80, Construct a pool & cabana in s, ApplicationPLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
• Application for a C a ga,.ol,ning:r
Variance from Zoning.Ordinance
The undersigned
Mark M. Friedman
Name
11 F1yin Mane Road
Street Address
Rolling Hills
City
2i)/ALe,„
•
377-4062
Telephone
xaa) is/are the owner(s) of
b) has permission of the owner
c) plaintiff
Legal description of property situated at #53 Southfield
Lot Tract
#11 Flying Mane Road, Rolling Hills, California
Street Address
petitions for
See Attached
I Such change is warranted because (state reasons) See Attached
11 Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or
extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally
to other property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
(state circumstances) See Attached
III Such change is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone because (s_ta.te reasons) RPP Attached
IV Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and
zone where property is located because See Attached
Plot Plan MUST accompany the application and must show:
a) the location of the (proposed) building on the property; and
b) the area(s) for which the variance is requested; and
c) the outside boundaries showing dimensions and easements.
Applicant or a representative must appear at the hearing.
Applications are considered at the regular meetings of the Planning Coiiutiission,
which are held the fourth Tuesday of each month. Applications must be submitted
to the Planning Commission Secretary no later than the first Monday of the
month in whichthe hearing is to be held.
A filing fee of $25.00 must accompany the application; make check payable
to THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS.
(If additional space is needed, use reverse side of sheet.)
•
4 NNING COMMISSION
CITY OF.BOLLING HILLS
Such change is warranted because the proposed indoor swimming
pool addition would be located parttally within the 10 foot'sideyard
setback on the south side of the property, .which already has the
required 10 soot utility easement.
Such change is further warranted by the exceptional condition
that the added easement would be basically unusable for a road or
a bridal path, because the steep slope below the brow of the hill
makes either use impractical.
Such change is further necessary for thepreservation of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same
vicinity for the following reasons:
1. the usuable space in the rear'of the present building
and the rest) ction of the building space is such that
the garden space is already limited. Moving inside
5 foot further would create 400 more square feet of
unusable space behind the proposed addition. This
would make the existing garden space even more limited.
2. it is necessary to place the swimming pool in its
proposed loaction in order to obtain a full 40 foot
length pool. Moving the proposed addition further
north would result in a shorter, less usable pool.
3. it is more desirable to locate the proposed addition
so that it will not project into the present view
from the existing building. .Please see the submitted
plot plan showing the existing view.
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in the vicinity
for the following reasons:
1. the proposed indoor pool addition is placed in a lo-
cation away from the street side of the house, and
it does not project into the view from the street
approach.
2. the proposed addition enlarging the existing house
will enhance the appearance of the house by being
consistent with the ranch house type construction.
This is made possible gy the proposed location which
affords an opportunity to ,lower the level of the pool
deck so that the enclosure can be kept low and in
conformity with the present ranch house construction.
3. the Purnell property, shown on the submitted plot
plan, is the only other building or improvement near
the proposed addition. The farther north the proposed
addition moves, the more the roof covering will pro-
ject into the present view area of the Purnell house.
Both lfr. and Mrs. Godfrey Purnell agree with this, and
they both indicate full approval of theproposed addition
and location, now submitted for your approval.