640, Enlarge garage with encroachme, Application•
£'i1yRoilinO O ..J h//6 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
VARIANCE NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
REOUEST FOR HEARING ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
PROPERTY OWNER: �1A M' lA MAGL,�
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 291C00 9. Y.131 N . , toLLIN61 'H'IL.L�-�
TELEPHONE NO.: 327 3410
PROPERTY ADDRESS: No. 1.46144e
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 1.5.
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. PAGE I" 6 PARCEL
AGENTS NAMEGrUlsibErrovc14
AGENTS ADDRESS: 4024 VIA eAco'i :CCU .s 'r. v' .
TELEPHONE NO.: 77
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project
require a Variance.
J Ld .�.ttt4r •at is -p C44 Co ffEaT
1141-0 51iE '/?p . Ssi- tc- . TOTAL I 1 ?
5�. FT. 114 E'eisicrK
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
• On r »4 (- 1 0e. 14As Co FE is oy
&? Mc a. is l �I yv jam! lit Is Et' -lc . >Hkii`ogr
EX1T N&s - 1s i,IbT yq
F..1ou ati 2. c;s
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because
e•Las :sT litIMa ► s i1 •rpT AWAY.
5642apki 1 DTI 1J (v O405Pt4e4 GPI
Ohi-r5. o12.40kowAy . 5wggexI,pih!b-
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS.
PROPERTY OWNER:
OWNER'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS:
• REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
fs*. tt• Mrs l aaJ MAUrncit,
2°fZ V. i? N.. fit,
r
�77 Zip
_No._ 3 M Il717L.EFZIZoe 1.,4tia G (-0
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO.
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. Chi . PAGE NB PARCEL 2e3
AGENTS NAME:
AGENT'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO:
'24 V iC3i r. dt e .
.NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan
Review:
Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage:
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRIT L&
•
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding,
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
YE-6. 611A L siaE c-# ,te e..
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
?oPoSLo 620t06- 1 ),AN )14 L *r ' o mole.
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading
and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be
rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect
drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading
and proposed minimization on lots.
rr-OPOSD . ( i7/Si& fDLLDuwS
$ie N C,5- 4o1J r u 1e-3 .
pI Vlo(5LY Afrgokei,
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates Iandscaping and creates buffers.
1Jo a-ikA t.l . nzvkA f 1 VIoN5L? }k1'f .ovvp P 6 4
• •
How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots.
or tTr 15 ovpli 31'2 rtzo1°ns P1 D 1b1 L, 1 r ktekrrs -a. WELL $e.Lw
•
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where
necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the
existing setbacks of neighboring properties,
`( S. 51 1 wrr1 i
oscl 0r4 oP Tra. *xisrris16- Slips •yntipt
vN wErsh- ci G F r) (, i 5,c411-I aF
D I P T HoPt 1 11cc:G 1,1,)Isl.1T 15
t 110 'EST IftgE.1op-e. .N0 Re&yrVs: t comer
X )STs
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data,
landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas.
YE.. cetlecgt,warsr cCt1Qrr►orlS
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
• •
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evalu tion to the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented aj e tru9/4i c9rrect to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date: 1 ' 5 • i
Sign
re
For: Gj.Erp
Applicant
DATE ZONING CASE ^T. ____ ADDRESS
APPLICANT MN
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
ritavioL45I-I
JUILDING AREAS APPIe+c'VEP PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA (� sq.ft. "" sq.ft. 1 sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) '712t'O sq.ft. (06' 5 sq.ft. 1.71945 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE �► ( sq.ft. sq.ft. 5l l °I 0 sq.ft.
GARAGE l O 3 n sq.ft. (6OI sq.ft. 1, (94 sq.ft.
SWIM: IING POOL/SPA 4 AO sq.ft. ▪ sq.ft. D %d sq.ft.
STABLE 450 sq.ft. • sq.ft. 460 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft. ▪ sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 10 O sq.ft. — sq.ft. t D O sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft. • sq.ft. sq.ft.
NEW BASEMENT AREA sq.ft.
(Volume to be included in grading quantities.)
TOTAL STRUCTURES _T sq.ft. — 150 sq.ft. 7,6 t4 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL 6.6 % D • 1 % 5.6 %
COVERAGE
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE 1.0• 1 % `" % '2 0. °) %
DRIVEWAY I *i 9O0 sq.ft. 'r sq.ft. it el 0° sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND — -
PATIO AREAS 3h sq.ft. sq.ft. 3► 51 $ sq.ft.
POOL DECKING 21 565 sq.ft. sq.ft. 2 i 55 5 sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK 2l 105 sq.ft. sq.ft. S (tO 55sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE 15 • % % (S.' %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE 2't, l04 sq.ft. sq.ft. 27 s00 sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE 2-7 •17 % O • ` % SP. %
DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS WO . 3 MI Dazi24 Veva (Ai. SO,
APPLICANT _M . 1 6 . (aN ' MA0LE:op
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
D NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 2.5 1)0 5 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE S + 1 1 C sq.ft.
GARAGE 1I19sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL LP 2 sq:ft.
RECREATION COURT
sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 1 O CA' sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE SO. %
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 64(5 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE _ sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) 45' sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 450 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE •'7 %
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at NO. O. M IODL Eg
this day of
By:
By:
Address
, California,
, 20
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in Califomia. If
this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary
Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized
by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that
the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and
belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: ,. DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE:Cit c 'N 1 �; N FEE:
COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
1024 VIAr fAGO. ' V. E • ZONING CASE NO:
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. J ) J7 J 8077
PROJECT ADDRESS:, M L!2E L
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent
and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the (ity and the RHCA to develop
property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or
ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge 'that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood.
Executed at . California
this day of
By:
By:
7
AA/),
Address
City
, 207�•