785, Construct a stable in front ya, Resolutions & Approval Conditions•
RECORDING REQUESTED BY ANC
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
G91,14:201
I I
*20101290995*
is RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE
RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE NO. 785
VARIANCE XX
§§
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
67 EASTFIELD DRIVE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 20-EF CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
VARIANCE XX
ZONING CASE NO. 785
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature �.
MI041EL C . 82fQNDi'tEV f .
Name typed or printed
6)1 GSTFI ti3O 7)R
Signature
Name typed or printed
A ress Address
ou wi6 HlLLs, go Z9�
City/State City/State
•
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
See Attached Exhibit "A", RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO. 2010-10
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On 46Laii 2712-8/O
before me,
Personally
appeared 1 (..kna. L- • T%4(4Aci M P-4
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personas) whose name0)6.a'
e/scribed to the within instrument and acknowled•e• to me that/ ice/ executed the same in
k/t`rir authorized capacity(W) and that by ZIP. he /.t it signatureY4 on the instrument the
persorf f, or the entity upon behalf of which the persor'J acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS by hand and official seal.
Signature of Notary6 C-• (AT-e/A
( Seal)
DoaolhY C. GEORGSTCCEr
Commission 0 1751120
Notary Public - CaJItarfta j
Loa Angelo* County
•
agrTwtHDO attcitol Vtato►4
ytnua0 tedegnA soJ
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO SET ASIDE
AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD
SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 785, AT 67 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 20-EF),
(BRANDMEYER). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Michael
Brandmeyer with respect to real property located at 67 Eastfield Drive (Lot 20-
EF), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Variance to permit to set aside an area for a
future stable and corral in the front yard setback.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearing to consider the application at a field trip on June 14, 2010. The applicants
and neighbors within 1,000-foot radius of subject property were notified of the
public hearing in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented
from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the
City staff, and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied
said proposal. No public comments were received at the meeting or in writing to
staff or the Planning Commission.
Section 3. The property is developed with a 2,648 square foot residence
with 451 square foot attached garage, 189 covered porch, service yard and 542
square foot raised deck. The applicants are planning to construct less than 800
square foot swimming pool and less than 1,000 square foot addition. Both projects
require administrative approval only, (over-the-counter).
Section 4. Pursuant to the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, in order to
construct a swimming pool or an addition to a residence a stable and corral must
either be constructed or an area set aside for a future stable and corral.
Section 5. The configuration of the lot and location of the existing
residence on the lot is such that there is not a sufficient area in the rear of the
residence to construct a stable and corral on the existing building pad, which
would meet the size and distance requirement (35 feet from a residential
structure). The lot behind the building pad slopes significantly towards the rear
at 2:1 and greater slopes. Such slopes are problematic for construction of stable
and corral. Therefore, the applicants requested that an area be set -aside in the
front of the residence.
Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project is
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Reso. 2010-10
67 Eastfield
1
Section 7. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of
property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity.
Section 17.16.110 requires that the front yard setback be fifty (50) feet from the
roadway easement line, and be unobstructed from the ground upwards. In order
to set aside a 1000 square foot area for a future stable and corral in the front
setback, the applicants are seeking a Variance. With respect to this request for a
Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and
conditions applicable to this property that justify the request:
1. The existing residence has been developed towards the rear of the
lot to garner the extraordinary views from the rear of the lot. The applicants are
not proposing major changes to the existing residence, other than a small
addition. There is not an adequate area in the rear of the residence on the existing
building pad to construct a future stable and corral without impairing the view.
2. The lot was graded previously to create a pad for construction in a
manner that the structure was placed towards the rear of the building pad. The
topography of the lot together with the fact that the existing pad and residence
are located in the rear create difficulty in setting aside the area for a future stable
and corral elsewhere on the property.
3. The configuration of the lot and location of the existing residence
on the lot is such that there is not a sufficient area in the rear of the residence to
construct a stable and corral on the existing building pad, which would meet the
size and distance requirement (35 feet from a residential structure). The lot
behind the building pad slopes significantly towards the rear at 2:1 and greater
slopes. Such slopes are problematic for construction of stable and corral.
4. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the gross lot area is 1.29 acres,
(excluding roadway easement). The net lot area, as calculated for development
purposes, is 41,239 square feet (0.95 acres). The lot has a narrow frontage along
Eastfield Drive (140 feet) and is over 423 feet long. The front of the property, for
about the first 210 feet distance from the roadway easement line, is relatively flat
after which it significantly slopes towards a canyon. It is in the rear of the flat
portion that the residence is located.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and
zone, but which is denied to the property in question because due to the existing
grade, narrow lot configuration it would be a hardship to located the stable in
the rear yard. The expansive open space in the front yard comfortably supports
future stable. The narrow nature of the property places a hardship on locating
the stable in the side or rear areas. Further, due to the steepness of the slope
behind the residential building pad it would be infeasible to construct a stable in
the rear. Without the Variance, the applicants would not be able to construct a
pool and small addition, and therefore their property right or enjoyment of the
Reso. 2010-10
67 Eastfield
2
• •
property would be affected. The property is developed with a 2,648 square foot
residence with 451 square foot attached garage, which are relatively small as
compared to other similar homes in the area and the future addition would not
make the lot look overbuilt or out of character with the neighborhood. The area
of the proposed pool is not feasible for the set aside for a stable and corral, as it
would be too close to the residence.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located because a stable, if ever built in
the front setback, would not affect any neighbor's views and therefore property
value and would be screened from the street.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of .the Zoning
Ordinance will be observed in that it is required by the Zoning Ordinance to set
aside an area for a stable and corral in order to improve the property, in this case
the front yard set aside area is suitable area for a future stable and corral.
E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City
of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient
open space between surrounding structures and a set aside area for a future
stable and corral.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings in Section 7, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance in Zoning Case No. 785 to set aside
an area for a future stable and corral in the front yard setback, subject to the
following conditions:
A. The set aside area in the front setback does not preclude another
party from applying to the Planning Commission for an alternate location of a
stable and corral.
B. The property on which the project is located contains a set aside
area for a future stable and corral in the front yard. However, the Planning
Commission shall review any proposed development in the future for a stable
and corral. The Variance granted in this application for front yard setback set
aside area for equestrian uses does not guarantee future approval in that
location.
C. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been
given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has
been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails
to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the
City's determination.
Reso. 2010-10
67 Eastfield
3
• •
D. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must
be complied with unless otherwise set forth in this approval, or shown otherwise
on an approved plan.
E. All administrative approvals, permitted pursuant to Chapter 17.44.
ZONE CLEARANCE, for a swimming pool, addition and other construction,
shall be subject to the project meeting all Zoning Code requirements for coverage
and all other development standards and the L.A. County Building Code
standards.
F. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a
result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time
limits set forth in Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code
of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20th DAY OF JULY 2010.
LOREN DEROY, ATRPERSON
ATTEST: i?
HE CE, r EPUTTCITY CLERK
Reso. 2010-10
67 Eastfield
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2010-10 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A VARIANCE TO SET ASIDE
AN AREA FOR A FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL IN THE FRONT YARD
SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 785, AT 67 EASTFIELD DRIVE, (LOT 20-EF),
(BRANDMEYER). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
July 20, 2010 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Chelf, Henke, Pieper, Vice Chairperson Smith and
Chairperson DeRoy.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
CITY CLERK
Reso. 2010-10
67 Eastfield
5
This is a true and certified copy of the record
if it bears the seal, imprinted in purple ink,
of the Registrar-Recorder/County C!erk
SEP 14 2010
a6VAC Los,ff!ofe4, itrARTECORBOWYCON
Po.= COUN1Y. CALIFORNIA