646, Construct a new SFR with modif, ApplicationPROPERTY OWNER:
OWNER'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS:
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
Ro c C c7 S
5Co Ccas-r5.
(310 ? - G 6 73
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1 O 2-
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.15 Col PAGE O 4 PARCEL IS
AGENT'S NAME: O L..-co Eta G ttii l:.'E.t21 GA
AGENT'S ADDRESS: `10 7 S tL) Gtz cJ P U R C2 , I I , ly . ca 2. 7 4
TELEPHONE NO:
(7431c1 (F.,4.4.-GpstC7
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including What aspects of the project require a Site ,Plan
Review:
Ni�.v) \\(,�,t_C�
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage:
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
GJ i rrGi L.E.F AM. I La k-k O tul. tE: — RA) C {-t ' i c) L E..
G.6..tr co-rt ,(.ct.L rtzor1/4/t.
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation,mature trees, drainage courses, and land
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
►Y�� \-1 c tart c. LA CC-. C.. K t s i t Ar-/ t to it -le
SAt•e(t . Lo c ca Ttc��J
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading
and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be
rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect
drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading
and proposed minimization on lots.
k/ G t24 t. 6s G-t
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
C�ct5-rtti�c,. LAalnSGnr't C-t ,)lLL l o ct-IAtoGt(
• •
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots.
t= vi NCG. Re. v L. D
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimumsand more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where
necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the
existing setbacks of neighboring properties.
Va G2tri Ll T TClaAa)CIE p T t1C„ StTC
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data,
landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas.
V" C l 1 A fJ C E
H. Does the site development plan confomt with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
t Q FF'ECT
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date: 12-ko -O\
Ocuee-t, //,/jiL
Signature
For: 120 55 Cos��L
Applicant
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at Kn L L--/A-117
this
day of cf 4 A)aA !z4)
By:
By:
S L�fST G0
Address
, California,
,200Z
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed. in .California. If
this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary
Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized
by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that
the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and
belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: ' = RU S S _ C o S CPS _ DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: no u e MS I4 AT r u u FEE:
COMPANY NAME: 13 o t_-rca til CA t Q tAc t RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
`7 0 7 c- S P U i; (QS) ZONING CASE NO:
R ,1-1. C . C a_, C) O 2.14 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. (310)'S 4-4 - (a O to
PROJECT ADDRESS: S Co E. e•=1't= tc,,,L_p
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent
and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop
property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or
ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood.
Executed at
this % S di
D 4-/,-) (-, /-/f Z-L- j , California
day of dl-1 AA} /2 41 , 200 2 .
By:
` 6 zL715 /� /C zD
Address
City
DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS S to
APPLICANT C C7 c= R
BUILDING AREAS
NET LOT AREA
BUILDING PAD(S)
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL/SPA
STABLE
RECREATION COURT
( 1
SERVICE YARD
OTHER.
NEW BASEMENT AREA
(Volume to be included in grading quantities.)
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
EXISTING
42, 24-0 sq.ft.
15.9 4 4. sq.ft.
2.000 sq.ft.
4-62
TOTAL STRUCTURES
% STRUCTURAL
COVERAGE
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE
PROPOSED TOTAL
42, 240 sq.ft. 42. 24-o sq.ft.
15_944 sq.ft.. 15.94-4 sq.ft.
S89.1 sq.ft. 5891 sq.ft.
sq.ft. 945 sq.ft. 945 sq.ft.
sq.ft. sq.ft. — sq.ft.
sq.ft. 4 5 O sq.ft. 4-5 0 sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
2 SS $ sq.ft.
6.1 %
16.0 %
DRIVEWAY 2.88 0 sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS
POOL DECKING
oft
9 O sq.ft.
sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK .3840 sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE 9,.1 %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE !0 39 sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE 15. 2 %
sq.ft.
!o sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
/7.5 %
46.3 %
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
/ 7._ 5 %
46.3 %
3470 sq.ft. 3470 sq.ft.
141.0 sq.ft. 1410 sq.ft.
sq.ft. — sq.ft.
4 880sq.ft.
II.6%
12,2�2 sq.ft.
29.0%
4880 sq.ft.
1 I. %
12,2b2. sq.ft.
29,0 %
2.680 sq.ft.
DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 56 E.46 % l"'/ G= G ,9
APPLICANT G 0 S L Q.
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
EAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA - / 5. 9 4.4 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE S$9 / sq.ft.
GARAGE 946 . sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) ¢50 ' sq.ft.
POOL
RECREATION COURT
l 1 sq.ft.
OTHER S,,q,QO 96 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 73 8 2 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 46.3 %
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 0 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
I ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.2
BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
sq.ft.
1 •
£1f,f 0/ I�O`LLilQ L`I!6 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
Date Filed Zoning Case No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s) Q055 C v 5E Q Tel. (3/0) 5 44 G 6 73
Address
56 EAS % IC/CLO
2. Legal Owner(s) 45 4%361/4-- Tel. ( )
Address
3. Project Address f S (aCb o V G
Assessor's Book No. 7 5 6 7 - 0 4 1 8 Lot No. ( 0 Z
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
C Lot A,? er a 4.. E 5 Co. [3LQ c-r •t. S P►F-e, re)
5. Existing zoning district R A S -
6. Proposed project/use of site SC-'A ?AiCZGSto
PROJECT DESCRIPTION.
7. Site size . S c ,
8. • . Net lot area 42. 2.40 . "Net Lot Area" means.the total area included within the lot lines of
the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement
plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement;
(b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or
driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag
lot."
9. Total square footage of structures 73 82.
10: • Number offloors of construction 0 NE.
11. Basement square footage 2. 4, B 0
I-1
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
Printer.' an Recycled Pape
• •
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 12.2_6 2. S
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? A LL
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? A LL.
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? %tc,
16... Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? i'.\) O
.17. • Driveway Access and Parking:
a Is a new driveway accessway proposed? 'y V (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 0IJ C. Proposed?
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission).
c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? 2 0 Proposed?
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%?
(Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required).
Existing? `/c_ 5 Proposed?
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 2 " f o Proposed?
(Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission).
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet
current driveway access requirements? t) 0
Explain
g. Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is
located? tJ o
Explain
h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? hl 0
Explain
i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or
less? VG. S Stable and corral average vehicular access slope 1 0 0,0 .
j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? VC- S With guest house a minimum of 3 cars?
18. Grading quantities'shall be balanced. Amount cut (go l C) . Amount fill G. ( c
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities).
19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance),
any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces
will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet ) Fa% I CEO ;Percentage of Net Lot Area 3 8 Afo .
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet SS 9 1
• March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
l-2
• •
21: If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city .or regionally oriented,.
square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
t�l A
22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
A
24. Attach plans.
25. Proposed scheduling. 2 U 0 Z
26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
GJrre. PLAtI NCie0 W6t•'tt=
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
V(F.,. D PG.. ) v.) -r t1 A4 Ci�Ct' r, siC-+ S siJC'-tu
f= /a M t n.' 17 L.) tE.. LL t t%i &-t C= u l_ A n.) f, 1 C7
o,•A G. P L A Nt) r TD
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-3
28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs
photos will be accepted.
29. Is the proposed project consistent with:
City of Rolling Hills General Plan
Applicable Specific Plan
City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance
South Coast Air Quality Management Plan
Congestion Management Plan
Regional Comprehensive Plan
30. Have any of the following studies been submitted?
Geology Report
_ Hydrology Report
_ Soils Report
_ Traffic Study
_ Noise Study
Biological Study
_ Native Vegetation
Preservation Plan
_ Solid Waste Generation Report
_ Public Services/
Infrastructure Report
1-4
on plants and animals and any cultural,
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
.) and scale of development (height,
of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
7
No
Historical Report
Archaeological Report
Paleontological Study
Line of Sight Exhibits
Visual Analysis
Slope Map
Fiscal Impact Analysis
Air Quality Report
Hazardous Materials/
Waste
N/A
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources
show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls
outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based o n
project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive
receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the
checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant
with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is
substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to
a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from
Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify
the following:
a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis.
c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared
or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where
the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-5
Issues:
I AESTHETICS — Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 ❑ CEr
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but ❑ 0 0 VI
not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 FJ
quality of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial Tight or glare which 0 0 ❑ IV
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the ,
area?
jI AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 0
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or 0 0 0 12(
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a 0 0 0
Williamson Act contract?
c) Involve other changes in. the existing environment 0 0 0
which, due to their location or nature, could result in
conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
ICI,. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance
criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the following determinations.
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-6
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 0 0
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of 0 0 0
any criteria pollutant for which the project region is
non -attainment under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard (including releasing
emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
0 0
0 ❑ 4 t'
�. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES, -- Would the project::
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or 0 0 0
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat 0 0 ❑ Er
or other sensitive natural community identified in local
or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service? —/
c) Have a substantial adverse effecton federally 0 0 ❑ Lv
protected wetlands as defined by. Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? —/
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 0 Ce
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife
corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? /
e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting 0 0 0 12
biological resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 0 0 ❑
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state
habitat conservation plan?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-7
V CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 0 0 0 13/*
of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the
State CEQA Guidelines?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the 0 0 0 L3
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 0
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 0 [lam
outside of formal cemeteries?
VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or
death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated ❑ ❑ . 0
on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? - 0 0 0 C�J
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ 0
liquefaction? /�
iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 —El/
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the Toss of topsoil? 0 0 0 H
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, 0 0 0 t
or that would become unstable as a result of the
project, and potentially result in on- or off -site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 0
1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life and property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the 0 0 0
use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-8
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area/
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including
where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
❑ 0 0 Gi
❑ ❑ 0 13/
❑ ❑ ❑ 13
❑ 0 0
❑ ❑ ❑ i
❑ ❑ ❑ 12
❑ ❑ 0 lEr
❑ 0 0 111
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-9
KJj. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
--Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 0 ❑ C9'
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or 0 0 0
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able
level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 0 @'
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or areas including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner which would
result in flooding on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed
the capacity of existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
❑ ❑ ❑ l�
❑ ❑ ❑ Q�
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ li
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 ❑ 0 I21'
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation
• map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 0 0 IZ(
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 0 0 0 i
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0 0 IV
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
I-10
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
0
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including but not limited to the general plan,
specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 ❑ 0 fir
natural community conservation plan?
0
jIERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
0
❑ I.Y
0 0/
❑ 0 0 1E(
Xi. NOISE— Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 ❑ [�
excess of standards established in the local general
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ 0 0 13'
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? �/
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 0 0 LK
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 0 Cd
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 0 0 Cd'
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 12"
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
Cll. POPULATION AND HOUSING— Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either 0 0
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating 0 ❑ 0
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
ZCI�I . PUBLIC SERVICES
0
0 0 0 Q/
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection? 0 0 0 Gel
Police protection? 0 0 0 137
Schools? 0 0 0
Parks? 0 ❑ ❑ d
Other public facilities? 0 0 0 12f
XIV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated?
0 0 ❑ Q
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or 0 0 0
require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect
on the environment?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-12
?SM. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC — Would the
project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the
street system (Le., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections?
0
0 E4
b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 0 GI/
service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways? /
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0 Q
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due.to a design feature 0 0 0 a
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 V
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 li
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 ❑ [if
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Item XVI, UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS —
Would the project: �/
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 ty
applicable Regional Water Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ 0 0 EV
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new stormwater
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,
the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the 0 0
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
❑ ❑
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-13
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 0 0 ❑
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the provider's
existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity
to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ [�
XVII,, MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCR
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0 0 0
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 0 [�
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have environmental effects which 0 0 0 19
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-14
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on
these lists.
Date 12-10-Q1
Jam e 2/-44r_
Signature Q
For R o s Co cm
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 12-10-o1
For
Signature
Ross
Applicant
1-16
Co5C'R
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
LEVINE RESIDENCE FOR 56 EAS'IN'IELD DRIVE
Approved by City Council action in 1990
Gross lot area 66,934 sq. ft.
Net lot area 54,760
Buildable area 17,870
Approved Development:
• Residence 5,590
• Garage 760
• Pool & Spa 648
• Stables 200
• Service Yard 96
Total Structures 7,294 sq. ft.
Buildable Area Coverage 35.53%
Disturbed Net Lot Area 90%
COSER RESIDENCE FOR 56 EAS'1'1IELD DRIVE
Buildable Area 15,944 sq. ft.
Proposed Development:
• Residence .5.891 sq. ft.
• Garage 945
• Stable 450
• Service Yard .96
Total Structures 7,382 sq. ft.
Buildable Area Coverage 46.3%
Disturbed Net lot Area 38.0%
It Should be noted that, whereas the percentage of structural coverage of the buildable area for the
approved Levine residence is smaller than for the current proposal, the buildable area for that project was
larger than indicated in our application. The larger buildable area was accomplished by far greater net lot
disturbance... 90% as opposed to our proposed 38%.
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPARISON CHART
LOT NO. GROSS LOT AREAS AREAOF EASEMENTS RATIO
(A) and SETBACKS (B) (B/A)
22 60,200 sq ft. 44,200 73%
23 71,046 31,046 43
24 82,938 34,138 41
25 65,950 34,750 53
26 66,342 29,942 45
30 70,654 45,054 64
31 60,331 32,731 54
32 58,283 30,283 52
33 56,410 32,410 57
100 57,325 32,525 57
101 50,922 31,322 62
103 50,573 34,973 69
Average Ratio
Subject Property (Corer):
56%
102 66,995 42,035 63%
• 66,995 sq.ft. x 56% neighborhood average percent of gross lot area devoted to easements and
setbacks) _ 37, 517 sq. ft.
• 66,995 - 37, 517 = 29,478 sq.ft available as buildable area ( subject to requirements of 10% maximum
slope).
• 29,478 sq. ft. x .30 = 8,843 sq. ft. max. (subject to grading limitations *)
• Current proposal = 7,382 sq. ft. as follows:
Residence 5,891 sq. ft.
Garage 945
Stable 450
Service Yard 96
Because most of the lower portion of the subject property has a slope of 10% to12 % the cut / fill required
to bring this area into compliance with the 10% requirement is very shallow (24" or less in depth) and
almost does not qualify as grading. No large slopes would be created and the site would appear
undisturbed.
03/16/2002 14:22
„„„
/" hag IS
t l36. 4c.
1 _
*4 VS 471
7607 `14138
MAGAUGD
i.c: / u he
PAGE 01
r�r
i� 9?
i,.dgme. / IdG#.dfr4
iup
\ 208?Ar. a. • �,1 /-h
r
• r
/12 /
I,?$ Ac.
//