Loading...
502, Certificate of Compliance - Lo, Correspondence• City ol Rollin S�uP� JODY MURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Councilmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Councilmember January 12, 1994 Mr. John Z. Blazevich P.O. Box 1660 San Pedro, CA 90733 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 723: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 IN ZONING CASE NO. 502. Dear Mr. Blazevich: At the regular City Council Meeting held Monday, January 10, 1994, City Councilmembers were prepared to act on the above referenced Resolution. However, during an inspection on your property on January 10, it was evident that the vehicular access from Parcel 1 across the property line to the guest house on Parcel 2 was not blocked in a manner required by the City Council and proposed by the property owners and persons involved in the case during the regular City Council Meeting held Monday, November 22, 1993. Although initial communication by your representative, Doug McHattie of South Bay Engineering, indicated that the driveway access was reactivated to allow for the moving of furnishings from the guest house, we do not have this confirmation in writing. Members of the City Council continued consideration of the above Resolution until Monday, January 24, 1994. Please provide written comments to this office no later than Tuesday, January 18,1994 relative to your adherence to the requirements of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 93-32. A copy of that Resolution is enclosed with this correspondence for your records. ®Printed on Recycled Paper Page 2 Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN:mlk corres.cm\res723.1tr enclosure cc: Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering Lola Ungar, Principal Planner City Attorney • • RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 502. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. John Z. Blazevich requesting a Certificate of Compliance and approval of a Lot Line Adjustment between two adjacent parcels of property. The first parcel is currently 5.641 gross acres and is located at 1 Buggy Whip Drive (Lot 176-A-MS)(Hereinafter referred to as "Parcel 1"). The second parcel is currently 4.249 gross acres and is located at 13 Crest Road West (Lot 176-MS)(Hereinafter referred to as "Parcel 2"). Single family residential structures exist on each parcel. A guest house currently exists on Parcel 2 within that portion of Parcel 2 to be transferred into Parcel 1. Section 2. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment involves moving the common side lot line between both parcels to the southwest so that 1.7842 gross acres is moved from Parcel 2 into Parcel 1. Section 3. Hr. John Z. Blazevich has requested a Certificate of Compliance and approval of this Lot Line Adjustment as a condition of an escrow agreement to purchase Parcel 1 from its current owner, Dr. and Mrs. H. Lawrence Amberg. The owner of Parcel 2, Dr. and Hrs. Paul Kouri, has consented to the Lot Line Adjustment in :documents submitted to the City. Section 4. California Government Code Subsection 66412(d) authorizes minor lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map if: A. The lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; B. A greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; C. The lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and D. The lot line adjustment is approved by the City. Section 5. The Planning Commission considered the application on October 23, 1993 at an adjourned regular meeting and conducted a field site review. • RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 2 Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 7. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral, presented to it in connection with this application and finds as follows: A. Section 16.16.010.E of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that each lot in any subdivision in the RAS-2 zone shall have a net area (excluding easements) of not less than eighty-seven thousand one hundred twenty square feet (2.0 acres). The proposed lot line adjustment will result in Parcel 1 being 6.6978 net acres and Parcel 2 being 2.0717. net acres after excluding easements. B. Section 16.16.040 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that the length of the lot that abuts the easement line shall be at least equal to or greater than the depth of the lot divided by two and one-half; provided, that in no event shall such abutting footage be less than one hundred fifty feet. Each of the parcels complies with the provision. The adjustment will provide a 520-foot frontage for Parcel 1 along Buggy Whip Drive. The adjustment will reduce the frontage of Parcel 2 along Buggy Whip Drive to 215-feet and will change the frontage for Parcel 2 but, will not be less than the 150 foot minimum frontage along a maintained roadway for each lot. C. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The proposed adjustment will result in the southwest sideline of Parcel 1 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet and the northeast sideline of Parcel 2 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet. The proposed irregular lot line between the two parcels is less angular than the existing irregular lot line. D. Section 16.16.040(D) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots shall have a depth with a slope less than thirty degrees at least equal to the footage abutting the street easement line. For Parcel 1 the proposed adjustment will result in 2.9 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 430 feet and a street frontage along the easement line of 520 feet along Buggy Whip Drive. For Parcel 2 the proposed adjustment will result in 2.05 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 365 feet, and a street frontage along the easement line of 215 feet along Buggy Whip Drive. Due to topographic conditions, 2.9 acres for Parcel 1 and 2.05 acres for • • RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 3 Parcel 2 demonstrate a sizeable area for development on each parcel. E. The City's Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study, prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers on February 9, 1988, recommends the installation of future sewer lines to service the immediate vicinity to be constructed along the northwesterly property line of Parcel 1 and the northwesterly and southerly property lines of Parcel 2. Based upon this Study and the need to provide for the future installation of sewers to serve the properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property, conditions have been attached to require the applicant to record an easement to the Rolling Hills Community Association for ingress and egress purposes to construct underground utilities along the northwesterly property line, the northerly boundary line, the easterly boundary line, the southeasterly boundary line, the southerly boundary line of Parcel 1; the area on either side of the boundary line between Parcel 1 and 2 between the southerly and northerly lot lines; the southeasterly boundary line, the southerly boundary line, and the northwesterly boundary line of Parcel 2. F. Conditions have also been attached to this approval which provide that it will not impair or limit the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance to any future development of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2. Section 8. In accordance with the foregoing findings, the lot line adjustment and Certificate of Compliance sought in Zoning Case No. 502,as indicated on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant shall prepare and, upon approval and acceptance of the City, record concurrent with the Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment an easement in gross, in favor of the City of Rolling Hills (with the intention that the City convey it immediately to the Rolling Hills Community Association) for the easements and rights -of -way reserved for the use and purpose of erecting, constructing, operating and maintaining thereon: (1) roads, streets, or bridle trails, parkways and park areas; (2) poles, wire and conduits for the transmission of electricity for lighting, heating, power, telephone, cable and other purposes and for the necessary attachments in connection therewith; (3) public and private sewers, storm water drains, land drains, and pipes, water systems, water, heating and gas mains or pipes; and (4) any other method of conducting and performing any public or quasi - public utility service or function beneath the surface of the ground. The easement deed shall prohibit Grantor or successor to Grantor from constructing or erecting any improvements or altering the contours of the surface of the easement area other than installation of shallow rooted landscaping and necessary irrigation systems. The map attached to the Certificate of Compliance, • • RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 4 referred hereto as Exhibit "A" shall delineate and note the easements specified in this paragraph. B. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No. 221, 1988) to Parcels 1 and 2 at such time as an application is made for development. C. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect waive, release or be construed to supersede any restriction, dedication or condition set forth on Los Angeles County Assessor Map No. 51, and all such matters are hereby reserved. D. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until a legal description complying with the delineation of adjustment, and including, the required easements as specified in Paragraph A of Section 8 are submitted to, and approved by the City, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." E. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions or this Lot Line Adjustment shall not be effective. F. Upon the recordation of the Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment, no access to the guest house on Parcel 1 shall occur across Parcel 2; the existing driveway to the guest house shall be removed, subject to City staff approval; and any access across Parcel 1 to the guest house shall comply with all current zoning requirements. G. The Lot Line Adjustment map shall be amended to designate the location of a 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral on each parcel. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ATTEST: lsr.' AY OF OCTOBER, 1993. 1 , \., ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN K..t MARILYN KER , DEPUTY CITY CLERK • RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ss I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-32 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 502. was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 26, 1993 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Lay ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices EPUTY CITY CLERK (4 - 1 1 ' ri _ 1 •4 • •4 t -� r. r 0•.99'.Cators csr*res 'J4 Oz•2r.Sa aolem L A. '213) »7•I609 /AA 'lii) 3/0•404 CSfLAMC VILLAc•C lees) 424•4402 '.x tic!) 4L4-42tI November 11, 1993 • • SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING CORPORATION 304 TCJON PLACE P,oLCS VCP0C3 CSTATC$, CALIWORNIA fl7274 Mayor July Murdock City of Rolling Bills #2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Mayor Murdock. RAYMOnD L OWG,ET OCNALC C CAAS:N CON5v0.040 CNL p•ce iO Reference Zoning Case No 5.02, Certificate or Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment, 13 Crest Road West and #1 Buggy Whip Drive, A plan for the further development of Buggy Whip Drive is currently being prepared. This plan calls for the utilization of the existing driveway that has been ordered "to be removed prior to recordation", The owners of both pacels, Doctors Kouri and Ambers are requesting a modification to this order. They are proposing that a 40 foot piece of the driveway be removed and a fence be placed on both ;newly created easement lines per the attached sketch, This action would have the etl'ect of rendering the driveway unusable and inaccessible to the servants quarters at the present time. The site review process must be undertaken for the development of #1 Buggy 'Whip Drive and its implementation would not allow for the servants quarters to remain in their current location. The parties involved in this transaction are most anxious to sec this matter resolved and to this end they have requested the work be undertaken immediately. 1 hope that you and the Council people can see your way clear to grant this modification as it will accomplish the same action. Sincerely, SMITH Ii -i Y ENGINEERING t;ORPORATION Douglas K. Mcliattie Assistant Vice-PN •;(sent DKMc: gh 93494C/ami v 1 \` ) ,, • , •• ' !'w ; M� • "'fit j• m r 4Y k.\ 1 , •� 1 t 1. r > •f • •' . 1, rr'r. rf f f t.t•.,+trri,ti I\ / j /' • / // it ` !`�,. • t r • qr City opaeen9Jaee, JODYMURDOCK Mayor GINNY LEEUWENBURGH Mayor Pro Tem THOMAS F. HEINSHEIMER Counc,lmember GODFREY PERNELL Councilmember GORDANA SWANSON Counc,lmember November 9, 1993 Dr. and Mrs. Paul Kouri 13 Crest Road West Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 1310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 Dear Dr. and Mrs. Kouri: At the regular City Council Meeting held Monday, November 8, 1993, City Councilmembers formally took Zoning Case No. 502, Resolution No. 92-32 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT under jurisdiction for their review. This item will be considered by the City Council at their next regular meeting on Monday, November 22, 1993, beginning at 7:30 p.m. During City Council deliberations, the following information was requested: • That an accurate map depicting the existing driveway to the guest house marked "to be removed prior to recordation" be indicated on the plans. • That the plans be signed off by a civil engineer as required by Rolling Hills policies. • That the accessibility plan for the guest house to be located on Parcel No. 1 be depicted on the plan. City Councilmembers opposed any extension of guest house accessibility via the existing driveway on Parcel No. 2 beyond the date of recordation. Please indicate in your cover correspondence your plans to remove the driveway to the guest house prior to recordation. Page 2 This letter shall serve as notice of the City Council deliberations at the November 8 City Council meeting. It is anticipated that further deliberation will occur on November 22, 1993. You or your representatives are encouraged to attend the appeal hearing on November 22 1993. Should you wish to discuss this further, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, Craig R. Nealis City Manager CRN: rnik corres.cm\zc5022.1tr cc: Mr. Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering 411 C1iy `{eofQ'np CERTIFIED MAIL November 4, 1993 Mr. and Mrs. John Z. Blazevich c/o Mr. Douglas McHattie South Bay Engineering Corp. 304 Tejon Place Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Mr. John Z. Blazevich P.O.Box 1660 San Pedro, CA 90733 SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 502, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE AND 13 CREST ROAD WEST (LOT 176-A-MS AND 176-MS) BY MR. JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 Dear Mr. Blazevich: This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 502 was APPROVED by the Planning Commission and the enclosed resolution was approved on October 26, 1993 at an adjourned regular meeting. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on November 8, 1993. The approval will become effective: (1) Thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution if no appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code attached), AND (2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject resolution must be filed by you with the County Recorder. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 93-32, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Plot Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $5.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. PAGE 2 Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. SINCF4 ELY, 6-6 OLA.UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTION NO.93-32, EXHIBIT A PLOT PLAN, AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, AND APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, South Bay Engineering Dr. and Mrs. H. Lawrence Amberg Dr. and Mrs. Paul Kouri RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 502. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. John Z. Blazevich requesting a Certificate of Compliance and approval of a Lot Line Adjustment between two adjacent parcels of property. The first parcel is currently 5.641 gross acres and is located at 1 Buggy Whip Drive (Lot 176-A-MS)(Hereinafter referred to as "Parcel 1"). The second parcel is currently 4.249 gross acres and is located at 13 Crest Road West (Lot 176-MS)(Hereinafter referred to as "Parcel 2"). Single family residential structures exist on each parcel. A guest house currently exists on Parcel 2 within that portion of Parcel 2 to be transferred into Parcel 1. Section 2. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment involves moving the common side lot line between both parcels to the southwest so that 1.7842 gross acres is moved from Parcel 2 into Parcel 1. Section 3. Mr. John Z. Blazevich has requested a Certificate of Compliance and approval of this Lot Line Adjustment as a condition of an escrow agreement to purchase Parcel 1 from its current owner, Dr. and Mrs. H. Lawrence Amberg. The owner of Parcel 2, Dr. and Mrs. Paul Kouri, has consented to the -Lot Line Adjustment in documents submitted to the City. Section 4. California Government Code Subsection 66412(d) authorizes minor lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map if: A. The lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; B. A greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; C. The lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and D. The lot line adjustment is approved by the City. Section 5. The Planning Commission considered the application on October 23, 1993 at an adjourned regular meeting and conducted a field site review. RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 2 Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 7. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence, both written and oral, presented to it in connection with this application and finds as follows: A. Section 16.16.010.B of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that each lot in any subdivision in the RAS-2 zone shall have a net area (excluding easements) of not less than eighty-seven thousand one hundred twenty square feet (2.0 acres). The proposed lot line adjustment will result in Parcel 1 being 6.6978 net acres and Parcel 2 being 2.0717 net acres after excluding easements. B. Section 16.16.040 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that the length of the lot that abuts the easement line shall be at least equal to or greater than the depth of the lot divided by two and one-half; provided, that in no event shall such abutting footage be less than one hundred fifty feet. Each of the parcels complies with the provision. The adjustment will provide a 520-foot frontage for Parcel 1 along Buggy Whip Drive. The adjustment will reduce the frontage of Parcel 2 along Buggy Whip Drive to 215-feet and will change the frontage for Parcel 2 but, will not be less than the 150 foot minimum frontage along a maintained roadway for each lot. C. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The proposed adjustment will result in the southwest sideline of Parcel 1 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet and the northeast sideline of Parcel 2 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet. The proposed irregular lot line between the two parcels is less angular than the existing irregular lot line. D. Section 16.16.040(D) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots shall have a depth with a slope less than thirty degrees at least equal to the footage abutting the street easement line. For Parcel 1 the proposed adjustment will result in 2.9 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 430 feet and a street frontage along the easement line of 520 feet'along Buggy Whip Drive. For Parcel 2 the proposed adjustment will result in 2.05 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 365 feet, and a street frontage along the easement line of 215 feet along Buggy Whip Drive. Due to topographic conditions, 2.9 acres for Parcel 1 and 2.05 acres for RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 3 Parcel 2 demonstrate a sizeable area for development on each parcel. E. The City's Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study, prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers on February 9, 1988, recommends the installation of future sewer lines to service the immediate vicinity to be constructed along the northwesterly property line of Parcel 1 and the northwesterly and southerly property lines of Parcel 2. Based upon this Study and the need to provide for the future installation of sewers to serve the properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property, conditions have been attached to require the applicant to record an easement to the Rolling Hills Community Association for ingress and egress purposes to construct underground utilities along the northwesterly property line, the northerly boundary line, the easterly boundary line, the southeasterly boundary line, the southerly boundary line of Parcel 1; the area on either side of the boundary line between Parcel 1 and 2 between the southerly and northerly lot lines; the southeasterly boundary line, the southerly boundary line, and the northwesterly boundary line of Parcel 2. F. Conditions have also been attached to this approval which provide that it will not impair or limit the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance to any future development of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2. Section 8. In accordance with the foregoing findings, the lot line adjustment and Certificate of Compliance sought in Zoning Case No. 502 as indicated on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant shall prepare and, upon approval and acceptance of the City, record concurrent with the Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment an easement in gross, in favor of the City of Rolling Hills (with the intention that the City convey it immediately to the Rolling Hills Community Association) for the easements and rights -of -way reserved for the use and purpose of erecting, constructing, operating and maintaining thereon: (1) roads, streets, or bridle trails, parkways and park areas; (2) poles, wire and conduits for the transmission of electricity for lighting, heating, power, telephone, cable and other purposes and for the necessary attachments in connection therewith; (3) public and private sewers, storm water drains, land drains, and pipes, water systems, water, heating and gas mains or pipes; and (4) any other method of conducting and performing any public or quasi - public utility service or function beneath the surface of the ground. The easement deed shall prohibit Grantor or successor to Grantor from constructing or erecting any improvements or altering the contours of the surface of the easement area other than installation of shallow rooted landscaping and necessary irrigation systems. The map attached to the Certificate of Compliance, • • RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 4 referred hereto as Exhibit "A" shall delineate and note the easements specified in this paragraph. B. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No. 221, 1988) to Parcels 1 and 2 at such time as an application is made for development. C. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect waive, release or be construed to supersede any restriction, dedication or condition set forth on Los Angeles County Assessor Map No. 51, and all such matters are hereby reserved. D. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until a legal description complying with the delineation of adjustment, and including, the required easements as specified in Paragraph A of Section 8 are submitted to, and approved by the City, attached hereto as Exhibit "A." E. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions or this Lot Line Adjustment shall not be effective. F. Upon the recordation of the Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment, no access to the guest house on Parcel 1 shall occur across Parcel 2; the existing driveway to the guest house shall be removed, subject to City staff approval; and any access across Parcel 1 to the guest house shall comply with all current zoning requirements. G. The Lot Line Adjustment map shall be amended to designate the location of a 450 square foot stable and 550 square foot corral on each parcel. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ''IS 2• H 31L- AY OF OCTOBER, 1993. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ss I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-32 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 502. was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 26, 1993 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Raine and Chairman Roberts NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Lay ABSTAIN: None and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices EPUTY CITY CLERK 17.54.010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • 17.54.030 C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title: In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • 1754.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time Iimits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 78 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: Recorder's Use CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation). ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss ZONING CASE NO. 502 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT X I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 1 Buggy Whip Drive and 13 Crest Road West, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 This property is the subject of the above numbered cases. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 502 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT X I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Print Owner Name Signature Address City/State Print Owner Name Signature Address City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of County of sS. On this the day of the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared O personally known to me 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) within instrument, and acknowledged that WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary's Signature 19_, before me, subscribed to the Qxecuted it. See Exhibit °A" attached hereto and made a part hereof November 5, 1993 Original copies of the attached documents were received by Douglas McHattie on behalf of Mr. & Mrs. John Z. Blazevich. / colco—ul ji ;W%( Dougla McHattie MEETING DATE: TO: FROM: APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING & SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: REQUEST • • City ofieoffinv JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 OCTOBER 23, 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION LOLA UNGAR, PRINCIPAL PLANNER NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 ZONING CASE NO. 502 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE & 13 CREST ROAD WEST (LOT 176-A-MS & 176-MS) RAS-2, EXISTING 5.641 ACRES & 4.249 ACRES MR. JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH MR. DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, SOUTH BAY ENGINEERING The applicant requests a Lot Line Adjustment to determine compliance with provisions of the Subdivision Map Act. DISCUSSION In reviewing the applicant's request under Title 16 (Subdivisions), Title 17 (Zoning), and the Subdivision Map Act, staff would identify the following issues for evaluation: 1. The applicant is requesting that the lot line on the subject lots be adjusted to the southwest so that the common side lot line between both parcels and that 1.7842 gross acres is moved from Parcel 2 into Parcel 1 as shown on the attached plans in which Parcel 1 would comprise 7.4265 acres gross (4.9558 acres net) and Parcel 2 would comprise 2.7916 acres gross (2.0690 acres net). 2. Mr. John Z. Blazevich has requested a Certificate of Compliance and approval of this Lot Line Adjustment as a condition of an escrow agreement to purchase Parcel 1 from its current owner, Dr. and Mrs. H. Lawrence Amberg. The owners of Parcel 2, Dr. and Mrs. Paul Kouri, have consented to the Lot Line Adjustment in documents submitted to the City. The purpose of the Lot Line Adjustment is to improve the integrity of each of the properties. 3 Improvements on Parcel 1 include a residence, attached garage, pool and guest house. Improvements on Parcel 2 include a residence and attached garage. 4. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment involves moving the common side lot line between both parcels to the southwest so that 1.7842 gross acres is moved from Parcel 2 into Parcel 1. Printed on Recycled Paper. ZONING CASE NO. 502 PAGE 2 5. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment includes easementsas follows: (1) the northwesterly twenty-five (25) feet of Parcels 1 and 2 between the northerly and southerly lot lines, (2) the northerly ten (10) feet of Parcel 1, (3) the easterly twenty-five (25) feet of Parcel 1, (4) the southeasterly twenty-five (25) feet of Parcel 1, (5) the southerly ten (10) feet of Parcel 1, (6) the ten (10) feet on either side of the boundary line between Parcel 1 and 2 between the northerly and southerly lot lines, (7) the southeasterly ten (10) feet of Parcel 2, and (8) the southerly fifty (50) feet of Parcel 2. 6. Section 16.16.020 of the Subdivision section of the Municipal Code referring to lot sideline angles reads, "In all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be approximate right angles to or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts." The proposed adjustment will result in the southwest sideline of Parcel 1 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet and the northeast sideline of Parcel 2 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet. The rest of the proposed irregular lot line between the two parcels is less angular than the existing irregular lot line. 7. Section 16.16.040.A of the Subdivision section of the Municipal Code refers to widths and depths of lots requirements, "The abutting footage of any lot along the street easement line shall be at least equal to or greater than the depth of the lot divided by two and one-half; provided, that in no event shall such abutting footage be less than one hundred fifty feet." The abutting footage of each of the parcels along the street easement line is more than 150 feet and equal to or greater than the depth of the lot divided by 2.5. 8. Section 16.16.040(D) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots shall have a depth with a. slope less than thirty degrees at least equal to the footage abutting the street easement line. For Parcel 1 the proposed adjustment will result in 2.9 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 430 feet and a street frontage along the easement line of 520 feet along Buggy Whip Drive. For Parcel 2 the proposed adjustment will result in 2.05 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 365 feet, and a street frontage along the easement line of 215 feet along Buggy Whip Drive. Due to topographic conditions, 2.9 acres for Parcel 1 and 2.05 acres for Parcel 2 demonstrate a sizeable area for development on each parcel. 9. Section 17.16.170(A) of the Zoning section of the Municipal Code requires that every lot or parcel for which a site plan review is approved or extended requires that an area of 450 • • ONING CASE NO. 502 PAGE 3 square feet for a stable and 550 square feet for an adjacent corral be provided. The adjustment of this lot line will allow room for a stable and corral where the fruit trees now exist on both sides of the proposed adjusted lot line. 10. The proposed lot line adjustment will require the removal of some existing trees for Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 which, if not removed, would be located on the boundary line within the easement on proposed Parcels 1 and 2. 11. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 12. Attached is a letter received from Dr. and Mrs. Larry Amberg. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the proposed lot line adjustment plans, view the subject site and the attached draft resolution. This item has been placed on the October 26, 1993 meeting agenda in case the Commission deems it necessary to continue the item for further deliberations. ROLLING HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA. 90274 ATTEN: MR. CRAIG NEALIS To the Planning Commission: Oct. 5, 1993 D 474,g/E/Mq OCT 1 1 1993 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS We are respectfully requesting the lot line adjustment on 13 Crest Road W. be considered and approved as soon as possible. We are in escrow at 1 Buggy Whip and can not close until this approval has been made. We appreciate your help in expediting this. Sincerely, 22V 1 Larry Amberg 'and Eleanore A berg FT RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 502. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. John Z. Blazevich requesting a Certificate of Compliance and approval of a Lot Line Adjustment between two adjacent parcels of property. The first parcel is currently 5.641 gross acres and is located at 1 Buggy Whip Drive (Lot 176-A-MS)(Hereinafter referred to as "Parcel 1"). The second parcel is currently 4.249 gross acres and is located at 13 Crest Road West (Lot 176-MS)(Hereinafter referred to as "Parcel 2"). Single family residential structures exist on each parcel. A guest house currently exists on Parcel 2 within that portion of Parcel 2 to be transferred into Parcel 1. Section 2. The proposed Lot Line Adjustment involves moving the common side lot line between both parcels to the southwest so that 1.7842 gross acres is moved from Parcel 2 into Parcel 1. Section 3. Mr. John Z. Blazevich has requested a Certificate of Compliance and approval of this Lot Line Adjustment as a condition of an escrow agreement to purchase Parcel 1 from its current owner, Dr. and Mrs. H. Lawrence Amberg. The owner of Parcel 2, Dr. and Mrs. Paul Kouri, has consented to the Lot Line Adjustment in documents submitted to the City. Section 4. California Government Code Subsection 66412(d) authorizes minor lot line adjustments without requiring a tentative map, parcel map or final map if: A. The lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; B. A greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; C. The lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and D. The lot line adjustment is approved by the City. Section 5. The Planning Commission considered the application on October 23, 1993 at an adjourned regular meeting and conducted a field site review. AFT RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 2 Section 6. The Planning Commission finds that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to a Class 5 exemption provided by Section 15303 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 7. The Planning Commission has considered the evidence,.both written and oral, presented to it in connection with this application and finds as follows: A. Section 16.16.010.B of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that each lot in any subdivision in the RAS-2 zone shall have a net area (excluding easements) of not less than eighty-seven thousand one hundred twenty square feet (2.0 acres). The proposed lot line adjustment will result in Parcel 1 being 4.9558 net acres and Parcel 2 being 2.069 net acres after excluding easements. B•. Section 16.16.040 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that the length of the lot that abuts the easement line shall be at least equal to or greater than the depth of the lot divided by two and one-half; provided, that in no event shall such abutting footage be less than one hundred fifty feet. Each of the parcels complies with the provision. The adjustment will provide a 520-foot frontage for Parcel 1 along Buggy Whip Drive. The adjustment will reduce the frontage of Parcel 2 along Buggy Whip Drive to 215-feet which will change the frontage for Parcel 2 but, will not be less than the 150 foot minimum frontage along a maintained roadway for each lot. C. Section 16.16.020 of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that in all cases where practicable, the sidelines of lots shall be at approximate right angles or radial to the street upon which such lot fronts. The proposed adjustment will result in the southwest sideline of Parcel 1 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet and the northeast sideline of Parcel 2 to be at right angles to the roadway for 45 feet. The proposed irregular lot line between the two parcels is less angular than the existing irregular lot line. D. Section 16.16.040(D) of the Rolling Hills Subdivision Ordinance requires that all lots shall have a depth with a slope less than thirty degrees at least equal to the footage abutting the street easement line. For Parcel 1 the proposed adjustment will result in 2.9 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 430 feet and a street frontage along the easement line of 520 feet along Buggy Whip Drive. For Parcel 2 the proposed adjustment will result ,in 2.05 acres of less than a 30 percent slope, a maximum lot depth of less than 30 percent slope of 365 feet, and a street frontage along the easement line of 215 feet along Buggy Whip Drive. Due to topographic conditions, 2.9 acres for Parcel 1 and 2.05 acres for RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 3 Parcel 2 demonstrate a sizeable area for development on each parcel. E. The City's Sanitary Sewer Feasibility Study, prepared by ASL Consulting Engineers on February 9, 1988, recommends the installation of future sewer lines to service the immediate vicinity to be constructed along the northwesterly property line of Parcel 1 and the northwesterly and southerly property lines of Parcel 2. Based upon this Study and the need to provide for the future installation of sewers to serve the properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property, conditions have been attached to require the applicant to record an easement to the Rolling Hills Community Association for ingress and egress purposes to construct underground utilities along the northwesterly property line, the northerly boundary line, the easterly boundary line, the southeasterly boundary line, the southerly boundary line of Parcel 1; the area on either side of the boundary line between Parcel 1 and 2 between the southerly and northerly lot lines; the southeasterly boundary line, the southerly boundary line, and the northwesterly boundary line of Parcel 2. F. The proposed lot line adjustment will require the removal of some existing trees on Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 which, if not removed, would be located on the boundary line within the easement on proposed Parcels 1 and 2. G. Conditions have also been attached to this approval which provide that it will not impair or limit the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance to any future development of Parcel 1 or Parcel 2. Section 8. In accordance with the foregoing findings, the lot line adjustment sought in Zoning Case No. 502 as indicated on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: A. The applicant shall prepare and, upon approval and acceptance of the City, record concurrent with the Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment and easement in gross, in favor of the City of Rolling Hills (with the intention that the City convey it immediately to the Rolling Hills Community Association) for the easements and rights -of -way reserved for the use and purpose of erecting, constructing, operating and maintaining thereon: (1) Roads, streets, or bridle trails, parkways and park areas; (2) Poles, wire and conduits for the transmission of electricity for lighting, heating, power, telephone, cable and other purposes and for the necessary attachments in connection therewith; (3) Public and private sewers, storm water drains, land drains, and pipes, water systems, water, heating and gas mains or pipes; and (4) Any other method of conducting and performing any public or quasi - public utility service or function beneath the surface of the. RAFT RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 4 ground. The easement deed shall prohibit Grantor or successor to Grantor from constructing or erecting any improvements or altering the contours of the surface of the easement area other than installation of shallow rooted landscaping and necessary irrigation systems. The map attached to the Certificate of Compliance, referred hereto as Exhibit "A" shall delineate and note the easements specified in this paragraph. B. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect limit or impair the City's application of the Site Plan Review Ordinance (Ordinance No. 221, 1988) to Parcels 1 and 2 at such time as an application is made for development. C. The lot line adjustment shall not in any respect waive, release or be construed to supersede any restriction, dedication or condition set forth on Los Angeles County Assessor Map No. 51, and all such matters are hereby reserved. D. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until a legal description complying with the delineation of adjustment, and including, the required easements as specified in Paragraph A of Section 8 are submitted to, and approved by the City, attached hereto as Exhibit "A."' E. All trees and shrubbery located within the easements on each side of the adjusted lot line shall be removed within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Resolution. A bond in the amount of the estimated cost of the removal of the trees and shrubs within the easements shall be submitted to the City prior to the recordation of the Certificate of Compliance. F. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions or this Lot Line Adjustment shall not be effective. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 1993. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK • • RESOLUTION NO. 93-32 PAGE 5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ss I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93-32 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 502. was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on October 23, 1993 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CITY CLERK ROLLING HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA. 90274 ATTEN: MR. CRAIG NEALIS To the Planning Commission: Oct. 5, 1993 X@EMED O C T 1 1 1993 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 9y We are respectfully requesting the lot line adjustment on 13 Crest Road W. be considered and approved as soon as possible. We are in escrow at 1 Buggy Whip and can not close until this approval has been made. We appreciate your help in expediting this. Sincerely, Larry Amberg and Eleanore Aerg September 23, 1993 s ol /eOf/fl( hfL5 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Mr. John Z. Blazevich P.O.Box 1660 San Pedro, CA 90733 SUBJECT: STATUS OF APPLICATION FOR ZONING CASE NO. 502: REQUEST FOR A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR 1 BUGGY WHIP DRIVE AND 13 CREST ROAD WEST (LOT 176-A-MS AND 176 MS) BY MR. JOHN Z. BLAZEVICH Dear Mr. Blazevich: A preliminary review of the application noted above has been completed by the City's staff and pursuant to state law we find that the information submitted is: X Not Complete. The application has been held in abeyance because certain information is missing, you failed to comply with certain requirements, or both. The information needed to complete the application is listed below, and must be supplied before the application can be deemed complete. Additional Information/Requirements: 1. Letter of Application for a Lot Line Adjustment is required. 2. Radius map and property. owners' labels. A map is required showing the existing properties, within or partially within a 1,000 foot radius of the exterior boundaries of the property under consideration, including the subject property(ies). Prepare 3 complete lists of property owners of each parcel with mailing address on mailing labels. Assign a number to each name on the list to correspond with the map numbers. 3. Certified Property Owners List Affidavit (attached). 4. Owner's Declaration for each lot (2 forms attached). 5. Size and use of existing structures along with existing and proposed structural and total lot coverage for each lot. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions about the application process. Sincer,ly, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. Douglas McHattie, South Bay Engineering Printed on Recycled Paper. 4 • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at ,California, this day of , 1991 (address) NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that .the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: ZONING CASE NO: COMPANY PHONE NO.( ) TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: PROJECT ADDRESS: Site Plan Review Application -13- OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at , California, this day of , 1991 (address) NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: /1(. , 41' REPRESENTATIVE: COMPANY NAME: COMPANY ADDRESS: :DirkiLiiittutv/ COMPANY PHONE NO.,( ) PROJECT ADDRESS: Site Plan Review Application -13- DATE FILED FEE: ilery `/1/,3 RECEIPT NO: ..�.S/I° BY: ZONING CASE NO: TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: 3 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss I, , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at , California, this day of , 19 SIGNATURE Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change Site Plan Review Application -15-