596B, Redo existing driveway and wal, Application0
0
MAGAUGD
U1/ 4'Ui001ulv2 1;15 FAX
4-0728$ CITY OF ROLLING HIO PAGE 01
@Joo3
Czi `Rolling .J�clL
INCORPORATIO JANUARY 21., 1957
PROPERTY OWNER: Q . i Ct3 c� cal v�i o t_F Eat, 11,E
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 54C ,A znU11 Aj.‘i1u-ttAc, 7 01a 90744_ _
TELEPHONE NO.: (" ta) f3 3 0- 8 z Z cp
PROPERTY ADDRESS: lra O . A c T t- I Q,Lt
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 0 4- A E 1 Q�
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 15 CQ 7 PAGE(70 a PARCEL 0 2
AGENTS NAME: "Bo or) c•) Cz 1 E (?_ 4 OCi
AGENTS ADDRESS: 7 0 7 tt-V ca. E P 0 R 9.0 9 0 Z 7 4
TELEPHONE NO.: (310) S 4-- 4- (c 0 l O
YARIalk'ri' NO. 2 PORTUOUESE REND ROAD
REQUEST FOR HEARING ROLLING NUR cols. 9o2r4
1310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377.72ee
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project
require a Variance.
QE `7' Ate C pc'T t1,)C, asaigNA4c) 171. -1AT 110 c E AOS F tilt_. c' er
lCD At ex1'5TrniC-, G,rARAG C. TLAcarl.s AQC- Lxc', i,,CC
1 t-:t l='D(2E O C= TtoS "O Rt• Ev30'1) TT 1-1O1-0 Psf1c-14._ i1
Di RT.
tL.IGSE NAM t-405 ((QE.. 441.i ,4ta 71-1L 71 rAC O �eri'.rcc.
Criteria to be satisfied for pant pf Variance
Such change is based upon the following described e:ceepdonal or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
' %a 714ty is Atl G�tt� �w�Ch CootTt(')!.i ((c,t1 5) T;-hAT l-lA
c-_ D c 't Naafi E ay. D 1 r- F t cyU LT
io Vel AOQ '41 r-L jz
07/19/2001 20:02 7607714138 MAGAUGD PAGE 02
07/24/01 TUE 11:16 FAX 310 41117288 CITY OF ROLLING MIIII1
e004
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property's located because
1 4-1 to0T A et-4A4.6il [?pQj.. 1tetPRca►lEMeFite.
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check: payable to: THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS.
07/19/2001. 20:02
7607714130
•
MAGAUGD
PAGE 04
BEOUEST FORBEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
PROPERTY OWNER: r6 0 •\l o t_ v EA Da
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 8 4 Co•w.a►TgoASIE. tc..rIrNci-r-ciA Ca., c)O'T44
TELEPHONE NO: C3 i o) 8 3 0- 8 2. 2 Co
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: (o 0 EA+ w
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. t d 4 A dk, t
ASSESSORS BOOK NO.15 to 7 PAGE O04 PARCEL 0 22.
AGENTS NAME: 2, c., LT o eJ E tJ t tJ .t=V2 AC,
AGENT'S ADDRESS: ?O 7 py2 CS a►o 2 74
TELEPHONE NO: (3 t o ) 4 A- Co U 1 O
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the r• „r.,.a.,3 project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan
Review:
X t� i c�1C:c txsocv3 Al) 4LL.' ARC PAR.:. 1J1 01
_UAL. c. F 112 Q,1,1 T OP. t ,,,'C c5 c i
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: 7 2 Q
07/19/2001 20:02 760771413E MAGAUGD PAGE 05
• •
,SITS PLd►N REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below.
A. Is the project car tpaeble with the General .Jan, the Zoning Ordinance and ssmosuedmng uses? Main how it
compare to the deers, setbacks and other eharacterisdes of neighboring houses.
,EX,' T,s'ty h/eti — 772 E'A)4 s 406s gr
&) 17ii A ./ z7 i Ti (2A) F Aa a 4 y,' yrAi 34
B. How does the project preserve and bete&are into the site design, to the mmdmwn driest fearibl, cdsting natural
topographic features of the lot including su roundterg nadva vegetation, .mature trees, drainage causer, and lend
forms (such as hillsides and knoiir)? Explain how the project preservers and integrates caging natural features.
RA $ ♦e., 5' Al AjA cr.—IA,7/./," _ .obi ,'
j lam' A Q,L) , Ti o ,t) c I Ree A 4
C. Flow does the site development plan follow naAvel contours of the site to minimise routing? Extensive grading
and reccntouring of existing terrain to masdmixe buildable area shall not be approved Graded slope& shall be
rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect
drainage flow unless into an existing drainage cause. Explain the nature aad'extent of the impact of wading
and proposed minimgation en lots.
,� Lr A' /.3 D Gr
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhancer the ntrol character of the cornmuniry? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition mono between private and public areas. Explain bow the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and MVOs buffers.
F ':s iQ,Pci✓ re_ 4/ erA
07/19/2001 20:02 7607714139 MAGAUGD PAGE 06
• •
E. How does the site deveiopnent plan paves the mood end andsveloped hate of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend npon the existing buildable area ref the lot Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares wdth let arferage square footap and peroeatsget os neigliboring lots.
2 G t s .,t gl,' , ? ,�,-//� �-, /e'%Q p /N r L.4 iQ6
P. Is the site development plan hannanlosu in scale and meus with the site, the natural tenisin and swrrrundfrng
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded .as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed when
necessary to assure prtsitastionaiity and openness. Explain bow the proposed project setbacks compare with the
ardating setbacks of neighboring . .
&iV &—A A t L r 1 / lE 5cr r d c tip l) ,42'Po Sa'O
// ' ' e_e& A . 94 ' 'O4 r iQ T�Ak A Sd.4Re igei 4
G. Is the site development pram smithy and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehteleat Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data,
landscaping and other on -site parking or storage seem
$A Me S ��xls rr'�tld'
Does the site development plan .conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the projsxt impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
/✓o F'-c"r �� T
07/19/2001 20:02 760771413E
•
MAGAUGD
•
PAGE 07
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date: 7 - 2 4- - O t
Signatur
For: (ffc7ca,)w0Lc- EM tl
Applicant _.
DATE? 3/-0/ ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 6 0 L' - 5 7 7 L D
APPLICANT /3 v /3 11)0 c.r- c r AJ DE A)
CALCULATION OF. LOT COVERAGE
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 1 3 3. '5 2.0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) 2 Co 3 2 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 2 6. 3 2 0 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 1 2 O 0 sq.ft. 3 2 G eo sq.ft. 4-4 (o Co sq.ft.
GARAGE 4 8 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 48 0 sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. S 7 8 sq.ft. 5 7 s sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft. 1 2O 0 sq.ft. 1 2 0 0 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft. sq.ft:....... sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 9 Co sq.ft. sq.ft. 9 G sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. .. sq.ft.
NEW BASEMENT AREA 3 2 6!o sq.ft.
(Volume to be included in grading quantities.)
TOTAL STRUCTURES
% STRUCTURAL
COVERAGE
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE
DRIVEWAY
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS
POOL DECKING
(7 7 Co sq.ft.
1,33 %
044 sq.ft.
S.% 8 %
(c 8 2 0 sq.ft.
5.11 %
19.2 % %
5 4S 0 sq.ft. 2 8( sq.ft. 13 2 6 0 sq.ft.
0 `7 4 sq.ft. % 1 20 sq.ft, ........ 4 l c) 4...sq.ft.
sq.ft. 6 0 sq.ft. SG 0 sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK G 5 14 sq.ft. .3 60 sq.ft. 10, 4 3 4 sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK , ' (
COVERAGE 4,8 8 % 1.01 % %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE 8 2 ci o sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE G. 21 %
l 4,404 sq.ft. 17, 254 sq.ft.
/0.s0 % I2,92 %
•
DATE?' % I- U I ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS Co 0 L_ T r l EL.. 0
APPLICANT ¶ 0 0 LFt =et D C. nl
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 1 s , l coo. sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4 4 (o % sq.ft.
GARAGE 4 0 sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL `D '� sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER ' E CaQ t CE YAW Co sq.ft.
5� �O
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 12-A sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 0 h %
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA S l to ° sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) 1 'L 0 0 sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
12 U '0 sq.ft.
(4.7 %
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent
and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop
property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or
ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood.
Executed at
this day of
By:
By:
Address
City
, California
, 20
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at
this r2/il day of
By:
By: dee<ttr-
‘ D /zi�,sl-�- /% 0 .off
Address
.r/
71 � 9027V
, California,
,20pf
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If
this application is signed outside of Califomia, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary
Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized
by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that
the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and
belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT:
ido G ��v�, DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: FEE:
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
ZONING CASE NO:
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. ( )
PROJECT ADDRESS:
City leollinf
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Date Filed (I UL 5J 3 / 2 U U / Zoning Case No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s) /3 IA) CL /_ �A)%JL i1) Tel. (3/0 ) 83 0 - 8 2 26
Address 846 idA % 6 O/J Ai'/r- . IA) IL,'i,/')Ci ion Ca, 90 7 4-4
2. Legal Owner(s) A- 5 , -/3 /J I/G Tel. ( )
Address
3. Project Address 60 6A J i /= /L LID
Assessor's Book No. 7 ri 6 7 - Od 4 - 0 2.2 Lot No. /044 $' /O 5
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
C, A, 4/ Los AA/etc-cgs Ca. 13z.o /4/=2:7"
5. Existing zoning district RA 5 - /
6. Proposed project/use of site S //y,% i G & Af:,4 /✓/ /[. y /- 5 //7G A)c _
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size / 55 2. S co 6.c.' 3,
8. Net lot area /3.3, 62.a. "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of
the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement
plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement;
(b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or
driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag
lot."
9. Total square footage of structures 68 2 0
10. Number of floors of construction 0�t%L-r
11. Basement square footage
1-1
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
Pnrited on Recycled Paper.
• •
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage / 7, 2 64.
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls?
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof?
�C 5
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? A/O
17. Driveway Access and Parking:
a. Is a new driveway accessway proposed? NO (Requires Traffic Commission Review).
b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 2 Proposed?
(Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission).
c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? l5 ,e /9 - Proposed?
(Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission).
d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%?
(Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required).
Existing? V E 5 Proposed?
e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? 6 4 /0 °l Proposed?
(Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission).
f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet
current driveway access requirements? A) 0
Explain
g. Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is
located? ") p
Explain
h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in
which it is located? ,.) d
Explain
Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or
less? /z 5 Stable and corral average vehicular access slope / 7 % .
j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of
2 cars? V 5 With guest house a minimum of 3 cars?
18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 2 91S 0 . Amount fill 2 98 0 .
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities).
19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance),
any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces
will remain or are proposed to be added.
Square feet 44 6 6 . Percentage of Net Lot Area 3 3. 7 .
20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 4- 4 Co Co
March 20, 2000
Environmental Information Form
1-2
07/19/2001 20:02 7S07714138
•
MAGAUGD
PAGE 12
Y
❑ 011 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
O 1i 30. Change in dust ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity.
❑ d 31. Change ;n ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or
alteration of existing draining patterns.
O 1/ 32. Substantial change In existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
el er 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
O le 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such es toxic substances,
flammable or explosives.
O l]l� 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, Are, water, sewage,
etc.).
[3 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil. natural gas, etc.).
❑ 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
FNVIRONMENTAL SEITlNQ
38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, Including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cutturai, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the she, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will b. accepted.
Err 'S 7/A) r Sias-, L FA Mi c.tri Ale CA) A Ali Lt i/
IC dL 44NSCAl>1.17.
39. Describe the surrounding properties, including Information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
ro IQ� & 4? OAO (1a/- Pef?CQO.
-3-
07/19/2001 20:02 760771413E
•
MAGAUGD
•
PAGE 13
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
Vi. A brief explanation is required for all answers except 'No Impact' answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a bad agency cites in the pbrentheses following each question. A 'No
impact' answer is adequately supported If the referenced information sources show that the impact simply
does not apply to projects like the one Involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A 'No
Impact' answer should be explained where It Is based on project -specific factors as wei as general
standards (e.g. the project we not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specHk
so»ening analysis).
VII. All answers must take account of the *hole action involved, including off -site as wel as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as wall as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
VIII. 'Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate If there Is substantial evidence that an effect Is
significant If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made,
an EIR is required.
IX. 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation incorporated' applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact' to a'Lase than Significant
Impact' The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V. 'Earlier Analysis,' above may be
cross-referenced).
X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed In an easier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
t5083(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above.
XI. Lead agencies are encouraged to i .. ate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a . 't . -. to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or Individuals contacted should be
cited in the discussion.
issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan deslgnadon or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project
❑ ❑
O ❑
c) Be incompatible with existing land use In the 0 0 0
vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. 0 0 0 el/
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 ❑ 0 IA
established community (including a low-income
or minority community)?
II . POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 le
population projections?
-4-
07119/2001 20:02
7607714138
•
MAGAUGD
•
PAGE 14
ParrfWy agisr Use Then
f 1 Impact
b) Induce substantial growth In an area either 0 ❑ ❑ d
directs/ or indirectly (e.g. through protects in an
undeveloped area or extension of motor
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especiaiy affordable 0 0 0 it
housing?
III. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal
result in or expose people to potential impacts
involving:
a) Fault rupture? 0 ❑ 0 re
b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 ❑ 0 1310
c) Seismic ground failure, Including liquefaction? 0 0 ❑ re
d) Sstche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 0 ape
e) landslides or mudfows? 0 0 0 flie
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 0 0 07/
conditions from excavation. grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? ❑ ❑ 0 a,
h) Expansive soils? 0 0 0 100
I) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 0 ❑ V
I V. WATER. Would the proposal result In:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 C7/
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 Q/
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration ❑ 0 0 1
of sumacs water quality (e.g. temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 Cr
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 0 d
water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 (r
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial lose of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of Clow of groundwater? 0 0 0 G
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 ❑ 0 d
I) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 III
groundwater othetwlee available for public water
supplies?
V. AIR OUAUTY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0
an existing or protected air quality violation?
- 5 -
07/19/2001 20:02 7607714138 MAGAUGD PAGE 15
• i
Potentially
131=1 Less Than
Strr 0't St=nt iNo
mpact
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 Gi/
c) Alter alr movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 II'
cause any charge in climate?
d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0 Wil
VI. TRANSPORTATIONICIRCULATiON. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 IV
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., term equipment)? J
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 e
nearby uses?
d) insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? 0 ❑ 0 rie
•) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 le
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting O 0 0 EV
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts.
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail. waterborne or air traffic impacts? O
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in lrnpacts to:
a) Endangered. threatened or rare species or their 0
habit (Including but not limited to plants. fish,
insects, animals, and birds)? /
b) Locally designated species (e.g.. heritage 0 Ci 0 ario
trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., ❑ 0 0 i!r
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Viand habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 0
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? O 0 0 i!l
VI II . ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 ❑ ❑ 11/
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and ❑ ❑ ❑
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 D/
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS, Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidents IT
explosion or release of ❑ ❑ ❑
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: all, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interierence with an emergency 0 0 0 1311/
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
❑ a d
-b-
07/19/2001 20:02 760771413E MAGAUGD PAGE 16
•
Palatally
8=it Una Than
t�Mrrds�y = Weston SignMont
Na
I .. � . , J impact Impact
c) The creation of any heath hazard or potential 0 0 0 El
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 ❑ ❑ CV
potential health hazards? ,.,/
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 1i
brush, grass, or trees?
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
e) increases in existing noise levels?' 0 0 0 fi
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 d
XI. PUBUC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result In a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 1
b) Police protection? 0 CI 0 61#
c) Schools? 0 D O t V
d) Malntonance of public facilities, including roads? 0 D O le
e) Other governmental services? 0 0 O 10/
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 11
b)' Communications systems? 0 ❑ 0 We
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 Di
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? O ❑ ❑ el/
e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 ffi
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 13/
g) local or regional water supplies? 0 0 0 it
XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 0 0 I3
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 !Y
c) Create light or glare? 0 0 0 Er
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? 0 0 0 Cif,
b) Disturb archaeological resources? 0 0 0 all
c) Affect historical resources? 0 0 0 fa
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 0 0 V
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within 0 0 0 i(
the potential impact area?
- 7 -
07/19/2001 20:02 7607714138 MAGAUGD PAGE 17
i •
Pols&aly Inirdesicr Lass Than
XV. RECRE DON. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or ❑ 0 0 CI
regional parks or other , , . facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 ❑ 0 er/
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade O 0 0 V
the quality of the environment substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
sett -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important example of the
major period of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 9'
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental gods? /
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 IY
individually limited. but cumulatively
considerable? rCumulativey considerable'
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects end the effects of probable
future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects 0 0 0
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARUER ANALYSES.
Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the
tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
15063(c)(3)(D) otthe State CECA Guidelines. in thin
case a discussion should Identty the following on
attached sheets.
a) Earlier analyses used. Identity earlier analyses 0 0 0 0
and state where they we available for review.
b) impacts adequately addressed. identify which 0 0 0 0
effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in en earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were
addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that ere 'Less 0 0 0 0
than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,'
describe the mitigation measures which were
incorporated or refined from the earlier documem
and the extent to which they address site -
specific conditions for the project.
-8-
07/19/2001 20:02 760771413B MAGAUGD PAGE 18
• 111110
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the
Bats prepared pursuant to Section 65982.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement
indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which Is included on any such list,
and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOusyVASIE AND $PB$TANCCC_ES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists
compiled pursuant to Section 65982.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is
required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant:
2. Address:
3. Phone Number;
4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code):
5. Local Agency (city/county):
6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number.
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE QF CALIFORNIA
HAZARDOUS WASTE_ANO SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall%
8. Regulatory identification number.
9. Date of List JULY Jan
Date
For
Signature
Applicant
07/19/2001 20:02 7607714130
MAGAUGD PAGE 19
• •
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any fist compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below,
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Govemment Code end hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed In this application are ngt contained on
these lists.
Date
5-23-9(4
nature
1-gA
Zwligdr
For R i 1Z G L r c A D as
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and In the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 5-2.3-Aai
11/84se
For R. i *1QLFLAT3E.1)
Applicant
tormabenvironm. 1998app
- 10 -