Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
587, Construct a tennis court, Application
• City 0/ A!! s REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 PROPERTY WNER: V(12. Akelglid js) 1/4I OWNER'S ADDRESS.: TELEPHONE NO: 32.. • 929 1 ° ' PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: ';./t LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO.itou„,),46- t ,45 ¶ Lot (n 3 .A ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S, ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: 1 4i v5 ._ M4-o -. too.143 lar-VesiDP1 r--\ `i a 2 77 (310) +4- $S7 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone. Cv..tpst- Pa tot ea. ®Pnnred on Recycled Parm'. theproposed use be cor'�i atible with the uses in the sui�roun in r a andif Will p g a e, � so, why? Yam, i.etAN`( = f4.ic1.I15012-itJCs LAP. P*A0.1uontzs , 1*. use 145_41424itiffr? Its! "ft eornt •zokttsieb- Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? .. Yes. ?itrvKt wiLc. psio tiet�14404174- r`\ FILING FEE A filling fee,,must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. _ . DATE e ` 21' 1SZON CASE NO. • -- ADDRESS - PouN1� 'APPLICANT SEI BUILDING AREAS ,CALCULATION EXISTING NET LOT AREA 1....15171.1 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) 33! Cp© pj sq.ft. RESIDENCE e3sq.ft. 912) GARAGE 1`.2.00 sq.ft.. .SWIMMING POOL/SPA 640 sq.ft. STABLE, ._... 4_66 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( 11514016 ) . SERVICE YARD rAczio sq:ft. 00. sq.ft. •• eft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 4172,6 sq.ft. 3. I %... % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE %y'UL Ie crll DRIVEWAY 3 %. PAVED . WALKS AND PATIO AREAS (IOW sq.ft. POOL DECKING f sq.ft. •INc-rx19 t7 tit AT0M- TOTAL FLATWORK ' Ii sq.ft. '% TOTAL FLATWORK . - COVERAGE ,rJ TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK • COVERAGE I a 6(,sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE % . CO % OF LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED TOTAL sq.ft. 2 "121 sq.ft. r 3 sq.ft. 33GO b sq.ft. _- sq.ft. sq.ft. •— sq.ft. sq.ft. '7eo sq.ft. Soo.: boo .'.' Boo . • 1: sq.ft. 91S ('ZOO sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. $0 sq.ft. 7700 sq.ft. (00 sq.ft. " r.boo 1..R. sq.ft. _..._ 7. 5 % 2.9.3 % sq.ft. 10C sq.ft. 21pOS sq.ft. sq.ft. 2- GOB sq.ft. (2,1005 sq.ft. 5 .to % 41/40 sq.ft. sq.ft. 4.I 446 sq.ft.• .. G.7 % '01 " 1O sq.ft. (4 t % ;DATE 92.9'9 ? ZON CASE NO. ADDRESS Fb+ztt.l6-tta APPLICANT" N. ) iF CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE. PAD AREA RESIDENCE <f:Ir#4Ir) GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ._ sq.ft. 41416 sq.ft. o sq.ft. sq.ft. GAv - sq.ft. - sq.ft. OTHER .. .. „- sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 61 t 7 �,�' sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 45.7 % „ , PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA .. RESIDENCE GARAGE . . STABLE (BARN) POOL .. _, . RECREATON COURT GAIT' ttta-l`. A.n 3316,0E7 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. /Coe> sq.ft. c.-,. boo !'ff-.��it sq 4TY . $Oo -. __'ieo_o .-ft, :fit, b°o 7. ft. _...._boo 01..�..,. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 9560 sq.ft. 2.9.3 % • City ofieolliny PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: r`\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. olot.) N6- it 11,4,45 Tpitar Logr ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL • REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 fit•4ee4j4 '1,4k1 041 --fcg•rurziets.41 fzel, • 92.9 I AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: C-42.1 I $40 r.r-Det4DC) (sio) a44-M7 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT_ Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is perrriitte in the -zone. elk lee 2.777 •14sel/61/4 ,As Egmgrocit4Mv.er etp, i2.4.,8sYern cal4 5rAc-si__pmEamo 1b0,1 is cc:4442T I r.• ®Pr.nted on Recycled Rene,. the ro osed use be Co —atible with the uses in the surrounding area, and if so, why? • Will proposed P t1t.c.41N:42-+�l�s �zo ►-► em s 'RA \le. 1-4 I LA-0-4 rA4,1LI-nta. uem r4--142,410V I 14 GSG�11J1+c1.IC�S crn=0L14& Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be -consistent with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? 'iit'roicz wi IN._ 50. too tierp4/4104174- FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. .- • , • DATE 1 21.18zolp CASE NO. - BUILDING AREAS EXISTING NET LOT AREA 2-IS 72..1 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) CPO sq.ft. RESIDENCE 341 7. sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 6(00 sq.ft. STABLE 1.6e) sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( 11514i4 ) SERVICE YARD •(00 LL' HP-16 C-ecer144A tiON3Y., =74 op. _41.0 .1912) GARAGE • I SOD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. Ec1411. too si.fh • ADDRESS 111 FOPILierA SMit, APPLICANT SEAN CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE • TOTAL STRUCTURES (172.6 sq.ft. 11100 sq.ft. % STRUci4JRAL 3, I % +.4 % COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE rog• f' LI e"rrlotis DRIVEWAY PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS POOL DECKING INLMpp TOTAL FLATWORK % TOTAL FLATWORK- COVERAGE ' TOTAL FriUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL COVERAGE . • " 10120Cosq.ft. •▪ sq.ft. I e4o sq.ft. 2 flocs sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. II $44.5 sq.ft. & FLATWORK I 2•1666sq.ft. sq.ft. I % (21005 sq.ft. % PROPOSED TOTAL • sq.ft. 2.6 1121 sq.ft. sq.ft.- 33ppo b sq.ft. sq.f•61395 sq.ft. 91 8 ISO 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. - sq.ft. 64,0 sq.ft. sq.ft. WOO sq.ft. sq.ft. 77C00 sq.ft. sq.ft. 10 0 sq.ft. boo eal. f. sq.ft. • 7. 5 % " .3 % 142M sq.ft. 41#240 sq.ft. sq.ft. 446 sq.ft. 0.7 % '015/0 sq.ft. ( 4/2- % DATE ¶ 19'9 ZO CASE NO. ADDRESS IF W+ztz.leu APPLICANT Itl.V KFF It r CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE (ri GARAGE.. STABLE (BARN), POOL r-\ RECREATION COURT OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO.-1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO., 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE .r'\ sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 460 sq.ft. POOL RECREATION COURT ( ' .14J l3 ) #704Cae, sq.ft. oY;BY, . • ,. Boo .ft. boo I..R.. i16/L5 sq.ft. +14-16 _ sq.ft. / O sq.ft. _ - sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 4s.7 % 3316,015 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON FAD NO.-2 % . BUILDING PAD COVERAGE sq.ft. el 56C,sq.ft. 29!3_. %_ City 0/ leo/tiny .Alt PROPERTY OWNER: OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: REOUEST FOR HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT “12-• fit461441/41,4 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 ••• f‘P"mete'avaio tzP PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: 5A1/44,Az. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. ia4)1,40) Ner 1 ILLS 1,01,T , Lot (05.A ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: cp.'• cl.imorzsg.sv\! 11140 a t40. 1.05 ikr-Ixt41)0 cik 490 yin (310) 6 44 - P NATURE OF PROPOSE) PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use and under what Section of the Zoning Ordinance the conditional use is permitted in the zone. f.) 15 cextrer • ' ' (i)Pnnted on Recycled Pao.:,. ti• Will the proposed use be cT1• patible with the uses in the surrounding area, and if so, why? %.1.4kwri t•1�i�18ow1.l6, tIzelorpzins ��:►ii..� �x�� �i•n� , use -- IIJ smoKllltr I. • Will the grant of this Conditional Use Permit be consistent. with and in furtherance of the public health safety and general welfare? i MCV. .1(ti!1 I44T,CI- FILING FEE A filling fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. • DATE &LON. CASE NO. ADDRESS Folztul�t�i APPLICANT it EdQM CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING NET LOT AREA 2IS (7'2..1 . sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) 33! 00 $ sq.ft. RESIDENCE ,315 sq.ft. GARAGE ( Sitd sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA ... 5410 sq:ft. STABLE, . --- 4615 sq:ft. RECREATION COURT ( 1151141M ) SERVICE YARD ! (00 sq.ft. WO sq.ft. PROPOSED „ TOTAL sq:ft. '2..I 117;1 sq.ft. sq.ft. 33(O $ sq.ft. b 4 9 s sq.ft. l 206400 +60 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 7ec o sq.ft. sq.ft. cerft. boo Boo'4:f}. TOTAL STRUCTURES (// 2.6 sq.ft. 1:+00 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL'PAD COVERAGE '?LIBC"IoN.s DRIVEWAY ' PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 3.I % 4.4 % 3%_- PI sq.ft. 640 sq.ft. POOL DECKING I no, M. sq.ft. IN.t-LIpt✓p l►1 ADoM. TOTAL FLATWORK I I , Mb sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 6.5 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE I % 1Cj(o6sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE %. (O % 15.0 -% 2.10S sq.ft. -�- sq.ft. (2.'00',.�" sq.ft. 5 .(4% sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 6-1C00. sq.ft. 0 0 sq.ft. I10,12� 7. 5 % sq.ft. 29.3 % 1_0_12M sq.ft. tdf GJ sq.ft. r sq.ft. sq.ft. 0.7 % DI 5'70 sq.ft. l4.'. % DATE 9' 2.9 ' e zow CASE NO. _ ADDRESS fbb't'U tl t� APPLICANT Ilk.' M S 1III CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA ! 6 2E sq.ft. RESIDENCE (reerrittorr): — 4-1+16 __sq.ft. GARAGE , 1 ,2.D 0 sq.ft. ::.STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ., _ sq.ft. ( OTHER. sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 Of f'7 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 4-5.7 PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD'AREA RESIDENCg GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT 1-tex o�BY 33161,0E> sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 460. sq.ft. `]G•C)b sq.ft. �,�t•..�. 13oo e• t. : _...Boo - .•ft. __boo TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDIN PAD COVERAGE 1560 sq.ft. 29.3 % PROPERTY OWNER OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW liass4//V /054. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. VQL L /n/' �< L 5 (it/)"C-7 .Lol' /U 3 _A_ ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE PARCEL AGENTS NAME: AGENTS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: Cif/ SS 4-J/Vie31,sdA/ / 5 40 S?) 077 } i i.z , 4 4.€/ A/o. 23 3 �P NDD c7}, G .277_ NATURE OF PROPOSED PROJECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: pp/77 J )CT'. .S77 • T7t/A7X/ 'SITE PLAN REVIEW CR TERIA • Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. /474,k// G1/. /.f%30/e/lc. i`W , i/ ' S/M/ "92 . 77 12 S 4-Lz-ozeJ /X/ 7?7 C/7 7, �/V/'/.L 0�,.//v,,3-A / S . . B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. 7 ' ' W/ - A/0 6/P/94)//r//?1t/r C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and'extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. C ' t'/A/ , D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the niral character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. T /1//-6- X,E 14/,/ %E 547. o C/ _: . • • 'E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed mpares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. (/VO DPP (77(D/AL ' , P}-40)- t 7`(6. P/9-,0 CoVeiies • 77t /'/2ZpoS 0 p7/77 ) •( .'. F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, ' landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. . &) i //1,7'T 7 'L ✓ 7e55T H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluati n to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information presented arerued ' rred to the best of my knowledge and belief. P ,f' ;, ,/ r�J, ��' ..f r.rr :s' Date: ! � ` � °� �..� � `��f<: r t., °`" Signature For: Applicant 0� 0 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING .r.(\ HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). • The 'land development.pertnit process of the City and the RHCA are completely I vv. independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and .2. the RHCA to develop property. in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the ---- RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that_the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. -- Executed at 7:4›. Iticrtiestissfe. tVr4/.4 this dayof ftlirViatiargie..., By - By: , California. itk t4o, rchtuizeues1060 • Address OC1441•i6. - city OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under.penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at $40. this 'L.lit day of • By: By: Address go California, ,19 1$ -- NOTE: Thte"Qwner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: eft . �'l�5�.#Ji4 Si-64.111.4 REPRESENTATIVE:G 05 CtINDLRSC cA4Noei COMPANY NAME: atireor __ COMPANY ADDRESS: fretaphipt 5-poi cA 9°1'31 COMPANY PHONE NO..(310 1644 • $887 PROJECT ADDRESS: WO. ..024 fbiLlUCLItre. DATE FILED FEE: RECEIPT NO: BY:. ZONING CASE NO: TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: ,Zr.71`Ne. 0 1ae v Date Filed • • City 0/ leo/ling _WA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) 7 dq I GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant(s) / 1A 7,14 sSr A/ '/74/7&f Tel. (3/0) S32 `2.9/ Address 28 Fb t ug.0 S` c $EWz2 J9 • 2. Legal Owner(s) `9'5 Address '_ /'e 45 /7,55o,y,• 1. INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Zoning Case No. `g7 3. Project Address Tel. ( ) Assessor's Book No. Lot No. 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 5. Existing zoning districtS- 6. Proposed project/use of site /x./ -.W !0-h 11/( i% �(f rcS� Cam/}-NA- �, T-15�/s �v1er- 7. Site size 2 541 0?)0 S. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8. Net lot area 2/Si 772 ?7- . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of a lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 10. Number of floors of construction 11. Basement square footage 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? rho 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? 5-05-98 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper • • 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? A(/ 17. Grading quantites shall be balanced. Amount cut 240 G-r. Amount fill 20o GY (Include any basement cut in grading quantities.) 18. Area of disturbance. 40% maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet Percentage of Net Lot Area 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 2.3 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. i 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. S / / A-, � Y/��/ C c'r1- OIL,/ii//i-i✓G5 C w STA70GT0'S) Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Ma HQ ❑ Er 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. ❑ 4 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. ❑ 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. -2- • • o ❑ pr o o ❑ �] o ❑ tfJ 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing draining patterns. 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. /YEA( Grc/-57,CA- A-M (z3fiy-. 39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. / r �r%� / GJ/7 - / 770/v'-'L_ C0/ l�C / C 44UA-5T ® / /24 5 5`T X. %7=1V/Y/.s -3- • • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: VI. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). VII. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. VIII. 'Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriaterf there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IX. 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact.' The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V, "Earlier Analysis," above may be cross-referenced). X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above. Xl. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the 0 vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low-income or minority community)? I I . POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 population projections? Pottntially`t S gndicant; ';.: Mitfgaiion . ❑ ❑ ❑ J� ❑ ❑ ❑ /� ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ))/ ❑ ❑ ❑ O 44 -4- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 ❑ 0 housing? III. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? 0 0 0/v( b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 rri c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 /" d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 0 p e) Landslides or mudflows? 0 0 0 /❑ f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 0 0 Zi J conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? / g) Subsidence of the land? 0 0 0 J� h) Expansive soils? 0 0 0 //— i) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 0 ❑ y� IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: / a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 P/ or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related , 0 0 0 hazards such as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration 0 0 0 F( of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 C water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 0 jd' water movements? / f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0 h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 p" i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 �] groundwater otherwise available for public water / supplies? V. AIR QUAUTY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 an existing or projected air quality violation? No Impact /°( -5- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 9/ c) Atter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 l cause any change in climate? / d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0 VI. TRANSPORTAT1ON/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 f sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or / incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 ❑ ,C] nearby uses? / d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? 0 0 0 e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 ,P( f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 / alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 VI I. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal • result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 0 0 habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 p/ trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., 0 0 0 oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vemal 0 0 • 0 pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 ❑ XVIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 2( J inefficient manner? / c) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 ❑ hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? O 0 0 3 O 0 0 / -6- • c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? XI. PUBUC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? e) Other governmental services? XI I. UT1UTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? b) Communications systems? c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? e) Storm water drainage? f) Solid waste disposal? g) Local or regional water supplies? XI II. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? c) Create light or glare? XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? b) Disturb archaeological resources? c) Affect historical resources? d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? • Potentially Si ificant Potentialy Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 3/ o o o o o o )21' o o o �Y o o o /221 o o o o o o o o o Ia o o ❑ 71 o ❑ ❑ )72 o o o o ❑ ❑ // o o o " 23* ❑ ❑ ❑ , i' ❑ ❑ ❑ // ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q' ❑ ❑ ❑ -7- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 r,{ regional parks or other recreations facilities? /`" b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 V XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 the quality of the environment, substantially/4/ reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important example of the major period of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 5/ short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 individually limited, but cumulativelyYi considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects 0 0 0 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses 0 0 0 and state where they are available for review. / b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which 0 0 0 �J effects from the above checklist were within the / scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less 0 0 0 than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. -8- NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement ind'cating whether the project and any alternatives are Located on a site which is included on any such list, and all specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The developm nt project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursua t to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit - signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applic nt: 2. Address: 3. Phone Number: 4. Address of Site (street name and umber if available, and ZIP code): 5. Local Agency (city/county): 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date For Signature Applicant -9- overnment Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA • • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date For Signature Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and qpirrect to the best,of my knowledge and belief. 414 Signature Date le% 22. For forms\environm. 1998app Applicant ` - 10 -