640, Enlarge garage with encroachme, CorrespondenceSep 08 03 02:36p
BOLTON Eng Corp
1-----
p. 1
4,
(310) 544-0458
•
Engineering Corporation
Bolton Eng Road,
707 Silver SpurSuite 2014
027
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 9544-0458
tel (310) 544-6010 fax (310)
Setember 15, 2003
Craig Nealis, City Manager
GIB Qf rigi yI
#2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Subject: Reference to July 17, 2003 letter
Export 200 yards of dirt
#4 Pine Tree Lane
#3 Middleridge Road
Dear Mr. Nealis
ay
yfflalajWitg
SEP 1 5 2003
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
In July the City gave us permission to export 300 cubic yards of dirt from #4 Pine Tree
Lane to #3 Middleridge Road as requested in our July 17, 2003 letter. About 100 cubic
yards was exported during July and August. This letter is to let the City know that we
are preparing to haul the remainder (about 200 cubic yards) of this dirt soon.
We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional
information, please call.
Sincerely,
Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120
President
/(-1-APtie
r CITY OF ROL 1NG HILLS
r/
r
PLANIN (OEPARTMEf
7i/t 7/V 3 fI-S
'7/ 2 VC S 7trA,'1,4
A,tittc6 &t.ruce— S-341 3.7
�- -, Li& t 1 y,�, 'At
r
(1'v' 11-( fVPUC 5 B l' s
• •
Bolton Engineering Corporation
707 Silver Spur Road, Suite 201
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
tel (310) 544-6010 fax (310) 544-0458
July 17, 2003
Craig Nealis, City Manager
City of Rolling Hills
#2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Subject: Export 300 yards of dirt
#4 Pine Tree Lane
Dear Mr. Nealis
JISJ-(1:351\VA 7'
JUL 232CO3
By
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
We request you permit the Centofantes at #4 Pine Tree Lane Road export up to 300
cubic yards to complete the addition to their home.
The majority of the grading for the new house has been completed. The need to export
the soil was not foreseen prior to the commencement of construction and the work for
the house cannot be completed without the requested export. The dirt quantities that
were initially calculated during the development of the grading plan didn't anticipate the
cut from the tunnel.
Currently, there is a grading project at #3 Middleridge Road that needs dirt to complete
their grading. We request permission to move this dirt to #3 Middleridge Road. This
dirt is necessary due to the elimination of the wall on the northwest side of the driveway.
This wall was expensive to build and rechecking the topography in this area allowed the
construction of the driveway with a two to one slope. We plan to provide an as -built
topo of this revised grading.
We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional
information, please call.
Sincerely,
//( -
Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120
President
CITY OF POLLING HILLS
1
r.••
„C TMEf
09/18/03 THU 07:40 FAX 310 377 7288
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
141001
Sep 08 03 02:36p
•
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
ST. TIME
USAGE T
PGS.
RESULT
:*:*****:** ::*****::x:***
*** TX REPORT ***
* :*a:**x:*** :*$:*:$:* :**
0102
09/18 07:39
00'55
2
OK
5440458
•
B0LTDN En6_ Corp [3101^544-0458
Corporation
Bolton Engineering Suite 20''
707 Silver Spur Road, Sui
Belling Hills Estates,CA 90274 ) �58
tel (310) 544-6010 fax
Setember 15, 2003
Craig Neelis, City Manager
GIWQ2111nris
##2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills. CA 90274
Subject: Referencert 2.00 yards of dirt
2003 letter
Expo
#4 pine Tree Lane
#3 Middleridge Road
By
SEP 1 5 2003
CITY OF ROLLING FILLS
p.1
Dear Mr_ Neelis
In July the City gave us permission to export 300 cubic yards of dirt from #4 Pine Tree
0 letter. About 10
Lane to##3M9
iddlerid a Road as requested in our July 17, 2003 t the Cit know thatWe
are pis
was exported during rem remainder (about August.
200 cubic yards) of this dirt soon.
are preparing to haul the
We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional
information, please call.
Sincerely,
-7Z-LC-Vf
Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120
r CITY OF ROL ING H1I.Ls
r / IL
iAleartf
VV/ 10/ UJ
inu u 1 : 4G •rAA .S1U .ST/ 7 Zb
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I� 001
Sep 08 03 02:36p
Setember 15, 2003
•
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX NO
CONNECTION TEL
CONNECTION ID
ST. TIME
USAGE T
PGS.
RESULT
*****:***a:x:*********#:*
*** TX REPORT ***
**a::***********a*****
0103
09/18 07:42
00'33
1
OK
BOLTON Eng. Corp
5305482
•
(3101 544-0458
Corporation
EngineeringgSuite 201
707 Silver Spur Road,
Hills Estates, CA 94 p4c5g
Rolling fax (310)
tel (310) 54 '6010
7671 Date
From
Co,
Phone #
Post -its Fax Note
CoJ
1;#
Craig Nealis, City Manager
o �0{IiP Hills
GIB
#2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Subject: ReferenceExport 2p0 yards of dirk
2003 letter
#4 Pine Tree Lane
#3 Middleridge Road
Fax
c—i°
..c o�
4a1003
CITY OF POLLING NULLS
p.1
pages►
u,.AZ*4-.
Dear Mr. Nealis
ga
ve July the
CityaYe us permission to export 300 cubic yards of dirt from
About utine� ubic
e Tree
Lane to #3 Middlendge Road as requested in our July 17, 2003
yards was exported during July and August. This letter is to cubic yards) Let othis the
dirtCity
k onw that we
are preparing to haul the remainder (about
We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional
information, please call.
Sincerely,�
JCS/
Ross N. Bolton, RCE 2(3120
�rec Mont
r CITY OF SOLI_ING HILLS
•
Bolton Engineering Corporation
707 Silver Spur Road, Suite 201
Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
tel (310) 544-6010 fax. (310) 544-0458
July 17, 2003
Craig Nealis, City Manager
City of Rolling Hills
#2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Subject: Export 300 yards of dirt
#4 Pine Tree Lane
Dear Mr. Nealis
By
JUL 232003
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
We request you permit the Centofantes at #4 Pine Tree Lane Road export up to 300
cubic yards to complete the addition to their home.
The majority of the grading for the new house has been completed. The need to export
the soil was not foreseen prior to the commencement of construction and the work for
the house cannot be completed without the requested export. The dirt quantities that
were initially calculated during the development of the grading plan didn't anticipate the
cut from the tunnel.
Currently, there is a grading project at #3 Middleridge Road that needs dirt to complete
their grading. We request permission to move this dirt to #3 Middleridge Road. This
dirt is necessary due to the elimination of the wall on the northwest side of the driveway.
This wall was expensive to build and rechecking the topography in this area allowed the
construction of the driveway with a two to one slope. We plan to provide an as -built
topo of this revised grading.
We appreciate your consideration. If you have any questions or need any additional
information, please call.
Sincerely,
,t,�%' /` (,�
Ross N. Bolton, RCE 26120
President
CITY 05 BOLLING HILLS
L(r-t��
t; `?ARTMEf
? - 2 3.0 7)
1
•
C1iy ol Rolling
CERTIFIED MAIL
November 15, 2001
Mr. Ian MacLeod
2960 Palos Verdes Drive North
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
ZONING CASE NO. 640 (LOT 3-A-EF)
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23
Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a
resolution on October 24, 2001 granting a request for a Variance at 3 Middleridge
Lane South, Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 640. That action, accompanied
by the record of the proceedings before the Commission was reported to the City
Council on November 13, 2001.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty
days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal
has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty
(30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed
until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of
the Municipal Code.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the
Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will
become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of
Acceptance Form together with the subject Resolution in the Office of the County
Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23, specifying the
conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved
Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the
Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE
FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a
copy of the Resolution to:
Printed on Recycled Paper.
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each
additional page. .
To expedite this process, you may want to hand carry the Affidavit and the
Resolution to the County Registrar -Recorder.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue
permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any
conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are
met.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Tanta Schwartz
Principal Planner
Enclosures:
Resolution no. 2001- 23
Affidavit of Acceptance Form
Appeal section of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code
Exhibit "A" Development Plan
cc: Mr. Criss Gunderson, Architect, (Resolution only)
&'"x i i t "A"
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A GARAGE ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 3 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH IN
ZONING CASE NO. 640.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS.DOES HEREBY
FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod duly filed an application with respect to
real property located at 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills, (Lot 253-B-UR)
requesting a Variance to permit encroachment into the south side yard setback to
construct a garage addition at an existing single family residence in Zoning Case No.
640.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing
to consider this application on October 16, 2001. The applicants were notified of the
hearing in writing by first class mail. The applicant's representative was in attendance at
the hearing.
Section 3. The Planning Commission found that a field trip to view the
proposed project was not necessary due to the fact that a similar application for a side
yard encroachment and a Site Plan review for subject site was approved by the Planning
Commission on August 21, 2001 by Resolution No. 2001-16, and the Commission
conducted a visit to the site on July 18, 2001.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
1 Exemption (State of CA Guidelines, Section 15301(e) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property
and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from
making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in
the same vicinity. Section 17.16.120 requires the side yard setback for every residential
parcel in the RA-S-2 Zone to be thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is requesting to
encroach up to a maximum of 6 feet into the 35-foot south side yard setback to permit
the encroachment of 116 square feet of a 156 square foot addition. With respect to this
request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the other
property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is located above the main road
and is not visible from the street. The proposed encroachment will follow a line of an
Ping. Comm.
Reso. 2001-23 1
• •
e
existing 120 square foot encroachment into the south side yard setback and a recently
approved 120 square foot encroachment along the same building line and will not be
visible from the roadway.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but
which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
development and use of the subject property in a manner consistent with the shape of
the lot and development of other property on this street justifies this additional small
incursion into the side yard setback. There will not be any greater incursion into the side
yard setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in
which the property is located. Allowing the proposed incursion into the south side yard
setback will not allow any greater incursion than already exists. In addition,
development on this portion of the pad will allow a substantial portion of the more
environmentally significant rear portions of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 640 to permit the encroachment of a
156 square foot addition that will encroach a maximum of 6 feet into the thirty-five (35')
south side yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this
application, dated October 9, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A,
subject to the conditions specified in Section 7 of this Resolution.
Section 7. The Variance to the side yard setback approved in Section 5 'of this
Resolution is subject to the following conditions:
A. The Variance approval shall expire within one year from the effective date
of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070(A), unless construction on the applicable
portions of the structure have commenced within that time period.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variances and Site Plan Review
approvals, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the approval shall be suspended
and the privileges granted thereunder shall be subject to revocation; provided that the
applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for
a.period of thirty (30) days and has been provided additional notice and a hearing prior
to the revocation of the Permit.
C. All requirements of the. Buildings Code of the City of Rolling Hills and the
Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the
Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with
the site plan on file marked Exhibit A, dated October 9, 2001, except as otherwise
provided in these conditions.
Ping. Comm.
Reso. 2001-23
2
• •
E. There shall be no grading for this project. The proposed retaining wall
along the perimeter of the building pad in the front and side yard areas of the site shall
be constructed without requiring any additional grading than what was approved
previously and memorialized in Resolution No. 2001-16 and shall not exceed 35-inches
in height at any point. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 38.3%.
F. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent
feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening
surrounding the building pad and driveway. The applicant is encouraged to retain the
existing native vegetation, to the maximum extent feasible, in the area of the relocated
driveway and to replant with like vegetation, should the existing vegetation be removed.
G. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the maximum
extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system, utilizes automatic
controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using "hydrozones," considers slope
factors and climate conditions in design, and utilizes means to reduce water waste
resulting from runoff and overspray in accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water
efficient landscaping requirements) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
H. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 30.3%. The structural
lot coverage shall not exceed 5.6% of the net lot area and the total structural lot coverage
(including all structures and paved areas) shall not exceed 20.4% of the net lot area.
I. The property owners shall be required to conform with the air quality
management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county
and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides, mudflows,
erosion, or land subsidence.
J. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours
of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical
equipment noise is permitted so as not to interfere with the quiet residential
environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
K. All parking, during and after construction, shall take place on the project
site.
L. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of septic tanks.
M. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation
and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
Ping. Comm.
Reso. 2001-23
3
N. The property owners shall be required to conform with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste and stormwater pollution prevention.
O. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in Section 7010
of the 1998 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be prepared to
minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control stormwater pollution as
requiredby the County of Los Angeles.
P. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final building plan to the County of
Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology,
soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the
Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff
for their review.
Q. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any
building or grading permit.
R. All utility lines shall be placed underground.
S. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code, any modifications to this approval, which would constitute additional
structural development, shall require the filing of a new application for approval by the
Planning Commission.
T. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of
the Variances and Site Plan approval, or the approvals shall not be effective.
U. All conditions of this Variance approval that apply must be complied with
prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
W. Except as herein specified, the provisions of Resolution No. 2001-16 shall
continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY F,CTOBER, 2001.
ALLANiBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
. k
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Ping. Comm.
Reso. 2001-23
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2001-23 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO PERMIT
ENCROACHMENT INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK TO
CONSTRUCT A GARAGE ADDITION AT AN EXISTING SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 3 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH IN
ZONING CASE NO. 640.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October
24, 2001 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and
Chairman Roberts.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
Ping. Comm.
Reso. 2001-23
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
5
•
1734 010
17.54 APPEALS
17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals
A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this
Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall
be filed in writing with the City Clerk.
B. All appeals must be Wed on or before the 30th calendar day
after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on
the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as
required by Section 1730.030 of this Title.
C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a
resolution which approves or denies a development
application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a
report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council
may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take .
jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City
Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning
Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council
completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions
of this Chapter.'
17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal
Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of
the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with
the terms of this Chapter.
17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application
A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a
form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall
be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been
received by the City Clerk.
B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name
and address of the appellant, the project and action being
appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that
the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or
why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by
evidence in the record.
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
76 MAY 24, 1993
17.54.030
If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City
Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the
appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is
deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an
amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of
receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal
application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee
will be returned to the applicant.
17.54.040 Request for Information
Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee,
the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to
transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire
proceeding before the Planning Commission.
17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing
Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a
hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing
of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for
the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard
at the same time.
17.54.060 Proceedings
A. Noticing
The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of
this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed:
1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed;
2. The appellant; and
3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written
comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of
the public hearing on the project.
B. Hearing
The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall
consider all information in the record, as well as additional
information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action
on the appeal.
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
77 - MAY 24, 1993
• •
1734.060
C. Action
The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the
Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the
Council may remand the application back to the Planning
Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall
make findings to support its decision.
D. Finality of Decision
The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny an application shall be final and conclusive.
E. Record of Proceedings
The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a
resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the
applicant or the appellant.
17.54.070 Statute of Limitations
Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by
the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing
is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and
discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of
facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in
any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within
the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure,
Section 1094.6
ROWNG mus ZONING
78 MAY ?A, 1993
NOV
IT( OF ROLLNC
4V-
w
a
trCI
C7
143
rl
O
O
m
tr
Er
Do
sI
il l�ra�-s�( 17,
Postage
Certified Fee
Return Receipt Fee
(Endorsement Required)
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
r•
Total Postage & Fees $ ' t 0 g
Postmark '
Here
Recipient's Name (Please Print Clearly) (to be compl ted by mailer)
Street, Apt. No.; or o Box o.
F2 4o f a-u7k-G?81 i---"Dn--=e_--1-11�-'' ----
City, State, ZIP+4 �/
M /F, . 1▪ 1, (44 5
• °7BI6!0
Certified Mail Provides:
® A mailing receipt
a A unique identifier for your mailpiece
El A signature upon delivery
® A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years
Important Reminders:
® Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First -Class Mail or Priority Mail.
e Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail.
® NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For
valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail.
I! For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of
delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return
Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the
fee. Endorse mailpiece 'Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for
a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is
required.
® For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or
addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the
endorsement "Restricted Delivery".
® If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti-
cle at the post office for postmarking. It a postmark on the Certified Mail
receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail.
IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry.
PS Form 3800, February 2000 (Reverse) 102595-99-M-2087
,°SENDER: ,CO
tea.:..
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse -
so that we can return the card to:you.
o Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits:: '
1. Article Addressed to:
Mr, .won //'IacJcx
c O 'Pates Vea-6?0, Dr. /V
lQ// ns5 ,Y'//s G/; ,o 27V
z . c . 0 yo
2. Article Number
(Transfer from service label)
- PS Form 3811, August 2001
7099
p Agent
Vic,/O Addressee
B.//Reced by (Printed Name) - ' 1 C.:Date of Delivery
/��i'
Is •eliver9 address different from item 1? ❑ Yes
❑ No
If YES, enter delivery address below:
3. Service Type
Certified Mail
❑ Registered
❑ Insured Mail
❑ Express Mail'.
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)
.3goo 0oi2' &6y sg/
Domestic Return Receipt
0 Yes
102595-01-M-2509
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
• Sender: Please print your name, addr
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
LISPS
P re i ► o. -10
and ZIP+4 in this box
NOV 20
CITY OF ROLLING HILL'I1"'
PORTUGUESE BEND my
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
it i t€ lit- t i t 1.t MI II ! ! it ! tt.
tl{tttt t.{t.l It 117lttf t7tt.11i m ttttt71t111titi Filll iltlJt
•
Cry ol� PF,.9 J&fe
October 25, 2001
Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod
2960 Palos Verdes Drive North
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640 (LOT 253 B-UR), RESOLUTION NO. 2001-23
Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution
on October 24, 2001 granting a request for a variance at 3 Middleridge Lane South,
Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 640. That action, accompanied by the record of the
proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on November
13, 2001.
The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days
after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed
or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period.
(Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal,
the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in
accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning
Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you
will be required to record an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject
Resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes
effect.
The Affidavit of Acceptance form and the Resolution, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved "Exhibit A"
Development Plan to keep for your files will be forwarded to you after the Council
meeting.
Should you have any questions, please call me at (310) 377-1521
Sincerely,
Y anta Schwartz
incipal Planner
Cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect
CP
Printed on Recycled Paper.
e44 ` Rolling
October 24, 2001
Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod
2960 Palos Verdes Drive North
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640 (LOT 253 B-UR)
Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Please find enclosed a refund for Planning Application fees in the amount of $1,500.00
for Site Plan review. Your current case did not require a Site Plan review application, just
a Variance.
Please do not hesitate to call me, if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
lanta Schwartz
rincipal Planner
Panted on Recycled Paper.
CITY OF ROLLING,LS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Palos Verdes Center #07'
507 Silver Spur Roe.
Rolling Hills Estates, CA
16-49/1220
LI
NUMBER
14560
PAY
*************** One Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100
TO THE
ORDER OF
Ian MacLeod
2960 Palos Verdes Dr. No
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
****************
DATE AMOUNT
Oct 22 01 S1
11°0 L4560111 1: L 220004961:073 2002 L7511■
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Ian MacLeod
INVOICE NO
#7468 Refund
SP
AUTHORIZE6 SIGIS lJFt
'Pp S
NUMBER
Oct 22 01
GROSS AMT DISCOUNT NET
1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00
Audited and approved for payment :
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
m38
1,500.00
14560
NUMBER
Ian MacLeod m38 Oct 22 01
INVOICE NO GROSS AMT DISCOUNT NET
#7468 Refund 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00
Audited and approved for payment :
41
AUTHOR Z 'SIGNATURE
Sataitnt'tl LITHO USA SFSL1 CK7S0B111L (201)
1,500.00
14560
M97SF016535M 10/97
October 18, 2001
Mr. and Mrs. Ian MacLeod
2960 Palos Verdes Drive North
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
411
�� �oi�n� ✓V��"j INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640, Request for a Variance to encroach into the side yard
setback at 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod:
This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting
on October 16, 2001 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for a Variance
to construct residential addition at an existing single family residence at 3 Middleridge Lane South
(Lot 253 B-UR), Rolling Hills, CA in Zoning Case No. 640 and shall be confirmed in the draft
resolution that is being prepared. In order to expedite your application staff will request that the
Planning Commission review and consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of
approval, at an upcoming meeting on Wednesday. October 24. 2001 at approximately 5:30 PM
durina a public hearina at a field trip to 8 Cinchrina Road and make its final decision on your
application at that meeting. Should the Commission wish not to act on the resolution at that time,
or if there is no quorum, the request will be placed on their regularly scheduled meeting on
Tuesday, November 20, 2001.
The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you.
The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's
resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within
that thirty- (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code).
Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes
its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code.
Should the Commission act on the resolution on October 24, 2001, that action, accompanied by
the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a
report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on Tuesday,
November 13, 2001.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Sincere)
YolIta Schwartz
Principal Planner
Cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie
Mr. Criss Gunderson
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• 1
City o/ /eO//dflg 4..L1 /a INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
STATUS OF APPLICATION
& NOTIFICATION OF MEETING
October 8, 2001
Mr. Ian MacLeod
2960 Palos Verdes Drive North
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 640, Request for a Variance and a Site Plan Review to
permit construction of an addition that will encroach into the side yard setback and
a wall at an existing single family residence at 3 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 253
B-UR), Rolling Hills, CA.
Dear Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod:
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted
above and finds that the information submitted is:
X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be
processed. Please submit 15 sets of site plan for the proposal.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or
otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly
suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the
application.
Your application for Zoning Case No. 640 has been set for public hearing consideration by the
Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday. October 16.2001.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration
Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must
attend to present your project and to answer questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, October
12, 2001. We will forward the report to you.
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
S'rely,
anta Schwartz
rincipal Planner
cc: Criss Gunderson, Architect
Printed on Recycled Paper.
From: Criss Gunderson
Fax: +1(310)373-8277
•
Fax: +1(310)3777288: Page 1 of 1 Thursday, October 04, 2001 4:12 PM
•
CRISS C GUNDERSON ARCHITECT
2024 Via Pacheco, Palos Verdes Estates, California 90274
TEL (310) 373-8077 FAX (310) 373-8277
Thursday, October 04, 2001
Ms. Yolanta Schwartz, Principal Planner
City of Rolling Hills
No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, California 90274
Regarding: No. 3 Middleridge South
MacLeod Addition, second applications
Dear Ms. Schwartz,
In so much that the Planning Commission recently visited the MacLeod's property during the
hearings for the last site review and variance applications; and, in that the current site review
and variance applications are very similar in nature in comparison to the currently approved site
plan: If deemed acceptable, the MacLeod's would very much appreciate a shortened hearing
process by waving the field trip, thus allowing the Planning Commission to act on the current
applications before them on the night of the 16th of October.
Thank you for your consideration,
Criss Gunderson
Transmitted via fax
cc: Mr. and Mrs. MacLeod
1
CI'IY .0 F QOLLI!7\[cj HILLS
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
DATE: September 20, 2001
TO: Lata Thakar, Ed Acosta, Building and Safety -Lomita
FROM: Yolanta Schwartz, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 634, 3 Middleridge Lane South, Rolling Hills
The Planning Commission has approved a Variance and a new addition for
the above mentioned address. The construction will take placs in several
phases. The additions, when completed, will be greater than -00 square
feet. Please inspect the existing roof to assure that it meets. the city's
requirement for Class A assembly and Class A construction. If you find
that the roofing material on the original house does not meet the City's
requirements, please let us know so that we can inform the property
owners that they will need to replace the entire roof with an approved
material. I spoke to their architect, Criss Gunderson ,concerning this
matter as well, but would appreciate if you could stay on top of this case.
CC: Rafael Bernal,