392, Construct a new pool, associat, ApplicationCOmPUTATION'OF 7..0'.' COVERAGE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
LOT COVERAGE (Ordinance No. 168)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structlates, tennis courts, swimming pools,
service yards (enclosed or.unenc),osed), staUles,or an area of not less than 200 squar
feet for the construction of a stable (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover
more than twenty (20%) percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition.
to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking
space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting
roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more
than thirty-five (35%) percent of the net lot area.
For the purposes uf this Section 'net area' shall exclude all perimeter easements
to a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the lot or parcel of land which is used
for roadway purposes, and shall also exclude any private drive or driveway which pro-
vides ingress and egress to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion
of any flag lot.
BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS
NET LOT AREA 1.975A47...
RESIDENCE
GARAGE
SWIMMING POOL
STABLE
rIANIOS 001MTG.r4do
Locbrb0 < Yril
7313144sq.
4 14 Oo sq.
700 sq.
4 45 sq.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
too sq. ft.
o %I. 4.
cr.) 5 0 sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET lig 9
% COVERED (MAY NOT EXCEED 20% OF NET LOT AREA) t 0 Itt
2. 1 DRIVEWAY oo sq. ft.
PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA i 'L 4 sq. ft.
POOL DECKING 9S B sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4962.
‘• %
TOTAL COVERAGE (MAY NOT EXCEED 35% OF NET LOT AREA) 11b
-DLo PC. C,LG_ 4-t
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The
undersigned N'l E 1-1 (� t
Name
4 L /aS i r= I c LD t .
Street Address
(1) cre the owner(s) or is/are
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at
Street Address
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of
aspects of the project require a
A IN i�IirJC- Poo 1
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
(-I C r- i r-'I A T
44--3v4�
Telephone No.
lawful possession of
In(, Q Ll F4/ l —/ O
Lot / Tract
the proposed project,
Site Plan Review.
including what
17 /= r v C-i
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must
make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's
conformance to the below .criteria:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the zoning
ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to sizes,
set -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
\/i= ')
L O T
AQc 4ram) ACC �=P T D V l=, 7-
t 1� Q Z. O cj c r <. 3 Ti-( i (-4 1 s
1 `) 4100
PoD�s
B. Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features
of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees,
drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)?
Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural
features.
r-. PLO / /=/ i //
2 ' / /-%/ 5 j /7 /yfvc%/ Po s sie3� �
1 (/, I2f) /,) Ltd / L/7 ( 7S Y
5
C. Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved?
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or
re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization measures.
/
ln� / r C C ////�� C i G // i 'O �cJ ,O
/A)
D. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native
vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping
should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and
public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
CA/ /JA NJ (( l �-/T 1-2 f Ste' cam- L 0/ Imo) c-->
/t ,1 %/ i/: <U-
E. Does the site development plan substantially preserve the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums
and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon
the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage
proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
neighboring lots.
F. is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with
the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be
imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
setbacks of neighboring properties.
PtDS�t /S 4 7__ /= L t i F2ot
PrTQ - -//\
6
•
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data and landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
4 / // 4i» /7�� ,�� ,� L / � J5 4c/L / -icy
� SC,
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, present the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria eevaluation to be the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
DATE: % /, l 9 8 %
SIGNATURE
FOR /`/C/-JD / //CA1/�1A %
APPLICANT
7
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct.
Executed at tv,4 -9 1/C 2f , 2 47 , California,
this day of 1 ) o r� 1 1927
== -ss)
R
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application
is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public
of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer
of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he
(it) owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
FORMS ISSUED TO:
NAME FILED
ORGANIZATION FEE
JOB ADDRESS RECEIPT NO.
H.N.M. BY:
19
8
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS,
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
1, , declare
under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names
and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they
appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within
the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet
from 'the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
Executed at
day of
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
,California, this
, 19
Signature
(tev'd 1980)
o �
APPENDIX e
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM
(Initial Study)
Date Submitted: 4p12JL / / 1C No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name .and address of developer or project. sponsor:
/iC/-/ n / /-/�,`� 7/! i f" 4 27/2
0(J Lc- rA/ram /�/9oZ74
2. Address of project: A-z 4, 9 /L
Assessor's Block and Lot Number 7 `6 7- (7Q q- -- 23
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted
concerning this project: Z7 'Jc %'%`',�% i i/C. �'�v � i�
% C, mPL, , 11�
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies: G?RAO(t�(
Pw-u 2 . tom. C, 4 . L t` t r= S Cc (],Q c J
cp
5. Existing zoning district: R 4 c 1
6. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size: i c `'i 7 ' ,4cV&�
8. Square footage:4-
9. Number of floors of construction: 0 t) 6
N MLK9-17A•
.,
•
10. Amount of off-street parking provided:
11. (Attach plans.)
12. Proposed scheduling: , 5,4 f
13. Associated projects: /V'O,Qr
14. Anticipated incremental development:
15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit
sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size
expected: %) I'ti ,.
16. I€ commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities:
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities:
4-
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community benefits to be derived from the project:
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or
rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the
application is required:
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
20. On a separate page, describe the project site as it exists
before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site,
and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site.
21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties,
including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use, and
scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard,
etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheets.)
22. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features? k
YES MAYBE NO.
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
'• MLK9-19�►'
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth-
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
23. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
24. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements, in
either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course of
flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
x
h. Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property
to water -related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
j. Significant changes in the
temperature, flow, or chemical
content of surface thermal springs?
25. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or number of any species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
of plants?
b. A reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
26. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result in
a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish
or wildlife habitat?
27. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
-5-
YES MAYBE 110
o�
x
ram=
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
28. LiQht and Glare. Will the
proposal produce new light or
glare?
29. Land Use. Will the proposal
result in a substantial alter-
ation of the present or planned
land use of an area?
30. Natural Resources. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
'b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource?
31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or
the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or up-
set conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an emer-
gency evacuation plan?
32. Population. Will the proposal
alter the location, distribution,
density, 'or growth rate of the
human population of an area?
33. 8ousinq. Will the proposal af-
fect existing housing, or create
a demand for additional housing?
34. Transportation/Circulation. Will
the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial addi-
tional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c. Substantial impact upon
existing transportation systems?
YES MAY?! NO
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne,
rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
35. Public Services. Will the
proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new
or altered governmental services .
in any of the following areas:
a. Pire protection?.
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public
facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
36. EnergX. Will the proposal result in:
a. Useof substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
37. Utilities: Will the proposal
result in a need for new systems,
or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
-7-
Z,ES MAYBE p0
t
E4LW9-Z3A*
1
0
38. Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to poten-
tial health hazards?
39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal
result in the obstruction of any
scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal re-
sult in the creation of an aesthet-
ically offensive site open to
public view?
40. Recreation. Will the proposal
result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
41. Cultural Resources'.
a. Will the proposal result
in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric
or historic archeological site?
b. Will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthet-
ic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure,
or object?
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural •values?
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact
area?
42. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a.fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number or restrict
YES MAYBE N2
- MLW9-24A'
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate impor-
tant examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term environ-
mental goals? (a short term impact
on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, defin-
itive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the
future.)
YES MAYBE- p0
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate re-
sources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small, but where the ef-
fect of the total of those impacts on
the environment is significant.) _
d. Does the project have environ-
mental effects which will cause sub-
stantial adverse effect on human be-
ings, either directly or indirectly? —
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor-
mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Date �PRM_ 13, t c)Sc)
For / .��C/`%/14 %
(Applicant)
-9-
X
x
i