610, Rebuild swimming pool, Applicationa
0 0
af.. 4elly4711aIlL5F L INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
Ii
VARIANCE
REOUEST FOR HEARING
PROPERTY OWNER: Mrs. Harlyne Norris
OWNER'S ADDRESS: 3 Johns .Canyon Road
TELEPHONE NO.: (310) 377-1100
PROPERTY ADDRESS: ' 3 Johns Canyon Road
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO.l of 1, tract 25017, MB 761, PP 51-52
ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. 7569 PAGE 024 PARCEL 0?6
AGENTS NAME:
AGENTS ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX (310) 377.7288
Russell E. Barto, AIA
3 Malaga Cove Plaza #202, Palos Verdes Est;eCA 90274
(310) 378-1355
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project
require a Variance.
The proposed use of the property is single family residential. The aspect of
the project that requires a variance is the work proposed within the setbacks;
garden walls, steps and freestanding trellis, barbecue,' and rebuilding
swimming pool.
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
1) Primary access to this flag lot is through the side (not front) yard.
2) Existing building structure limits development of outdoor living space to
the setback areas. 3) Existing development pre dates current setback rules. .
SP(3-**adv^ Ro^yr'a'+Paper.
• •
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because
1) Proposed improvements are minor and are not visible from roads or
surrounding structures. 2) Pool reconstruction will decrease the side
yard encroachment of the existing pool.
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS.
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING
HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely
independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and
the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the
RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read
and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at PALOS VERDES ESTATES , California
this 12 .day of JANUARY
By
By:
3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD
Address
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
City
, 19 2000 ,
• •
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at PALOS VERDES ESTATES , California,
this
12 day of JANUARY
By:
By:
, 19 2000
04f,D
3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Address
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California.
If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before
a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that'
State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property
described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best
of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: MRS HARLYNE NORRIS
REPRESENTATIVE: RUSSELL E BARTO, AIA
COMPANY NAME: RUSSELL E BARTO, AIA
COMPANY ADDRESS:
3 MALAGA COVE PLAZA #202
PALOS VERDES ESTATES CA 90274
COMPANY PHONE NO. (310) 378-1355
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD
DATE FILED fI1/2iD
FEE: 4,2
ARCH RECEIPT NO: 9/ 0 7
BY:
Aux -
ZONING CASE NO: 6 (U
TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
(1/•((20CD
• • DATE 4 `2 r4ING CASE NO. !° ADD 3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD
APPLICANT MRS HARLYNE NORRIS
CATION OF T COVERAGE
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA 75530 sq.ft. — sq.ft. 75530 sq.ft.
.
BUILDING PAD(S) 15842 sq.ft. — sq.ft. 15842 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4563 sq.ft. sq.ft. 4563 sq.ft.
GARAGE 803 sq.ft. sq.ft. 803 sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA 490 sq.ft. _0 sq.ft. • 490 sq.ft.
STABLE 400 sq.ft. 320 sq.ft. 720 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft. — sq.ft. — sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD 200 sq.ft. sq.ft. 200 sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft. 195 sq.ft. 195 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES 6456 sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL 8.5 %
COVERAGE
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE 40.7 %
DRIVEWAY 4900 sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS 2315 sq.ft.
POOL DECKING 1080 sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK 8295 sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE 11.0 %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE 14751 sq.ft.
TOTAL COVERAGE 19.5 %
515 sq.ft.
0.7 %
3.3. %
sq.ft.
325 sq.ft.
6971 sq.ft.
q2 %
44.0 %
4900 sq.ft.
2640 gilt
sq.ft. 1080 sq.ft.
325 sq.ft. 8620 sq.ft.
0.4 % 11.4 %
84o sq.ft. 15591 sq.ft.
1.1 % 20.7 %
w r
DATE '�`{�? - .NIIVG CASE NO. iD]..A. 3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD
APPLICANT MRS HARLYNE NORRIS
CALCULATION OF BUILDINCLFAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 14442 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE 4563 sq.ft.
GARAGE 803 sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL 490 sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) — sq.ft.
OTHER 195 sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
6051 sq.ft.
41.9
_EAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA 1400 sq.ft.
RESIDENCE — sq.ft.
GARAGE — sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) 720 sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 720 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 51.4 %
Date Filed
•
City Rolling -WA
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
Zoning Case No.
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274
(310) 377.1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
E-maik cityofrh@aoLcom
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicant(s) MRS HARLYNE NORRIS Tel. (310 ) 377-1100
Address 3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD
2. Legal Owner(s) SAME Tel. ( )
Address
3. Project Address 3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS
Assessor's Book No. Lot No.
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: L A COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT
5. Existing zoning district RA - S - 2
6. Proposed project/use of site
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size 95365
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
8. Net lot area 75530 . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot
lines of a lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway
easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway
easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any
private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip
portion of a flag lot."
9. Total square footage of structures 715
10. Number of floors of construction ONE
11. Basement square footage N/A
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 1040
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? BARN
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? BARN
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? BARN
5-05-98
-1-
®Pnnteo on Recycled Paper
• •
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? NO
17. Grading quantites shall be balanced. Amount cut 20 . Amount fill 20
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities.)
18. Area of disturbance. 40% maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded •
slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or
are proposed to be added. Square feet 16641 Percentage of Net Lot Area 20.7% .
19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 4563 EXISTING
20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,
square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
N/A
21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
N/A
22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
N/A
23. Attach plans.
24. Proposed scheduling. WORK TO COMMENCE UPON APPROVAL
25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
VARIANCE RFO1LT_RFO TO PFRMIT STRUCTURFS WITHIN THE 35 FT SETBACK
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach
additional sheets as necessary).
Y_E_E
0 ■ 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or
substantial alteration of ground contours.
0 ■ 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or
roads.
0 m 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
-2-
• •
YES 1E2
o ■ 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
❑ MI 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity.
❑ III 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or
alteration of existing draining patterns.
❑ I• 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
O IS 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
❑ MI 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives.
❑ M 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage,
etc.).
❑ M 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
I• 0 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
THE PROJECT SITE IS PRESENTLY OCCUPIED BY A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. GARAGE. POOL
AND PATTO AND BARN THE RFCTf1FNCF, GARAAF AND PATH) ARFAC ARP PRFCFNTI Y RFTMG
EXTENSIVELY REMODELED. THE PROPERTY IS A FLAG LOT AND SLOPES DOWN FROM THE
BUILDING PAD IN A NORTH—EASTERLY DIRECTION. MATURE TRFFS OCCUPY PORTIONS OF THE
SITE.
39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
THE PROJECT SITE IS SURROUNDFO RY STNGIF FAMTnY RFSTOFNTTAI PROPFRTTFS
WHICH ARE .SIMILARTIN'.SCALE OF DEVELOPMENT.
-3—
• •
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
VI. A brief explanation is required for all answers except 'No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A 'No
Impact' answer is adequately supported If the referenced information sources show that the impact simply
does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A 'No
Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general
standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific
screening analysis).
VII. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
VIII. 'Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is
significant If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made,
an EIR is required.
IX. 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from 'Potentially Significant Impact' to a 'Less than Significant
Impact.' The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V, 'Earlier Analysis,' above may be
cross-referenced).
X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEOA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above.
Xl. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be
cited in the discussion.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
I]
•
Potent".•
PotentiallyUN:::ant' Less •
Titan
nirtcaa�t Sig . Mitlgaflon:.:;.;';:.: Significant .
I . LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? 0 0 ❑ II
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or ❑ 0 0 III
polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the ❑ 0 0 e
vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. 0 0 ❑ 11
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 0 ❑ 0
established community (including a low-income
or minority community)?
11. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 IN
population projections?
-4-
•
Potently
Potentially Skdnless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact i...,,,.r,,...:, .J Impact Impact
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 •
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 E
housing?
III. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal
result in or expose people to potential impacts
involving:
a) Fault rupture? 0 in 0 ■
b) Seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ E
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ 0 0 II
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 0
e) Landslides or mudflows? 0 0 0 E
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 0 0 III
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? 0 0 0 ■
h) Expansive soils? 0 0 0 ■
i) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 0 0 II
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 M ❑
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related , ❑ 0 0 I!
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration 0 0 0 El
of surface water quality (e.g. temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 ❑ ■
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 0 ■
water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 IP
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0 ■
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 1
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 6
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
V. AIR DUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 PI
an existing or projected air quality violation?
-5-
• •
ly
Sigtnfiicantt
Potentially Unless Less Than
Si
gnificant Incorporated Significant Impact Impact
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 ❑
c) After air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 IrN •
cause any change in climate?
d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0 III
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 B
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 ig
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 B
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? 0 0 0 ■
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterbome or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0
VI I. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 0 0 6
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 ❑ 0 M
trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., 0 0 0 PI
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vemal 0 0 0 111
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 111
VI I I. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and
inefficient manner?
❑ ❑ ❑ e
❑ ❑ ❑ ■
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 II
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 gl
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 gi
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
-6-
Potentially
Potent Sunless Less Than
Impact
t Incinerated
Significant ImpactImpact
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 M
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 M
brush, grass, or trees?
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 ❑ ■
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 M
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 ❑ 0 III
b) Police protection? 0 0 0 pg
c) Schools? 0 0 0 gg
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 0 II
e) Other govemmental services? 0 0 0 C
XII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 El
b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 pg
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 NI
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0
e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 gg
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 III
g) Local or regional water supplies? 0 0 0
XI II. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 0 0 IN
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 II
c) Create Tight or glare? 0 0 0 ffl
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? 0 0 0 III
b) Disturb archaeological resources? 0 0 0 ■
c) Affect historical resources? 0 0 0 B
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 ❑ 0 III
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values?
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within 0 0 0 I
the potential impact area?
-7-
• •
Pont
gteennttiiaally
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 trs
regional parks or other recreations facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 ❑
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
sell -sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important example of the
major period of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0
short-term, to the disadvantage of Tong -term,
environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable'
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects and the effects of probable
future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects ' 0 0 0 M
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the
tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEOA Guidelines. In this
case a discussion should identify the following on
attached sheets.
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses 0 0 0 ■
and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which 0 0 0 Il
effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were
addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less 0 0 0 It
than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were
incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site -
specific conditions for the project.
-8-
• •
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the
lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Govemment Code and submit a signed statement
indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list,
and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists
compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Govemment Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is
required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant: MRS HARLYNE NORRIS
2. Address: 3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD
ROLLING HILLS CA 90274
3. Phone Number: 310-377-1100
4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code):
3 JOHNS CANYON ROAD
ROLLING HILLS CA 90274
5. Local Agency (city/county): CITY OF ROLLING HILLS / COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number:
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City HaID,
8. Regulatory identification number:
9. Date of Ust:Y 1992
Date •2• 2000
For ViThd A
Applici t
f51 r
- 9 -
• •
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Govemment Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are gnS contained on
these lists.
Date 3.2.2000
For
Viat
Signature
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date
3.2.2fX'N')
For
forms\environm. 1998app
•10-
+.r ..r 41/4/101.1
1 LL 4t103/ti152Y
PAGE 62
CITY OF ROLLING MU
ZONING CS .
CERt1FIED PROPERLY OWNERN LIST
ME D=
STATE OF CAISFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
C ti .//Yld,� 'f!l2e0
-
of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom
t all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County
within the area described and for a distance of one tho d (1,000) f from the exterior
boundaries of property legally described as:
:A/A.45 (�GriR,c/ /7�!
r4'/✓/''' r /6-41— (),,)4 —(,
J2 . 35LA r.
, declare under penalty
` /)—l'29 /516 i
Executed at � ir�v10. & ,- der---'
day of
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
Site Plan Review
Zone Change
California, this
,19 AeDv
jlONATURE