419, Expand existing SFR constructi, Application-
For
•7 ; t'
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
RecorAks Use
1771437.
t
1
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record this form with
return to:
RECORDED IN OFFICIALRECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
MIN, P MI.OF,T 1g90
f ;1�T.
the -Registrar -Recorder's Office and
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office
before recordation.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO.
VARIANCE CASE NO.
I (We) the undersigned state:
FEE $7
requires that the form be notarized
Acceptance Form
William Martin ri
17 Caballeros Road- C i OV 15 1990
2
419
By
(We are) the owner(s)• ofthe real property described as
l
•7�t3�-�
City Of Rolling E-iifls
follows:
40 y
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
Conditional. Use Permit .Case' No.'
Variance Case No. la19
C. ••C-_g
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of 'Perjury that the
foregoing is true'and correct..
(Where the owner •.and
applicant. are not the same, both must sign.)'
Type or print
Applicant Name
Address i-1 6,16„y,.ts -
City, State
Signature
i
Owner Name I,t h r r L 4/2-7
Address
City, State
Signature
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
/17,4e-S' Gi'
i
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
C: — NO. 201
County of
California
SS.
Los Angeles
90-1'7'7143'7
-- —
OFFICIAL SEAL
CLAIRE A. ENFIELD '
Notary Public-Califomla
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Commission Expires
June 1,1994
On this the 25 day of
September
Claire A. Enfield
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
William L. Martin
1990 , before me,
personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) is subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that he executed it.
WITNE my hand and official tUitz)
Notary's Signature
7110 122
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364
The undersigned
RE2UEST FOR HEARING
FOR ZONE VARIANCE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Russell E. Barto, AIA
Name
3 Malaga Cove Plaza /E202 Palos Verdes Est,. CA g0247 378-1355
Street Address Telephone Number
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of
(2) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at Parcel 20 per book 67 pages 31-32 of 'record
Lot Tract of survey
17 Caballeros Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Street Address
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the
project require a Variance.
We are proposing to expand the existing single family residence by constructing
a new exercise room and retaining wall. We need to have a rear yard variance per
section 17.16.080 because the new construction will encroach into the required
rear yard setback.
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the
'same vicinity and zone,
The configuration of the lot and the orientation of the existing house on the
property are very unusual. The house and pool and patios are oriented to the view,
technically the side yard. Existing topography limits available areas for expansion.
Previously the stable was approved to be located in the front yard.
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to
the property'or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located beta
The nronnsed area of expansion is Iodated to the rear of the lot and is small in
scale. The new square footage of the residence will remain consistant in scale and
mass with the site and with the neighboring properties.
FILING FEE
?, filing fee 041110110104006must accompany the application, Make check payable tor
mur rT'V nr. a Y Ymn %!TY T,C
•
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. 41,
Executed at i%4 / l�a�.�, �( , California,
this day of -7 €. - 19 %
(Address)
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application
is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public
of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer
of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he
(it) owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate Acknowledgment here.
FORMS ISSUED TO:
NAME FILED
ORGANIZATION FEE
JOB ADDRESS RECEIPT NO.
H.N.M. BY:
19
8
•
The
undersigned
REQUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
Russell E. Barto, AIA
Name
3 Malaga Cove Plaza #202 Palos Verdes Est., CA 378-1355
Street Address Telephone No.
(1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are lawful possession of
(I) has permission of the owner
Legal description of property situated at Parcel 20 per book 67 pages 31-32 record
Lot Tractof survey
17 Caballeros Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Street Address
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what
aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review.
This oroiect reauires a site plan review due to the fact that work has been performed
within the last 36 months. The proposed addition is an exercise room on the south side
of the property. The total sauare footage of the project is 237 s.f.
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site Plan Review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must
make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's
conformance to the below criteria:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the zoning
ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to sizes,
set -backs and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
The project is compatible with the requirements of the general plan although a rear
yard setback variance is required. This minor expansion will not alter the compatible
relationship of this house to its neighbors.
B. Does the project preserve and integrate into the site design,
to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features
of, the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees,
drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)?
Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural
features.
Some minor impact on existing topography and vegetation will occur due to the need
to construct a retaining wall to accomodate this expansion.
5
•
C. Does the site development plan follow natural contours of the
site to minimize grading; extensive grading and recontouring of
existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved?
Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with
existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage or
re -direct drainage flow unless into an existing drainage courses.
Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed
minimization measures.
The proposed project of 237 s.f. is so minor compared to the site that the grading will
not effect the existing drainage courses or the overall natural contours.
There will be less than 10 c.y.
D. Does the site development plan preserve surrounding native
vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with
and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping
should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and
public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation,
integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
The project preserves the native vegetation of the lot except for the areas of
construction and retaining wall.
E. Does the site development plan substantially preserve the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums
and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon
the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage
proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on
ieighboring lots.
The proposed addition of 237 s.f. is less than half of one percent of the total lot area.
Is the site development plan harmonious in scale' and mass with
ie site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks
Ia11 be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be
,posed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness.
:plain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing
tbacks of neighboring properties.
The proposed addition will be set back 10' from the existing easement. This would meet
-,he criteria if this was considered a side yard (which functionally it is). The addition
s minor and will not impact the scale of the existing development as it relates to the
ite or neighboring sites.
6
• •
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles?
Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway
location, design, trip data and landscaping and other on -site parking
or storage areas.
The existing driveway and circulation for pedestrians will remain unchanged. The
proposed addition will have no impact on trip data or parking requirements.
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project
impacts the environment, e.g., significant impact, proposed
mitigation measures.
The oroiect conforms fully with the above act and has no impact on the environment.
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached
exhibits, present the data and information required for the site plan
review criteria eevaluation to be the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
DATE:
FOR
CIf'
.SIGNATURE
APPLICANT
7
CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTAL (con't)
17. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot
that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous
portion of the lot within the area defined by the required
minimum setbacks that has an average slope of ten (10%) percent
or less. If there is not existing building pad, the buildable
area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks
that has an average slope of ten (10%) of less.
COMPUTATION OF DOT COVERAGE,
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
LOT COVERAGE (Title 171
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts,
swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an
area of not less than 200 square feet for the construction of a stable
(with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty (20%)
percent of the net lot area; provided further that in addition to the
above described improvements, the areas included within driveways,
parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of
any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community
Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five (35%) percent of the
net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude all
perimeter easements for a maximum of ten feet and that portion of the
lot or parcel of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also
exclude any private drive or driveway which provides ingress and egress
to any other lot or parcel of land, and access strip portion of any flag
lot.
BUILDING AREA EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
CALCULATIONS
NET LOT AREA 49,497 sq. ft. sq. ft. 49,497 sq. ft.
RESIDENCE 3,207 sq. ft. 237 sq. ft. 3,444 sq. ft.
GARAGE 682 sq. ft. sq. ft. 682 sq. ft.
SWIMMING POOL 288 sq. ft. sq. ft. 288 sq. ft.
STABLE 432 sq. ft. sq. ft. 432 sq. ft.
TENNIS COURT 0 sq. ft. sq. ft. 0 sq. ft.
SERVICE YARD sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.
OTHER sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 4,609 s.f. 237 s.f. 4,846 s.f.
% STRUCTURE COVERAGE 9 % 1 % 10 %
)RIVEWAY 2,160 sq. ft. sq. ft. 2,160 sq. ft.
'AVED WALKS AND PATIO AREA sq. ft. sq. ft. 416 sq. ft.
416 s.f.
'OOL DECKING 352 sq. ft. sq. ft. 352 sq. ft.
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 2,928 s.f. 2.928 s.f.
FLATWORK COVERAGE 6 % % _ 6 %
%TOTAL COVERAGE 15 % 1 % 16 %
4
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I. (We, declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct.
Executed at 61�'G�: (v/%G , California,
this day of F�' r 1990
taa,ir
(Address)
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application
is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of
California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public
of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer
of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgments, that he
(it) owns the property described herein, and that the information
accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its)
knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
FORMS ISSUED TO:
NAME FILED
ORGANIZATION FEE
JOB ADDRESS RECEIPT NO.
H.N.M. BY:
19
8
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)ss.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES)
Z, •
•
CITY 0!' ROLLING HILLS
BONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNERS' LIST
AFFIDAVIT •
istdSAAs Viskm k Ir ' I • , declare under. penalty of
perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to
whose all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll
• • of the Couaty within the area described and .for a distance of. one thousand,. (1,000)
feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as:
PARcF� 20 Boot Goa potGFs 3 1::_sz reopeo of VARYFY
•
• • •
•..
Executed at 4.45 V_6-epq.s " ' `ms , California c this
' 1 day of •M►NU • • 19 q0
.%7.., a
Signature
.Q Conditional Use Permit
Variance
El Zone Change
(tsv'd 1990)
•
APPENDIX $
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECXLIST FORM
(Initial Study)
Date Submitted: No.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Name •and address of developer or project sponsor:
Russell E. Barto, AIA
3 Malaga Cove Plaza #202 Palos Verdes Est., CA 90274
2. Address of project:
17 Caballeros Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Assessor's Block and Lot Number Parcel 20 as oer book 67 pages 31-32 of record.
3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted
concerning this project: Russell E. Barto, AIA
3 Malaga Cove Plaza //202 Palos Verdes Est., CA 90274
378-1355
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies:
Rear yard setback variance, site plan review and building permits
5. Existing zoning district: RAS - 1
6. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
Exercise room addition to existing residence.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size: 49,497 s.f.
8. Square footage:
237 s.f.
9. Number of floors of construction: cinolp store
•
10. Amount of off-street parking provided: 2 car garage 3 open spaces
11. (Attach plans.)
12. Proposed scheduling: undetermi mod
13. Associated projects: none
14. Anticipated incremental development: none
15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit
sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size
expected:
-single family residence
16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities:
N/A
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities: N/A
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated
employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community benefits to be derived from the project:
N/A
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or
rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the
application is required: This property requires a rear yard setback
variance due to the proximity of the addition to the property line and because
of the unique configuration of the property and the orientation of the existing
developaent.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
20. On a separate page, describe the project site as it exists
before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site,
and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site.
21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties,
including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use, and
scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard,
etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes' and "maybe' answers are required
on attached sheets.)
22. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water
erosion of soils, either on or off
the site?
YES MAYBE NO
X
X
X
•
/
f. Changes in deposition or erosion
of beach sands, or changes in
siltation, deposition or erosion
which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the
ocean or any bay, inlet or lake?
g. Exposure of people or property
to geologic hazards such as earth-
quakes, landslides, mudslides,
ground failure, or similarhazards?
23. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
24. Water. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements, in
either marine or fresh waters?
b. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course of
flow of flood waters?
d. Change in the amount of surface
eater in any water body?
e. Discharge into surface waters,
or in any alteration of surface
water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved
oxygen or turbidity?
f. Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
g. Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct addi-
tions or withdrawals, or through
interception of an aquifer by cuts
or excavations?
YES MAYBE NO
•X
X
X
X
JL
X
X
X
X
X
$I,M-207►'
h. Substantial reduction in the
amount of eater otherwise available
for public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property
to water -related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
j. Significant changes in the
temperature, flow, or chemical
content of surface thermal springs?
25. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of'
species, or number of any species of
'plants (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and
of plants?
b. A reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
•
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
26. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of
species, or numbers of any species
of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of
any unique, rare or endangered
species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result in
a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
YES MAYBE WO
-X.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
d. Deterioration to existing fish
or wildlife habitat? X
27. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels? X
QtLW ' 21A•
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
28. Light and Glare. Will the
proposal produce new light or
glare?
29. Land Use. Will the proposal
result in a substantial alter-
ation of the present or planned
land use of an area?
YES KAYPE WO
r
X
..X.
X
30. Natural Resources. Will the
proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use
of any natural resources? X
b. Substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable natural resource? X
31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal
involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or
the release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or up-
set conditions?
b. Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an emer-
gency evacuation plan?
32. Population. Will the proposal
alter the location, distribution,
density,*or growth rate of the
human population of an area?
33. Sousing. Will the proposal af-
fect existing housing, or create
a demand for additional housing?
34. Transportation/Circulation. Will
the proposal result in:
a. Generation of substantial addi-
tional vehicular movement?
L_
X
L
X
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking? X
c. Substantial impact upon
existing transportation systems? X
wLW9-22Ae
411
XII MAYst V0
d. Alterations to present
patterns of circulation or move-
ment of people and/or goods? X
e. Alterations to waterborne,
rail or air traffic? X
f. Increase in traffic hazards
to motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
35. Public Services. Will the
proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new
or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Maintenance of public
facilities, including roads?
f. Other governmental services?
36. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Ose'of substantial amounts of
fuel or energy?
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources of energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
37. Utilities: Will the proposal
result in a need for new systems,
or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
-T-
X
X
X
X
X
X
r
38. Buman 8ealth. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard
or potential health hazard
(excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to poten-
tial health hazards?
39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal
result in the obstruction of any
scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal re-
sult in the creation of an aesthet-
ically offensive site open to
public view?
40. Recreation. Will the proposal
result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
41. Cultural Resources.
a. will the proposal result
in the alteration of or the
destruction of a prehistoric
or historic archeological site?
b. will the proposal result.in
adverse physical or aesthet-
ic effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure,
or object?
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural .values?
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred
uses within the potential impact
area?
42. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish •
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining levels. threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal commun-
ity, reduce the number or restrict
YES MAYBE N3
X
X
X
X
X
7 NIA1-24As
the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate impor-
tant examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term, to
the disadvantage of long-term environ-
mental goals? (a short term impact
on the environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief, defin-
itive period of time while long-term
impacts will endure well into the
future.)
YES NAM- NO
c. Does the project have impacts•
which are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? (A project
may impact on two or more separate re-
sources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small, but where the ef-
fect of the total of those impacts on
the environment is significant.) _
d. Does the project have environ-
mental effects which will cause sub-
stantial adverse effect on human be-
ings, either directly or indirectly? —
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor-
mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information
presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and
belief.
Date
For
-9-
(Signature)
(Applicant)
X
L.
X