Loading...
755, Construct a deck in the back y, Staff ReportsDATE: TO: FROM: • Cit opeo eett9 J/di • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 JUNE 17, 2008 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: REQUEST ZONING CASE NO. 755 25 CABALLEROS (LOT 16-SK) RA-S-1, 1.076 ACRES (GROSS, EXCLUDING ROADWAY EASEMENT) MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH BERENATO DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING APRIL 5, 2008 Mr. and Mrs. Berenato, the applicants, are requesting to withdraw the application for a deck, a portion of which would extend above ground and a Variance to exceed the currently greater than 35% total lot coverage. RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to the enclosed letter from Mr. Berenato it is recommended that this case be withdrawn. BACKGROUND At the May 15 meeting, the Planning Commission directed staff to prepare a resolution of approval for a 609 square foot deck, a portion of which (64 sq.ft.) would be raised above ground, and denying the request for a Variance to exceed the currently greater than 35 % total lot coverage. The applicants stated that they will not construct the deck, and will submit plans to show that the exiting 41.9% total lot coverage will remain or be reduced, by utilizing grass crete or other pervious material. Printed on Recycled Paper Wed, Jun 11, 2008 10:04 AM Subject: Re: 25 Caballeros case Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:01 AM From: Berenato, Joe <jberenato@ducommun.com> To: <ys@cityofrh.net> Conversation: 25 Caballeros case Dear Yolanta, Molly and I have decided not to build the deck. We are investigating using the Grass Crete for our driveway, anyway. Thanks for your help during this process. Sincerely, Joe Berenato. Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1957 - 2007 DATE: TO: • Ctty • op2 / fi/& IfJC.Of< GRATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310)377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 MAY 15, 2008 (T M.' 5A) HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 755 25 CABALLEROS (LOT 16-SK) RA-S-1, 1.076 ACRES (GROSS, EXCLUDING ROADWAY EASEMENT) MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH BERENATO DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING APRIL 5, 2008 REOUEST AND RECOMMENDATION Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a 609 square foot deck, a portion of which would be raised above ground and a Variance to exceed total net lot coverage. It is recommended that the Planning Commission, after viewing the project in the field earlier today, review the staff report, open the public hearing, take public testimony, consider the criteria for granting of a Site Plan Review and a Variance and provide direction to staff. BACKGROUND AND MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE 1. The applicant requests a Site Plan Review to construct a 609 square foot deck, a portion of which would be 3 feet above ground as measured from top of the deck to the ground. 2. At the April meeting the Commission received a letter from the property owner at 27 Caballeros objecting to this project. In addition, at the meeting a neighbor from 12 Bowie Road addressed the Planning Commission objecting to the project. However, since the meeting Mr. Bishop rescinded his objections and invitation to view the project from his property. Previously staff received a verbal inquiry from a property owner on Caballeros, requesting that the deck be moved to the north. 3. The applicants are currently remodeling the existing residence and propose to remodel the outside of the property as well, including replacing the existing pool deck and to construct additional deck, a portion of which would be raised. Pursuant to ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros Piinted on Recycled Paper Section 17.12.190 of the Zoning Code, a raised deck is considered a structure that requires Site Plan Review. 4. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the gross lot area is 1.076 acres. The net lot area for construction purposes is 36,608 square feet. The lot has a very narrow frontage along Caballeros (15 feet) and a long driveway leading into the main portion of the lot. 5. The property is developed with a 3,885 square foot residence, 600 square foot garage, 666 square foot swimming pool / spa, 42 square foot pool equipment area, service yard and 759 square foot stable. 6. The existing residential building pad (outside the setbacks) is 17,434 square feet and has coverage of 30.3%. The pad will not be enlarged. The proposed building pad coverage will be 33.8%. The stable is located on a level area in the rear setback, which is not considered a building pad due to the location. 7. The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 6,715 square feet or 18.3%, which includes all the structures and the proposed deck (20% permitted). 8. The total net lot coverage (structures and paved areas) currently exceeds the maximum permitted of 35%, and is at 41.9%. The proposed total lot coverage, including the deck and new hardscape will be 48.3%, which requires a Variance. The driveway alone is 6,289 square feet. 9. Currently 25,108 square feet of the lot or 68.6% is disturbed, and will not change. CONCLUSION 10. When reviewing a site plan review application the Planning Commission should consider whether the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation;; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 11. Pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance, raised decks (raised 12 inches or more above natural grade) are considered structures and also require Planning Commission review. 12. The lot is irregular in shape with a narrow frontage and long driveway. The paved driveway contributes to the high hardscape (total net lot coverage) calculations. 13. The existing conditions on the lot are such that they do not exceed the required development standards, except for total lot coverage. However, this condition is pre- existing and will not be greatly exacerbated by the construction of 609 square foot raised deck and additional pool decking. 14. The property meets the requirement for stable and corral, as there is a stable 1 on the property. ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 2 • • 15. In response to justification for the request for a Variance, the applicant's representative states that the size, shape and development pattern on the lot dictates that any improvements would add to an already nonconforming coverage. Further, the proposed hardscape and deck will have no effect on the other properties or be intrusive to neighbors. OTHER AGENCIES REVIEW 16. The Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Committee will review the project for architectural elements and design. 17. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA. ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros ZONING CASE NO. 755 CRITERIA & MAJOR IMPACTS RA -S-1 Zone Setbacks: Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line Structures (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period). Structural Lot Coverage (20% maximum) Total Lot Coverage (35% maximum) Building Pad Coverage (30% maximum -guideline) Stable Grading Disturbed Area (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. Roadway Access Access to Stable Preserve Views Preserve Plants and Animals ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros EXISTING Residence with accessory structures Residence 3885 sq.ft. Garage 600 sq.ft. Swim Pool /spa 666 sq.ft. Stable 759 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Pool eqp. 42 sq.ft. TOTAL 6199 sq.ft. PROPOSED New deck. Variance for total lot coverage Residence Garage Swim Pool /spa Stable Service Yard Pool eqp. Barbecue TOTAL 3885 sq.ft. 600 sq.ft. 666 sq.ft. 759 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 42 sq.ft. 154 sq.ft. 6715 sq.ft. 16.9% 18.3% of 36,608 s.f. net lot area. 41.9% 48.3% of 36,608 s.f. net lot area 30.3% of 17434 s.f. pad N/A 68.6% Existing from Caballeros From Caballeros and trails from the rear of property N/A N/A 4 33.8% of 17434 s.f. pad none 68.6% (pre-existing). Existing from Caballeros From Caballeros and trails from the rear of property Planning Commission review Planning Commission review w • • SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 17.46.010 Purpose. The site plan review process is established to provide discretionary review of certain development projects in the City for the purposes of ensuring that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 17.46.050 Required findings. A. The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a site plan review application. B. No project which requires site plan review approval shall be approved by the Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made: 1. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance; 2. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot; 3. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences; 4. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls); 5. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area; 6. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course; 7. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas; 8. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and 9. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. SOURCE: City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 5 CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES 17.38.050 Required findings. In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 6 1200 • - 1190 1180 1170 1160 �ili •�!li.11i. ill_III !( .!L. •Ri . iit �lu ut ICI !n r.l !�I� � / "•••... I!!_ .11 I!i!I.:II!, ,!;I_:ul_ �li...11r-.ul.-l•rul-lll _ni__1.. ' I !J=IIh-1f I I�}:Ill._.lil_IIL.IIi-;!; !f!'lll..!Il:_.III_-.I!F Il( ;G'"•II-!IL... EXISTING i l'lli` I -III I! II ui ' I !I- III 11; 7CC ccW _I•i,J it T,1D •' W W p ''1!ii,!II11!II' : lj V) N h !,I ,!i II Q LJ_ r, .II IIi!ll IIII } < 'rI II! 'li II '!i.' 1!l ill, ill illII II! CC t_Ca ! li il' II !II III L!J 1Ii101111111.11tlllllliill!III', 01 4. III-•, III I!I ill III I!1 Ii1 ii I Iii ill Hi ill of li! a 11 —^.- r! i -rt tr *i m -m rr m , i tr m m t: ti -rti � 4. C• !II III !II III 111 II 111 I III 1!1 ill III 111 III Ilt__lil 111:III_ III CC I!III IIII11:II I!IIII in Hi HiHi IIIIIliIII Hi in II111 I III 111111!IIIELll1! I. j1111T1111' ! I.III id III III 111 Ill III III !11 III :1:.11! 11! ,.l!:.tl::-�i—I! !1 III IIJ III I III III II_al.. ailTwirio,_IJj)IIIJ,JI!I 1:1 n,inwi_ljJ,111 111'. _,_,'. Flpr 15 08 03: 35p Oiiriker 310.73344 April 15,2008 Planning Commission Attention: Yolanta Swartz 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 RE: ZONING CASE NO. 755 p1. 1 VI t l'it• f/ Z-\rpo . •'" • C.;;1: It is the distances of the perimeter between neighbors that results in the privacy, peace and quiet that is the hallmark of our city. We are kindly asking the planning commission not to allow the variance for construction of a deck (600 square feet) on a slope and exceeding the maximum permitted total nct lot coverage at an existing single family residence. Thank you for your consideration and we trust your judgment to assure the privacy and rural character of the community. Sincerely. c7)(7xLi /The Vstrikei--Farnily 1,-/5-026-eg • Live Search pt • r+. http://local.live.com/PrintableMap.aspx?rnkt=en-Us -, :;:,f`•�'�'"^"�!�^1iLk,.2ye�kt. „ ,.n . n , r, tikrio Tkoro:`a7' ti dine. i,at'Vi y,. .r;;I e, I, 0:14 t4'ti,, kt. •p tr ,x .. 0 2006'Microsof Corporation;lma'ye.Iy courtesy 0f,G.S., 2/17/2007 From: Jeanne Bishop To: CitvhlanagereCitvofrh.net Cc: moIlvberenato@ 'ahoo.com ; iberenatoCq ducommun.com ; Ron E Bishop Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:13 PM Subject: Planning commission Zoning case No. 755 To Yolanta Schwartz, Planning Director Re: Planning Commission case No. 755 Dear Ms. Schwartz, This letter is to communicate the WITHDRAWAL OF MY OBJECTIONS to the construction of a deck in regards to loss of privacy issues at my property. I spoke in strong opposition to the proposed variance at the April 15 meeting of the planning commission. This opposition vas based on past issues on the back property line and the impact of the two story barn placed by the immediate previous property owners inside the property rear set back - apparently without a variance for same. It is my view that set backs are primarily for the purpose of separating adjacent properties buildings so that their use does not significantly impact neighbors regarding noise views and privacy. I am very pleased that the current property owners are acting responsively and going thru the proper processes to improve their property. I spoke with Mr. and Mrs. Berenato following the meeting and they described their project in more detail and answered numerous questions that I had and even invited me on to their property. They are the kind of neighbors that anyone would avant to have and we wish them to be able to properly develop and fully enjoy their property. Finally I wish to thank the planning commission for its oversight of development in the city. The previous invitation that I extended to the Commission to view the proposed project from my property is also WITHDRAWN. Sincerely, Ron Bishop • • MEMORANDUM: APRIL 15, 2008 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ZONING CASE NO. 751, 24 CINCHRING ROAD, NAKAMURA DUE TO PROXIMITY OF COMMISSIONER'S WITTE PROPERTY TO SUBJECT SITE (WITHIN 500-FEET), COMMISSIONER WITTE MUST ABSTAIN FROM DELIBERATING AND VOTING IN ZONING CASE NO. 751. ZONING CASE NO. 755, 25 CABALLEROS ROAD, BERENATO IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT COMMISSIONER DEROY ABSTAIN FROM DELIBERATING AND VOTING IN ZONING CASE NO. 755, 25 CABALLEROS. COMMISSIONER DEROY WAS THE PREVIOUS OWNER OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. 50TH ANNIVERSARY 1957 - 2007 DATE: TO: FROM: • Cry o/l2lP„g.Jd I! INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310)377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 APRIL 15, 2008 HONORABLE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION YOLANTA SCHWARTZ, PLANNING DIRECTOR APPLICATION NO. SITE LOCATION: ZONING AND SIZE: APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PUBLISHED: ZONING CASE NO. 755 25 CABALLEROS (LOT 16-SK) RA-S-1, 1.076 ACRES (GROSS, EXCLUDING ROADWAY EASEMENT) MR. AND MRS. JOSEPH BERENATO DOUGLAS MCHATTIE, BOLTON ENGINEERING APRIL 5, 2008 REOUEST AND RECOMMENDATION Request for a Site Plan Review to construct a 609 square foot deck, a portion of which would be above ground and a Variance to exceed total net lot coverage. It is recommended that the Planning Commission review the staff report, open the public hearing, take public testimony, consider the criteria for granting of a Site Plan Review and a Variance and schedule a field trip. BACKGROUND AND MUNICIPAL CODE COMPLIANCE 1. The applicant requests a Site Plan Review to construct a 609 square foot deck, a portion of which would be 3 feet above ground as measured from top of the deck to the ground. 2. The applicants are currently remodeling the existing residence and propose to remodel the outside of the property as well, including replacing the existing pool deck and construction of a 154 square foot barbecue area and to construct additional deck, a portion of which would be raised. Pursuant to Section 17.12.190 of the Zoning Code, a raised deck is considered a structure that requires Site Plan Review. 3. The property is zoned RAS-1 and the gross lot area is 1.076 acres. The net lot area for construction purposes is 36,608 square feet. The lot has a very narrow frontage along Caballeros (15 feet) and a long driveway leading into the main portion of the lot. ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 1 ® Printed on Recycled Paper 4 The property is developed with a 3,885 square foot residence, 600 square foot garage, 666 square foot swimming pool/spa, 42 square foot pool equipment area, service yard and 759 square foot stable. 5. The existing residential building pad (outside the setbacks) is 17,434 square feet and has coverage of 30.3%. The pad will not be enlarged. The proposed building pad coverage will be 33.8% (not including the proposed barbecue, but including the deck). The stable is located on a level area in the rear setback, which is not considered a building pad due to the location. 6. The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 6,715 square feet or 18.3%, which includes all the structures and the proposed deck (20% permitted). 7. The total net lot coverage (structures and paved areas) currently exceeds the maximum permitted of 35%, and is at 41.9%. The proposed total lot coverage, including the deck and new hardscape will be 48.3%, which requires a Variance. The driveway alone is 6,289 square feet. 8. Currently 25,108 square feet of the lot or 68.6% is disturbed, and will not change. CONCLUSION 9. When reviewing a site plan review application the Planning Commission should consider whether the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 10. Pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance, raised decks (raised 12 inches or more above natural grade) are considered structures and require Planning Commission review. 11. The lot is irregular in shape with a narrow frontage and long driveway. The paved driveway contributes to the high hardscape (total net lot coverage) calculations. 12. The existing conditions on the lot are such that they exceed the required development standards, except for structural coverage. However, these conditions are pre-existing and will not be greatly exacerbated by the construction of 609 square foot raised deck and additional pool decking. 13. The lot contains a stable and corral. 14. In response to justification for the request for a Variance, the applicant's representative states that the size, shape and development pattern on the lot dictates that any improvements would add to an already nonconforming coverage. Further, the proposed hardscape and deck will have no effect on the other properties or be intrusive to neighbors. ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 2 OTHER AGENCIES REVIEW 14. The Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Committee will review the project for architectural elements and design. 15. The project has been determined to be categorically exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA. ZONING CASE NO. 755 CRITERIA & MAJOR IMPACTS RA -S-1 Zone Setbacks: Front: 50 ft. from front easement line Side: 20 ft. from property line Rear: 50 ft. from property line Structures (Site Plan Review required if size of structure increases by at least 1,000 sq.ft. and has the effect of increasing the size of the structure by more than 25% in a 36-month period). Structural Lot Coverage (20% maximum) Total Lot Coverage (35% maximum) Building Pad Coverage (30% maximum -guideline) Stable Grading Disturbed Area (40% maximum; any graded building pad area, any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces exist. Roadway Access Access to Stable Preserve Views Preserve Plants and Animals EXISTING Residence with accessory structures Residence 3885 sq.ft. Garage 600 sq.ft. Swim Pool /spa 666 sq.ft. Stable 759 sq.ft. Service Yard 96 sq.ft. Pool eqp. 42 sq.ft. TOTAL 6199 sq.ft. 16.9% 41.9% 30.3% of 17434 s.f. pad N/A 68.6% Existing from Caballeros From Caballeros and trails from the rear of property N/A N/A PROPOSED New deck. Variance for total lot coverage Residence Garage Swim Pool /spa Stable Service Yard Pool eqp. Barbecue TOTAL 3885 sq.ft. 600 sq.ft. 666 sq.ft. 759 sq.ft. 96 sq.ft. 42 sq.ft. 154 sq.ft. 6715 sq.ft. 18.3% of 36608 s.f. net lot area. 48.3% of 36608 s.f. net lot area 33.8% of 17434 s.f. pad none 68.6% (pre-existing). Existing from Caballeros From Caballeros and trails from the rear of property Planning Commission review Planning Commission review ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA 17.46.010 Purpose. The site plan review process is established to provide discretionary review of certain development projects in the City for the purposes of ensuring that the proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan; incorporates environmentally and aesthetically sensitive grading practices; preserves existing mature vegetation; is compatible and consistent with the scale, massing and development pattern in the immediate project vicinity; and otherwise preserves and protects the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Rolling Hills. 17.46.050 Required findings. A. The Commission shall be required to make findings in acting to approve, conditionally approve, or deny a site plan review application. B. No project which requires site plan review approval shall be approved by the Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, unless the following findings can be made: 1. The project complies with and is consistent with the goals and policies of the general plan and all requirements of the zoning ordinance; 2. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage. Lot coverage requirements are regarded as maximums, and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted depends upon the existing buildable area of the lot; 3. The project is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences; 4. The project preserves and integrates into the site design, to the greatest extent possible, existing topographic features of the site, including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls); 5. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area; 6. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow, unless such flow is redirected into an existing drainage course; 7. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and supplements these elements with drought -tolerant landscaping which is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community, and landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between private and public areas; 8. The project is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenient and safe movement of pedestrians and vehicles; and 9. The project conforms to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 4 SOURCE: City of Rolling Hills Zoning Ordinance CRITERIA FOR VARIANCES 17.38.050 Reauired findings. In granting a variance, the Commission (and Council on appeal) must make the following findings: A. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same vicinity and zone; B. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone but which is denied the property in question; C. That the granting of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; D. That in granting the variance, the spirit and intent of this title will be observed; E. That the variance does not grant special privilege to the applicant; F. That the variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities; and G. That the variance request is consistent with the general plan of the City of Rolling Hills. ZC NO. 755 25 Caballeros 5