Loading...
455, 12 foot garage addition at the, Application• RF�UEST FOR HEARING FOR ZONE VARIANCE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The undersigned Edward Carson Beall and Associates, Attention: Don Thursby Name 23727 Hawthorne Boulevard, Torrance, California (213) 378-1280 Street Address Telephone Number (1) is/are the owner(s) or is/are in lawful possession of has permission of the owner. Legal description of property situated at Portion of Lot 60 B S.F. Lot Tract #10 Flying Mane Road, Rolling Hills, California 90274 Street Address Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. 1. 16 saizare foot Breakfast Roam Bay window addition at the front of the house encroaching into the front yard setback. 2. 120 square foot garage addition at the north side of the house encroaching into the front yard setback. Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. See attached sheet. Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where prr-7:-ty..is. lccated because. See attached sheet. FILING FEE A filing fee ' must accompany the application. Make check payable to: Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance 1. Original development at the upper end of Flying Mane was done with front yard setbacks varying from 26 feet to 32 feet. The current 50 foot front yard setback creates a unique situation in that all houses in the area are encroaching into the setback. The applicants house is currently setback 26 fee. The proposed garage addition will be setback 30 feet and the breakfast room addition 39'. This is consistent with the neighbor on either side that have setbacks of 31 and 31 feet. The houses on the opposite side of Flying Mane are setback 26'. 2. The proposed additions do not project beyond the existing building setback of 26 feet. The proposed additions are consistent with both the character and scale of the existing development on Flying Mane. The visual impact of the additions are minor due to the existing building pad being substantially lower than the elevation of the street; making the majority of the house non visible from the street. COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF • A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn) and other accessory structures, proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area". A suggested coverage has been set forth by. policy at 40 percent. 4 For purposes of this calculation, ."buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.08.135 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an .average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS. BUILDABLE PAD AREA total sq.ft. 8,650 RESIDENCE sq. ft. • 2.751 GARAGE sq. ft. 594 STABLE (BARN) sq. ft. 450 (Not In Pad) OTHER sq. ft. BUILDING • total sq. ft. 3,345 PERCENT (%) COVERAGE total sq. ft. 38.67 • (%) CXECXLYET ,701 PLAN 8TThMITTAL (con ' t� 17. shov the sxistinq buiidabls arsa which is that portion of a lot that constitutor the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot vithin the arsa dstinsd by the rsquirod aininus sstbacks that has an average slops of tsn (10%) percent or 10s5. if thsrs is not Sxistinq building pad, the buildabls b,rsa ehall seen that portion of a lot vithin allowable sstbacks that has an aysrage slops of tan (10%) of isss. COXPOTATION Of LOT COVERAGE CITY Of ROLLING RILL$ ZOT COVERAGE (Title 17 )lain buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, svioaing pools, ssrvice yards (onclosed or unonclossd), stabias, or an area of not less than 200 square fast for tho construction of a stable (with vohicis access thsrsto) shall not cover aoro than tvsnty (20%) percent of the net lot area•. provided further that in addition to the above describ d iaprovoaonts, the areas includod vithin drivevays, parking sp4CS, vaika, patios, docks and asphalt or concreto paving of any kind oxceptinq roads aaintainod by the Rolling Eilis Coaaunity Association, shall not cover aors than thirty-five (35%) percent of the nst lot area. For the purposss of this Section 'nat arsa" shall exclude all porisstet aassmsnts for a aaxiaua of tsn feat and that portion of the lot ,or pa.rc�1 of land which is used for roadway purposes, and shall also excludo any private drivo or drivsvay vhich provides ingress and ogress to any other lot or parcel of land, . and accsss strip portion of any flag lot. DUIWIXG.:AfA EXISTING PROPOSED. CAL I ATIONB NET LOT A1EA 36,680 •Q. ft. -0- sq. ft. REEIDENCC 2,605 sq. ft. 136 sq. ft. GARAC3t 572 ..sq....ft. g =4+22 ' sq. ,ft. SwnorniG .POOL . 750 . sq. ft. -0- sq. ft. STABS 'ixJ 9'm i, 450 sq. ft. -0- sq. ft. TS2dliI8 COURT -0- sq. ft. •-0- aq. ft. 9BRVICE TARD loo sq. ft. -0- sq. ft. Ot _ -0- sq. ft. '-0- sq. ft. TOTAL SQUAPE FEET 4.4 7 7 256 % 8TRUCTURE COVERAGE 12.71 % .69 _ DRZVi11AT 1,970 sq. ft. -120 sq. ft. PAVED WAL1 AND PATIO 957 sq• ft. -0- ®q. ft. POOL DECE1Id „ 1,578. sq. ft. -0- aq. ft. TOTAL SQOAU FEET 4,505 =12 0 .ANO COVERAGE 12.28 % . 32 AIi covroE ; 24 .4 8 $ +. 37• q 36,680 eq. ft. 2,741 sq. ft. 592 sgL....ft. 750 sq. ft. 450 sq, ft. -0- sq. it. 100 sq. ft. -0 sq. ft. 4,633 12.63 1,850 sq. tt• 957 aq. ft. 1,578 sq. ft. 4 385 111.95% 24.58� OWNER'S ACKNOWIQGMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the City of Rolling Hills ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the Rolling Hills Cominunity Association ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence for property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at , California this JJ . day of / By. By: , 19 g/ . , 1A 7 % /D F y//t/ AMA/iE ,2D, Address ,Q 2JL /A/ C ///LLS G4 City ft ) , dsclara un br Zzecutmd at this nalty of perjury that th torogoin is trtao eat eoacroct. v 1')) day of s Califo�aia, 199/ /D /LvinO<' /fi�/F 2v OLL /ir/ G /1.;/, s (:4 ! OTE: The Oamer' z D:eclarmtioz can only be used if this applicatiei is slgnod in California. If this application is signed outsiid of California, tho applicant should acknowledge before a. Notary Public of the State here the signa+turo is ffixed, or before another officer of that StatQ autboiised by its lava to take 4cknc�r1edga�ant8, that be (it) Darns tho propcerty described ;, rift, and that tbo inforaaaticn in th$ accc panying thin application is true to the bect of psis (it,) )..nowledgo and belief. Attach appro riate a►cknowl,=�•,�><«nt, b re. PO1 4S ISSUSD TO: ®�IZATIC oa DDIES$ /) zL %Z EWT O. . - DATE• DECISION OF PLM?NIY�G COMMISSION L2. The action of he planning Caasm1ssion sill be final unless withd.n tvonty (20) dayst following the notico to the applicant of the decisioa�, an appea1 in writing is filed c9ith the city C1 rk by: A. The applicants S. ?rny pera:on two protested, eeitber orally ox in taritifT, an a "..,,tier of record prior to the final vote of the Planni! j Corc1Liffiaiom an the Dettor and ttho in addition, received or aeas4 entitled to receives tF.o written notic o spacifiad in subdivisions 2 of ubnoction A of Sections 17.40.060r or C. The City Council, upon the affirmative.voto of three seern of the Council. In ordeP to obtaii. m building perait, it will be nei a e. Iy for the applicant to sign n ccpy of the findingst that they understend and accept the coaditoav of approval. • (r•r'0 1f0) • APPENDIX ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND CHECKLIST POR!! (Initial Study) Date Submitted: April 24, 1991 110 . GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Name .and address of developer or project sponsor: Mr. and Mrs. August Rihaczek, #10 Flying Mane Road, Rolling Hi11s, CA 2. Address of project: #10 Flying Arne Road, Rolling Hills, CA Assessor's Block and Lot Number A portion of Lot 60 B Southfield 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Edward Carson Beall ? Associates, 23727 Hawthorne Boulevard, Torrance, California 90505 Attention: Don W. Thursby (213) 378-1280 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning district: 6. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filEd): Residential PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site Size: Gross 51,030 8. Square footage: 146 square foot addition 9. Number of floors of construction: 1 floor 1 10. Amount of off-street parking provided: 2-car garage 11. (Attacb plans.) 12. Proposed scheduling: Not Applicable 13. Associated projects: Not Applicable 14. Anticipated incremental development: Not Annlicahle 15. If residential, indicate the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sise expected: Single Family Residential 16. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities: Not Applicable 17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: Not Applicable 18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: Not Applicable i • • . MLA-1sa 1!. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly vhy the application is required: This project requires a City variance to encroach within the front yard setback. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 20. On a separate page, describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. 21. On a separate page, describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use, and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. ENVI RONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all 'yesand 'maybe' answers are required on attached sheets.) 22. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, com- paction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? YES MAYBE NO f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beaeh sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologie hazards such as earth- quakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 23. Air. Mill the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? 24. water. will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? c. Alterations to the course of flow of flood waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? x f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? x Es aAYSE o g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi- tions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? x x x L x x x x x �iilf!•20�1e b. Substantial reduction in the amount of water othervise available for public vater supplies? i. Exposure of people or property to eater -related hazards such as floodin; or tidal eaves? j. Significant changes in the temperature, floc, or chemical content of surface thermal springs? 25. Plant Life. Will the proposal result ins a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and of plants? b. k reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenish- ment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? 26. Arnimal Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or icrofauna)? YES $AYU x r x i x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals7 x c. introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the :migration or movesment of animals? x d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? x 27. poise. Will the proposal result ins a. increases in existing noise levels? x x x . MLW!-21Ae b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 28. Lisht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 29. Land Os.. Will the proposal result in a substantial alter- ation of the present or planned land use of an area? ,__ x 30. patural_Resources. will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Y_ ES MAYPt p0 x 31. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or up- set conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response plan or an emer- gency evacuation clan? 32. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 33. Rousincl. Will the proposal af- fect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? 34. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial addi- tional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? x x �irWi•Z�e . . d. lterations to present cattetns of circulation or move- ment of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 35. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x r, _ f. Other governmental services? X ryas MAYU x r 36. Enerav,. Will the proposal result in: a. Use•of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x b. 5ubstantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? 37. Utilities. still the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a. Power or natural gas? x b. Commuaications systems? x �_ r c. Water x. d. Sewer or septic tanks? x r, e. Stors eatu drainage? x f. Solis Baste and disposal? X 38. ®unan Bealth. Will the proposal result in: lS MATE a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health bazard (excluding mental health)? ___ X b. Exposure bf people to poten- tial health hazards? X 39. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal re- sult in the creation of an aesthet- ically offensive site open to public view? 40. Recreation. will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 41. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archeolovical site? b. Will the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthet- ic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change whicb would affect unique ethnic cultural •values? d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? 42. Mandatory Findings of Siqnificance. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fisb or wildlife species, cause a fisb or viidlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal comaun- ity, reduce the number or restrict r X i .. , A� • the rang• of a rare or endangered plant or animal or elioinate impor- tant examples of the Major ptrioda of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short -tern, to the disadvantage of long -terse environ- mental goals? (a short tern impact on the environment is one vhich occurs in a relatively brief, defin- itive period of time while long -tern impacts will endure veil into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or sore separate re- sources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the•ef- fect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) d. Does the project have environ- mental effects which will cause sub- stantial adverse effect on human be- ings, either directly or indirectly? MAYU- NC CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and infor- mation required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date April 24, 1991 (Signature) For Mr rncl T-Ss. August Rihaczek Applicant) x x x AUGUST W RIHACZEK & ROSE P RIHACZEK JT TEN WROS & NOT AS TEN COM 10 FLYING MANE ROAD ROLLING HILLS CA 90274 - 5238 't.AA s 9/ J k ������� II1094034 L74":03 L0000 L84 OOOOiu3OL,il' ]%JO 4820 RECEIVED FROM THE SUM OF c #s - c,. 19 OFFICIAL RECEIPT pit, of RoL'L' L'L' CALIFORNIA .DOLLARS $ 1184 FUND L(LLLI AMOUNT CITY CLERK J2 4/ AD & i? u098803 4 L?L,",:O 3 i0000 L 'I 0000u930I' 4820 RECEIVED FROM THE SUM OF - FOR DATE OFFICIAL RECEIPT 2it o[ S?oLLB nfJ IL'L' w 1 A4 79 CALIFORNIA r)OLLARS $ FUND AMOUNT CITY CLERK