416, Construct a new tennis court, Resolutions & Approval ConditionsRESOLUTION NO. 91-9
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A
MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 90-32
APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 416
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and
Mrs. Craig Caldwell with respect to real property located at
1 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-1-MS) and real property located at
3 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-MS) in the City of Rolling Hills
requesting a modification to a condition of approval for lot line
adjustment. The modification requested is to extend the allow-
able time period to remove the existing structure on 3 Georgeff
Road.
Section 2. The Commission considered this item at its
meeting on April 6, 1990 at which time information was presented
indicating that the extension of time is necessary so as to
formalize documents evidencing the adjustment and was caused in
part due to a change in the original timetable for the sale of 3
Georgeff Road.
Section 3. Based upon information and evidence
submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend paragraph C
of Section 8 of Resolution 90-32 to read as follows, subject to
the condition contained in Section 4:
"C. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall
not be issued until the existing residential
structure located at 3 Georgeff Road is removed.
Removal of such structure shall occur within
twelve (12) months of the approval of this
Resolution."
Section 4. The approval of the extension to the time
period of paragraph C of Section 8 of Resolution 90-32 as
specified in Section 3 of this Resolution is subject to the
condition that the trellis structure constructed on Lot 57-A-1-MS
for purposes of screening parked vehicles be removed by June
30, 1991 (as previously required by paragraph B of Section 8 of
Resolution 90-32) or the extension to the time period of
paragraph C as specified in Section 3 of this Resolution shall
automatically be withdrawn and shall cease to have any effect.
03/27/91 eeh 1680468
Section 5. Except as herein amended,
Resolution 90-32 shall continue to be in full
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16
April, 1991.
ATTEST:
�9tPv�`i CITY CLERI
the provisions of
force and effect.
day of
Allan Roberts, Chairman
03/27/91 eeh 1680468
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 91-9
PAGE 3
The foregoing Resolution No. 91-9 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION
NO. 90-32 APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR
LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 416.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning
Commission on April 16, 1991 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS FROST, LAY, RAINE AND CHAIRMAN ROBERTS
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: HANKINS
ABSTAIN: NONE
DEPUTY CITY CLERK`
PARTNERSHIP ACKNOWLEDGMENT
NO. 203
:e!i5
State of California
County of
Los Angeles
OFFICIAL SEAL
}
SS•
SIVA A. TI)IASOSOPO
NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Commission Exp. Aug.16, 1991 =
Notary's Signature
On this the 7t11 day of
November
Siva A. Tuiasosopo
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Craig Edward Caldwell
1922, before me, 11
V
personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) who executed the within instrument on behalf of the
partnership, and acknowledged to me that the partnership executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
.OurZi' (1. �d2ic�oa��,il
7130122 NATIClNAI NU)TARY ASSOCIATION • 24f112 Venhv.t 11I'd • PO Rox 4)5 • tv �,u...•t iism- O1 .-
For Recorder's use
•
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND HAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized
before recordation.)
Acceptance Form
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO.
VARIANCE CASE NO. 416 (Resolution #90-32)
SITE PLAN REVIEt7 CASE NO.
416 (Resolution #90-32)
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s), of the real property described as follows:
#1 Georgeff Road & #3 Georgeff Road, Rolling 1-Iills, CA 90274
( Lot 57-A-1-riS ) ( Lot 57-A-MS )
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
`Conditional Use Permit Case No.
Variance Case No. 416 (Resolution #90-32)
Site Plan Review Case No.
416 (Resolution #90-32)
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct:
(Where the owner .and applicant.are not the same, both must sign.)
Type or print
Applicant Name
Address
City, State
Signature
Owner Nam
This signature must
be acknowledged by a
notary public. Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
4L TA-'-1... JSCC)
Address
6 ev..y r iC
City, State y4o1/�,�., J,/ /is
Signatur:'2 �_ , _-�.
RESOLUTION No. qn-32.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLINO HILLS APPROVING A
VARIANCE TO THE MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE
REQUIREMENTS AND APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF
COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING
CASE NO. 416
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
.DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
section L. An application was filed by Mr. and
Mrs. Craig Caldwell with respect to real property located at
1 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-1-MS) and real property located at
3 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-MS) in the City of Rolling Hills
requesting a variance to reduce the required lot frontage for the
two lots created by the proposed lot line adjustment and request-
ing a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Line Adjustment to move
the side lot line dividing these two lots so that a portion of
existing Lot 57-A-MS (3 Georgeff Road) is placed into Lot
57-A-1-MS (1 Georgeff Road).
,g gtion a. Tho Planning Commission conducted a duly -
noticed publio hearing to consider the applications on
January 16, 1990, February 20, 1990, April 18, 1990, June 19,
2990, July 17, 1990, August 21, 1990, September 15, 1990 and
September 18, 1990, and conducted a field site review on February
10, 1990 and June 30, 1990.
section . Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning 0rdinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstance$
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of
a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar prop-
erties. Section 16.16.040 requires each lot to have a minimum
frontage of 150 feet along a street easement line.
findings:
Section 4. The Planning Commission makes the following
A. Special circumstances exist in that the total
street easement frontage for the two lots combined is legs than
25 feet, thereby making it impossible to comply with the zoning
ordinance even for one lot. The two lots were created in 1956 to
permit two (2) residences on the original larger parcel. Numbor
1 Georgeff, as it exists today, has no direct access to any
street making it unique in the immediate area.
B. Application of the 150-foot lot frontage require-
ment would deny the owner all use of both lots. The condition
constituting a variance to the code already exists.
C. The granting of a variance would not constitute a
special privilege because the configuration of the lots as
originally approved is unique. The variance would permit the
owner the use and enjoyment of his property in a manner consis-
tent with the present use of the property.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the variance to the minimum
lot frontage requirement to permit a 22.5 foot frontage for Lot
57-A-1-MS (1 Georgeff Road) and no frontage for Lot 57-A-MS (3
Georgeff Road) as indicated on the lot line adjustment map
attached hereto ao Exhibit A, subject to the conditions set
forth in Section S of this Resolution.
;?ection 6. California Government Code section 66412(d)
authorizes minor lot line adjustments without requiring a tenta-
tive map, parcel map or final map if:
A. the lot line adjustment involves two or more
existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken
from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel;
B. a greater number of parcels than originally
existed is not thereby created;
C. the lot line adjustment will create parcels
that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and
D. the lot line adjustment is approved by the
City.
Section 7. The Planning Commission finds that:
A. The proposed lot line adjustment will create
two lots that will comply with the minimum lot size requirements.
Lot 57-A-1-MS (1 Georgeff Road) will cover a net 7.61 acres after
excluding easements and Lot 57-A-1-MS (3 Georgeff Road) will
cover a net 2.06 acres after excluding easements. The lots
comply with Section 17.16.020, imposing a minimum lot size of 2
acres excluding easemonts.
8. The two parcels created by the lot line
adjustment will conform to local zoning and building ordinances
because Lot 57-A-MS and Lot 57-A-1-MS have been granted a vari-
ance pursuant to Section 5 of this► Resolution with regard to the
minimum lot frontage requirement.
--2-
900918 l:j 1680276 (2)
C. Conditions have bean imposed upon approval of
this lot line adjustment to ensure that the parcels created will
conform to local zoning and building ordinances. These condi-
tions require that the existing trellie structure constructed for
recreational vehicle parking and which is located on Lot
57-A-1-MS will be brought into compliance with local zoning and
building ordinances, and that each lot will have lawful vehicular
access off of Georgeff Road.
$ectipr� g. Based upon the foregoing findings, the
Planning Commission hereby approves a Certificate of Compliance
for a lot line adjustment for Lote 57-A-MS and 57-A-1-MS pursuant
to California Government Code Section 66412(d) as indicated on
the attached lot line adjustment map attached hereto ag
Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions:
A. A Grant of Driveway Easement shall be
prepared and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's
Officer with respect to Lots 57-A-1-MS (1 Georgeff Road) and
57-A-MS (3 Georgeff Road) to reserve for the benefit of Lot
57-A-MS a non-exclusive appurtenant easement for driveway
purposes over a portion of Lot 57-A-1.-MS. A conformed copy of
the recorded easement shall be filed with the City's Principal
Planner prior to the issuance of the City's Certification of Lot
Line Adjustment. The easement shall be configured in such a
manner as to ensure that the intersection of the driveway access
for Lot 57-A-MS and the street easement is located upon Lot 57-A-
1-MS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Easement referred to
above may be removed by the owners of the subject property if the
Rolling Hills Community Association provides written notice to
the City of its approval of driveway access to Lot 57-A-MS
directly to that Lot from the street easement.
B. The applicant shall obtain the approval of
the Rolling Hills Community Association, the County of Los
Angeles Department of Building and Safety and all other necessary
permits and approvals required by law to legally maintain the
existing trellis structure constructed for purposes of screening
parking vehicles, which are located on Lot 57-A�1-MS. If all
required approvals are not obtained within 90 days of the
approval of this Resolution, the structure shall be removed
within 30 days thereafter.
C. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall
not be issued until the existing residential structure located at
3 Georgeff Road is removed. Removal of such structure shall
occur within six (6) months of the approval of this Resolution.
D. The variance approval shall expire if not
used in one year from the effective date of approval as defined
and specified in Section 17.32.110 of the Municipal Code.
-3-
900918 L•1 1680276 (2)
E. Any modifioations to the lot line adjustment
approved by the Planning Commission shall require the filing of
an application for modification of the lot line adjustment and
must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission.
F. The applicant shall execute an affidavit of
acceptance of all conditions pursuant to Section 17.32.087 or
thie variance and lot line adjustment shall not be effective.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED thin Gth day of
October , 1990.
Allan Roberts, Chairman
ATTEST!
1
0J o5
City Clerk'
-4-
900918 Isj 1680276 (2)
GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
NO. 201
t
4Stateof California
t
t
t
County of
Los Angeles
SS.
OFFICIAL SEAL
SIVA A. TIJIASOSOPO
NOTARY PIJBLIC - CALIFORNIA
PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN
LOS ANGELES COUNTY
My Commission Exp. Aug 16, 1991
On this the 7th day of November
Siva A. Tuiasosopo
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Craig Edward Caldwell
C personally known to me
❑ proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) i s
within instrument, and acknowledged that
WITNESS my hand and
0 yyofff'iciii'nallseal.
pJi
Notary's Signature
He
19 90, before me,
subscribed to the
executed it.
7110 122
NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION • 23012 Ventura Blvd. • P.O. Box 4625 • Woodland Hills, CA 91365-4625
1
For Recorder'se
1
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO:
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please.record this form with the -Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to:
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized
before recordation.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )
Acceptance Form y
..Craig Caldwell
1 Georgeff Road
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CASE NO: 416
VARIANCE CASE NO. 416
SITE PLAN R�VIE11 CASE NO. 416
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s)• of'the real property described as follows:
#1 Georgeff Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
-f
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware o'f, and accept, all the stated conditions in said
Conditional Use Permit Case No. 416
Variance Case No. 416
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty. of perjury that the
foregoing is true'and correct. -
(Where the owner and applicantare not the same, both must sign:)
Type or print
Applicant Name
Address
City, State
Signature
Owner N
' Address
City, State dC,//; , J/rl/s.
Signatur
This signature must rC%
be acknowledged by a
notary public. •Attach
appropriate acknowledgement.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 90-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR
COOKING/KITCHEN FACILITIES IN A PAVILION/CABANA, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PAVILION/CABANA, AND A
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A PAVILION/CABANA IN
ZONING CASE NO. 416
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES
HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Craig
Caldwell with respect to real property located at 1 Georgeff Road,
Rolling Hills (Lot 57-A-1-MS) requesting a variance to install
Cooking/Kitchen facilities in a Pavilion/Cabana, a Conditional Use
Permit to construct and maintain a detached Pavilion/Cabana on said
property and for Site Plan Review approval of the proposed
Pavilion/Cabana.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed
public hearing to consider the application on January 16, 1990,
February 20, 1990, April 18, 1990, June 19, 1990 and July 17, 1990
and conducted a field site review on February 10, 1990(and June 30,
1990.
Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit
approval of a variance form the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances
applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar
properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a
parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties.
Section 17.16.012 (G) prohibits cooking or kitchen facilities in a
cabana. The applicant is requesting to install cooking/kitchen
facilities in the proposed Pavilion/Cabana.
findings:
Section 4. The Planning Commission makes the following
A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property or the intended use that do not
apply generally to the other property or class or use in the same
vicinity and zone because due to the development pattern of the
property, the location of the pavilion/cabana structure is far
removed from the residence.
B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property
in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in
question because granting of the variance will not be a special
privilege since the subject site is large and can accommodate
detached accessory structures that have been commonly constructed in
the neighborhood.
C. The granting of the variance would not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or
improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is
located because the.improvements will not visually impact the
surrounding properties, and other conditions have been incorporated
to address potential impacts.
Section 5. Based on the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 416 to
permit installation of cooking/facilities within a detached pavilion/
cabana structure which is accessory to an existing tennis court as
indicated in the Development Plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the
conditions set forth in Section 11 of this Resolution.
Section 6. Section 17.16.012 (G) of the Municipal Code
requires a Conditional Use Permit to construct and maintain a
detached 1,164 square foot, one story pavilion/cabana structure which
is accessory to an existing tennis court.
Section 7. The Planning Commission makes the following
findings:
A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning
Ordinance and General Plan; and be desirable to the public
convenience and welfare because the proposed
pavilion/cabana would have minimal impact to the site and
surrounding properties.since the pavilion/cabana will be
secluded from the house, surrounding residences and the
roadway. Further, existing landscaping that provides
screening will remain.
B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be
consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning
Ordinance and General Plan, because the proposed project
will be mostly an open structure, comply with the height
and setback requirements, and its size will not cause the
total lot coverage of all structures on the site to exceed
the twenty percent maximum structural lot coverage.
Further the project required minor grading to create a
grading pad that is cut into the ground , and thereby will
be compatible with the site and surrounding properties.
Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning
Commission hereby approves the Conditional Use Permit for Zoning Case
No. 416 to construct and maintain a pavilion/cabana as indicated on
the development plan submitted with the application and incorporated
herein by reference as Exhibit A subject to the conditions set forth
in Section 11 of this Resolution.
•
Section 9. Section 17.34.010 requires a development plan
to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building
or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition,
alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve
changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or
structure by more than twenty-five (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month
period.
Section 10. The Planning Commission makes the following
findings of fact:
A. The proposed development is compatible with the General
Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the
proposed structure complies with the General Plan
requirement of low profile, low density, residential
development with sufficient open space between surrounding
structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback
and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square
foot area of 203,369 square feet. The proposed
pavilion/cabana existing residence, garage, swimming pool,
future stable, service yard and tennis court will have
20,909 square feet which constitutes 10.3% of the lot,
which is substantially less than the maximum 20% structural
lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including
paved areas and driveway will be 39,989 square feet which
equals 19.7% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum
overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is
similar and compatible with neighboring development
patterns.
B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into
the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing
natural topographic features of the lot including
surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage
courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)
because extensive grading for the pavilion/cabana structure
was not required and no further mature trees will be
removed. Further, the applicant will be undertaking
restorative landscaping requirements that have been
mandated by the Planning Commission. Further, additional
conditions of approval have been imposed accordingly.
C. The development plan follows natural contours of the
site to minimize grading because the project will be
constructed upon an existing building pad, thereby
requiring no extensive grading.
D. The development plan preserves surrounding native
vegetation and supplements it with landscaping that is
compatible with and enhances the rural character of the
community. The applicant, as part of this approval, shall
restore compatible landscaping on the property as
prescribed by the Commission through conditions of
approval.
E. The development plan substantially preserves the
natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing
building coverage because construction will occur at a
secluded place on the site and as indicated in paragraph A,
the structural lot coverage is substantially less than that
is permitted.
F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and
mass with the site and as indicated in paragraph A, lot
coverage maximum will not be exceeded since the subject
property is very large and can accommodate the proposed
pavilion/cabana structure.
G. The proposed development is sensitive and not
detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for
pedestrians and vehicles because the pavilion/cabana will
be secluded and removed from the roadway beyond required
setbacks.
H. The project conforms with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically
exempt from environmental review.
Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings, the
Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application
for Zoning Case No. 416 for a proposed pavilion/cabana on the
property located at 1 Georgeff Road as indicated on the development
plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A and subject to the following
conditions:
A. The variance for the cooking/kitchen facilities within
the pavilion/cabana structure shall expire if not used in
one year from the effective date of approval as defined and
specified in Section 17.32.110 of the Municipal Code.
B. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire unless used
within one year from the date of the Permit is granted.
This approval, as indicated on "Exhibit A", is for an open
pavilion/cabana, with exception of the cooking/kitchen and
bathroom areas that are enclosed. As agreed by the owner,
should the pavilion/cabana be fully enclosed without
approval from the City, said structure shall be removed by
the owner and the Conditional Use Permit shall be void.
C. If any provision of the Conditional Use Permit is held
or declared to be invalid, the permit shall be void and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse.
D. It is declared and made a condition of the Permit that
if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be
suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall
lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written
notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for
a period of thirty (30) days.
E. All requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and of the
zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or
shown otherwise on an approved plan.
F. The lot shall be developed and maintained in
substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked
Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these
conditions.
G. Renting, leasing or any commercial use of the
pavilion/cabana is prohibited.
H. A landscaping plan must be submitted to the City of
Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for approval. The
plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of
the Site Plan Review Ordinance. A bond in the amount of
the cost estimate for the landscaping plus 15% may be
required to be posted and retained with the City for not
less than two years after landscape installation. The
retained bond will be released by the City after the City
Manager (or the landscape Committee of the Rolling Hills
Community Association, if appointed to act for this purpose
in place of the City Manager) determines that the
landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan
as approved, and that such landscaping is properly
established and in good condition.
I. The "Rosea" ground cover on the easterly slope shall be
within five (5) years from the approval date of this
Permit, be covered with landscaping consistent with the
rural character of the community or be removed, and subject
to approval from City Staff.
J. The walk way lights on the easterly slope, as indicated
on "Exhibit A", shall be removed, and all other exterior
lighting must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association and City Staff.
K. The applicant shall offer an easement for equestrian use
to the Rolling Hills Community Association over the
southeasterly corner area of the subject property.
L. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading
plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a
detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology,
soils and hydrology reports that conform to the Development
Plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be
submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff
for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the
City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. The
"as graded" plan and required reports shall be reviewed by
the County of Los Angeles prior to the issuance of a
grading permit.
M. The project must be reviewed and approved by the
Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review
Committee prior to the issuance of any building permit for
the proposed pavilion/cabana.
N. The working drawings submitted to the County Department
of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform
to the Development Plan approved with this application.
O. Any modifications to the project which would constitute
a modification to the Development Plan as approved by the
Planning Commission, shall require the filing of an
application for modification of the Development Plan
pursuant to Section 17.34.070 of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code.
P. Applicant shall execute an affidavit of acceptance of
all conditions pursuant to Section 17.32.087 or this Permit
shall not be effective.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of Aucrust , 1990.
Allan RoWerts, Chaijman
ATTEST:
(1/ R,)L_j Q�s ��pC�
�Ep j-r-j 1City Clerk