Loading...
640, Enlarge garage with encroachme, CorrespondenceSep 08 03 02:36p BOLTON Eng Corp 1----- p. 1 4, (310) 544-0458 • Engineering Corporation Bolton Eng Road, 707 Silver SpurSuite 2014 027 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 9544-0458 tel (310) 544-6010 fax (310) Setember 15, 2003 Craig Nealis, City Manager GIB Qf rigi yI #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: Reference to July 17, 2003 letter Export 200 yards of dirt #4 Pine Tree Lane #3 Middleridge Road Dear Mr. Nealis ay yfflalajWitg SEP 1 5 2003 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS In July the City gave us permission to export 300 cubic yards of dirt from #4 Pine Tree Lane to #3 Middleridge Road as requested in our July 17, 2003 letter. About 100 cubic yards was exported during July and August. This letter is to let the City know that we are preparing to haul the remainder (about 200 cubic yards) of this dirt soon. We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120 President /(-1-APtie r CITY OF ROL 1NG HILLS r/ r PLANIN (OEPARTMEf 7i/t 7/V 3 fI-S '7/ 2 VC S 7trA,'1,4 A,tittc6 &t.ruce— S-341 3.7 �- -, Li& t 1 y,�, 'At r (1'v' 11-( fVPUC 5 B l' s • • Bolton Engineering Corporation 707 Silver Spur Road, Suite 201 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 tel (310) 544-6010 fax (310) 544-0458 July 17, 2003 Craig Nealis, City Manager City of Rolling Hills #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: Export 300 yards of dirt #4 Pine Tree Lane Dear Mr. Nealis JISJ-(1:351\VA 7' JUL 232CO3 By CITY OF ROLLING HILLS We request you permit the Centofantes at #4 Pine Tree Lane Road export up to 300 cubic yards to complete the addition to their home. The majority of the grading for the new house has been completed. The need to export the soil was not foreseen prior to the commencement of construction and the work for the house cannot be completed without the requested export. The dirt quantities that were initially calculated during the development of the grading plan didn't anticipate the cut from the tunnel. Currently, there is a grading project at #3 Middleridge Road that needs dirt to complete their grading. We request permission to move this dirt to #3 Middleridge Road. This dirt is necessary due to the elimination of the wall on the northwest side of the driveway. This wall was expensive to build and rechecking the topography in this area allowed the construction of the driveway with a two to one slope. We plan to provide an as -built topo of this revised grading. We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, //( - Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120 President CITY OF POLLING HILLS 1 r.•• „C TMEf 09/18/03 THU 07:40 FAX 310 377 7288 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 141001 Sep 08 03 02:36p • TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID ST. TIME USAGE T PGS. RESULT :*:*****:** ::*****::x:*** *** TX REPORT *** * :*a:**x:*** :*$:*:$:* :** 0102 09/18 07:39 00'55 2 OK 5440458 • B0LTDN En6_ Corp [3101^544-0458 Corporation Bolton Engineering Suite 20'' 707 Silver Spur Road, Sui Belling Hills Estates,CA 90274 ) �58 tel (310) 544-6010 fax Setember 15, 2003 Craig Neelis, City Manager GIWQ2111nris ##2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills. CA 90274 Subject: Referencert 2.00 yards of dirt 2003 letter Expo #4 pine Tree Lane #3 Middleridge Road By SEP 1 5 2003 CITY OF ROLLING FILLS p.1 Dear Mr_ Neelis In July the City gave us permission to export 300 cubic yards of dirt from #4 Pine Tree 0 letter. About 10 Lane to##3M9 iddlerid a Road as requested in our July 17, 2003 t the Cit know thatWe are pis was exported during rem remainder (about August. 200 cubic yards) of this dirt soon. are preparing to haul the We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, -7Z-LC-Vf Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120 r CITY OF ROL ING H1I.Ls r / IL iAleartf VV/ 10/ UJ inu u 1 : 4G •rAA .S1U .ST/ 7 Zb CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I� 001 Sep 08 03 02:36p Setember 15, 2003 • TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID ST. TIME USAGE T PGS. RESULT *****:***a:x:*********#:* *** TX REPORT *** **a::***********a***** 0103 09/18 07:42 00'33 1 OK BOLTON Eng. Corp 5305482 • (3101 544-0458 Corporation EngineeringgSuite 201 707 Silver Spur Road, Hills Estates, CA 94 p4c5g Rolling fax (310) tel (310) 54 '6010 7671 Date From Co, Phone # Post -its Fax Note CoJ 1;# Craig Nealis, City Manager o �0{IiP Hills GIB #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: ReferenceExport 2p0 yards of dirk 2003 letter #4 Pine Tree Lane #3 Middleridge Road Fax c—i° ..c o� 4a1003 CITY OF POLLING NULLS p.1 pages► u,.AZ*4-. Dear Mr. Nealis ga ve July the CityaYe us permission to export 300 cubic yards of dirt from About utine� ubic e Tree Lane to #3 Middlendge Road as requested in our July 17, 2003 yards was exported during July and August. This letter is to cubic yards) Let othis the dirtCity k onw that we are preparing to haul the remainder (about We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely,� JCS/ Ross N. Bolton, RCE 2(3120 �rec Mont r CITY OF SOLI_ING HILLS • Bolton Engineering Corporation 707 Silver Spur Road, Suite 201 Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 tel (310) 544-6010 fax. (310) 544-0458 July 17, 2003 Craig Nealis, City Manager City of Rolling Hills #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: Export 300 yards of dirt #4 Pine Tree Lane Dear Mr. Nealis By JUL 232003 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS We request you permit the Centofantes at #4 Pine Tree Lane Road export up to 300 cubic yards to complete the addition to their home. The majority of the grading for the new house has been completed. The need to export the soil was not foreseen prior to the commencement of construction and the work for the house cannot be completed without the requested export. The dirt quantities that were initially calculated during the development of the grading plan didn't anticipate the cut from the tunnel. Currently, there is a grading project at #3 Middleridge Road that needs dirt to complete their grading. We request permission to move this dirt to #3 Middleridge Road. This dirt is necessary due to the elimination of the wall on the northwest side of the driveway. This wall was expensive to build and rechecking the topography in this area allowed the construction of the driveway with a two to one slope. We plan to provide an as -built topo of this revised grading. We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please call. Sincerely, ,t,�%' /` (,� Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120 President CITY 05 BOLLING HILLS L(r-t�� t; `?ARTMEf ? - 2 3.0 7) 1 • C1iy ol Rolling CERTIFIED MAIL November 15, 2001 Mr. Ian MacLeod 2960 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 640 (LOT 3-A-EF) RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23 Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on October 24, 2001 granting a request for a Variance at 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 640. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission was reported to the City Council on November 13, 2001. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to: Printed on Recycled Paper. Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. . To expedite this process, you may want to hand carry the Affidavit and the Resolution to the County Registrar -Recorder. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tanta Schwartz Principal Planner Enclosures: Resolution no. 2001- 23 Affidavit of Acceptance Form Appeal section of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code Exhibit "A" Development Plan cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect, (Resolution only) &'"x i i t "A" RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 3 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH IN ZONING CASE NO. 640. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS.DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod duly filed an application with respect to real property located at 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills, (Lot 253-B-UR) requesting a Variance to permit encroachment into the south side yard setback to construct a garage addition at an existing single family residence in Zoning Case No. 640. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider this application on October 16, 2001. The applicants were notified of the hearing in writing by first class mail. The applicant's representative was in attendance at the hearing. Section 3. The Planning Commission found that a field trip to view the proposed project was not necessary due to the fact that a similar application for a side yard encroachment and a Site Plan review for subject site was approved by the Planning Commission on August 21, 2001 by Resolution No. 2001-16, and the Commission conducted a visit to the site on July 18, 2001. Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e) and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 5. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.120 requires the side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-2 Zone to be thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is requesting to encroach up to a maximum of 6 feet into the 35-foot south side yard setback to permit the encroachment of 116 square feet of a 156 square foot addition. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is located above the main road and is not visible from the street. The proposed encroachment will follow a line of an Ping. Comm. Reso. 2001-23 1 • • e existing 120 square foot encroachment into the south side yard setback and a recently approved 120 square foot encroachment along the same building line and will not be visible from the roadway. B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the development and use of the subject property in a manner consistent with the shape of the lot and development of other property on this street justifies this additional small incursion into the side yard setback. There will not be any greater incursion into the side yard setback than already exists. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. Allowing the proposed incursion into the south side yard setback will not allow any greater incursion than already exists. In addition, development on this portion of the pad will allow a substantial portion of the more environmentally significant rear portions of the lot to remain undeveloped. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 640 to permit the encroachment of a 156 square foot addition that will encroach a maximum of 6 feet into the thirty-five (35') south side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application, dated October 9, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in Section 7 of this Resolution. Section 7. The Variance to the side yard setback approved in Section 5 'of this Resolution is subject to the following conditions: A. The Variance approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A), unless construction on the applicable portions of the structure have commenced within that time period. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variances and Site Plan Review approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall be subject to revocation; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a.period of thirty (30) days and has been provided additional notice and a hearing prior to the revocation of the Permit. C. All requirements of the. Buildings Code of the City of Rolling Hills and the Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A, dated October 9, 2001, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. Ping. Comm. Reso. 2001-23 2 • • E. There shall be no grading for this project. The proposed retaining wall along the perimeter of the building pad in the front and side yard areas of the site shall be constructed without requiring any additional grading than what was approved previously and memorialized in Resolution No. 2001-16 and shall not exceed 35-inches in height at any point. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 38.3%. F. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the building pad and driveway. The applicant is encouraged to retain the existing native vegetation, to the maximum extent feasible, in the area of the relocated driveway and to replant with like vegetation, should the existing vegetation be removed. G. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. H. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 30.3%. The structural lot coverage shall not exceed 5.6% of the net lot area and the total structural lot coverage (including all structures and paved areas) shall not exceed 20.4% of the net lot area. I. The property owners shall be required to conform with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence. J. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. K. All parking, during and after construction, shall take place on the project site. L. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of septic tanks. M. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. Ping. Comm. Reso. 2001-23 3 N. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and stormwater pollution prevention. O. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as requiredby the County of Los Angeles. P. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Q. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. R. All utility lines shall be placed underground. S. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to this approval, which would constitute additional structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. T. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of the Variances and Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective. U. All conditions of this Variance approval that apply must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. W. Except as herein specified, the provisions of Resolution No. 2001-16 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY F,CTOBER, 2001. ALLANiBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: . k MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK Ping. Comm. Reso. 2001-23 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-23 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A GARAGE ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 3 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH IN ZONING CASE NO. 640. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 24, 2001 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. Ping. Comm. Reso. 2001-23 DEPUTY CITY CLERK 5 • 1734 010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be Wed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 1730.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take . jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.' 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. ROLLING HILLS ZONING 76 MAY 24, 1993 17.54.030 If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. ROLLING HILLS ZONING 77 - MAY 24, 1993 • • 1734.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 ROWNG mus ZONING 78 MAY ?A, 1993 NOV IT( OF ROLLNC 4V- w a trCI C7 143 rl O O m tr Er Do sI il l�ra�-s�( 17, Postage Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) r• Total Postage & Fees $ ' t 0 g Postmark ' Here Recipient's Name (Please Print Clearly) (to be compl ted by mailer) Street, Apt. No.; or o Box o. F2 4o f a-u7k-G?81 i---"Dn--=e_--1-11�-'' ---- City, State, ZIP+4 �/ M /F, . 1▪ 1, (44 5 • °7BI6!0 Certified Mail Provides: ® A mailing receipt a A unique identifier for your mailpiece El A signature upon delivery ® A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: ® Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail. e Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. ® NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I! For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. ® For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". ® If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. It a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, February 2000 (Reverse) 102595-99-M-2087 ,°SENDER: ,CO tea.:.. • Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ■ Print your name and address on the reverse - so that we can return the card to:you. o Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits:: ' 1. Article Addressed to: Mr, .won //'IacJcx c O 'Pates Vea-6?0, Dr. /V lQ// ns5 ,Y'//s G/; ,o 27V z . c . 0 yo 2. Article Number (Transfer from service label) - PS Form 3811, August 2001 7099 p Agent Vic,/O Addressee B.//Reced by (Printed Name) - ' 1 C.:Date of Delivery /��i' Is •eliver9 address different from item 1? ❑ Yes ❑ No If YES, enter delivery address below: 3. Service Type Certified Mail ❑ Registered ❑ Insured Mail ❑ Express Mail'. ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) .3goo 0oi2' &6y sg/ Domestic Return Receipt 0 Yes 102595-01-M-2509 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE • Sender: Please print your name, addr First -Class Mail Postage & Fees Paid LISPS P re i ► o. -10 and ZIP+4 in this box NOV 20 CITY OF ROLLING HILL'I1"' PORTUGUESE BEND my ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 it i t€ lit- t i t 1.t MI II ! ! it ! tt. tl{tttt t.{t.l It 117lttf t7tt.11i m ttttt71t111titi Filll iltlJt • Cry ol� PF,.9 J&fe October 25, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod 2960 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640 (LOT 253 B-UR), RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23 Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on October 24, 2001 granting a request for a variance at 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 640. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on November 13, 2001. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to record an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. The Affidavit of Acceptance form and the Resolution, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved "Exhibit A" Development Plan to keep for your files will be forwarded to you after the Council meeting. Should you have any questions, please call me at (310) 377-1521 Sincerely, Y anta Schwartz incipal Planner Cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect CP Printed on Recycled Paper. e44 ` Rolling October 24, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod 2960 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640 (LOT 253 B-UR) Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Please find enclosed a refund for Planning Application fees in the amount of $1,500.00 for Site Plan review. Your current case did not require a Site Plan review application, just a Variance. Please do not hesitate to call me, if you have any questions. Sincerely, lanta Schwartz rincipal Planner Panted on Recycled Paper. CITY OF ROLLING,LS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Palos Verdes Center #07' 507 Silver Spur Roe. Rolling Hills Estates, CA 16-49/1220 LI NUMBER 14560 PAY *************** One Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 TO THE ORDER OF Ian MacLeod 2960 Palos Verdes Dr. No Rolling Hills, CA 90274 **************** DATE AMOUNT Oct 22 01 S1 11°0 L4560111 1: L 220004961:073 2002 L7511■ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ian MacLeod INVOICE NO #7468 Refund SP AUTHORIZE6 SIGIS lJFt 'Pp S NUMBER Oct 22 01 GROSS AMT DISCOUNT NET 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 Audited and approved for payment : CITY OF ROLLING HILLS m38 1,500.00 14560 NUMBER Ian MacLeod m38 Oct 22 01 INVOICE NO GROSS AMT DISCOUNT NET #7468 Refund 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 Audited and approved for payment : 41 AUTHOR Z 'SIGNATURE Sataitnt'tl LITHO USA SFSL1 CK7S0B111L (201) 1,500.00 14560 M97SF016535M 10/97 October 18, 2001 Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod 2960 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 411 �� �oi�n� ✓V��"j INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640, Request for a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback at 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on October 16, 2001 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for a Variance to construct residential addition at an existing single family residence at 3 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 253 B-UR), Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 640 and shall be confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. In order to expedite your application staff will request that the Planning Commission review and consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting on Wednesday. October 24. 2001 at approximately 5:30 PM durina a public hearina at a field trip to 8 Cinchrina Road and make its final decision on your application at that meeting. Should the Commission wish not to act on the resolution at that time, or if there is no quorum, the request will be placed on their regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, November 20, 2001. The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you. The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty- (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. Should the Commission act on the resolution on October 24, 2001, that action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Tuesday, November 13, 2001. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincere) YolIta Schwartz Principal Planner Cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie Mr. Criss Gunderson Printed on Recycled Paper. • 1 City o/ /eO//dflg 4..L1 /a INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING October 8, 2001 Mr. Ian MacLeod 2960 Palos Verdes Drive North Rolling Hills, CA 90274 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640, Request for a Variance and a Site Plan Review to permit construction of an addition that will encroach into the side yard setback and a wall at an existing single family residence at 3 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 253 B-UR), Rolling Hills, CA. Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please submit 15 sets of site plan for the proposal. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 640 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. October 16.2001. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, October 12, 2001. We will forward the report to you. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. S'rely, anta Schwartz rincipal Planner cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect Printed on Recycled Paper. From: Criss Gunderson Fax: +1(310)373-8277 • Fax: +1(310)3777288: Page 1 of 1 Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:12 PM • CRISS C GUNDERSON ARCHITECT 2024 Via Pacheco, Palos Verdes Estates, California 90274 TEL (310) 373-8077 FAX (310) 373-8277 Thursday, October 04, 2001 Ms. Yolanta Schwartz, Principal Planner City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 Regarding: No. 3 Middleridge South MacLeod Addition, second applications Dear Ms. Schwartz, In so much that the Planning Commission recently visited the MacLeod's property during the hearings for the last site review and variance applications; and, in that the current site review and variance applications are very similar in nature in comparison to the currently approved site plan: If deemed acceptable, the MacLeod's would very much appreciate a shortened hearing process by waving the field trip, thus allowing the Planning Commission to act on the current applications before them on the night of the 16th of October. Thank you for your consideration, Criss Gunderson Transmitted via fax cc: Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod 1 CI'IY .0 F QOLLI!7\[cj HILLS NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 DATE: September 20, 2001 TO: Lata Thakar, Ed Acosta, Building and Safety -Lomita FROM: Yolanta Schwartz, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 634, 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills The Planning Commission has approved a Variance and a new addition for the above mentioned address. The construction will take placs in several phases. The additions, when completed, will be greater than -00 square feet. Please inspect the existing roof to assure that it meets. the city's requirement for Class A assembly and Class A construction. If you find that the roofing material on the original house does not meet the City's requirements, please let us know so that we can inform the property owners that they will need to replace the entire roof with an approved material. I spoke to their architect, Criss Gunderson ,concerning this matter as well, but would appreciate if you could stay on top of this case. CC: Rafael Bernal,