24, PVPUSD wants to use the 32 acr, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsBEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF'THE CITY:: OF
ROLLING HILLS, COUNTY. OF LOS ANGELES
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In the Matter of the Application
)
)
- of )
.PALOS VERDES:PENINSULA
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
38 Crest Road West (32 acres)
Conditional Use Permit
ZONING CASE NO. 24
- FINDINGS AND FORMAL .REPORT
The application of Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School
District for Conditional Use Permit for the construction of.
a complex of the following building:
1. bistrict Administration offices
2. Educational Materials and Library facilities
3. Maintenance andTransportationfacilities
4. Elementary School
came on -for hearing on the 28th day of January, 1963 at the hour.
of 7:30 P.M., at the City Hall of the City of Rolling Hills,
California, and the applicant having submitted evidence,
both oral and documentary, in support of its application and
the Planning Commission being advised, now makes its Findings
and Formal Report as required by Ordinance No. 33 of the City
of Rolling Hills.
The Commission finds that the applicant,. Palos Verdes
Peninsula Unified School District, is the owner of that
certain real property located on Crest Road West consisting
of 32 acres,located in the City of Rolling Hills, California,
known by street and number as 38 Crest Road West and that notice
of the public hearing in connection with said application was
given as required by Sections 8.06 and 8.07 of Ordinance No. 33
of the City of Rolling Hills and that applicant is not required
to pay a fee for filing said application.
II
That John B. Merritt, 41 Crest Road West, Edward L. Pearson,
1 Johns Canyon Road, Owen F. Goodman, 14 Crest Road West,
Walter W. Ralphs, 35 Crest Road West, Felix McGinnis,
37 Crest Road West, Clifton Hix, 27 Crest Road West, Carl J. Ghormely,
2 Johns Canyon Road, owners of real property in close proximity
to the property on which applicant proposed to locate said
public buildings were opposed to granting said Conditional
Use Permit for the construction and operation of a building
in which to operate a maintenance and transportation facility.
III
The Commission further finds that the construction and
operation by applicant of a maintenance and transportation
facility for the repair, service and maintenance of approximately
40 diesel -powered busses and other automotive equipment belonging
to applicant, would create odors, noises and conditions which
would adversely affect the property values of all owners of
property in the area surrounding the proposed location of
said building.
IV
From the foregoing, it is concluded that a Conditional
Use Permit for the construction of an Administrative Building,
-2-
•
Educational Material and Library Facility, Maintenance and
Transportation Facility and Elementary School, as a complex,
by the applicant, would beinconsistent with the objectives
of Ordinance No. 33 and would be undesirable and unnecessary
to serve the public convenienceand welfare of the residents
of the City of Rolling Hills and that said application for
a Conditional Use Permit should be denied.
Dated: February 7, 1963
Sam W. Good, Jr.
Chairman of the Planning Commission
yPhylls 'Stackdale
Secretary of the Planning Commission