455, 12 foot garage addition at the, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsGENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of
91-1477133
C% /t' 7/9
County of 4os �f1%C�Gr=S
°FACIALS.
PEGGY R. MINOR
Notary Public -California
LOS ANGELES COUNN
My Commission Expires
August 23,1993
On this the 17aday of
=5-&---%799/before me,
. ,/ /iUo ,2
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
S� -P,
/2Ypersonally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) / S subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that ale executed it.
WITNESSp hand and official seal.
Notary's Sign
)
)
}
7110 122
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91364
10 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECOI'DS
RECORDER'S OFFICE
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
4 MIN.
PAST. 8 A•M.SEP 19 Eel
RECORDING REQUEoTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
.91 1477133
Recorder's Use
M FEE $14
i
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF-CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
ss
ZONING CASE NO. .54fr
I (We) the undersigned state:
SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as
follows:(2e-- 6o -- --Scv) /0 i'GyONo• Af4A/ ' /24,4D
This property is'the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in
said
ZONING CASE NO. 4J SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
(Where the owner and the applicant are not the same, both must
sign).
TYPE OR PRINT
Applicant Owner A'? 4///ve
Address Address / /`1L//M) /M E
City/State
s L.Q- t a `
TYPE OR PRINT /? ie /Z RffiAG2ek
City/State / i/4/K? ////L. '
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT A BAY WINDOW ADDITION AND AN
ADDITION TO THE GARAGE IN ZONING CASE NO. 455.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs.
August Rihaczek with respect to real property located at 10 Flying
Mane Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 60-B-SF) requesting a Variance to the
front yard setback to permit a bay window addition and an addition
to the garage to encroach into the front yard setback.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the application for Variances on June
25, 1991 and July 16, 1991, and at a field trip visit on July 13,
1991.
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar
properties. A Variance to Section 17.16.060 is required to
construct a bay window addition and an addition to the garage in
the fifty (50) foot front yard setback. The applicant is
requesting additions that will encroach a maximum of twenty-four
(24) feet into the front yard setback. The Planning Commission
finds:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances
and conditions applicable to the property and the intended use that
do not apply generally to the other property in the same vicinity
and zone. The Variance is necessary because the existing legal
nonconforming residence was built within the front yard setback
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent.
residences.
B. This Variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the
property in question. The Variance is necessary because the
existing development pattern on the lot precludes the requested
additions from being built into the rear yard.
C. The granting of this Variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in the vicinity or zone in which the property is
located. Development on the pad will allow a substantial portion
of the lot to remain undeveloped.
91a-14'7'7133
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 91-20
PAGE 2
Section 4. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance to encroach into the front
yard setback to permit an encroachment to a maximum of 24 feet into
the front yard to construct a bay window addition (16 square feet)
and an addition to the garage (120 square feet) as indicated on the
Development Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A subject to the
conditions contained in Section 5. The Planning Commission also
finds that the project conforms with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt
from environmental review.
Section 5. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in
Section 4, as indicated on the Development Plan attached hereto and
incorporated herein as Exhibit A, is subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Variance shall expire unless used within one year
from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.32.110
of the Municipal Code.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance
approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit
shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall
lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice
to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone
in which the subject property is located must be complied with
unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the Development Plan on file marked Exhibit A
except as otherwise provided. in these conditions.
E. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling
Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to
the issuance of any building or grading permit.
F. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building 'and Safety fur plan check review must conform to the
development plan approved with this application.
G. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance
of all conditions of this Variance, pursuant to Section 17.32.087,
or the approval shall not be effective.
91-1477133
RESOLUTION NO. 91-20
PAGE 3
H. All conditions of this Variance approval, except for the
maintenance requirement of Paragraph D, must be complied with prior
to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of
Los Angeles
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 20TH DAY. OF AUGUST, 1991.
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
ATTEST:
DIANE SAWYER, DEPUTY CI CLERK
The foregoing Resolution No. 91-20 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO PERMIT A BAY WINDOW ADDITION AND AN
ADDITION TO THE GARAGE IN ZONING CASE NO. 455.
was approved and adopted at a regular adjourned meeting of the
Planning Commission on August 20, 1991 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Frost, Hankins, Lay, Raine;
Chairman Roberts
None
None
ABSTAIN: None
DEPUTY CITY CLERK `\
�1�l4-77I33