684, Construct a new stable, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 2005-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2004-10 AND
APPROVING A TWO YEAR TIME EXTENSION TO A
PREVIOUSLY .APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING
AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A
STABLE IN ZONING CASE NO. 684 AT 5 HILLSIDE LANE, (LOT
126-C-RH), (GAUDENTI).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Bryant, Palmer, Soto Inc.
representatives for the property owners, with respect to real property located at 5
Hillside Lane, (Lot 126-C-RH), Rolling Hills, CA requesting a two-year time extension
for a previously approved Site Plan Review to construct additions to an existing
residence and a new stable.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on March 15,
2005 at which time information was presented indicating that additional time is
needed to process the development application.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning
Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 6 of Resolution No. 2004-10,
dated March 16, 2004, to read as follows:
"A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within three years from the effective
date of approval of this Resolution if work has not commenced as defined in
Section 17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance."
Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions and conditions of
Resolution No. 2004-10 shall continue to be in full force and effect.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15th DAY OF MARCH, 2005.
ATTEST:
h�
ROGER OMMER, CHAIRMAN
MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
•
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
• CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-11 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO
PLANNING COMMISSION- RESOLUTION NO. 2004-10 AND
APPROVING A TWO YEAR TIME EXTENSION TO A
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING
AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A
STABLE IN ZONING CASE NO. 684 AT 5 HILLSIDE LANE, (LOT
126-C-RH), (GAUDENTI).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission
on March 15, 2005 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Witte and Chairman
Sommer.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD
'pprgilW1
FEB 0 3 2006
CITY OF ROWNG HILLS
By
TITLE(S) :
FEE
FEE $;31.00I
DAF $ 2.00
C-20
CODE
20
CODE
19
CODE
9
( A
06 0130521
RECORDED/FILED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNPA
ti
9:21 AM JAN 19 2006
_ E A D S -I _ E T.
D.T.T.
Assessor's Identification Number (AIN)
To be completed by Examiner OR Title Company in black ink. Number of AIN's Shown
THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED
•
RECORDING REOUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation.
AFFIDAVIT O F ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
ZONING CASE NO. 684
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE (MODIFICATION)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
5 HILLSIDE LANE, ROLLING HILLS, (LOT 126-C-RH) CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
ZONING CASE NO. 684
06 0130521
XX
SITE PLAN REVIEW XX
VARIANCE (MODIFICATION)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
(We) certify (or declar under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Sign ren
Name typed or printed
Address 5 14.1U-5 toe" (-0
City/State `?, a,.1 4.7Y
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public,
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
Signature
Name typed or printed
Address
City/State
On '\.L 0 (O before me, Vr Li
personally appeared �� b2i4 C'7 c2L N, p„ �t
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(
subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/srq/trgy executed the same in
capacit (tee and that by his/hef/thejr signature(X) on the instrument the person(', or the en
person acted, executed the instrument.
a
KRISTIE ARL it <I
Commission # 1384310
Notary Public - California
Witne :.y and and tci
J
L' s•lir �/
'Signature of Notary
T Recorders Use Only
whose name(S1 is/a'Ap
is/hk/thtSir authorized
�rbiNa.li��
KRISTIE ARE IART
Commission # 384310
Notary Public - California
Orange Cc unty [
My Comm. Expires lov 11, 2006
nMCornm.Ex► iresNovl$1036 XHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
1
• t'•
State of C..0 Il Af ;Act
County of LDS A•Q le s
personally appeared
}
}
}
before me,
Ckris
•
06 0130521
3
Vci SA2 Re,Larfr A/DIf;/Pfr 1.0
(Insert Name of Notary Public and Title)
LOa r(:),
personally known to me (or proved to me the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be
the personwhose name is/ak subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he/se/ttey executed the same in his/h'r/th4r authorized
capacity(), and that by his/h'r/th iir signature(s) on the instrument the person(),
or the entity upon behalf of which the person) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
-4,e"L- -
KRISTIE AREHART
Commission # 1384310 z
Notary Public - California
Orange County
My Comm. Ewes Nov 11, 2006
J
ackpara (12/05)
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-10 06 0130521
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF
ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE IN ZONING CASE NO. 684 AT
5 HILLSIDE LANE, (LOT 126-C-RH), (GAUDENTI).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Robert
Gaudenti with respect to real property located at 5 Hillside Lane (Lot 126-C-RH),
Rolling Hills, requesting a Site Plan Review to construct additions to an existing
single family residence for a total of 6,380 square foot residence, 664 square foot
garage and grading for a 1,440 square foot new stable. A 1,815 square foot
basement is also proposed.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public
hearings to consider the application on January 20, 2004, February 17, 2004 and at
a field trip visit on February 10, 2004. The applicants were notified of the public
hearings in writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all
persons interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff
and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and studied said
proposal. The applicants' representatives were in attendance at the hearings.
Section 3. The property is currently developed with a 3,630 square foot
residence, 600 square foot garage, 910 square foot swimming pool and 600 square
foot cabana. Access to the property is taken through a driveway, which crosses
the adjacent lot, at 6 Hillside Lane.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as
a Class 1 Exemption [State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)] and is therefore
categorically exempt from environmental review under the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be
submitted for site plan review and approval before any development requiring a
grading permit or any building or structure may be constructed or any
expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made
which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of
the building by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month
period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application requesting grading for
1,440 square foot new stable with 988 square foot loft and for construction of a
2,750 square foot additions to the residence, 67 square foot addition to the
Resolution 2004-10
Gaudenti 1
• •
06 0130521
garage, 767 square foot covered porches and service yard at an existing single- V
family residence, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: S
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures
comply with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential
development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The
project conforms to Zoning Code setbacks, lot coverage requirements, disturbed
area requirements and all other development standards. The construction of the
new stable is in furtherance of the City's goals to retain the equestrian flavor in
the community.
B. The project substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped
state of the lot. The proposed additions will be constructed on an existing
building pad and will utilize for most part already existing impervious surfaces.
The project is of sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the additions
will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will permit
the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious infringement on the rights
of surrounding property owners.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale
and mass with the site. The proposed project is consistent with the scale of the
neighborhood when compared to properties in the vicinity. The site was
previously disturbed and no additional disturbance will result from the
proposed project.
D. The development plan incorporates existing vegetation to the
maximum extent feasible. The development plan substantially preserves the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot and the new additions will not cause the
lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped
so as to maintain open space.
E. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the
proposed project will not change the existing circulation pattern and will utilize
an existing driveway.
F. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings of this Resolution, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review in Zoning Case No.
684 to permit additions and construction of a stable subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Site Plan approval shall expire within one year from the
effective date of approval if work has not commenced as defined in Section
17.46.080 of the Zoning Ordinance, unless otherwise extended pursuant to the
requirements of this section.
Resolution 2004-10
Gaudenti 2
• ` 06 0130521
B. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any
conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been
given written notice to cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has
been provided, and if requested, has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails
to correct the violation within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of the
City's determination.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must
be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on
an approved plan. This shall include, but not be limited to, the requirements of
the Lighting Ordinance, Roof Covering Ordinance and others.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A and dated February 12,
2004 — Site Plan and February 14, 2004 - Grading, except as otherwise provided in
these conditions.
E. The stable may have a loft and shall have a vehicular access not to
exceed 25% in slope. The height of the stable shall conform to the requirements
of the Rolling Hills Community Association.
F. All utility lines serving the residence and stable shall be placed
underground.
G. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 10,856 square feet or 10.86%
in conformance with lot coverage limitations of the Zoning Ordinance.
H. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed
15,341 square feet or 15.3% in conformance with lot coverage limitations of the
Zoning Ordinance.
I. The disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 37,571 square feet or
37.6% in conformance with 40% maximum lot disturbance limitations.
J. Residential building pad coverage on the 33,369 square foot
building pad shall not exceed 9,417 square feet or 28.2%. The coverage on the
9,494 square foot stable building pad shall not exceed 15.2%.
K. Grading for this project shall not exceed 945 cubic yards of cut and
945 cubic yards of fill soil, and shall be balanced on site.
L. The height of the residence and the attached garage, at the highest
point, shall not exceed 17.5 feet from the finished grade.
M. Landscaping shall be designed using mature trees and shrubs so as
not to obstruct views of neighboring properties but to obscure the residence and
Resolution 2004-10
Gaudenti 3
• 06 0130521
stable. Any new trees and shrubs shall, at maturity, be not higher than the ridge
height of the structures.
N. Landscaping shall include water efficient irrigation, to the
maximum extent feasible, that incorporates a low gallonage irrigation system,
utilizes automatic controllers, incorporates an irrigation design using
"hydrozones," considers slope factors and climate conditions in design, and
utilizes means to reduce water waste resulting from runoff and overspray in
accordance with Section 17.27.020 (Water efficient landscaping requirements) of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
O. During construction, dust control measures shall be used to stabilize
the soil from wind erosion and reduce dust and objectionable odors generated by
construction activities in accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management
District, Los Angeles County and local ordinances and engineering practices.
P. During construction, conformance with local ordinances and
engineering practices so that people or property are not exposed to landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
Q. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements, stormwater pollution prevention practices, county and
local ordinances and engineering practices so that people or property are not
exposed to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, objectionable odors, landslides,
mudflows, erosion, or land subsidence shall be required.
R. During and after construction, all soil preparation, drainage, and
landscape sprinklers shall protect the building pad from erosion and direct
surface water to the rear of the lot at the west.
S. During construction, the Erosion Control Plan containing the
elements set forth in Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform
Building Code shall be followed to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and
channels to control stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los
Angeles.
T. During and after construction, all parking shall take place on the
project site and, if necessary, any overflow parking shall take place within nearby
roadway easements.
U. During construction, the property owners shall be required to
schedule and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day
between the hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when
construction and mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere
with the quiet residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
V. A drainage plan shall be approved by the Planning Department
and County District Engineer, to include any water from any site irrigation
Resolution 2004-10
Gaudenti 4
� 0 06 0130521
systems and shall ensure that all drainage from the site is conveyed in an
approved manner.
W. If an above ground drainage design is utilized, it shall be designed
in such a manner as not to cross over any equestrian trails. Any drainage system
shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall incorporate earth tone colors,
including in the design of the dissipater and be screened from any trail and
neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable, without impairing the
function of the drain system.
X. An Erosion Control Plan containing the elements set forth in
Section 7010 of the 2001 County of Los Angeles Uniform Building Code shall be
prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control
stormwater pollution as required by the County of Los Angeles.
Y. The property owners shall be required to conform with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Health Department
requirements for the installation and maintenance of stormwater drainage
facilities.
Z. The property owners shall be required to conform with the
Regional Water Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department
Best Management Practices (BMP's) related to solid waste.
AA. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance
of any permit.
AB. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of
Building and Safety for plan check review shall conform to the development plan
described in Condition D.
AC. The applicants shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this Site Plan approval, or the approval shall not be effective.
AD. All conditions of this Site Plan approval, which apply, must be
complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit from the County of Los
Angeles.
AE. Notwithstanding Sections 17.46.020 and 17.46.070 of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code, any modification to the property which would
constitute additional structural development or additional lot disturbance
shall require the filing of a new application for discretionary review and
approval by the Planning Commission.
Resolution 2004-10
Gaudenti 5
• 06 0130521
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 16TH,,H�A�OF MARCH 2004.
, CHAIRMAN
AlLEST:
MARILYN KE , DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution 2004-10
Gaudenti 6
• •
06 0130521
b
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS)
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004-10 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A SITE PLAN REVIEW
APPROVAL FOR GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF
ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
AND FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE IN ZONING CASE NO.
684 AT 5 HILLSIDE LANE, (LOT 126-C-RH), (GAUDENTI).
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
March 16, 2004 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners DeRoy, Hankins, Margeta, Sommer
and Chairman Witte.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
EPUTY CITY CLERK
Resolution 2004-10
Gaudenti 7