Loading...
885, "Build a deck that?s 12"" in a, Application• • This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD UI I 111 III III II I II 1111 20160754429 II I II I I II II III I I I I I I III I II Recorded/F led in Officia Records Recorder's Office, Los Angeles County, California III 0160629061001 i 001228762 lllll IIIII SEQ: 01 111 06/29/16 AT 02:16PM I 1111 III lII DAR - Counter (Upfront Scan llll 011 111111 lll0 111 1 II IIIl IMIlI IIIIl I 11 IlIlUl 111111111 111 111 llIl 111 II 1 II II 111 III II 1111 II i 111 II THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED P0011: FEES: 45.00 TAXES: 0.00 OTHER: 0.00 PAID: 45.00 III E4384G7 • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS PLANNING DEPARTMENT 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX 9 i129121116 il1l !i1 ill\!.I ,I! II � 'ill II.� "'201(10754429` T RECORDER'S USE ONLY THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE RECORDATION. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 885 (SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED) XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCE 1 (We) the undersigned state 1 am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 15 CABALLEROS ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 21-SK) This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 885 XX SITE PLAN REVIEW XX VARIANCE I (We) certify (or;fieclare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is tru Signature fp Name typed or printed if ( /41u Address ID'//% 4%z27 City/State L 'Signature and correct. Name typed or print �. Coak, ,2C e,os- 1. Address /2/-if.‘24,C) Jeh4q(4?an ?gj City/State • A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. STATE OF l -t oyv1 i c t } COUNTY OF 01-Av p On Mau 214" 20 ila , before me, K-U i . S. +%k , a Notary Public, personally appeared A'I cutiA elr ltilarit S (A4 p teivl , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature: Name of '.�c/(dVl leg Le. Date Commission Expires 69//3/Zo l Qj Commission No. ZO f 166 Z KYLE STEVEN HATCH Commission # 2081552 Notary Public - California Orange County M Comm. Expires Seis 13, 2018 )f,----tt5 IT 'f- • RESOLUTION NO. 2015- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A Si1'E PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A RAISED DECK AND A WALL; TO ENCROACH WITH A PORTION OF THE WALL AND WITH THE RAISED DECK INTO THE SIDE SETBACK AND TO EXCEED THE ALLOWED MAXIMUM STRUCTURAL AND TOTAL LOT COVERAGE IN ZONING CASE NO. 885, AT 15 CABALLEROS ROAD, (LOT 21-SK), ROLLING HILLS, CA, (SHIPMAN). THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Alex and Marie Shipman with respect to real property located at 15 Caballeros Road, (Lot 21-SK), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a Site Plan Review and Variances to construct a 686 square foot raised deck with supporting retaining walls. The raised deck would be 3.75 feet above grade including a planter wall 3' above the raised deck along the eastern limit of the raised deck. The raised deck would encroach 6.5 feet into the 20-foot wide easterly side setback and a portion of a wall located along the north side of the new deck would also encroach into the side setback, with said construction, to exceed the maximum allowed coverage with an increases from 24.55% to 26.78% where 20% maximum allowed for structural coverage and, an increase from 43.87% to 44.22% where 35% maximum allowed for total lot coverage. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings to consider the application on July 21, 2015 at regular Planning Commission meetings and in the field also on July 21, 2015. The applicant was notified of the public hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said proposal. The applicants' representative was in attendance at the regular meeting hearing. One neighbor came to the field trip meeting, but did not object to the project, except to request that she be notified if the owners propose any new trellis of other high structure on the patio. Section 3. The subject property is zoned RAS-1, located on Caballeros Road, irregularly shaped lot, with net lot area for development purposes of 36,859 square feet. The proposed raised deck would be at the same elevation as an existing upper terrace, creating a consolidated single outdoor living area as opposed to two separate tiered terraces. A new outdoor kitchen is to be constructed on the consolidated terrace area. Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. 1 Section 4. Ike Planning Commission finds thane project qualifies as Class 3 Exemption, pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) Guidelines as new construction of a small structure and is therefore exempt from environmental review. Section 5. A Site Plan Review is required subject to Section 17.46.020 of the Zoning Ordinance, in that the proposed raised deck is a structural addition. With respect to the Site Plan Review application for the subject deck, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compliant with all requirements of the Zoning Ordinance except as approved herein by Variance, and is compatible with the General Plan and surrounding uses because the proposed project is consistent with goals and policies that require low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The deck construction will occur in an area previously graded and disturbed and there will be no new grading. The elevated condition and "bulk" of the new deck will be mitigated, as the new deck area will be visually shielded by vegetation and the existing residence. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot because no grading is required and the proposed deck improvement is relatively minor change to an existing outdoor patio area, and would be located above an existing patio. The construction will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the proposed improvements will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with vegetation and is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed project will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors. C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of homes in the surrounding RA-S-1 similarly zoned neighborhood. The proposed project entails a construction of a raised deck approximately 686 square feet in area, within an existing outdoor living and recreational area on the property consisting of a swimming pool, water element, terraced "on -grade" patios and spa for the purpose of enhancing and facilitating outdoor living on the site, a common residential amenity enjoyed by property owners throughout the City. The proposed raised deck would be located above and within the same configuration as an existing on grade deck. D. The development plan generally follows natural contours of the site to the maximum extend practicable to accomplish groomed and usable areas of the lot, subject to concurrent approval of Variances pursuant to Section 6 of this resolution. The proposed raised deck would be located above and within the same configuration as an existing on grade deck. Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. 2 E. lcral drainage courses will not be acted by the project. No grading is proposed and therefore existing drainage channels are not anticipated to be impacted. The project construction will not be located in a canyon or on existing slopes that exceed 25%. p'. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because no change is proposed to the existing driveway, which is in compliance with applicable requirements. Section 6. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance granting relief from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity or zone. In proposing to encroach 6.5 feet into the 20-foot easterly side yard setback with a new raised deck supported by a 3.75-foot tall retaining wall, Variances are required to grant relief from the following Sections of the Zoning Ordinance: 17.16.150 (Structures and driveways permitted in setbacks), where the height of the proposed deck -greater than 12" above grade, and supporting retaining wall greater than 3', and 17.16.070 (maximum allowed lot coverage) in which case the proposed total structural and total lot coverage area would exceed the allowed amounts with an increases from 24.55% to 26.78% where 20% maximum is allowed for structural coverage and, an increase from 43.87% to 44.22% where 35% maximum total lot coverage is allowed. With respect to the aforementioned requests for Variances, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There axe exceptional circumstances and conditions on the subject property as follows: Regarding requested variance from Zoning Ordinance Sections 17.16.150, and 17.16.070 relating to the height and projection into the setback for the proposed deck and wall: there is an existing fall in elevation of approximately 13 feet between the garage exterior grade and elevation of lower pool deck below, between which the property is improved with existing terraces and access steps between. The sloping condition of the lot in this area constrains the ability to have a single level outdoor living area of a size that can be adequately furnished and usable. Projection of the raised deck into the side setback would enable the property owners to construct a reasonably sized level patio designed for outdoor living by utilizing an existing planter wall in the easterly setback as a structural support. The proposed raised deck would be located above and within the same configuration as an existing on grade deck. Regarding the requested variance from Section 17.16.070, relating to maximum structural and total lot coverage limits: the property has an unusually long street Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. 3 frontage along gkalleros Road, of approximately it lineal feet, which, due to related roadway easements and applicable setbacks, effectively diminishes the base "net lot area" upon which allowed impervious and structural coverage is based. In addition, the exceptional length of the existing driveway, which is necessary in order to avoid sloping conditions along Caballeros Road, requires a large amount of paved area, which in turn, reduces the residual amount of lot area that can be covered with impervious material without exceeding the limit. Likewise the size of the existing home including several covered porches, constrains the residual amount of net lot area that can be covered with new structural improvements without exceeding the code limit. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property owners in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied to the property in question by strict application of the code. The property right which otherwise would be enjoyed is the ability to utilize a portion of their rear yard with a sizeable patio to accommodate outdoor recreational use, including an outdoor kitchen, which currently can not be enjoyed due to the terraced configuration. The location of the deck is the least visually intrusive to the property and its neighbors. C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the properties or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located in that the degree of deviation from the allowed amount of encroachment (6-inches) and wall height (9 inches) is relatively minor. Further, the proposed patio would not be visible from the adjoining street or private properties and therefore is not expected to result in any visual or privacy impacts. D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will be observed in that the proposed patio construction will be orderly, attractive, in line with an existing on -grade patio footprint and will not affect the rural character of the community. The subject property is currently improved with a suitable stable and corral area and the proposed patio will not impact use of these existing structures. E. The Variance request is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Rolling Hills because the proposed structures comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. F. The Variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waster Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review and Variances in Zoning Case No. 885 for new Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. 4 raised deck, AL and to exceed the maximum Omitted structural and total lot coverage subject to the following conditions: A. Expiration. The Site Plan and Variances approval shall expire within two years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections. B. Enforcement It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall Lapse; provided that the City has given the applicants written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination. C. Plan conformance with Municipal Code and Planning Commission approval Resolution. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated June 30, 2015, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. A copy of the conditions of this Resolution shall be printed on plans approved when a building permit is issued and a copy of such approved plans, including conditions of approval, shall be available on the building site at all times. The licensed professional preparing construction plans for this project for Building Department review shall execute a Certificate affirming that the plans conform in all respects to this Resolution approving this project and including conformance with all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and Zoning Ordinance. Further, the person obtaining a building permit for this project shall execute a Certificate of Construction stating that the project will be constructed according to this Resolution and any plans approved therewith. D. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, any modifications to the property or this project, which would constitute additional grading, height or any structural development including a Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. 5 trellis or other Altar above ground structure shal require the filing of a new application for approval by the Planning Commission. E. There shall be no grading for this project. F. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 9,874 square feet, or 26.78%; with allowance the structural coverage shall be no more than 26.46%. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 8,978 square feet or 44.65% or, with allowances, 8,266 square feet or 48.5% without allowances in accordance with the proposed plan. G. The disturbed area of the lot is 100% (of net lot area) and as such is legal nonconforming. The proposed construction shall be contained as proposed within an already disturbed area of the property. H. Residential building pad coverage on the 18,511 square foot residential building pad shall be 44.65% including allowed deductions or 48.5% without deductions, which includes the proposed raised patio. I. The existing stable and corral or 1,000 square foot area, feasible for development of a stable, corral and access thereto, shall be retained on the property. J. The applicant shall obtain building permits for the proposed raised patio addition and walls. K. During construction, conformance with the air quality management district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors shall be required. L. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby unimproved roadway easements, but not to obstruct neighboring driveways. During construction, to maximum extend feasible, employees of the contractor shall car-pool into the City. M. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills. N. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities. Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. 6 Further, the property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste. O. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills Outdoor Lighting Standards Ordinance. P. Minimum of 50% of the construction material spoils shall be recycled and diverted. The hauler shall provide the appropriate documentation to the City. Q. If any new landscaping is introduced for this project, either within a planter or along a wall, such vegetation shall be maintained to not exceed a height of 4- feet above finished grade at all times. R. Rolling Hills Community Association Review. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of building permit. Perimeter easements and trails, if any, shall remain free and clear of any improvements including, but not be limited to, fences -including construction fences, grading, landscaping, irrigation and drainage devices, play equipment, parked vehicles, driveways, building materials, debris and equipment, unless the Rolling Hills Community Association approves an encroachment. S. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can be found at htip;//www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page= hazard definitions#FIR E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to monitor the red flag warning conditions. Should a red flag warning be dedared and if work is to be conducted on the property, the contractor shall have readily available fire distinguisher. T. Until the applicants execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this approval, the approvals shall not be effective PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOP 1ti'U ATTEST:� (4, HEIDI LUCE, CITY CLERK Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. BRAD 7 RMAN 2015. • Any action challenging the final decision of the City made as a result of the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CTIY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2015-17 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW AND VARIANCES TO CONSTRUCT A RAISED DECK AND A WALL; TO ENCROACH WITH A PORTION OF THE WALL AND WITH THE RAISED DECK INTO THE SIDE SETBACK AND TO EXCEED THE ALLOWED MAXIMUM STRUCTURAL AND TOTAL LOT COVERAGE IN ZONING CASE NO. 885, AT 15 CABALLEROS ROAD, (LOT 21-SK), ROLLING HILLS, CA, (SHIPMAN). was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on August 18, 2015 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Cardenas, Gray, Kirkpatrick and Chairman Chelf. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Smith. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices. (44-86b6 CTTY CLERK Reso. 2015-17 15 Caballeros Rd. 8 VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: 4.)iE%1P1.. OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: 213 • PROPERTY ADDRESS: 5 r-iscWd-L- I ©- EMAIL: i 3A-L..L '-. r aim LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. "2.1 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. -] 56 1 PAGE PARCEL 2.1 AGENT'S NAME: C751.4 4t;i• AGENT'S ADDRESS: '2.+I1 hWriA 1 F2-11:36V- 1 4;?). TELEPHONE NO.: - 221-3 • S a 71 etD'215 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. LA1r'ew'i 1 ir?› -re:Ate* elks7 i•W &ii ,'t". V�f 1 L L. t a. -4;A.-mz�. l e22 � T c)w i cA AL S. , Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change4s based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. i/.T1 r4&' �T= M ----- Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because =. .. 12-1' e•. ta. h�l LikeA T L� FILING FEE: A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -12- • VARIANCE 3 REOUEST FOR HEARING NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed. Therefore, you may be required to mods or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction with this application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No. 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and is subject to higher application fee. PROPERTY OWNER: I OWNERS ADDRESS: ! G TELEPHONE NO.: EMAIL: PROPERTY ADDRESS: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO.: Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project.require a Variance \/144k-m Li t Lop t Nev A 4 I, 1 t -11- Criteria to be satisfied for 4rant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. ( 5 `ierzs WAS ,-._. +I5 Y Y DLie T rt� 7rez) gyp °° ,. !T . IBC" Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because Ftze>FinC4M2- ) 2.0 . l PF24:*1.7 I N Ti+E. eN, 1 - —fe tr ,4c4 i 1..IP i LL , "rvVE' I VIAL- ..eisver;Tr • 57tpta.$) A1-4 ***) FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. -12- SERVICE YARD • sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. BASEMENT AREA +54' sq.ft. (volume to be included in grading quantities) -DEPTH OF BASEMENT • DATE e,t2L10& 'I ZONING CASE NO. 152), ADDRESS i5 ALL STRUCTURES MUST BESHOWN,ON THE PLAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE AREA AND STRUCTURES EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 3�6°'isq.ft. — sq.ft. 51sq.ft. RESIDENCE 050 sq.& — sq.ft. tel,te, sq.ft. GARAGE '"-MS sq.ft. — sq.ft. 1 S5 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 145\ sq.ft. &')sq.ft. 42:51. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT 3 sq.ft. sq.ft. 5 sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. — sq.ft. — sq.ft. CABANA sq.ft. sq.ft.. sq.ft. STABLE (dirt volume to be included in grading quantities) 6 3 sq.ft. — sq.ft. 5 3 sq.ft. PP—a-t( +. f 12;" ti 16+ .— sq.ft. 6tSee_ sq.ft. Of:40., sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES t i t? sq.ft. sq.ft. I 141, sq.ft. ENTRYWAY/ PORTE COCHERE, BREEZEWAYS ' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED TRELLISES 4 11 sq.ft. — sq.ft. 411 sq.ft. *DETACHED STRUCTURES: (circle all that applies) SHEDS, TRELLISES, GAZEBO, sq.ft. — sq.ft. — sq.ft. BARBECUE, OUTDOOR KITCHEN, ^ sq.ft. 1-41 sq.ft. I1 C• sq.ft. ROOFED PLAY EQUP.- over 15 ft. 7 sq.ft. — sq.ft. . sq.ft. high and over 120 sq. ft. in area, WATER FEATI,TRES, ETC. '-",C., sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. i2/4" sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 4/75,t sq.ft. 41. TOTAL STRUCTURES p7 sq.ft. 7 )1 sq.ft. iiSeKsq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 2..a2. % 246% TOTAL STRUCTURES EXCLUDING UP TO 5 & UP TO 800 sq. ft. detached structures that are not higher than 12 ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 110'51 sq.ft. ei..4.6 % egoi sq.ft. 1764:,sq.ft. • % t2.60,47_% -13- ALL FLATWORK MUST BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN PRIMARY DRIVEWAY(S) 'PAVED WALKS, PATIO AREAS, COURTYARDS POOL DECKING OTHER PAVED DRIVEWAYS, ROAD EASEMENTS, PARKING PADS TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWQRK COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE TOTAL STRUCTURAL & •FLATWORK COVERAGE Excl. the allowance of up to 5 — 800 sq. structures from previous page. % TOTAL COVERAGE . TOTAL DISTURBED AREA % DISTURBED AREA GRADING QUANTITY (include future stable, corral and access way; basement and all other areas to be graded) *sq.ft. 4.142+ sq.ft. '2 0+7sq.ft. sq.ft. "74 i 1 sq.ft. I, 1r % sq.ft. sq.ft. —531 sq.ft. 41Co sq.ft. 4-1 e> sq.ft. 16 sq.ft. sq.ft. "" sq. ft. sq.ft. 41. 5G'2.sq.ft. I 1— sq.ft. 2 v sq.ft. 44. 43.:17 % ©l, ., �.1 % ft -10 . All structures (attached and detached) must be listed. 11'D sq.ft, sq.ft. sq.ft. % 1t>0 % cubic yards * Free standing accessory structures such as sheds, trellises, covered patios, gazebo, fountains, barbecue, outdoor fire place, etc., are not counted towards coverages and disturbed area, unless their combined area exceeds 800 sq. ft., or if there are more than 5 such structures on the property. -14 • DATE Z.C. NO. ADDRESS CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BMIDABLE.PADAREA AN) STRIJCTT TR RS BUILDING PAD RESIDENCE GARAGE POOL/SPA POOL EQUIPM.1/4ET PI17 CABANA/REC. GUEST HOUSE STABLE SERVICE YARD ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence Accessory structures AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES THAT EXCEED ro% OF SIZE OF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRU ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ATTACHED TRELLISES ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) E3C-J.TINTO- 12)161 sq ft °EA ft 3sq ft. AS5sq ft qq.ft. am. sq.ft. OM sq.ft. sq ft sq.ft. 115 sq ft THE CTURE •sq.ft. ÷-..12sq ft. sq.ft. *MO ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES sq.ft. (from 1page not including allowed deductions) OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL $TRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 ‘Iletsq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 411^2. To 1 TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 7i6ei, sq.ft. Nor jincl attached trellises, Not inc.] allowed deductions, and inrl the area of covered porches that , • exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE .4.4?› 6 PR OP OF.,T) • sq.ft. sq.ft. • sq.ft. C3.1q ft sq.& sq.ft. MOM sq.ft. saq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL 1,45,(sq.ft. sq ft. ..705sq ft ,2sq ft sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. MINI1111 OM11.111 NNW sq.ft. edebeOsi.ft. 77° sq.ft. l'sq.ft. sq.ft. 17 ..... ...— sq.ft. •sq.ft. sq.ft. • 417 sq ft 13±.,..sq ft 1'147 sq ft Cq.ft. sq.ft. •-7127—sq ft 703 sq ft q.ft. sq.ft. Ok1.112sq ft -15- DATE Z.C. NO. ADDRESS CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA EX/STING PROPOSED TOTAL AND STRUCTURES BUILD.1.1\1(i PAD 14 6.5q.ft. ... sq.ft. 1.35sq ft RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. POOL/SPA -' :' sq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft. POOL EQUIPMENT 5'5 sq.ft. sq.ft. 53 sq ft CABANA/REC.RM sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. GUEST HOUSE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. STABLE 633sq.ft. sq.ft. 53-3 Sq.ft. SPORTS COURT sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ATTACHED COVERED PORCHES Primary residence sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Accessory structures 44b5sq.ft. _ qq.ft. 416 sq ft AREA OF ATTACHED COVERED sq.ft, sq.ft. sq.ft. PORCHES THAT EXCEED 10% OF THE A_.1_,.., ....• +-3 SIZEQF QF RESIDENCE/ACCS. STRUCTURE ENTRYWAY/PORTE COCHERE/ BREEZEWAY ATTACHED TRELLISES ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1" page) • ALL DETACHED STRUCTURES (from 1"page not including allowed • deductions) sq.ft.' sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. gq.ft. cq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. OTHER cq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. TQTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 f P7 I sq ft sq.ft. 4,1427,4sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 4t41% % eeel•177 TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 1.4.4a2/sq ft sq.ft. q ft -- Nor inc.] attached trellises, Not inql allowed deductions, and inel the area of covered porches that exceed 10% of the size of the residence/accs. structures. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE % .60603Z,70‘ -16-. r 11,7\ P, JUf.292015 REOUESTFORHEARING City of Rolling Hills FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW By NOTE: According to Section 17.24.020 of the Rolling' Hills Municipal Code, illegal uses or structures are required to be made conforming or shall be removed Therefore, you maybe required to modify or remove any unauthorized or unlawful use or structure on your property prior to or in conjunction withthis application. In addition, pursuant to Resolution No: 900 of the City Council, any use or structure which would require a discretionary permit but which is conducted without the acquisition of said permit, shall be subject to retroactive discretionary permit process, and rs subject to higher applications fee. PROPERTY OWNER: �l`� 'Cra4°-1f0/ 1 OWNER'S ADDRESS; ' t . L-6 . TELEPHONE NO: to 1.3 " �.� "` ► 44 EMAIL: I,- 'X5I4"1 < P`'r t PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: V5 eoP4OPic L.1--a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ASSESSORS .BOOK NQ.77 6 41 PAGE PARCEL 'r. t AGENT'S NAME:.'" AGENT'S ADDRESS: '2.4) ` ; . `I F..) E^�.C`�roa TELEPHONE NO:... 110 313 „ ..7 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed. project, including what aspects of the project require a.Site Plan Review: r SY (4:94- 0. 11411.1P t L. /1" 1.:1r eltAieM, Att•I ( 07) OV.4:44. 15Y rNPV Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and 'surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. *14A) et ors' �- ►14 ) L 1.eze...fisc)d="1.4 IS 44000624,vim :. (E) b B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasibte, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximizebuildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain : the nature and extent of the impact of grading' and proposed minimization on lots. No 412.40Pitt D. • To what extent does the site development .plan . preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. -12- • E. How does the site development, plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the 'lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be, regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Pe* . � . F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. • G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of, vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. 1Z 1 i L H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. -13- I hereby certify that the statements furnished abov- and in a ed exhi its, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria -. ation th est of y ability; and, that the facts, statements++' and other information presented are true . , • rre tot est of owledge and belief. Date: 41 Signature For: Applicant FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: CITY OF ROLLING• RILLS -14- PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION (Projects Approved by Resolution) I, ,i2 certify, warrant and represent that the (9..(5.1A ALA, d -v? • plans I prepared and which are submitted concurrently herewith for l S7T/n raufiLtGr3 and on which I have affixed my stamp conform in all material respects to Resolution No. ' J 7 approving this project and all of the conditions set forth therein and the City's Building Code and zoning ordinance. I understand and acknowledge that failure of City officials, employees and agents to identify discrepancies, inaccuracies or errors in the plans does not exculpate me from responsibility for submitting plans that comply materially with the Resolution, Building Code or zoning ordinance. I further understand and acknowledge that I may be subject to administrative proceedings, penalties and/or fines should the submitted plans be inconsistent with Resolution No. 'O /c— (`7 , the Building Code or zoning ordinance. I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of my (our) knowledge and belief. NOTE: If this certification is signed outside of California, it must be acknowledged before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fzxed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take ou edgemefi. tr. tta�hciEop at f' ;a.� owledgment here. Executed at , Y l , California, thi' s 1 day of i� P t , 20 I (0. By: By: Company Name Address "rat' ^ 3. '' O 1 Phone & E-mail ea', '/ Rsllf p ;villa i • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under nay of perjury thatt theforegoingis true and correct. Executed at " " /, c �' r�" `lS , California, this L S t day of % / /�: , 20 S By: By: `/giros Address tss 1 tss /- .)Is, jD 2 7y City NOT.: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is, signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized byits laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: ' al414 2411 SWANYOMIS 1,4POM imp � c: ,r ¶ 74 COMPANY PHONE NO. (11 v ) Y73 $O 77 PROJECT ADDRESS: eA -18- DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: 4040 �i im FEE: COMPANY NAME: RECEIPT NO:Pak COMPANY ADDRE S:till'dir BY: ZONING CASE NO TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understpod. (2_0ej-- /C//$ Executed at ; California this `5 r day of ` y , 20 I . By: By: /fCG /Pr'r Address .94 7 /s 0- 907 7/ City -19-