the driveway, entrance and breezeway. A three foot cut exists around the driveway. This is held in place by a P.V. stone rubble wall. There was no evidence of any animal use. The site is over two thirds surrounded by street. It can be assumed, though, that skunks, possum, racoons and gophers that are indigenous to the area are present. 22c. A slight amount of grading will take place in order to locate the new residence, this will result in minor changes of slope to the existing site. 24b. The house and decking for the pool will be larger than existing. An insignificant amount of additional water will flow across the site due to less absorbtion. ' MLW9-19A* • i f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 23. Air. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? YES MAYBE NO X b. The creation of objectionable odors? X c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 24. Water. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? X g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? MLW9-20A* YES MAYBE NO h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to water -related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? aC j. Significant changes in the temperature, flow, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 25. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and of plants? b. A reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 26. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 27. Noise. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? -5- X MLW9-21A* b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 28. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 29. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alter- ation of the present or planned land use of an area? 30. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? >t b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or up- set conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emer- gency evacuation plan? 32. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,'or growth rate of the human population of an area? 33. Housing. Will the proposal af- fect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? >C 34. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? )4 MLW9-22A* • • YES MAYBE NO d. klterations to present patterns of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? )C e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? '` f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? )( 35. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental services? 36. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use -of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 37. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications systems? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? -7- X MLW9-23A* 38. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to poten- tial health hazards? 39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal re- sult in the creation of an aesthet- ically offensive site open to public view? 40. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 41. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeological site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthet- ic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural •values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 42. Mandatory Findings of Significance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal commun- ity, reduce the number or restrict YES MAYBE NO . • MLW9-24A* • the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate impor- tant examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term environ- mental goals? (a short term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, defin- itive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) YES MAYBE NO c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate re- sources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the ef- fect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause sub- stantial adverse effect on human be- ings, either directly or indirectly? CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor- mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability., and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date /1 2.1) lqgU , •Mom%45.° Signature) For /5I2 (Applicant)