354, Addition to SFR requirering en, ApplicationREQUEST FOR HEARING
FOR ZONE VARIANCE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
The undersigned Herbert and Merilyn Atkinson
Name
0 Eastfield, Rolling Hills (213) 547-3160
Street Address
(1) Xis/are the owner (s) xW Rxiiikx glIk RRR x xx
(2) lioiWpkbmicAralcalxcaiRxtbminactxxx
Telephone Number
Legal description of property situated at 0 Tract 29520
Lot Tract
0 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
Street Address
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use,
project require a Variance.
The use is single family residence
including what aspects of the
. The addition will
project into the front -setback from original 50 feet to 41 feet.
The other portions of the remodel will stay within
the
prescribed setbacks. The addition is.not parallel to.:_the
property line and as it turns away form the pl.it.
distance.
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
increases
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the
same vicinity and zone.
The property is set low on the site and is not visible form the
roadway. The addition is single story, and does not follow
the property line, but turns away into the property itself.
The encroachmentis measured to the furthest point o6 the
addition and the average setback is much greater than 50 feet.
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to
the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property -is located because -
The existing trees and vegitation encircle the site. The
building sets back away and down slope from the roadway and
cannot be seen. The style and color of the structure will follow
local color and standards of the City.
FILING FEE
A filing fee (31:fi� u+3f4 h0 .-must accompany the application. Make check payable to:
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
•
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I, (We), declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at
/q(7GG/A1 y!`G 4 S
this /5
day of
Address
v•r& ih. &$ Gla
, California,
, 19 e7
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in
California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant
should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is
affixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take
acknowledgments, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the
information in the accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
FORMS ISSUED TO:
NAME FILED
ORGANIZATION FEE $
JOa. ADDRESS RECEIPT NO. •
i1.0N‘Mt
•
DATE. &Y
DECISION OF PLANNING COMMISSION
, 19
The action of the Planning Commission will be final unless within twenty (20) days
following the notice to the applicant of the decision, an appeal in writing is filed
with the City Clerk by:
A. The applicant;
B. Any person who protested, either orally or in writing, as a matter of record,
prior to the final vote of the Planning Commission on the matter and who, in
addition, received or was entitled to receive the written notice specified
in subdivision 2 of subsection A of Section 17.40.060; or
C. The City Council, upon the affirmative vote of three members of the Council.
In order to obtain a building permit, it will be necessary for the applicant to sign
a copy of the findings that they understand and accept the conditons of approval.
FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS;
Existing Floor Plan:
House
Garage
2,272 sq. ft.
473 sq. ft.
Total existing area 2,745 sq. ft.
Added Floor Area:
Home +958 sq. ft. = 3,230
Garage +215 sq. ft. = 688
Total added area +1,173 sq. ft. - 3,918
t'
MLW9-16A*
(rev'd 1980)
•
APPENDIX B
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST FORM
(Initial Study)
Date Submitted:
No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name and address of developer or project ARRImR: Owner
Herbert and Merylin Atkinson-_0 Eastfield, Rolling Hills
James Montero-Architect, 110 W. Ocean Blvd. Suite J, Long Beach
2. Address of project: 0 FagtfiP1d. Rollina Hills
Assessor's Block and Lot Number Lot 0., Tract 29520, Eastfield
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted
concerning this project: James Paul Montero
de Still Group Architects, 110 W. Ocean Blvd. Suite J
Long Beach, Ca. 90802 (213) 436-3297
4. List and describe any other, related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies: Building Permit
5. Existing zoning district: RAS-1
6. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
Single Family Residence
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size: Irregular: 218.57 ft. x 243.31 ft
8. Square footage: Existing net Acreage: .68 Acres= 29,62ii q. ft.
9. Number of floors of construction:
MLW9-17A*
•
10. Amount of off-street parking provided: 3 covered, 8-10 guest spaces
11. (Attach plans.) See Plans
12. Proposed scheduling: Start Construction February 15, 1988
13. Associated projects: None
14. Anticipated incremental development:
None
15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit
sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size
expected: D.N.A.
16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities: D.N.A.
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities: D.N.A.
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community benefits to be derived from the project:
D.N.A.
MLW9-18A • •
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or
rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the
A variance is required. The existing
application is. required:
front setback is 50 feet to the property line and the isroposed
remodel will bring the addition to 41-0_ feet approximately
to the property line.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
20. On a separate page, describe the project site as it exists
before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site,
and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site.
21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties,
including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use, and
scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard,
etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required
on attached sheets.)
YES MAYBE NO
22. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures? xxx
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
XX
XXX
xx
Question 20:
The project site is the first lot after the east gate entry. It
has a one-story single family residence, with attached garage, of
approximately 3,000 sq. ft. and a building height of
approximately 12 feet 6 inches. The residence is a California
ranch style, stucco exterior, wood shake roof and trimmed
with Palos Verdes stone, all white in color. A portion of the
perimeter property is fehced with white equestrian fencing.
The site has varied vegetation including Eucalyptus trees,
evergreen pine trees, avacado and miscellaneous fruit trees
and orchard. In addition, it is densely planted with shrubs and
oleanders, along the property line abutting the road. Ivy
covered slopes abut the driveway. The residence is not visible
from any surrounding streets. The topographic aspect of the site
is that the residence is built on a graded pad, with the balance
of the yard gently sloping with a series of graded flat spots
and slopes and orchard.
There is no apparent evidence of any wild animal activity other
than the normal skunk, field rodent, or cats. The bird
population includes Crows and Dove which feed on the olive trees.
The building is approximately 20 years old and has no apparent
historical significance.
The site and soil conditions seem relatively stable and the
dwelling shows no signs of cracking or movement. The exterior
paving stones do exhibit some cracking.
0
Question 21:
The surrounding properties are similar in context to the subject
property. Densely treed and shrubs exist along all the property
lines. No residences can be seen from the roadway or from the
subject property. All of the surrounding properties are single
family residences with mixed single and two-story buildings.
The setbacks of the adjacent properties are consistent with the
city standards, 50 + - feet from the front property lines.
A bridal trail weaves through between the properties across the
street.
• MLW9-19A*
•
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth-
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similar hazards?
23. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
24. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements, in
either marine or fresh waters?
YES MAYBE NO
xx
xx
XX
XX
xx
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface water runoff? xx
c. Alterations to the course of
flow of flood waters? xxx
d. Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? lx
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? xx
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
XX
XXX
MLW9-24A*
•
h. Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property
to water -related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
j. Significant changes in the
temperature, flow, or chemical
content of surface thermal springs?
25. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or number of any species of
plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
of plants?
b. A reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
YES MAYBE NO
XX
XX
xx
xx
XX
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop? xx
26. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)? xx
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result in
a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
xx
XX
d. Deterioration to existing fish
or wildlife habitat? XX
27. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels? xx
-5-
MLW9-21A*
• •
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
28. Light and Glare. Will the
proposal produce new light or
glare?
YES MAYPE NO
XX
xx
29. Land Use. Will the proposal
result in a substantial alter-
ation of the present or planned
land use of anarea? xx
30. Natural Resources. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource? xx
31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or
the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or up-
set conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an emer-
gency evacuation plan?
32. Population. Will the proposal
alter the location, distribution,
density,'or growth rate of the
human population of an area? xx
_XX
XXX
33. Housing. Will the proposal af-
fect existing housing, or create
a demand for additional housing? xx
34. Transportation/Circulation. Will
the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial addi-
tional vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
c. Substantial impact upon
existing transportation systems?
XX
XX
XX
MLW9-22A*
• •
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods?
YES MAYBE NO
e. Alterations to waterborne,
rail or air traffic? xx
f. Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
.xX
35. Public Services. Will the
proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new
or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection? xx
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? �x
e. Maintenance of public
facilities, including roads? xx
f. Other governmental services?
36. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use -of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
XX
3CX
37. Utilities. Will the proposal
result in a need for new systems,
or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas? xxx
b. Communications systems? xx
c. Water? xx
d. Sewer or septic tanks? xx
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
-7-
MLW9-23A*
38. Human Health. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to poten-
tial health hazards?
39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal
result in the obstruction of any
scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal re-
sult in the creation of an aesthet-
ically offensive site open to
public view?
40. Recreation. Will the proposal
result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
XX
XX
XX
41. Cultural Resources.
a. Will the proposal result
in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric
or historic archeological site? xx
b. Will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthet-
ic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure,
or object?
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural •values?
XX
xx
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact
area? xx
42. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number or restrict
-8-
NO
...: - MLf.3-24A*
. P
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate impor-
tant examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term environ-
mental goals? (a short term impact
on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, defin-
itive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the
future.)
YES MAYBE NO
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate re-
sources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small, but where the ef-
fect of the total of those impacts on
the environment is significant.) _
XX
xx
XXX
d. Does the project have environ-
mental effects which will cause sub-
stantial adverse effect on human be-
ings, either directly or indirectly? XX
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor-
mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Date DER_ . 21 i9 i1
Signatu e) Alme5 pkuL WtoN7704-0
For �1M50t-j" f M1 &lLIIN t45b )
(Applicant)
•
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST
'AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
I , NE1T k T I (\1'
declare under penalty of
perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all pexsons.to
whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll
of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000)
feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
10l EJNSTFtl.CW
T o TicAtT 105ao
Executed at
/eoGL/A/G
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Zone Change
/G G 5 . California, thi§
day of
eA✓ rge2, , • is 87.
Signature
CITY OF ROLLING HILii
VARIANCE
VARIANCE
A variance is a form of permit which is required of any property owner who seeks to vary
from the provisions of the City's zoning ordinance in the development of property in the
City. In order to obtain a variance, the applicant must be able to demonstrate that
practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships result through the strict and literal
interpretation and enforcement of the zoning provisions. Variances are considered and
decided upon by the Planning Commission following a public hearing.
APPLICATION AND REQUEST FOR HEARING
In order to obtain a variance, a property owner or his or her agent must submit an appli-
cation and request a hearing before the Planning Commission. To do so, the applicant
should complete the requirements enumerated herein, assemble the necessary application
documents and call to make an appointment at (213) 377-1521. Making an appointment will
assure that someone is available to explain the necessary procedures and review the case
material for completeness and accuracy.
PLAN SUBMITTAL INFORMATION
Complete and submit for each application:
1: "Request.for Hearing" Application.
/2. Owner's Declaration
J3: Plan submittal using the "Checklist" as guide. Each plan must have computation of lot
coverage printed on the plot plan.
:' Ownership List: Prepare a complete list of names and mailing addresses of all property
Fifteen copies of plan MUST accompany application,
;5.
6. Filing fee - Resolution #494 attached.
REGULAR MEETINGS
owners of each parcel, within or partially within a 1,000 foot radius of the exterior
boundaries of the property under consideration, including the owner of the subject
property. Assign a number to each name on the list. This information must be as it
appears on the latest available assessment roll of the Los Angeles County Assessor.
This list shall be certified to be true and correct (complete Certified Property Owner's
Affidavit). An inaccurate or incomplete list is cause for removal of the case from
the agenda or to require a rehearing of the case.
Type Self -Adhesive Mailing Labels: In addition to the Ownership List required, submit
one complete set of typed self-adhesive mailing labels for all property owners listed
on the Ownership List.
Certified Property Owners List Affidavit
Once an application has been accepted as complete by the City, a hearing will be set before
the Planning Commission. Applications are considered at the regular meetings of the Plan-
ning Commission, which are held the third Tuesday of each month. Applications must be
submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary no later than the last Monday of the month
immediately preceding the regular meeting at Vehich the matter shall be considered. Provide
sufficient time in your plans to attend at least two meetings to allow the Planning Com-
mission to study the facts presented and to make a field trip review of the physical
conditions. The applicant or a representative must appear at the meeting.
AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY
In reviewing a request, the Planning Commission must consider the following:
/! °"'he Planning Commission shall consider all matters presented to it fairly and impar-
tially, recognizing the rights of the applicant as well as its obligation to enforce
all zoning ordinances and resolutions adopted by the City Council of the City of
Rolling Hills.
2G The development and use of all land within the City of Rolling Hills should be directed
to the continuation of the existing rural open areas surrounding the existing residences
in the City, and each new improvement or use of land should be carefully examined to
determine what effect the proposed improvement or use of land will have on the terrain,
trees and natural flora in the City.
3. The granting of variances shall be carefully scrutinized to protect bridle trails, ...
and provide the proper spacing of residences and accessory building so as to prevent
overconstruction of the lot or parcel to be improved.