893, Construct a new cabana (475 sq, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
111111" r l
111111"
I11,11
I
*20170043279*
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE
RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
ZONING CASE NO. 893 (SEE EXHIBIT A-- ATTACHED)
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCES XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
66 EASTFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 107-EF)
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 893
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCES XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (Rr declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature
Name typed or printed
Signature
De i�lr1 k h om a
Name typed or print
<v s-t- 're lc) Dv.
Address Address
,F?,00 HilLs CA 61601P-t
City/State City/State
See Exhibit A, attached
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who
signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of
that document.
STATE OF l lt6tyqG-
COUNTY OF I AS f y I‘P,c
On OUhua OI7 , before me, Uind D 6Ard et-e,r , a Notary
Public, persolly appeared J
iohn\rtIV1�1111hYY1(1 C
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons whose names)
is/ subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that-he/she/tier
executed the same in h /her/t eirauthorized capacity(iesj, and that by_hia/her/their
signaturefel on the instrument the person,(s)j, or the entity upon behalf of which the
personf4 acted, executed the instrument.
}
}
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that
the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature:
v
Name of Notary: eiCAVOIW
Date Commission Expires S /2A /wl'
Commission No. 2bSgtF-?2
LINDSEY GARDNER
Commission # 2058672
Notary Public - California
Los Angeles County
My Comm. Expires Mar 21.2018
hl , +P I•' 1' • 1
•
411 EX-11( 61 r /1-1
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-06
' A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW CABANA, GRADING,
ABOVE GRADE DECK, RETAINING WALLS, POOL AND RELATED
STRUCTURES AND FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH A PORTION OF THE
RAISED DECK, WALLS, POOL EQUIPMENT AREA AND FIRE PLACE INTO
THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO RETAIN TWO EXISTING SHEDS, PORTION
OF TRELLIS AND BARBEQUE IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO EXCEED
THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT AND TOTAL
COVERAGE OF THE LOT AND TO SET ASIDE AN AREA FOR A FUTURE
STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AT 66
EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 107-EF), (THOMAS).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Tom and Debi
Thomas with respect to real property located at 66 Eastfield, (Lot 107-EF), Rolling Hills,
CA requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 475 square foot cabana; Site Plan
Review for the cabana, for 1,450 square foot pool deck, for higher that 3' in height
retaining walls and grading consisting of a total of 565 cubic yards of dirt, plus
additional 180 cubic yards if a stable is constructed in the future; Variances to encroach
with a portion (310 sq.ft.) of the raised deck, retaining walls, pool equipment area and
fireplace into the rear yard setback; to retain two previously constructed sheds, a portion
of a trellis and barbeque in the rear yard setback; to exceed the maximum permitted
disturbance of the lot with 68.3% (maximum allowed is 40%); to exceed the maximum
permitted total coverage of the lot with 43.2% (maximum allowed is 35%), and to set
aside an area for a future stable and corral in the front yard area of the lot.
Also proposed is a 632 square foot swimming pool with 100 square foot spa. Although
the pool and spa would not require a discretionary permit and could be approved
administratively, the grading for the location requires a Site Plan Review.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application on November 17, 2015, December 15, 2015, and February 16,
2016 at regular Planning Commission meetings, and in the field also on December 15,
2015. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail.
Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said
proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having
reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in
attendance at the public hearings. No neighbors reviewed the plans before the
meetings or attended the site visit. The Rolling Hills Community Association received a
letter from the adjacent neighbor advising they have no objection to the applicant's
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
1
retaining the sheds in the rear easement and the RHCA Board granted the applicants a
license agreement to retain the sheds in the easement until such time as the property
' sell8.
Section 3. The subject property, zoned RA-S-1, contains 1.3 acres gross and
44,563 square feet (1.02 acres) of net lot area. The property is developed with a 5,850
square foot residence with 680 square foot garage, 86 square foot entryway, water
feature, 766 square foot detached trellis, barbeque, two-100 square foot each sheds and a
service yard. The trellis, BBQ and sheds are non -permitted and 251 square foot of the
trellis, the BBQ and sheds are located in the rear yard setback. The applicants wish to
keep those structures on the property and are a part of this Resolution. Most of the
garage and approximately 1,060 square feet of the residence is located in the rear yard
setback, and are legal non -conforming.
Section 4. The project is exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15303, Class 3 exemption Guidelines.
Section 5. A Site Plan Review is required subject to Section 17.46.020 of the
Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed cabana, raised deck, and retaining walls are a
structural addition. Further, the grading for these new structures require Site Plan
Review. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for the cabana, deck, walls,
and grading, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compliant with all requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance except as approved herein a Variance, and is compatible with the
General Plan and surrounding uses because the proposed project is consistent with
goals and policies that require low profile, low -density residential development with
sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The cabana, pool, walls, and
deck construction will be situated to ensure it is not obtrusive to neighbors, will be
screened from view, and the pool equipment is located in an area that will not be
intrusive. The elevated out -of -grade condition and "bulk" of the new deck will be
mitigated, by landscaping and retaining walls and separated by a 4' walkway. To
address Planning Commissioner's concerns, the entire project was "dropped down"
and softened with landscaping.
B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot because the required grading has been carefully
considered, and the out -of -grade condition is being softened with walls and
landscaping. The construction will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to
the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed improvements will be
constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties,
will be screened and landscaped with vegetation and is of sufficient distance from
nearby residences so that the proposed project will not impact the view or privacy of
surrounding neighbors.
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
2
• •
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and
mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed
project is consistent with the scale of homes in the surrounding RA-S-1 similarly zoned
neighborhood. The proposed project entails construction of a cabana, pool, raised deck
and retaining walls for the purpose of enhancing and facilitating outdoor living on the
site, a common residential amenity enjoyed by property owners throughout the City.
D. The development plan generally follows natural contours of the site to
the maximum extent practicable to accomplish groomed and usable areas of the lot,
subject to concurrent approval of Variances and a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to
Section 6 and 7 of this resolution.
E. Natural drainage courses will not be affected by the project. Minimal
grading is proposed and therefore existing drainage channels are not anticipated to be
impacted. The project construction will not be located in a canyon or on existing
slopes that exceed 25%.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because no
change is proposed to the existing driveway, which is in compliance with applicable
requirements.
Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance granting relief from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to. the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same
vicinity or zone. In proposing to encroach with 310 square feet of raised deck, the
retaining walls, pool equipment, and fireplace into the rear yard setback, and also to
retain 2 sheds, a portion of the trellis and barbecue in the rear yard setback, Variances
are required to grant relief from the following Sections of the Zoning Ordinance:
17.12.190 (setback definitions requiring that setbacks be free of structures) and
17.16.150 (Structures and driveways permitted in setbacks where the height of the
proposed deck -greater than 12" above grade, and supporting retaining wall greater
than 3', and 17.16.070 (maximum allowed lot coverage and disturbance) in which case
the proposed total lot coverage and disturbance area would exceed the allowed
amounts with an increases from 36.02% to 43.2% where 35% maximum is allowed for
total lot coverage, and an increase from 54.5% to 68.3% where 40% maximum total lot
coverage is allowed. Variance from Section 17.16.110 relating to the location of the
future stable and corral in the front yard setback is required. With respect to the
aforementioned requests for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional circumstances and conditions on the subject
property as follows:
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
3
• •
Regarding requested variance from Zoning Ordinance Sections 17.16.150, and
17.16.070 relating to the encroachment of the structures in the rear yard setback and
the height of the deck and projection into the setback for the proposed miscellaneous
structures: the current residence is legal non -conforming, with a large portion of the
residence including most of the garage being located in the rear yard setback creating
a constraint on where outdoor livable area adjacent to the residence can be located.
Previously constructed existing structures in the rear yard setback further constrain
the lot and as a part of this Resolution, these structures will be legalized. The
proposed structures common to residences in Rolling Hills are a pool, outdoor deck,
and cabana, and this approval permits the applicants to enjoy the same amenities.
Encroachment of the raised deck, existing trellis, and pool equipment into the rear
yard setback would enable the property owners to construct a reasonably sized deck
designed for outdoor living. The placement of the pool equipment in the rear yard
setback keeps it away from all neighbors and allows for better screening. Retaining
the two sheds has received approval from the RHCA.
Regarding the requested variance from Section 17.16.070 for total lot coverage
and disturbance limits, the project does not meet the total lot coverage requirement of
35% and is proposed at 43.2%, which is an increase from the existing 36.0% which is
legal non -conforming. The proposed structures increases disturbance area to 68.34%,
including the future stable and corral which has a slope of 3:1 and the pool pad
slopes will be 2:1. The lot coverage and disturbance exceedance is due to the fact that
with the house located in the rear of the lot there is a long and wide existing
driveway leading to the residence, an area of which is calculated towards the total lot
coverage. To accommodate the large driveway and the house in the rear, the lot was
previously graded more than the maximum permitted of 40%; therefore any
structural improvements cause those numbers to exceed the maximum permitted.
Regarding the Variance from Section 17.16.110, relating to the location of the
future stable and corral in the front yard setback, the existing residence is in the rear
of the property leaving very few options other than to propose the stable and the
corral in the front yard setback.
B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity
and zone but which is denied to the property in question by strict application of the
code. The property right which otherwise would be enjoyed is the ability to utilize a
portion of their rear yard with a sizeable deck, pool, and cabana to accommodate
outdoor recreational use, including an cabana and pool, which currently can not be
enjoyed due to the existing residence being so far towards the rear of the lot. The
proposed location of the entire project - deck, cabana, and pool are the least visually
intrusive to the property and its neighbors.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity and
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
4
zone in which the property is located in that the degree of deviation from the allowed
amount of encroachment (310 square feet of the raised deck), a portion of the trellis,
and the pool equipment is relatively minor. Further, the proposed patio would not
be visible from the adjoining street or private properties and therefore is not expected
to result in any visual or privacy impacts.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
will be observed in that the proposed deck, cabana, and pool construction will be
orderly, attractive, legalizes non -conforming uses on the property, and will not affect
the rural character of the community. The subject proposed structures are in the rear
of the property and will not impact the proposed future stable and corral area and the
proposed deck, cabana, and pool will not impact use of the existing structures.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of
Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open
space between surrounding structures. The property is located above the adjacent
property to rear and there is large open space between any structures on subject
property to the adjacent property.
F. The Variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los
Angeles Hazardous Waster Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for
hazardous waste facilities.
Section 7. Section 17.16.210(A)(2) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
permits approval of a cabana under certain conditions, provided the Planning
Commission approves a Conditional Use Permit. With respect to this request for a
Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit for the cabana would be consistent
with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan because
the use is consistent with similar uses in the community, meets all the applicable
development standards of the Zoning Ordinance and no deviations from the
development standards are requested.
B. The nature, condition, and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and
structures have been considered, and the construction of a cabana will not adversely
affect or be materially detrimental to these adjacent uses, buildings, or structures
because the project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the structure
will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors.
C. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain,
and surrounding residences because it complies with the low profile residential
development pattern of the community, and will be screened from neighbors' view.
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
5
• •
D. The proposed conditional use complies with all applicable development
standards of the zone district because the 475 square foot size of the cabana does not
exce'ed the maximum permitted under the Municipal Code and it does not encroach
into any setback areas and is not located in the front.
E. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the portions of the Los Angeles
County Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities because the project site is not listed on the current State of California
Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
F. The proposed conditional use observes the spirit and intent of Title 17 of the
Zoning Code because the proposed project meets all of the development standards of
the Zoning Regulations and has a proposed stable, corral and access thereto. The
construction of the project and the structure will not be obtrusive to neighbors.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Site Plan Review, Variances, and Conditional Use Permit in
Zoning Case No. 893 for new cabana, raised deck, pool, pool equipment, fireplace,
and walls; to encroach with a portion (310 square feet) of the raised deck, retaining
walls, pool equipment area, and fireplace into the rear yard setback; to exceed the
maximum permitted total lot coverage and disturbance of the lot; and to retain and
legalize two previously constructed sheds, a portion of a trellis, and barbecue in the
rear yard setback, subject to the following conditions:
A. The Site Plan, Variances, and Conditional Use Permit approval shall
expire within two years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to
this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections
17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise
extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges
granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the City has given the applicants
written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been
provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct
the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's
determination.
C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site
plan on file dated February 10, 2016, except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
6
• •
The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan
check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application.
• A copy of the conditions of this Resolution shall be printed on plans approved when a
building permit is issued and a copy of such approved plans, including conditions of
approval, shall be available on the building site at all times.
The licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building
Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all
respects to this Resolution approving this project and including conformance with all
of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance.
Further, the person obtaining a building permit for this project shall execute a
Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this
Resolution and any plans approved therewith.
D. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to the property or this project, which would
constitute additional grading, height or any structural development including a
trellis or other similar above ground structure shall require the filing of a new
application for approval by the Planning Commission.
E. Grading for this project shall not exceed 320 cubic yards of cut,
including 220 cubic yards from excavation of the pool; and 245 cubic yards of fill, for a
total of 565 cubic yards of dirt, of which 75 will be exported from the pool excavation
and 100 cubic yards, will be for overexcavation and recompaction. 180 cubic yards of dirt
will be required for the future stable and corral area, when constructed. The grading will
result in 2:1 slopes behind the pool and cabana. Some of the grading for the future stable
shows the resulting slopes at 3:1.
F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 8,893 square feet, or 19.96%.
Total lot coverage shall not exceed 43.2% or 19,263 square feet. Building Pad coverage
on the 21,660 square foot residential pad shall not exceed 8,433 square feet or 39%
coverage. Building pad coverage for the future stable will not exceed 450 square feet
with 45 % coverage.
G. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 68.3% (of net lot area),
which includes the future stable and corral area.
H. The future set -aside area for the stable and corral area of 1,000 square
feet, shall be retained on the property at all times.
I. A minimum of four -foot level path and/or walkway, which does not
have to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the cabana, pool
and decking.
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
7
J. There shall be no sleeping quarters and temporary occupancy in the
cabana. The cabana shall not exceed 475 square feet. All conditions of Section 17.16.210
A. (2) for a cabana shall apply.
K. The pool equipment area shall be enclosed and screened with
landscaping. Per LA County Building Code, pool barrier/fencing shall be required.
L. A drainage plan, as required by the Building Department shall be
prepared and approved by City Staff prior to issuance of a construction permit. Such
plan shall be subject to LA County Code requirements.
M. The "as built" miscellaneous structures including 2 sheds, the trellis, fire
place and barbecue that are in the rear yard setback shall be made legal and building
permit obtained. Further, the approval of the two sheds located in the rear setback
shall expire upon the sale of the property.
N. The side and rear setback lines in the vicinity of the construction for this
project shall remain staked throughout the construction. Construction fence may be
required.
O. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local
ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to
undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required.
P. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project
site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby unimproved
roadway easements, but not to obstruct neighboring driveways. During construction,
to maximum extend feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City.
Q. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet
residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
R. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) requirements related to solid waste, drainage and storm water
management and comply with the City's Low Impact development Ordinance (LID), if
applicable. Further the property owners shall be required to conform to the County
Health Department requirements for a septic system, should one be required for the
cabana.
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
8
• •
S. A minimum of 50% of the construction material spoils shall be recycled
and diverted. The hauler shall provide the appropriate documentation to the City.
• T. All graded areas shall be landscaped. In addition, the cabana and
swimming pool shall be screened from the neighbors and a landscaping plan shall be
submitted to the City for review and approval. If landscaping of 5,000 square foot area
or greater is introduced or redevelop, the landscaping shall be subject to the
requirements of the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Any plants
introduced for this project shall not grow into a hedge but be offset and shall not
exceed the ridgeline of the cabana. The landscaping plan shall utilize to the maximum
extent feasible, plants that are native to the area and are consistent with the rural
character of the community.
U. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association (RHCA) Architectural Review Committee prior to the
issuance of building permit. Perimeter easements and trails, if any, shall remain free
and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to fences -including
construction fences, any hardscape, driveways, landscaping, irrigation and drainage
devices, except as otherwise approved by the RHCA.
V. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including
for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can
be found at:
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/fox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIR
E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to
monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be declared and if
work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire
distinguisher.
W. All requirements of the Building and Construction Code, the Zoning
Code, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with,
including the Outdoor Lighting Ordinance. All utility lines to the cabana shall be
undergrounded pursuant to Section 17.27.030.
X. Prior to finaling of the project an "as graded" and an "as constructed"
plans and certifications shall be provided to the Planning Department and the Building
Department to ascertain that the completed project is in compliance with the approved
plans. In addition, any modifications made to the project during construction, shall be
depicted on the "as built/as graded" plan.
Y. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of this approval, the approvals shall not be effective. Such affidavit shall be recorded
together with the resolution.
Reso.2016-06
66 Eastfield
9
• •
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF MARCH 2016.
B D CHELF, CHAIR AN
ATTEST:
Ctifdt )
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public
hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in section
17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6.
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
10
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2016-06 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,
SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FOR A NEW CABANA, GRADING,
ABOVE GRADE DECK, RETAINING WALLS, POOL AND RELATED
STRUCTURES AND FOR ENCROACHMENT WITH A PORTION OF THE
RAISED DECK, WALLS, POOL EQUIPMENT AREA AND FIRE PLACE INTO
THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO RETAIN TWO EXISTING SHEDS, PORTION
OF TRELLIS AND BARBEQUE IN THE REAR YARD SETBACK; TO EXCEED
THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOTAND TOTAL
COVERAGE OF THE LOT AND TO SET ASIDE AN AREA FOR A FUTURE
STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD AREA OF THE LOT AT 66
EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 107-EF), (THOMAS).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
March 15, 2016 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Cardenas, Gray and Chairman Chelf.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners Kirkpatrick and Smith.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
Reso. 2016-06
66 Eastfield
cgeld we)
HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK
11