815, Demo & construct a new SFR wit, Resolutions & Approval Conditions• •
This page is part of your document - DO NOT DISCARD
20121846336
II
i
ID1
i
i
1011
i
V
II
1111
Recorded/Filed n Offcial Records
Recorder's Office, Los Angeles County,
California
12/03/12 AT 03:43PM
JAN 15 2013
City of Rolling Hill
By
i
i
000686028
ui
Isla
004474235
SEQ:
01
DAR - Counter (Upfront Scan)
1111 11 1 I1Ill lIIllhII 1111 H IIID 1
1111111111111 11111111 11111111111111
m
IIij1IIII
Il 1
lIlI
III
II
an
THIS FORM IS NOT TO BE DUPLICATED
P0015�
FEES: 57.00
TAXES: 0.00
OTHER: 0.00
PAID: 57.00
E441959
•
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD.
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
(310) 377-1521
(310) 377-7288 FAX
-\
*20121846336*
T RECORDER'S USE ONLY
THE REGISTRAR -RECORDER'S OFFICE REQUIRES THAT THE FORM BE NOTARIZED BEFORE
RECORDATION.
AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
) §§
ZONING CASE NO. 815
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW -NEW REISDENCE XX VARIANCES
hibifi Pt
I (We) the undersigned state
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows:
5 JOHNS CANYON ROAD, ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (LOT 173-A-MS)
This property is the subject of the above numbered case and conditions of approval
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 815
XX SITE PLAN REVIEW -NEW REISDENCE XX VARIANCES
I (We)�-rtify(or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
ture
Ccc lc M u v (41 r- tct vl
Name typed or printed
Address ?' f3NAcc,c4
1(t fells �slurn. (4
City/Suite
Signature
Lori 1 Pa to A10 E rz k")
Name typed or printed
Ili A,narApa
Address /Z o I I( t't l4i Ile, PS is : C.A
regoing is true and correct.
City/State
'9 a.7y
• •
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
See Attached Exhibit "A", RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL NO. 2012-15
State of California )
County of Los Angeles )
On 1,1/%0z before me,
11/ nd avitm,o,v/A),77,011yAlit G
Personally
appeared AviioGj�a-i%,‘ Q�,�.J r-,And�i.c�
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person hose namsOj&J
subscrib- • o the within instrument and acknowledged to me th-t beLstle/ !�'�'-executed the same in
Alfghe �%� authorized capacity) and that by Isis/ Pitr /signatur=,s on the instrument the
person 0 or the entity upon behalf of which the persoriacted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing
paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS by hand and official seal.
Signature of Nota
( Seal)
ARTIN OHANNESIAN
Commission 11986871
Notary Public - California I
Los Angeles County
My Comm. Expires Au? 28. 2016
E,c(4,61T-
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR
GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
WITH GARAGE AND SWIMMING POOL AND GRANTING VARIANCES TO
EXCEED THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT AND TO
LOCATE THE SWIMMING POOL AND THE FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL
SET ASIDE AREA IN THE FRONT YARD OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO.
815, AT 5 JOHNS CANYON ROAD (LOT 173-A-MS), (MUNCHERIAN). PROJECT
HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Jack Muncherian with
respect to real property located at 5 Johns Canyon Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 173-A-MS)
requesting a Site Plan Review and Variances. The project entails grading of total of
4,420 cubic yards of dirt (cut and fill) to be balanced on site, to construct a new 9,387
square foot residence with 1,187 square foot attached garage, 687 square foot
swimming pool, 67 square foot pool equipment area, 917 square feet of porches, a
small barbeque area and a service yard area. The applicants also seek Variances to
exceed the maximum permitted disturbance of the net lot area (73.5%), and to locate
the swimming pool and the area for a future stable and corral in the front yard area of
the lot. No basement is proposed.
The applicants plan to construct a temporary construction driveway of Johns Canyon
Road directly into their property, and return the area to its preconstruction condition
after completion of the project. The Traffic Commission approved the driveway
approach on May 24, 2012.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted duly noticed public hearings
to consider the application on April 17, 2012, May 15, 2012, June 19, 2012, July 17, 2012
and in the field on May 15 and June 29, 2012. Neighbors within 1,000-foot radius were
notified of the public hearings and a notice was published in the Palos Verdes
Peninsula News on April 5, 2012. The applicants were notified of the public hearings in
writing by first class mail. Evidence was heard and presented from all persons
interested in affecting said proposal and from members of the City staff, neighbors and
applicant's engineers and the Planning Commission having reviewed, analyzed and
studied said proposal. Several neighbors attended the public hearings and testified,
and several letters were received in support and in opposition to the project.
As a result of the public testimony and Planning Commission's concerns, the applicant
revised the project, including grading for gentler than 2:1 slopes, slightly reduced the
size of the residence and lowered the building pad. The property owners at 1 Johns
Reso. 2012-15
1
• •
Canyon Road object to this project on the basis that the proposed residence would
block their view.
Section 3. The property is zoned RAS-2 and the gross lot area is 2.46 acres.
The net lot area for development purposes is 2.18 acres or 95,233 square feet. The lot
has a very long frontage along Johns Canyon Road, and is located at the bend of the
road. The existing house will be demolished and the proposed house will be located in
the general location of the existing house. An area for a future stable and corral has
been set aside below and in front of the residence.
Section 4. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3
Exemption, and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under
the California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 5. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for
Site Plan Review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit or any
building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or
repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an
increase to the size of the building or structure by not more than 999 square feet in any
thirty-six (36) month period. With respect to the Site Plan Review application
requesting grading and construction of a new residence and accessory structures, the
Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the
Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structures comply with
the General Plan requirement of low profile, low -density residential development with
sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project is located on a large
lot, over 2.4 acres, and will not look overdeveloped. The project conforms to Zoning
Code lot coverage requirements, and specifically the coverage of the lot by structures is
much less than the maximum permitted. The net lot area of the lot is 95,233 square feet.
The structural net lot coverage is proposed at 12,791 square feet or 13.5%, which
includes all the structures, including the future stable (450 sq.ft.), (20% max. permitted);
and the total lot coverage proposed will be 29,691 square feet or 31.5%, (35% max.
permitted). This includes the long driveway and open courtyard in the rear of the
garage. Additional parking areas are proposed, which will have a pervious surface. The
proposed project will be screened from the road and neighbors so as to reduce the
visual impact of the development.
B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and
undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new
structure will not cause the lot to look overdeveloped. Significant portions of the lot will
be left undeveloped so as to maintain open space on the property. The applicants
propose utilize all of the existing building pad for the new construction and the existing
building pad will be increased by only 1,663 square feet. The proposed residence will be
at the same elevation as the existing residence. The lot beyond the existing building pad
is steep at 2:1 slopes. The natural topography of the sloped areas will remain and the
Reso. 2012-15
2
• •
slopes will be made gentler with areas of 2.5:1 and 3:1 slopes. The nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the topography of the lot
have been considered, and the construction of the new house will not adversely affect
or be materially detrimental to the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures because the
proposed structure will be constructed on a portion of the lot which is least intrusive to
surrounding properties, will be screened and landscaped with trees and shrubs, is a
sufficient distance from nearby residences so that the proposed structures will not
impact the privacy of surrounding neighbors, and will substantially utilize the existing
building pad.
C. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and
mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. The project observes
all of the setback requirements and coverage requirements. The structure is proposed to
be located in the rear of the lot and the building pad will be lowered, therefore most of
the house or the swimming pool will not be visible from the road.
D. The development plan incorporates existing trees and is screened from
other properties and the road by existing mature vegetation along the slopes, which will
be preserved. The applicant is required to plant trees to screen the development from
the neighbor to the south.
E. The development plan follows to the maximum extent practicable
contours of the site to minimize grading and retain the natural drainage courses. The
project utilizes most of the existing building pad area, however the pad will be lowered.
The graded areas will be landscaped.
F. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the
convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the existing
driveway will be utilized and two additional parking spots are proposed to take any
cars off the street easements.
G. The project conforms to the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and is exempt.
Section 6. The applicant seeks a variance from the 40% maximum disturbed
area standard set forth in Section 17.16.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code.
Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Code permit approval of a variance from the
standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when, due to exceptional or
extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other
similar properties in the same zone, strict application of the Code would deny the
property owner substantial property rights enjoyed by other properties in the same
vicinity and zone. Additional findings are also required, as detailed herein. With
respect to this request for a variance for 73.5% disturbance of the lot, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
Reso. 2012-15
3
• •
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same
vicinity and in the same zone. Section 17.16.070 of the Municipal Code provides that
disturbance shall be limited to 40% of the net lot area. The applicants propose to
demolish the existing residence to allow construction of a new residence and accessory
structures. The property is unique in that it is already disturbed more than 40%. 63.5%
of the lot has been previously disturbed and the additional 10% disturbance is minimal
for the construction of the proposed improvements. The resulting slopes will be gentler
than the existing slopes and will daylight into the lower slope in a much more attractive
manner than if the slopes were 2:1, which is the maximum permitted, but would require
less disturbance.
B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone,
but which would be denied to the property in question absent a variance. The
applicants propose increase the building pad by a very small amount, 1,653 square feet.
Construction of a single family, single story home is a right possessed by residence of
Rolling Hills. The overage is not significant and the property owner should not be
denied the privilege of a constructing a larger than existing residence simply because
the topographic nature of the lot makes it infeasible to comply strictly with Section
17.16.170.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located. A minor increase in the overall percentage of
disturbed area on the lot will have no effect on the public welfare or on property or
improvements in the vicinity.
D. In granting the variance, the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance will
be observed. The purpose of the Zoning Ordinance is to regulate development in an
orderly fashion and in a manner consistent with the goals and policies of the General
Plan. Approval of the variance will not impede any goals of the Zoning Ordinance or
the General Plan. Rather, the variance will allow the property owner to enjoy the same
rights and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity. The overage
requested is not substantial, especially because the existing disturbance exceed the
maximum permitted by 23%, and does not undermine the spirit or intent of the Zoning
Ordinance.
E. The variance does not grant special privileges to the applicant. To the
contrary, absent a variance, the property owner would be deprived of the same rights
and privileges afforded to other property owners in the vicinity. Unique circumstances
applicable to the subject property make it infeasible for the property owner to comply
with Section 17.16.070. The minor overage requested will allow the property owner to
enjoy the same rights and privileges afforded to many other properties in the vicinity
and zone.
Reso. 2012-15
4
• •
F. The variance is consistent with the portions of the County of Los Angeles
Hazardous Waste Management Plan relating to siting and siting criteria for hazardous
waste facilities.
G. The variance request is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed
project, together with the variance, will be compatible with the objectives, policies,
general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan.
Section 7. Section 17.16.200(I) prohibits the construction of a swimming pool or
other structures in the front yard area of a lot, which includes stables, except where a
Variance is approved. The applicants request to construct an 687 square foot swimming
pool, pool equipment area and set aside area for a future stable and corral in the front
yard. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as
follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property that do not apply generally to the other property or class of
use in the same zone. The lot was graded in a manner that the construction of a pool
and outdoor living amenities lend itself to the front location. The location of a future
stable is not practical on the existing pad, as it would be too close to the residence. The
topography of the lot together with the fact that the pad has been already created, cause
difficulty in constructing the new improvements elsewhere on the property.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
existing terrain and development on the lot creates a difficulty in placing the new
construction elsewhere on the property. The lot is unique in that it is on a knoll and any
different configuration of structures on the lot would require additional grading. The
pool and future stable would be located in an area least obtrusive to adjacent properties.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone
in which the property is located. The proposed construction will be constructed on an
existing building pad, will be the least intrusive to surrounding properties, will be
screened and landscaped with mature trees and shrubs, is of sufficient distance from
nearby residences so that it will not impact the view or privacy of surrounding
neighbors, and will permit the owners to enjoy their property without deleterious
infringement on the rights of surrounding property owners.
D. In granting of the Variance the spirit and intent of the Zoning Ordinance
will be observed in that the proposed construction will be orderly, attractive and shall
protect the rural character of the community. The proposed pool and spa will not
encroach into the future equestrian uses on the property. A suitable area for a future
stable and corral has been set aside, also in the front area.
Reso. 2012-15
5
• •
E. The project is exempt from the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings in Sections 5, 6 and 7, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application and Variances
in Zoning Case No. 815 for grading and construction of a new residence with attached
garage a swimming pool and future stable and corral as shown on the Site Plan dated
June 12, 2012 subject to the following conditions:
A. The conditions of approval specified herein shall be printed on all
construction plans and shall be at all times available at the construction site.
B. The Site Plan Review and Variances approvals shall expire within two
years from the effective date of approval if construction pursuant to this approval has
not commenced within that time period, as required by Sections 17.46.080(A) and
17.38.070(A) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, or the approval granted is otherwise
extended pursuant to the requirements of those sections.
C. It is declared and made a condition of the approval, that if any conditions
thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted
hereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicants have been given written notice to
cease such violation, the opportunity for a hearing has been provided, and if requested,
has been held, and thereafter the applicant fails to correct the violation within a period
of thirty (30) days from the date of the City's determination.
D. All requirements of the Building and Construction Code, the Zoning
Code, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in this approval, or shown otherwise on an approved plan.
E. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated June 12, 2012 including the elevation plan (p.3).
F. The working drawings submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety (County or Willdan Engineering), for plan check and construction review must
conform to the development plan approved with this application. In addition, prior to
submittal of final plans to the Building Department for issuance of building permits,
the plans for the project shall be submitted to staff for verification that the final plans
are in compliance with the plans approved by the City.
G. The project shall be reviewed and approved by the RHCA Architectural
Committee.
H. Grading shall not exceed a total of 4,420 cubic yard of cut and fill, which
includes excavation of the pool, and shall be balanced on site. Only excavated material
may be exported. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed steepness as shown on the
development plan dated June 12, 2012 and shall not be greater than 2.5:1 and 3:1.
Reso. 2012-15
6
• • •
I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 12,791 square feet or 13.5% of the
net lot area.
J. Total lot coverage of structures and paved areas shall not exceed 29,691
square feet, including the widened driveway, or 31.5% in conformance with lot
coverage limitations.
K. Additional guests parking spaces maybe constructed as shown on the site
plan dated June 12, 2012, but such pads shall have a pervious surface, subject to
approval by staff.
L. The retaining wall along the driveway may not exceed 24 inches in height
at any one point from the finished grade. The seat walls along the north portion of the
residence shall not exceed 36" in height from finished grade. The service yard wall may
not exceed 6' in height.
M. The disturbance of the net lot shall not exceed 70,159 square feet of surface
area or 73.5%, in conformance with the approved Variance.
N. Residential building pad coverage on the 41,413 square feet residential
building pad shall not exceed 27.6% (not including portion of the covered porches and
bbq). The future stable and corral pad of 1,000 square feet shall have coverage of not
more than 45%.
O. A minimum of four -foot level path and/or walkway, which does not have
to be paved, shall be provided around the entire perimeter of the residence and garages.
P. The ridge line of the residence shall be as shown on the elevation plans
dated June 12, 2012; the highest ridge being at 788.5 feet and a certification of the ridge
height by a civil engineer shall be submitted prior to completion of framing of the
house.
Q. The applicant shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling Hills
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Chapter 13.18 of the Municipal Code. The
applicant shall submit to the City two copies of a landscaping and irrigation plan and
water usage certification prior to obtaining grading permits. Within 90-days of
completion of the construction of the project, the applicant shall submit a landscaping
compliance certification.
R. A fuel modification plan, a landscape plan, and an irrigation plan
prepared by a registered landscape architect, landscape designer, landscape contractor,
or an individual with expertise acceptable to the forestry division of the fire department
shall be submitted and approved. After the forestry division of the fire department has
approved such final plan, a signed copy of a Covenant and Agreement for maintenance
shall be recorded at the registrar-recorder/county clerk's office.
Reso. 2012-15
7
• •
• S. A construction fence shall be erected along the limits of grading, so that
dirt, dust, rocks and other material does not slough off towards the road.
T. The existing landscaped slopes along Johns Canyon Road shall be
maintained in good condition at all times, including during construction and shall be
watered during construction.
U. The development shall be screened from 1 Johns Canyon Road by
planting of trees and shrubs, which at maturity shall not exceed the ridge height of the
residence. At planting the vegetation shall be no smaller than 36" box or equivalent.
V. An Erosion Control Plan per Building Department requirements shall be
prepared to minimize erosion and to protect slopes and channels to control storm water
pollution as required by the Code.
W. All graded areas shall be vegetated utilizing to the greatest,extent feasible
mature native and drought resistant plants. Plants shall be utilized, which are
consistent with the rural character of the community and meet the fire department
requirements for fire resistant plants. Any trees and shrubs used in the landscaping
scheme for this project shall be planted in a way that will not result in a hedge like
screening and as not to impair views of neighboring properties but to screen the project
site. Any tree at maturity shall not exceed the height of the residence.
X. Prior to the issuance of grading permit two copies of a preliminary
landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review ' by the Planning
Department, including for the pool area. A security in the amount of the cost estimate of
the implementation of the landscaping plan (including irrigation), plus 15% shall be
required to be posted prior to issuance of a grading permit and shall be retained with
the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained security
will be released by the City after the City Manager determines that the landscaping was
installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is
properly established and in good condition.
Y. All utility lines to the new structures on the lot shall be placed
underground and one of the poles on the property removed.
Z. The pool equipment shall be screened; if by a solid wall, the wall shall not
exceed 4 feet in height at any point from finished grade. Sound attenuating equipment
shall be installed to dampen the sound. The swimming pool and the spillway shall
utilize the most quiet and technologically advanced equipment to dampen the sound.
AA. The property owners shall be required to conform to the City of Rolling
Hills and RHCA roofing material standards, Outdoor Lighting Standards, as well as all
other requirements of the Municipal Code.
AB. Minimum of 50% of the construction material spoils shall be recycled and
diverted. The hauler must be licensed by the City, must have the appropriate insurance
and must provide the appropriate documentation to the City.
Reso. 2012-15
8
•
AC. There shall be no dumping of any debris, trash, soil spoils, construction
materials or any other matter into the slopes.
AD. The property lines, easement lines and setbacks, where possible, in the
vicinity of the areas of construction, shall be delineated during the entire duration of the
construction and no grading, construction or storage of any objects including building
materials shall take place in the easement, unless approved by the RHCA.
AE. During construction, the property owners shall be required to schedule
and regulate construction and related traffic noise throughout the day between the
hours of 7 AM and 6 PM, Monday through Saturday only, when construction and
mechanical equipment noise is permitted, so as not to interfere with the quiet
residential environment of the City of Rolling Hills.
AF. During grading and construction operations, trucks shall not park, queue
and/or idle at the project site or in the adjoining right-of-way before or after the
permitted hours of operations. To the maximum extent possible, staging of equipment
and parking of vehicles during construction shall be on site. The contractors and
subcontractors are to encourage their employees to car-pool into the City. Only the
temporary construction driveway shall be used during construction.
AG. Upon completion of the project, the temporary construction driveway
shall be returned to its pre -construction condition.
AH. As part of the soils and geology report, location for a future septic tank to
serve the new single family residence will be established. All applicable State and
County requirements, including County Health Department, pertaining to septic tanks
construction and maintenance shall be complied with.
AI. The applicant shall comply with requirements for bonding for grading
and all other requirements resulting from the review of the soils and geology reports.
AJ. The applicant shall submit a detailed drainage plan including hydrology
study to the drainage engineer. The drainage plan shall address the water flow from the
street. To the maximum extent practicable, additional drainage generated from the
development shall be retained and dissipated on site. Prior to issuance of a grading
permit for this project such approved plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for review and filing.
AK. No drainage device may be located in such a manner as to contribute to
erosion or in any way affect an easement, trail or adjacent properties. The energy
dissipaters shall be designed in such a manner as to not cross over any equestrian trails
or easements. The drainage system(s) shall not discharge water onto a trail, shall
incorporate earth tone colors, including in the design of the dissipater and shall be
screened from any trail and neighbors views to the maximum extent practicable,
without impairing the function of the drainage system.
Reso. 2012-15
9
• •
AL. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department requirements for the
installation and post construction maintenance of stormwater drainage facilities.
AM. During construction, conformance with the air quality management
district requirements shall be complied with, so that people or property are not exposed
to undue vehicle trips, noise, dust, and objectionable odors. The grading activities shall
be watered on a daily basis, or more often, if necessary.
AN. The property owners shall be required to conform to the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and County Public Works Department Best Management
Practices (BMPs) related to solid waste and storm management.
AO. The property owner and/or his/her contractor/applicant shall be
responsible for compliance with the no -smoking provisions in the Municipal Code.
AP. The contractor shall not use tools that could produce a spark, including
for clearing and grubbing, during red flag warning conditions. Weather conditions can
be found at:
http;//www.wrh.noaa.eov/lox/main.php?suite=safety&page=hazard_definitions#FIR
E. It is the sole responsibility of the property owner and/or his/her contractor to
monitor the red flag warning conditions.
AQ. Until the applicants execute and record an Affidavit of Acceptance of all
conditions of this Site Plan Review, Conditional Use Permit and Variance approvals, as
required by the Municipal Code, the approvals shall not be effective.
AR. All conditions of the Site Plan and Variance approvals, that apply, shall
be complied with prior to the issuance of grading or building permit.
AS. Any modification to the project, including but not be limited to increase
in grading quantities, limits of grading or disturbed area on the property, location or
size of structures and any other changes that vary from this approval shall be reviewed
by staff and a determination made whether the changes are minor or major subject to
Section 17.46.070C of the Zoning Ordinance.
AU. The applicant shall pay all of the applicable Building and Safety and
Public Works Department fees including Palos Verdes Peninsula Unified School District
fees for new residence.
AV. Any action challenging the final decision of the City made.as a result of
the public hearing on this application must be filed within the time limits set forth in
Section 17.54.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code and Code of Civil Procedure
Section 1094.6
Reso. 2012-15
10
• •
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 21st DAY OF AUGUST 2012.
ATTEST:
dia(dtE6
HEIDI LUCE
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Reso. 2012-15
11
jE'F Ek.EiChl'r2frAH�N
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2012-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING
HILLS GRANTING APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR GRADING AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH GARAGE AND
SWIMMING POOL AND GRANTING VARIANCES TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM
PERMI i i by DISTURBANCE OF THE LOT AND TO LOCATE THE SWIMMING
POOL AND THE FUTURE STABLE AND CORRAL SET ASIDE AREA IN THE FRONT
YARD OF THE LOT IN ZONING CASE NO. 815, AT 5 JOHNS CANYON ROAD (LOT
173-A-MS), (MUNCHERIAN). PROJECT HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO BE
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA).
was approved and adopted at an adjourned meeting of the Planning Commission on
August 21st, 2012 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Chelf, Henke, Mirsch, Smith and Chairman Pieper.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: None.
ABSTAIN: None.
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
Reso. 2012-15
Otactt taw
HEIDI LUCE
DEPUTY CITY CLERK
12