Loading...
608, Construct a Barn & riding ring, Application,. - • • erg ofi? P!•,.y JJ.•fl PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BOB GAUDENTI #5 HILLSIDE LANE (310) 833-1369 #5 HILLSIDE LANE INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX(310) 377-7288 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOTNO.A PORTION OF LOT 126 OF THE ROLLING HILLS TRACT ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 004 PARCEL 015 AGENT'S NAME: WYNN ENGINEERING, INC. AGENT'S ADDRESS: 27525 VALLEY CENTER RD #B VALLEY CENTER, CA 92082 TELEPHONE NO: (760) 749-8722 (310) 306-9728 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinanc the conditional use is permitted in the zone. THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DWELLING IS TO BE EXPANDED 3742 SQUARE FEET WHILE THE BACK YARD IS TO BE EXPANDED TO INCLUDE A BARN STRUCTURE, RIDING RING, NEW POOL AND POOL CABANA. SECTION 17.16.210.A.2&3 OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIRES A C.U.P. FOR THE EQUESTRIAN AMMENITIES AND POOL CABANA. Will the proposed use be apatible with the uses in the surro•ng area, and if so, why? THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ENCOURAGES THE DEVELOPMENT OF EQUESTRIAN AMENITIES, THEREFORE, THE USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? THERE WILL BE NO ADVERSE IMPACTS ON THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY AND GENERAL WELFARE AS A RESULT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS BACK YARD AREA. FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. • DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT #5 HILLSIDE LANE MR. & MRS. BOB GAUDENTI CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 99,978 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 9 9, 9 7 8 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) 39200 sq.ft. 7200 sq.ft. 46,400 sq.ft. RESIDENCE q A q n' sq.ft. 3622 sq.ft. 7252 sq.ft. GARAGE 600 sq.ft. 120 sq.ft. 720 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 700* sq.ft. 850 sq.ft. 850 sq.ft. STABLE 0 sq.ft. 1440 sq.ft. 1440 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( 1 — sq.ft. — sq.ft. — sq.ft. SERVICE YARD — sq.ft. — sq.ft. _ sq.ft. OTHER — sq.ft. — sq.ft. sq.ft. NEW BASEMENT AREA *EXISTING POOL/SPA TO BE RELOCATED. sq.ft. (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) TOTAL STRUCTURES 4 9 3 0 sq.ft. 6 0 3 2 sq.ft. 1 Osq.ft. /� O Z % STRUCTURAL 5.0 % — % % l/, o G l0 COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 12.6 % — % • 1 % 2 3. g /a DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING 3200 sq.ft. 2740 sq.ft. ' 2740 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 400 sq.ft. 400 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 3200 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 3.1 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 8130 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 8 .1 % 3140 sq.ft. 3140 sq.ft. 3.1 % 3140 sq.ft. 1 02 sq.ft. Pei Z6 Z /e. Gl DATE ZONING CASE NO. _ ADDRESS #5 HILLSIDE LANE APPLICANT MR. & MRS. BOB GAUDENTI CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT OTHER CABANA TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 26400 7252 720 0 0 0 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 7972 30.2 8000 0 0 0 850 0 800 ' 1650 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. //6 PAD NO. 3 STABLE & RIDING RING 12,000 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft 1440 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PAD NO. 3 1440 sq.ft. 20.6 % 12% • • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at ROLLING HILLS this day of By: By: , California, 27525 VALLEY CENTER RD #B Address VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: BOB GAUDENTI DATE FILED Zho tzar° REPRESENTATIVE: GARY WYNN FEE: ' 3,001) COMPANY NAME: WYNN ENGINEERING, INC . RECEIPT NO: 7/0 COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 27525 VALLEY CENTER RD #B ZONING CASE`PdO: 6 �f VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 COMPANY PHONE NO. (31 0) 306-9728 PROJECT ADDRESS: #5 HILLSIDE LANE ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: 3/21 124-tr0 . • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at LL-!M?r- G A\ this .day of By: l By: , California ,Ig219c.J kt u/Cco' L• ,1� Address (211-4-44.6-- l-tt ws C.P1 City • • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFI DAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, GARY WYNN , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: A PORTION OF LOT 126 OF THE ROLLING HILLS TRACT Executed at 43 Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change ROLLING HILL$ day of ./'1'8'-+ , California, this ,42-6 90 . RE • REQUEST FOR HEARING • FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: MR. AND MRS. BOB GAUDENTI #5 HILLSIDE LANE (310) 833-1369 PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: #5 HILLSIDE LANE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. A PORTION OF LOT 126 OF THE ROLLING HILLS TRACT ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 0 04 PARCEL 015 AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: WYNN ENGINEERING, INC, GARY WYNN 27525 VALLEY CENTER ROAD VALLEY CENTER, CA 92027 (760) 749-8722 (310) 306-9728 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: THE OWNER PROPOSES TO ENLARGE THE EXISTING 4230 SQUARE FOOT DWELLING BY 3742 SQUARE FEET FOR A :.... AREA OF 7972 SQUARE FEET ON THIS 2.63 ACRE LOT. A NEW POOL HOUSE/CABANA IS PROPOSED, WITH A.MODERNIZED POOL AND LANDSCAPING. A NEW RING-O-STEEL, 8 STALL BARN IS ALSO PROPOSED WITH A NEW RIDING RING FOR THE OWNERS HORSES. THE ACCESS DRIVEWAY MAINTENENCE IS A CONCERN. THE PAVEMENT NEEDS AN OVERLAY AND BRUSH MAINTENENCE RAISES FIRE CONCERNS. Describe and delineate on plans any new basement area square footage: NO NEW BASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED. SITE PLAN REVIEW •TER!A • Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how i. compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH ALL ZONING CRITERIA AND IS COMPARABLE TO OTHER UPSCALE ROLLING HILLS PROPERTIES. THE PROPOSED DWELLING IS SMALLER THAN ANOTHER PROJECT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED FOR THIS LOT. THE EQUESTRIAN AMMENITIES AND POOL ARE COMMON ON SIMILAR PROPERTIES. B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the marimzun extent feasible, existing natura. topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and lane. forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features EXISTING CONTOURS AND BENCHES ARE UTILIZED EXCEPT FOR THE GRADED RIDING RING AREA. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES HAVE ASSISTED IN LOCATION DECISION ON NEW SITE AMMENITIES. WALLS ARE SHORT WHE REQUIRED AND HAVE BEEN MINIMIZED. C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. THE ONLY GRADED AREA IS FOR THE RIDING RING. PATHS WILL FOLLOW EXISTING CONTOURS. THE ROLLING HILLS EFFECT WILL BE RETAINED. SPLIT RAIL FENCES WILL LINE THE RIDING RING. D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. NO SIGNIFICANT NATIVE VEGETATION IS PROPOSED TO•BE REMOVED. ALTHOUGH FINAL LANDSCAPING PLANS ARE STILL IN THE WORKS, THE OWNER PROPOSES TO ENHANCE PRIVACY AND MAINTAIN NATIVE PLANTS AND SLOPE PLANTINGS • • E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. THE TERRACED FEEL OF THE LOT WILL BE PRESERVED BY THE WAY THE DIFFERENT LEVELS ARE GRADED. THE RIDING RING AREA IS WHERE THE GRADING IS PROPOSED. ALTHOUGH, ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE NOT SIMILAR, OTHER PROPERTIES ALONG SADDLEBACK ROAD ARE. F. Is the site development plan hamronious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and sumoundin€ residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties, NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES HAVE EXISTING NON —CONFORMING CONDITIONS. ALL SETBACKS ARE HONORED AND ZONING COMPLIED WITH. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrian and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip date landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. • NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN CIRCULATION ARE PROPOSED. THE EXISITING OFFSITE DRIVEWAY NEEDS TO BE OVERLAYED WITH ASPHALT AND IS POORLY MAINTAINED BY THE NEIGHBOR. H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Ac Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. THE PROJECT COMPLIES WITH CEQUA. NO MITIGATION MEASURES ARE REQUIRF • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data an information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, tha the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of rn knowledge and belief. Date: 2 6 Za9 D Signaturi For: 92 clasQEK/1? Applicant 41, DATE 240 IZ6"1) ZONING CASE NO. 4.4 g ADDRESS APPLICANT BUILDING AREAS NET LOT AREA BUILDING PAD(S) RESIDENCE GARAGE SWIMMING POOL/SPA STABLE RECREATION COURT ( ) SERVICE YARD OTHER NEW BASEMENT AREA #5 HILLSIDE LANE MR. & MRS. BOB GAUDENTI CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE EXISTING 99,978 39200 3630. 600 700* 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. PROPOSED TOTAL 0 7200 3622 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 120 sq.ft. 850 sq.ft. 1440 sq.ft. 99,978 sq.ft. 46,400 sq.ft. 7252 sq.ft. 720 sq.ft. 850 sq.ft. 1440 sq.ft. sq.ft. — sq.ft. sq.ft. _ sq.ft. sq.ft. — sq.ft. *EXISTING POOL/SPA TO BE RELOCATED. (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING 4930 sq.ft. 5.0 % 12.6 % 3200 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 3200 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 3.1 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 8130 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 8.1 % sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 6032 sq.ft. 10,262 sq.ft. — % 10.2 % 22.1 % 2740 sq.ft. 2740 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 400 sq.ft. 3140 sq.ft. 3140 sq.ft. 400 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. 3140 sq.ft. 3.1 % 13,402 sq.ft. 13.4 % 03/14/2000 03:35 7607499412 WYNN ENGINEERING PAGE 02 • • DATE 9/1 aiacZONING CASE NO. 608 ADDRESS #5 HILLSIDE LANE APPLICANT MR & MRS BOB GAUDENTI CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTS NET LOT AREA 9 9.9 7 8 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 99,978 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) 39200 sq.ft. 7200 sq.ft. 46,400 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 3630 • sq.ft. 3622 sq.ft. 7252 sq.ft. GARAGE 600 sq.ft. 120 sq.ft. 7 2 0 sq.ft. SWIMMINGPOOL/SPA 700* sq.ft. 850 sq.ft. 850 sq.ft. STABLE 0 sq.ft. 1440 sq.ft. 1440 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT f ) — sq.ft. — sq.ft. — sq.ft. SERVICE YARD — sq.ft. — sq.ft. — sq.ft. OTHERpoaT. CABANA — sq.ft. Bop sq.ft. 800 sq.ft. NEW BASEMENT AREA (Volume to be included in grading quantities.) sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 4 9 3 0__ sq.ft. 6832 sq.ft. q.ft. // 0 G a % STRUCTURAL 5.0 % — % 1.3�8 5--% //, d G ro COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD ToCOVERAGE 12.6 % — % 2 .3 % 2 s F DRIVEWAY 3200 sq.ft. 2740 sq.ft. • 2740 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 0 sq.ft.. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. POOL DECKING sq.ft. 4 00 sq.ft. 400 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 3200 sq.ft. 3140 sq.ft. 3140 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 3.1 % — % 3.1 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 81 '1 n sq.ft. 9972 sq.ft. 1 2 sft. / 11/ 202 % TOTAL COVERAGE 8-1 % — % �J % l �f • �'' o DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS APPLICANT #5 HILLSIDE LANE MR. & MRS. BOB GAUDENTI CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 26400 7252 720 0 0 0 0 7972 30.2 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 8 0 0 0 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft. GARAGE 0 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 0 s ft. q• POOL 850 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT 1 0 sq.ft. OTHER CABANA 800 ' sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 1650 sq.ft. 20.6 % ?AD NO. 3 STABLE & RIDING RING 12,000 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft 1440 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft 0 sq.ft PAD NO. 3 1440 sq.ft. 12% l • 1• DATE t°I 3 ('z4NING CASE NO. (00 Si' ADDRESS A S H c c.c.-5tpe (-k ii APPLICANT M (1- k m n-S (,o PIER-7 6e<VUCE51.7r1 CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 2 6 1- c7 ' sq.ft. RESIDENCE b ? CZ sq.ft. GARAGE O'() sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 0 sq.ft. POOL 0 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( 1 0 sq.ft. OTHER sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 2; sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE b • 0 % PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA e oov , sq.ft. RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft. 0 GARAGE sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 0 sq.ft. POOL g5f0 ' sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( 1 d sq.ft. OTHER I(2D c0 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE sq.ft. 'S t ArLE fta- 4 6;c9 tt 0 0 Cto 3 • OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at ROLLING HILLS this day of 2v imi f ?f51(? ..- ----4--------.._ 27525 VALLEY CENTER RD #B Address By: By: , California, 2-©6 O VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: BOB GAUDENTI REPRESENTATIVE: GARY WYNN COMPANY NAME: WYNN ENGINEERING, INC. COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 27525 VALLEY CENTER RD #B ZONING CASE NO: 600 DATE FILED Z/0/ eD FEE: 43 7-0-71 1/0 RECEIPT NO: VALLEY CENTER CA 92082 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: 3'V,(-- COMPANY PHONE NO. L3.101 3 0 6- 9 7 2 8 PROJECT ADDRESS: #5 HILLSIDE LANE ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at CA this .day of ' r61-✓J r By: By: PS t uAt c? 1-01A,G Address (2-07-(4,&(,- t-tk City , California , Ig 249 0P C. P? CITY OF ROLLING HILL _ZONING CASE • CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, GARY WYNN , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: A PORTION OF LOT 126 OF THE ROLLING HILLS TRACT Executed at Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change ROLLING HILL$ day offu/'Q'R'�-+ , California, this RE Date Filed GENERAL INFORMATION • City O/ /EO4fl (6LS INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. (310) 306-9728 1. Applicant(s) WYNN ENGINEERING, INC Tel. (760 ) 749-8722 Address 27525 VALLEY CENTER RD #B, VALLEY CENTER, CA 92082 2. Legal Owner(s) BOB GAUDENTI Tel. (310 ) 833-1369 Address NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com #5 HILLSIDE LANE ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 3. Project Address #5 HILLSIDE LANE ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 Assessor's Book No. 7569 - 004 - 015 Lot No. PORTION LOT 126 ROLLING HILLS TRACT 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including t ose required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: COUNTY ENGINEERING 5. Existing zoning district RAS — 1 6. Proposed project/use of site SINGLE FAMILY PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 114;556 SQUARE FEET OR 2.63 ACRES 8. Net lot area 99.978 . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of a lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 10,212 (HOUSE, POOL CABANA & BARN) 10. Number of floors of construction ONE STORY 11. Basement square footage N/A 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 12,951 SQUARE FOOT 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? YES, SEE PLAN 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? YES, SEE PLAN 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? YES -1- 5-05-98 ®Panted un R.3cvcled Parser 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with Tess than 200 square feet added? NO 17. Grading quantites shall be balanced. Amount cut (Include any basement cut in grading quantities.) 18. Area of disturbance. 40% maximum; any remedial slopes and building pad areas, and any non1g7 ded are proposed to be added. Square feet 600 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 1600 . Amount fill 1600 grading (temporary disturbance), any graded area where impervious surfaces will remain or Percentage of Net Lot Area 17.6% 7,972 SQUARE FEET 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. N/A 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. N/A 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. N/A 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. AS SOON AS ALL APPROVALS ARE GRANTED 25. tf the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. THE C.U.P. IS REQUIRED FOR THE NEW STABLE AREA AND THE NEW POOL CABANA. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YEa HQ o 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. O IX 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. o fX 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. -2- Yo ❑ El 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. ❑ KJ 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. ❑ 10 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing draining patterns. ❑ ] 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. E ❑ 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. ❑ IR1 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. ❑ al 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). ❑ CI 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). ❑ N 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. THE SITE CURRENTLY HAS AN EXISTING DWELLING AND POOL. 39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE SIMILAR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING LOTS. -3- • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: VI. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported ff the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). VII. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. VIII. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IX. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V, "Earlier Analysis," above may be cross-referenced). X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above. XI. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): -4- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 gl directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 El housing? III. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? 0 0 0 E1 b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 CM c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 El d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 0 El e) Landslides or mudflows? ❑ 0 0 El f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 0 0 El conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? 0 0 0 h) Expansive soils? ❑ 0 a 0 i) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 0 0 tO IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 ❑ 0 DI or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 (20 hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration 0 0 0 Q4 of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 Cli water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 0 El water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 El through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0 El h) Impacts to groundwater quality? ❑ 0 0 El i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 DO groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? V. AIR OUAUTY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 al an existing or projected air quality violation? -5- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 El c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 El cause any change in climate? d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0 Tel VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULAT1ON. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 IM b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 Ea sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 El nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? 0 0 0 it e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 111 f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 ffi alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 KI VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 0 0 Kl habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 30 trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., 0 0 0 %l oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 Cl Ill pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 El VI II. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 El plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 El inefficient manner? c) Result in the Toss of availability of a known 0 ❑ 0 Kl mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 %] hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 /l response plan or emergency evacuation plan? -6- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 El health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 El potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 ❑ 0 El brush, grass, or trees? X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 in b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 XI. PUBUC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 KI b) Police protection? 0 0 0 Kl c) Schools? 0 0 0 in d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 0 KI e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 Kl XI I. UT1UTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 IN b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 tg c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 ❑ 0 facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 gl e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 El f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 ill g) Local or regional water supplies? 0 0 0 EI XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 0 0 El b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 El c) Create light or glare? 0 0 0 K1 XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? 0 0 0 Kl b) Disturb archaeological resources? 0 0 0 n c) Affect historical resources? 0 0 0 X1 d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 0 0 K1 which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within ❑ 0 0 Zl the potential impact area? -7- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 611 regional parks or other recreations facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 El XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important example of the major period of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 short-term, to the disadvantage of Tong -term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects 0 ❑ 0 121 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses 0 0 0 and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which ❑ 0 05 effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less 0 0 ❑1 than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. -8- 3 • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: 2. Address: WYNN ENGINEERING, INC. 27525 VALLEY CENTER RD #B VALLEY CENTER CA 3. Phone Number: (310) 306-9728 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): #5 HILLSIDE LANE ROLLING HILLS 5. Local Agency (city/county): ROLLING HILLS 92082 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7569-004-015 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (aysllable at City Hall), 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date FMB. B. E3 , 2cstea For Signatup Applicant -9- • • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any altematives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date - S - 19a For Signatur7 6-4cLy uA,/, AnN Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the • facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date db For Signatur,f Applicant forms\environm. 1998app -10-