452, Bedroom addition into front ya, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsSS. 91-124'7455
(Individual)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF Los Angeles
On .Tnly 27. 1991
State, personally appeared Mi rhP1 P .1• . Mnttn1 a
onally known to me
(or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence), to be
the person Y wilme name -1 c
to the within instrument and acknowledged that cha
executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal
Signature
subscribed
before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
egeeN rmeeeeeeesseee saiki
OFFtCtAL SEAL
ANNETTE P. ALLEN �Q
NOTARY PUBLIC - CAUIFORNA , =
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Commission Exp. May 2. 1994
41 oeseeeeeeeesatessass
LE-76 (7/82)
(This area for official notarial seal)
A
jrOle
91 1f47455
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
RECORD I`OFtldtP RECORDS
REC rIDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
4 MIN.
PAST 8 A.M.AUG 9 1991
FEE $
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office
return to:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that
before recordation.)
Acceptance Form
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
and
the form be notarized
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO. n/
VARIANCE CASE NO. 45j Ce sda6:0A/ /1, . 9/- /3)
SITE PLAN REVIEW CASE NO.
I (We) the uncle 's. gned state:
I am (We .,b ) the owner(s). of the real property described as follows:
(Lat s/ — sir) 7 FL Ramie' /eoz/C
y�
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
Conditional Use Permit Case No.
O
Variance Case No. 452 (ge5O4P4v % .
Site Plan Review Case No.
I (ale) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct. -
(Where the owner .and applicant. are not the same, both must sign.)
Type or print
Applicant Name t-itekitSLI J. Nto I. I t51.--A
Address Lkeq (.i vv u.nCie E� 'rr,
City, State Dws+.s aeW94 ('A Ros71
Signature
Owner Name 4TmE
Address
..City; State
Signature
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement,.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT A ROOM ADDITION, AN ENTRY AREA,
AND AN ADDITION TO THE GARAGE IN ZONING CASE NO. 452.
THE'PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Ms. Michelle
Mottola with respect to real property located at 7 Flying Mane
Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 51-SF) requesting a Variance to*the front
yard setback to permit a room addition, an entry area, and an
addition to the garage to encroach into the front yard setback.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the application for Variances on April
16, 1991 and May 21,- 1991, and at a field trip visit on May 4,
1991.
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.060 is required to
construct a room addition, an entry area, and an addition to the
garage in the fifty (50) foot front yard setback. The applicant is
requesting additions that will encroach a maximum of twenty-seven
(27) feet into the front yard setback. The Planning Commission
finds:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is necessary because the existing legal
nonconforming residence was built within the front yard setback
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent
residences.
B. This Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same .vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
existing development pattern on the lot precludes the requested
additions from being built into the rear yard.
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
91-124'7455
RESOLUTION NO. 91-13
PAGE 2
Section 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the front
yard setback to construct a room addition, an entry area, and an
addition to the garage to a maximum of 27 feet as indicated on the
Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the
conditions contained in Section 5. The Planning Commission also
finds that the project conforms with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt
from environmental review.
Section 5. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in
Section 4, as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, is subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Variance shall expire unless used within one. year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110
of the Municipal Code.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance
approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit
shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall
lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice
to cease such violation and has failed to 'do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone
in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the Development Plan on file marked Exhibit A
except as otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. The garage shall be screened on the north side property
line with drought -tolerant landscaping approved by the landscaping
consultant.
F. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling
Hills Community°Association.Architectural Review Committee prior to
the issuance of any building or grading permit.
G. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the
development plan approved with this application.
.H. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions• of this Variance, pursuant to Section 17.32.087,
or the approval shall not be effective. 91_124'7455
RESOLUTION NO. 91-13
PAGE 3
I. All conditions of this Variance approval, except for
Paragraphs (D) and (E), must be complied with prior to the issuance
of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 30TH DAY OF MAY, 1991.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DIANE SAWYER, DEPUTY 6ITY CLERK
91--124'7455
.RESOLUTION NO.. ,91-13
PAGE 4
The foregoing Resolution No. 91-13 entitled:
'A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT A ROOM ADDITION, AN ENTRY AREA,
AND AN ADDITION TO THE GARAGE IN ZONING CASE NO. 452.
was approved and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting of the
Planning Commission on May 30, 1991 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS FROST, HANKINS, LAY, RAINE AND CHAIRMAN
ROBERTS
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
\\
DEPUTY CXTY CLERK
91-1247455
rigamq
SEP 1 3 1991
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
^/ tfffffl44411gff,