Loading...
893, Construct a new cabana (475 sq, Application• October2�2015► fi 'fie VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING OCT 302015 City of Rolling mills NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses Bytzuctuzes-are required-tbrb' made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit shall be subject to a retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to a higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: Tom & Debi Thomas OWNER'S ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 377-4558 EMAIL: dksthomasPme.com PROPERTY ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 107 of Record of Survey Book 58 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7567 PAGE 004 PARCEL 024 AGENT'S NAME: Tavisha Nicholson. Bolton Enaineerina Cora. AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Avenue #210. Lomita CA 90717 TELEPHONE NO.: 310-325-5580 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance: Structures in Setback: Zoning Code 17.16.190 F/17.16.150 A portion of the proposed walls and deck will be located in the rear yard setback. The deck and walls would extend to approximately the line of the house which is in the rear yard setback as well. They would be out of the side yard setback. The pool equipment is also proposed to be in the rear yard setback. The placement in the setback keeps it away from all neighbors and allows for better screening. The only other location would be visible from Eastfield Drive and quite close to the adjacent neighbor's residence. A gas fireplace is proposed within the rear yard setback as well. This will be in line with the existing deck and existing residence. It is proposed in the rear yard setback to keep it away from the neighboring residence. It was decided that the comer of the lot was farthest away from the adjacent neighbors which is more desirable. Existing 766 sf unpermitted trellis built by previous owner is requested to remain in the rear yard setback. Of the 766 S.F., 251 S.F. is in the rear yard setback. This trellis was built in line with the outer wall of the residence and sits on a concrete deck. Two existing 100 S.F. sheds are located in the rear yard setback. These sheds are requested to remain where they are due to a lack of other locations on the lot. If they are required to be relocated, the only other place would be in the front yard, in the view of Eastfield, which the owner is trying to avoid. Existing 42 S.F. BBQ located in rear yard setback. Requesting to leave in existing location. 121 Page • • October 29, 2015 Disturbed Area Above Allowable: Zonina Code 17.16.070 B The lot in its existing condition has a disturbed area of 54.48% and so is legal non -conforming. The proposed pool pad additions will result in an additional disturbed area of 3,625 s.f. and the requirement to show a future corral and stable, including grading, causes an increase in the disturbed are to 68.12%. All grading proposed for the future stable and corral will have a slope of than 3:1 and only a portion of the pool pad slopes will be 2:1 so therefore per the Zoning Code 17.16.070.8.1 we are allowed a maximum disturbed are of 50%, which we are still over, but by a smaller amount. Stable in Front Yard: Zoning Code 17.18.060 Being that the existing residence is in the very rear of the lot, there is no location to place a stable and corral set aside other than the front yard. These structures are not being proposed to be built right now and are simply representative of a possible future location. The proposed location will require grading to be built and with the proposed 3:1 slopes the disturbed area will be 68.12%, which is above the allowable 50%. Structural + Flatwork Coverage > 35% Zoning Code 17.16.070 A-2 The project does not meet the Structural + Flatwork Coverage Zoning Code ordinance of less than 35%. As proposed with deductions the project has 42.21% structural + flatwork coverage. The existing lot has 35.46% structural + flatwork coverage with deductions, meaning that it is legal non -conforming and any additions either structural or flatwork wise would further exceed the zoning code ordinance and would require a variance. Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. The extraordinary condition which does not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone is that the current residence is legal non -conforming, with a portion of the residence being located in the rear setback. This means that if we want to construct any new structures or decking adjacent to the residence there is a high possibility that they will end up in the rear yard setback. The previous owner had constructed items in the setback which were unpermitted, we are trying to clean up some of these items and bring the residence into compliance. A large number of houses on Eastfield have pools and the only way to allow this residence to have a pool results in the disturbed area over the allowed amount. As the house was built towards the rear of the lot there is no other location to locate a future stable set aside which is not in the front yard. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located The change would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property of improvements in the surrounding vicinity due to the proper building and OSHA codes being followed during the construction process. The proposed pool pad additions will be at the rear/side of the lot and therefore those traveling or walking on Eastfield will not be affected by the construction or future use. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 13IPage • DATE: ftftftf f ffftft## ZONING CASE NO.: • 0 ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive GRADING Pad 1: Main House Pad Grading Ouantities: CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List CABANA DECK For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation TOTAL CUT AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Cubic Yds. Max Depth 0 25 55 140 100 320 TOTAL EXPORT max allowed export for pool is 140 c.f. FILL For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List CABANA DECK For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Recompaction TOTAL FILL TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill): PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing Dad elevations Finished Floor Finished Grade ProDosed Dad elevations Finished floor Finished grade 0 50 45 50 0 100 245 565 Main Residence Other Pad: Stable 540.00 539.50 537.00 Max Depth Location 530.00 536.50 529.50 -75 21 • • DATE: ftft###### ZONING CASE NO.: 0 ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Pad 2: Proposed Stable Grading Ouantities: Cubic Yds. Max Depth Max Depth Location CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition (Stable) 60 5' Stable For other structures (i.e. walls) List Corral 0 0 For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation 30 2' Stable TOTAL CUT 90 TOTAL IMPORT 0 FILL For house/addition (Stable) N/A For other structures (i.e. walls) List Corral 60 2.5' Corral Covered Porch For driveway(s) - - For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Recompaction 30 TOTAL FILL 90 TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill): 180 PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing nad elevations Finished Floor Finished Grade Proposed Dad elevations Finished floor Finished grade Stable 530.00 529.50 Other Pad: Residence 540.00 539.00 22 • • DATE \ o j2'i(I5 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 'FA f L-, . De. CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED ct 5 0 sq. ft 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE - LANDSCAPED) © sq. ft 3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS CI Sp sq. ft. OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT SITE PLAN: WATER FEATURE: GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) SITTING WALL / BENCH WALKWAY OR PATIO TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE ir -21- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this -3 © day of By: By: Address City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT:1oM .E3, 111tlMAS DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: k S 1-t a� N I i-410-5 a r+ FEE: COMPANY NAME: Thri RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: NAs-oa M Avk 5-Tr, 21 ZONING CASE NO Wiwi 0-, ar TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( 31 6 ) 35--S S5 6 PROJECT ADDRESS: 6 Co EP t tF -20- • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at . California this 30 day of C5Ge , 20 (S- . By. `�� By: Address City _\ -21- ti CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ AFFIDAVIT 1 I, declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of .. persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of th- ounty within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior bou Executed at this aries of property legally described as: California, day of . 20 Signature PUBLIC::Planning Forms in PDF format:Variance Application Rev. 2010 -22- • T:pct?be?29) 20 ' ., REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT OCT 3 0 2015 City of Rolling dills NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal is or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: Tom & Debi Thomas OWNER'S ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 377-4558 EMAIL: dksthomaspme.com PROPERTY ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 107 of Record of Survey Book 58 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7567 PAGE 004 PARCEL 024 AGENTS NAME: Tavisha Nicholson. Bolton Enaineerina Corp. AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Avenue #210, Lomita CA 90717 TELEPHONE NO.: 310-325-5580 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone: The nature of the proposed use of the structure is as a cabana and is allowed per Zoning Ordinance 17.16.210. The cabana will be 475 S.F. and will be enclosed on three sides, the open side will face the pool. The cabana will be located on a newly constructed pool deck which will have a 632 S.F. pool and 100 S.F. spa. 12IPage • • October 29, 2015 Will the proposed use be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area, and if so, why? The cabana will be compatible with the uses in the surrounding area due to the fact that many other residences have cabanas or pool houses on their lots. The structure is out of all setbacks and easements. The cabana will have an architectural style matching the existing residence and meet all of the requirements of the RHCA Architectural committee as well. Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? The granting of the Conditional Use Permit will be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health, safety and general welfare. This is due to the fact that the new structure will be built to the current building codes, be required to meet Fire Department requirements, and is not adjacent to a roadway so it will not have an impact traffic or pedestrians. FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 13IPage • • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this 3(9 day of C:r By: _ By: Address , California, ,20 ( City NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT T& g \ -TY\ S DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE:1;1 vi A- 1‘)II C H0 r..Srl-I FEE: COMPANY NAME: �o'-7 r' /-16),yF £¢riVzi RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 2C-83 i /VAR Q*NNC s TV Z / ZONING CASE NO `Ort i A e A Po1i 1- TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. (3 I 0 1 3-5581/43 PROJECT ADDRESS: to (o EA-S ii-;vn IDQ. -20- • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at , California this C) day of 6 G T— , 20 /' . By: \ fn By: Address City -21- CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all person to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County w' in the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of ..'operty legally described as: this Executed at . California, day of . 20 Signature Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Conditional Use Permit Application rev. 2013.doc -22- • • DATE \ c J2 i /IS ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 6 f'iFL-1. D z CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED Ct 5 ° sq. ft 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE - LANDSCAPED) 0 sq. ft 3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS St) sq. ft. OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT SITE PLAN: WATER FEATURE: GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) SITTING WALL / BENCH WALKWAY OR PATIO TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE -21- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills • October 29, 2015 REQUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW rrz � /:, A ii tztz�y ,1\41, OCT 3 0 2015 NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or removeremoveGria&th3fP4roguillaful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addiRbfi,.ursuanua.Resalutiott.N.a..9.00 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit shall be subject to a retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to a higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: Tom & Debi Thomas OWNER'S ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 377-4558 EMAIL: dksthomaspme.com PROPERTY ADDRESS: 66 Eastfield Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 107 of Record of Survey Book 58 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7567 PAGE 004 PARCEL 024 AGENT'S NAME: Tavisha Nicholson. Bolton Enaineerina Corp. AGENT'S ADDRESS: 25834 Narbonne Avenue #210, Lomita CA 90717 TELEPHONE NO.: 310-325-5580 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: The proposed project includes the construction of a new 632 S.F. pool, 100 S.F. spa, 475 S.F. covered patio / cabana, walls not to exceed 5' in height and to average 2.5', and 1,250 S.F. of pool decking. A Site Plan Review is required for the following reasons: The new cabana requires a Site Plan Review under Zoning Code 17.46.020 since it is a new structure. The new retaining walls require a Site Plan Review since they are over 3' in height and not for walkways or drainage devices. The 1,250 S.F. of above grade pool deck requires a Site Plan Review due to the deck being 12" or more above grade. Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: None 121Page • • October 29, 2015 SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. The existing residence is a legal non -conforming structure, as it is in the rear yard setback. There were trellises constructed by the previous owner in the side yard which were not permitted. The smaller trellis has since been removed however the current owner would like to keep the 766 s.f. trellis and include it in this application. The project does not meet the Structural + Flatwork Coverage Zoning Code ordinance of less than 35%. As proposed with deductions the project has 42.26% structural +flatwork coverage. The existing lot has 35.46% structural + flatwork coverage with deductions, meaning that it is legal non- conforming and any additions either structural or flatwork wise would further exceed the zoning code ordinance and would require a variance. The project's disturbed area is currently 54.48% which is above the allowed 40%. We are proposing 3,390 s.f. of new disturbed area for the new pool pad additions which will be located in the side yard. Additionally, the future corral and stable will require grading to create a pad, with a disturbed area of 2,450 s.f.. These two areas of disturbance will bring the final site disturbed area to 67.59%. The grading for the stable will all be 3 to 1 slopes and a portion of the pool pad will be graded at 3:1 or shallower so since we have no more than 50% of the slopes resulting from the grading steeper than 3:1 then per Zoning Code 17.16.070 we are allowed a maximum disturbed area of 50%. We are still over this threshold so we will need the variance for disturbed area. The existing easements are the same width as those neighbors on Eastfield however larger than the neighbors on Open Brand. When looking at the site, there are no other locations for the pool to be placed without requiring a variance of some sort and there would be no other location to site a future stable. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. The project preserves and integrates into the site design existing topographic features by placing the new pool pad adjacent to the house in an area of the lot that required a minimal amount of grading. Drainage courses are avoided and the only vegetation in the area is grass installed by a previous owner, nothing native. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and re -contouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. 13IPage • • October 29, 2015 The site development plan follows the natural contours of the site to minimize grading by utilizing a wall along the rear setback line to bring the pool pad more up to grade and reduce the amount of grading required. There are existing 2:1 slopes on the lot so the area in which we are joining will look like an extension of the existing slope. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. The project preserves the native vegetation by proposing the structures in an area that has grass as opposed to native landscaping. The setback & easement will be the buffer zone between our property and neighboring residence on the pool side. The new slope will be planted for slope stability. E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. The site development plan preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by utilizing an area previously partially disturbed as opposed to disturbing more land. While the disturbed area does increase from the addition, there is no other area to place a pool and not disturb the same amount of area. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. The plan is harmonious in scale and mass as surrounding residences. We are asking for a variance to build a wall, deck, fireplace & pool equipment in the setback however only in the rear setback which is 50' as opposed to the side yard setback of 20'. Other neighboring residences have pools so this addition would be harmonious with the surrounding residences. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. The Site Plan is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles as the pool is in the side yard of the lot and the farthest distance away from Eastfield as possible. There will be no changes to the driveway at Eastfield and therefore will not impact any pedestrians or vehicles. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. 141Page • i.� • • October 29, 2015 The Site Plan is sensitive conforms with the requirements of C.E.Q.A and will not have any significant impacts to the environment. I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: Signature For: Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 15IPage DATE \ c127/15 ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS 6 .gA f'iF1-j. De CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING PROPOSED ELEMENTS MUST BE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PLANNING APPLICATION PLANTING AREA 1. NEW AREA(S) TO BE LANDSCAPED 5 O sq. ft 2. EXISTING LANDSCAPING TO BE ALTERED (RE - LANDSCAPED) © sq. ft 3. TOTAL LANDSCAPING: NEW AND ALTERED AREAS ctS.0 sq. ft. OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS 4. CHECK OFF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ELEMENTS THAT MAY BE PROPOSED, AND SHOW LOCATIONS ON PROJECT SITE PLAN: WATER FEATURE: GARDEN WALL (less than 3-Ft tall) SITTING WALL / BENCH WALKWAY OR PATIO TRELLIS, CANOPY OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE -21- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills • • Planning Information for New Development/Redevelopment Projects General Project Information Project Address 66 `\S-rYIFis> Parcel ID Zoning/Use Code: S�� Project Developer 'ot„-v.pt.( fir+ c, j >`1�c 4 '( t.) Project Owner TO b2br h� s Owner Phone 3:1 C �3 3 �. _ LJ o Owner address /_ FA ST,F Ea„ Owner email KS�1cMa) e^ `MP . c oM Site acreage: ' •3 Project acreage/disturbed area (may be less than site ' 1 acreage for redevelopment projects) SO el Planned impervious surface area (square feet) (includes building footprint as well as impervious driveways, 2,55 1 patios, sport courts, etc.) State WDID No. 1, (if subject to Construction General Permit) Runoff Calculations for Project Site 85th percentile, 24-hour storm (inches) Project design storm (inches ) (Greater of 85th percentile, 24-hour storm and 0.75) Storm Water Quality Design volume (cubic ft) Percent of design storm to be retained on site Biofiltration BMPs being used 7 (Yes/No) Biofiltration BMP Treatment Volume (1.5 times the SWQDv not reliably retained on site) If offsite mitigation measures will be used, the following information must be provided Design volume for water quality mitigation treatment BMPs! (cubic ft!I If flow -through water quality treatment BMPs are approved,. provide the 1-year, 1-hour storm intensity (inches per hour]i Percent of design storm volume to be infiltrated at off -site mitigation site Percent of design storm to be treated with biofiltration at off site retrofit Name/address of off -site mitigation or retrofit sites GIS coordinates for off -site mitigation project BMP Specifications Permanent Structural BMP ID [provide additional columns for BMPs as necessary] Structural BMP Type and Description BMP Location on Site (Coordinates) BMP Location Description (or attach map) BMP Design Capture Volume (cubic ft) *Attach BMP design plans/specs BMPA City of Rolling Hills Developer Planning Checklist Public: YOLANTA on Server:WOES:Low Impact Development Ordinance:LlD-req. planning info. subm/lml formsfrx -28- � S CV- cL X(er-0- L 1>'") S'oo° BMP B (if necessary) SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills • L • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at this 3 cp day of OCT By: By: Address City , California, ,20 (,� NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: 01A c DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE-Mktmo►-s oM FEE: COMPANY NAME: \-23ok--rov RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 25-0 31-/ oNNr Ate— S� 2/o ZONING CASE NO Lam rra , c A- /d1i1-- TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. ( 3 to 1 3 25-S"r80 PROJECT ADDRESS: iv b EAsTf1Fk) -22- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at , California this (9 day of 0 C� ,20 i . By: By: Address City -23- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT 'e4 S °° - P\ 3(1 c,\lei S STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) § § CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and dresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available asse ment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet fro the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Exe d ted at this • California, day of ,20 Signature Public:PLANNING MASTERS: City of Rolling Hills Site Plan Review Application rev. 2015.doc -24- SPR Rev. 2015 City of Rolling Hills 2/3/2016 ZONING CA.O.: 0 ADDRES• Eastfield Drive ALL STRUCTURES MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 44,563 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 44,563 sq.ft RESIDENCE 5,850 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 5,850 sq.ft I GARAGE 680 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 680 sq.ft ✓ SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft 732 sq.ft 732 sq.ft ✓ POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 48 sq.ft 48 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ✓ CABANA 0 sq.ft 475 sq.ft 475 sq.ft STABLE (dirt volume to be 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft ✓ included in grading quantities RECREATION COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE, 86 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 86 sq.ft BREEZH WAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) 21 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 21 sq.ft SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, BARBEQUE, 200 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 200 sq.ft OUTDOOR KITCHEN,ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- 766 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 766 sq.ft over 15 ft. high and over 120 sq.ft. in area, WATER FEATURES, ETC. 32 sq.ft 66 sq.ft 98 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 10 sq.ft 10 sq.ft I SERVICE YARD 90 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 90 sq.ft 1 OTHER: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft BASEMENT AREA: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (Volume to be included in grading quantities) DEPTH OF BASEMENT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURE 7,725 sq.ft 1,781 sq.ft 9,506 sq.ft %STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 17.34% sq.ft 4.00% sq.ft 21.33% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 AND UP TO 800 sq.ft. 7,178 sq.ft detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 16.11% sq.ft 1,715 sq.ft 8,893 sq.ft 3.85% sq.ft 19.96% sq.ft LATEX2/3/2016 ZONING CAS.O.: 0 ADDRESS: 10,Eastfield Drive ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK %TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE %TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5- 800 sq.ft. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL DISTURBED AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral, and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL 7,270 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 7,270 sq.ft 1,605 sq.ft 45 sq.ft 1,650 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 1,450 sq.ft 1,450 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 8,875 sq.ft 1,495 sq.ft 10,370 sq.ft 19.92% 3.35% 23.27% 16,600 sq.ft 3,276 sq.ft 19,876 sq.ft 37.25% 7.35% 44.60% 16,053 sq.ft 3,210 sq.ft 19,263 sq.ft 36.02% 7.20% 43.23% 24,280 sq.ft 6,175 sq.ft 30,455 sq.ft 54.48% 13.86% 68.34% 745 C.Y. All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. *Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fireplace, etc. are not counted towards coverage and disturbed area unless their combined area exceeds 80 sq.ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. ..DATE;' 2/3/2016 ZONING CAS.: 0 ADDRESS: Eastfield Drive CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1- MAIN RESIDENCE BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD 19,160 sq.ft 2,500 sq.ft 21,660 sq.ft RESIDENCE 5,850 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 5,850 sq.ft GARAGE 680 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 680 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA 0 sq.ft 732 sq.ft 732 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT 0 sq.ft 48 sq.ft 48 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft - sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft 475 sq.ft 475 sq.ft STABLE sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SERVICE YARD 90 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 90 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZF OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE 86 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 86 sq.ft COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (From 1st page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: COVERED PATIO TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 1,019 sq.ft 76 sq.ft 1,095 sq.ft 472 sq.ft 10 sq.ft 482 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 7,725 sq.ft 40.32% sq.ft 1,331 sq.ft 6.14% sq.ft 9,056 sq.ft 41.81% sq.ft 7,178 sq.ft 1,265 sq.ft 8,443 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 37.46% sq.ft 5.84% sq.ft 38.98% sq.ft ._DATE; ' 2/3/2016 ZONING CASVVI 0 ADDRESS: illrastfield Drive CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2-Stable Pad BUILDABLE PAD AREA AND EXISTING PROPOSED STRUCTURES BUILDING PAD 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft GARAGE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft POOL EQUIPMENT - sq.ft - sq.ft 0 sq.ft GUEST HOUSE sq.ft sq.ft 0 sq.ft CABANA 0 sq.ft - sq.ft 0 sq.ft STABLE 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft SPORTS COURT 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft SERVICE YARD 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary Residence 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft Accessory Structures 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURES ENTRYWAY/PORTE 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ATTACHED TRELLISES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft *DETACHED STRUCTURES: 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (From 1st page) ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft (From 1st page not including allowed deductions) OTHER: sq.ft - sq.ft 0 sq.ft TOTAL TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft %BUILDING PAD COVERAGE #DIV/0! sq.ft 100.00% sq.ft 100.00% sq.ft TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Not incl. attached trellises, Not incl. allowed deductions, 0 sq.ft 450 sq.ft 450 sq.ft and incl. the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence / accs structures % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE #DIV/0! sq.ft 100.00% sq.ft 100.00% sq.ft - DATE 2/3/2016 ZONING CASE 0: 0 ADDRESS: 0 66 Eastfield Drive GRADING AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Pad 1: Main House Pad Grading Ouantities: Cubic Yds. Max Depth CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition For other structures (i.e. walls) List CABANA DECK For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation 0 25 55 140 100 TOTAL CUT 320 Max Depth Location TOTAL EXPORT max allowed export for pool is 140 c.f. -75 FILL For house/addition 0 For other structures (i.e. walls) List CABANA 50 DECK 45 For driveway(s) For yard areas 50 For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation 0 Recompaction 100 TOTAL FILL 245 TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill): 565 PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing Dad elevations Main Residence Other Pad: Stable Finished Floor 540.00 Finished Grade 539.50 Proposed pad elevations Finished floor 537.00 530.00 Finished grade 536.50 529.50 DATE 2/3/2016 ZONING CASE 0: 0 ADDRE. 66 Eastfield Drive GRADING Pad 2: Proposed Stable Grading Quantities: CUT/EXCAVATION For house/addition (Stable) For other structures (i.e. walls) List Corral For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Overexcavation TOTAL CUT TOTAL IMPORT FILL For house/addition (Stable) For other structures (i.e. walls) List Corral Covered Porch For driveway(s) For yard areas For basement excavation For pool/spa excavation Recompaction TOTAL FILL TOTAL GRADING (Sum of total cut and total fill): PAD/FLOOR ELEVATIONS Existing Dad elevations Finished Floor Finished Grade ProDosed nad elevations Finished floor Finished grade AND EXCAVATION INFORMATION Cubic Yds. Max Depth 60 5' 0 0 30 2' 90 60 2.5' 30 90 180 Stable 530.00 529.50 Max Depth Location Stable Other Pad: Residence 540.00 539.00 Stable 0 N/A Corral • OCT 3 0 2015 City of Rolling Nips By oxet Reeeb., wed Date Filed GENERAL INFORMATION �-h Applicant(s) 1 Oil Ze i \ l \a`(` et) Address 6(0 EA S-m t,fl- 2. Legal Owner(s) --TOM Q \ C=31 'ihOM4*) Address 6-1e EAsrweLs0 - 3. Project Address Co(O "FAST F1�vc- Assessor's Book No. -g,1-4- - 60 ti - H 1. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. Tel. (3° )_3 4-1 SSA Tel. (3\b ) 3V1- -t sse, Lot No. 10.7 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district 'SAS.- 6. Proposed project/use of site i�Od1 tM1��CMrN C PROTECT DESCRIPTION� 7. Site size 5 1 } �3 b STY 8. Net lot area L\y , 5103 . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of the lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures , SO(o dewcfiow. 6,9-0So 10. Number of floors of construction t 11. Basement square footage • 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 1- l • fa3 \ SF (1`3 I ?jl 63\ s7� 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? f t (' - 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? n c" c_ 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? v 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? `les 17. Driveway Access and Parking: a. Is a new driveway access way proposed? n (Requires Traffic Commission Review). b. Number of driveway(s) Existing? 1 Proposed? O (Second driveway requires approved Conditional Use Permit from Planning Commission). c. Width of driveway(s) Existing? \ •� 1 Proposed? (Maximum of 20 foot width unless approved by the Planning Commission). d. Does first 20 feet of driveway have a maximum grade of 7%? (Maximum of 7% for first 20 feet of driveway required). Existing? \JQ 5 e. Grade of driveway(s)? Existing? Z (Maximum of 12% unless approved by the Planning Commission). Proposed? Proposed? f. Has site plan been reviewed by Los Angles County Fire Protection Engineer to meet current driveway access requirements? (t Explain W'\1 SA)brn;c•Iser Apyc‘.►I. \in Pt t•trlcj g. Does driveway cover more than a maximum 20% of the area of the yard in which it is located? Yes Explain DcNcWa ►s \n SAc_ Yard , h. Does uncovered parking area cover more than a maximum 10% of the area of the yard in which it is located? t4v Explain or' \ti , Y\a unccp►ere--2., Qoc n °y i. Does vehicular accessway to stable and corral have a maximum slope of 25% or less? Stable and corral average vehicular access slope ZS / . j. Does property have an above ground garage with a minimum capacity of 2 cars? ye With guest house a minimum of 3 cars? / 18. Grading quantities shall be balanced. Amount cut 2 S O . Amount fill 2°S . re - c lrt g-';) (Include any basement cut in grading quantities). (uav 19. Area of disturbance. 40% of net lot area maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet S0. t 2- v . Percentage of Net Lot Area (s/• S . 20. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet S $S.v + Co 50 3etcr48t- 2 • • 21. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 22. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 23. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 24. Attach plans. 25. Proposed scheduling. Q4- yC Ccx�in. Jr O'\ c1J i i 2 at 1e 26. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. %-gj. w N . S'\-N ec\s- c.hw CAM : QAokno- van'o,A : ci;%A.H10-c? 0.41 '‘1Sr" +1•10fc.3- Covert ';n %re- A° a- c.1s— ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 27. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. C.iCSJ�t1n� �•�� J ck,x z-YG,.,1t4,c,,_ 6et-sc-,i. • Rear yard SS \CAA c .p0.. t.) I ‘Q • 3 • • . 28. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set- back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. `') \ Yee Wnrx ie+ "\ -e a Oct `2.3-)adzo ri ce— • Act \'‘\ r -e: \ cri 29. Is the proposed project consistent with: City of Rolling Hills General Plan Applicable Specific Plan City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance South Coast Air Quality Management Plan Congestion Management Plan Regional Comprehensive Plan 30. Have any of the following studies been submitted? Geology Report _ Hydrology Report Soils Report Traffic Study Noise Study Biological Study _ Native Vegetation Preservation Plan Solid Waste Generation Report _ Public Services/ Infrastructure Report Yfes No _ Historical Report Archaeological Report Paleontological Study Line of Sight Exhibits Visual Analysis Slope Map _ Fiscal Impact Analysis Air Quality Report _ Hazardous Materials/ Waste N/A 4 • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the Lead Agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The Lead Agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," above may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See State CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 5 Issues: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but 0 0 0 not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 0 )74 quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which 0 0 0 X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural 0 0 0 ❑ resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? ❑ ❑ ❑ X. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ )11 III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 0 0 0 applicable air quality plan? Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially 0 0 0 to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any 0 0 0 X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ K ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ ❑ K ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 7 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the State CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than • Significant With Less Than Mitigation Significant No Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ J1;3 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ )744 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS — Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on 0 0 0 the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ 0 0 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑lEt iv) Landslides? 0 0 0 X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the Toss of topsoil? 0 ❑ ❑' c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or 0 0 0 that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 0 0 0 1 B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life and property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use 0 0 0 Qd of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 ❑ 0 environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 0 ❑ .+ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ 0 0 acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? n- d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 0 )Kr - hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 0 0 or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area/ f) Fora project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, 0 ❑ 0 would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with 0 0 0 an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 0 12( loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY — Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste 0 0 0 discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere 0 0 0 substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater able level (e.g., the production rate of preexisting nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 0 site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the 0 0 0 site or areas including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed 0 0 0 >:( the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 0 0 g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 0 0 mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures 0 0 0 C which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of 0 0 0 loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 0 0 0 10 IX.LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact 0 0 0 ‘Jr' b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or 0 0 0 + regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or 0 0 0 natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ 0 0 resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important 0 0 0 mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE — Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 ❑ excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0 groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels 0 0 0 in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 0 0 C,00 tivCW61 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 0 0 0 where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 0 0 0 the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 11 XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less Than Potentially Significant Less Than Significant With Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? 0 0 0 Police protection? 0 0 0 Schools? 0 0 0 Parks? 0 0 0 Other public facilities? 0 0 0 A6 0 XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing 0 0 0 ' neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ❑ ❑ ❑ the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 12 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XV. TRANSPORTATIONlTRAFFIC — Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in 0 0 0 relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections? b) Exceed either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 ❑ 0 service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either 0 0 0 Ogr an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 0 0 0 (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 0 i❑ supporting alternative transportation (e.g., but turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the 0 0 0 applicable Regional Water Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ❑ 0 0 wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water 0 0 0 drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 0 0 ❑1 13 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. STORM WATER QUALITY IMPACTS — Would the project: a) During construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff? b) Post -construction result in potential impact on storm water runoff c) Result in potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handlir or storage, delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation O 0 Less Than Significant Impact 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to impair 0 the beneficial uses of the receiving waters or areas tha provide water quality benefit? e) Result in potential for discharge of storm water to cause 0 significant harm on the biological integrity of the waterways and water? f) Result in potential for significant changes in the flow 0 velocity or volume of storm water runoff that can cause environmental harm: g) Result in potential for significant increases in erosion of 0 the project site or surrounding areas? 0 0 No Impact l�1 ❑ \ - - ►e. yrwe_c•I .r-Ivo ar c ❑ 04trc\k X ❑ ❑ ,c7.1)a;or, Ew‘ky1 ,Ta.• vh\1 ��dl W fin;.S dr-r‘J Cor&mi ❑ ❑ be ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ X 14 Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0 0 0 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 0 0 ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will 0 0 0 cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? • s NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: ---rot' E 'bear; 7tiOf"#0 2. Address: Co ( EIS>'FAs Lfl OavJS= V4.11-L.%Nu 'AM 44 To 2 �) 3. Phone Number: 31 v •3 1 -Lt s s $ 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): iO (0 AJ \Z td 'Z2AJ to A 1,1 , t 1» eta 2 1 `i 5. Local Agency (city/county): `\w' I)k1 -1411.6.1 /144 (odnl 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: (pd '' 001-I 62L1 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date Jo( 3 0 (lc For Signature Applicant -16- • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application e not contained on these lists. Date t 3 c) (If f For Signature Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date I Sig For Applicant Public:PLANNING MASTERS:City of Rolling Hills Environmental Questionnaire Rev. 2009.doc -17-