517, Construct a workshop addition,, CorrespondenceCi1 o/ /E'JA,, Jh//S
FAX & MAIL
March 8, 1995
Mr. Thomas A. Blair, AIA
Blair Associates
2785 Pacific Coast Highway, Suite E149
Torrance, CA 90505
SUBJECT: EXPORTATION OF SOIL
5 FLYING MANE ROAD
Dear Mr. Blair:
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
In response to your letter of March 8, 1995 and in accordance with Section 15.04.130
of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, this letter is to inform you that up to a
maximum of 50 cubic yards of soil along with the footings may be removed to
replace existing walls at the Gieszl residence at 5 Flying Mane Road.
Please call me if you have any further questions at (310) 377-1521. Your cooperation
is appreciated.
Sincerely,
LOLA M. UNGAR •
PRINCIPAL PLANK R
cc: Mr. Craig Nealis, City Manager
Mr. Rafael Bernal, Senior Engineering Building Inspector
Mr. and Mrs. Yale Geiszl
Printed on Recycled Paper.
EE`A(P ASSOCIATES
PHONE NO. : 310 791 4211 Mar. 08 1995 03:11PM P2
• •
3... BLAIR, A.I.A.
Ft_ :-iTE(_ r
Ms. Lola M. Ungar
Principal Planner
City of Rolling Hills
2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
Re: Gieszl Residence
#5 Flying Mane Road
Dear Ms. Ungar,
March 8, 1995
BLAIR
ASSOCIATES
ARCHITECTURE &
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
Construction has begun on the Gieszl residence addition and during the demolition of the
existing footing and retaining wall it was discovered that the footings of the existing walls
extended well beyond the normal footings. Also several very large rocks were found
behind the wall. This has resulted in the need to remove approximately 40 to 50 yards of
dirt along with the footings. Also by pulling out these very large footings, some larger
"pockets" were created which will require backfilling with sand or some other, competent
soil.
Please provide an approval to remove the dirt as required. We will be constructing the
new walls per plan and backfilling to replace the pre-existing grade as soon as they are
completed.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Since ly
\Tho as A. Blair,-A.LA.
Architect
cc: Yale & Elvie Gieszl
MAILING
2785 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, SUITE E149, TORRANCE, CA 90505
OFFICES
24423 HAWTHORNE BOULEVARD, TORRANCE, CA 90505
PHONE: (310) 791-4212 FAX: (310) 791.4211 ,
•
C1iy ol) ie0iit4 �aeP
CERTIFIED MAIL
October 18,1994
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Mr. and Mrs. Yale Geiszl
5 Flying Mane Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM,
ZONING CASE NO. 517, 5 FLYING MANE ROAD (LOT 50-SF)
RESOLUTION NO. 94-22
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Geiszl:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 517 was
APPROVED by the Planning Commission and the enclosed resolution was
approved on October 6, 1994 at an adjourned regular meeting. The Planning
Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting
on October 24; 1994.
The approval will become effective:
(1) Thirty (30) days after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution if no
appeals are filed within that time period (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling
Hills Municipal Code attached), AND
(2) An Affidavit of Acceptance Form and the subject resolution must be filed by
you with the County Recorder.
We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 94-22, specifying the conditions of
approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A
Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution,
please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the
signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and the Resolution to:
Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder
Real Estate Records Section
12400 East Imperial Highway
Norwalk, CA 90650
:i
Printed on Recycled Paper.
PAGE 2
Include a check in the amount of $7.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional
page.
The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue
permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions
of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met.
Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
SIN ELY,
LOLA UNGA
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
ENC: RESOLUTION NO.94-22, EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN, AFFIDAVIT OF
ACCEPTANCE FORM, AND APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS
MUNICIPAL CODE.
cc: Mr. Thomas A. Blair
• •
State of
County of
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: Recorder's Use
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274
Please record, this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and
return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
(The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be
notarized before recordation).
ACCEPTANCE FORM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
ZONING CASE NO. 517 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE X
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) the undersigned state:
I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as
follows:
5 Flying Mane Road (Lot 50-SF)
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
This property is the subject of the above numbered cases.
I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in
said
ZONING CASE NO. 517 SITE PLAN REVIEW
VARIANCE X
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct.
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Print
Owner
Name
Signature
Address
City/State
Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public.
On this the day of
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
S
19_, before me,
❑ personally known to me
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) subscribed to the
within instrument, and acknowledged that executed it.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Notary's Signature
See Exhibit "A" attached
hereto and made a part hereof
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 94-22
6x41'61T
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD
SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A WORKSHOP ADDITION,
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A PAINTED
WOOD FENCE, AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK
TO CONSTRUCT A GARDEN WALL AND PAINTED
WOOD FENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 517.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Applications were duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Yale Geiszl with
respect to real property located at 5 Flying Mane Road (Lot 50-SF) requesting a
Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to construct a workshop addition,
requesting a Variance to encroach into the front yard setback to construct a painted
wood fence, and requesting a Variance to encroach into the south side yard setback
to construct a garden wall and painted wood fence at an existing single family
residence.
Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public
hearing to consider the applications on August 16, 1994 and September 20, 1994, and
at a field trip visit on September 13, 1994.
Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class
1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15301(e)) and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality
Act.
Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal
Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the
Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to
the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent
the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by
similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard
setback for every residential parcel to be fifty (50) feet. The applicants are requesting
to construct an attached workshop addition plus enlargement of a bedroom and a
bath totaling 471 square feet. The workshop addition will encroach a maximum of
eleven (11) feet into the fifty (50) foot front yard setback. With respect to this request
for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows:
RESOLUTION NO.9422 •
PAGE 2
•
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence within allowable setbacks.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and» zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
there will not be any greater incursion into the front setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 517 to permit a workshop
addition to the residential structure to encroach a maximum of eleven (11) feet into
the front yard setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this
application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the
conditions specified in Section 10 of this Resolution.
Section 6. Section 17.16.110 requires a front yard setback for every residential
parcel to be fifty (50) feet. The applicants are requesting a Variance to encroach 17
feet into the 50 foot front yard setback to construct a 12 foot long, up to 4-foot high
painted wood fence. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence within allowable setbacks.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
there will not be any greater incursion into the front setback than already exists.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
RESOLUTION NO. 94-22 •
PAGE 3
•
Section 7. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 517 to permit a 12 foot long, up to
4-foot high painted wood fence to encroach up to 17 feet into the 50 foot front yard
setback, as indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 10 of this Resolution.
Section 8. Section 17.16.120(A)(1) requires a side yard of 20 feet in the RA-S-1
residential zone. The applicant is requesting a Variance to encroach up to 5 feet into
the 20 foot side yard setback to construct a 49 foot long, 3-foot high cement block
garden wall and a 7 foot long, 4-foot high painted wood fence that would replace an
existing garden wall. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning
Commission finds as follows:
A. There are exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions
applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply generally to the
other property or class of use in the same zone because the lot is long and narrow
and the building pad is located close to the street and adjacent residences. The
existing development pattern on the lot and the sloping rear portion precludes
continued expansion of the residence within allowable setbacks.
B. The Variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone,
but which is denied to the property in question. The Variance is necessary because
by allowing incursion into the south side yard, the new garden wall and painted
wood fence would conform with the new addition and replace the existing fencing.
C. The granting of the Variance would not be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity
and zone in which the property is located. Development on the pad will allow a
substantial portion of the lot to remain undeveloped.
Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission
hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 517 to permit a 49 foot long, 3-
foot high cement block garden wall and a 7 foot long, 4-foot high painted wood fence
to encroach a maximum of five (5) into the twenty foot south side yard setback, as
indicated on the development plan submitted with this application and
incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions specified in
Section 10 of this Resolution.
Section 10. The Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 5, the
Variance to the front yard setback approved in Section 7, and the Variance to the
side yard setback approved in Section 9 of this Resolution are subject to the
following conditions:
RESOLUTION NO. 94-22.
PAGE 4
•
A. The Variance approvals shall expire within one year from the effective
date of approval as defined in Section 17.38.070.
B. It is declared and made a condition of the Variance approvals, that if
any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the
privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been
given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of
thirty (30) days.
C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the
Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be
complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an
approved plan.
D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance
with the site plan on file dated July 5, 1994 and marked Exhibit A, except as
otherwise provided in these conditions.
E. Landscaping shall be provided to obscure the new additions but, shall
not encroach any more than already exists near the existing rural road at the south
side of the property.
F. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills
Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of
any building or grading permit.
G. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County
of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related
geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as
approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills
Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a
steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio.
H. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions
of these Variance and driveway modification approvals, or the approvals shall not
be effective.
I. All conditions of these Variance approvals must be complied with prior
to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DOF o CTOBER, 1994.
1
ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN
RESOLUTION NO. 94-22 •
PAGE5
ATTEST:
MARILYN°KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) SS
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 94-22 entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A
VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE FRONT YARD
SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A WORKSHOP ADDITION,
GRANTING A VARIANCE TO ENCROACH INTO THE
FRONT YARD SETBACK TO CONSTRUCT A PAINTED
WOOD FENCE, AND GRANTING A VARIANCE TO
ENCROACH INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK
TO CONSTRUCT A GARDEN WALL AND PAINTED
WOOD FENCE IN ZONING CASE NO. 517.
was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on
October 6, 1994 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Frost, Raine, Witte and Chairman Roberts
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Hankins
ABSTAIN: None
and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following:
Administrative Offices.
DEPUTY CI'f Y CLERK
i •
1734.010
17.54 APPEALS
17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals
A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this
Title may be appealed to the City Council. Alt appeals shall
be filed in writing with the City Clerk.
B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day
after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on
the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as
required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title.
C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a
resolution which approves or denies a development
application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a
report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council
may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take
jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City
Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning
Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council
completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions
of this Chapter.
17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal
Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of
the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with
the terms of this Chapter.
17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application
A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a
form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall
be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been
received by the City Clerk.
B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name
and address of the appellant, the project and action being
appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that
the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or
why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by
evidence in the record.
76
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
17.54.030
C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City
Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the
appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is
deficient. The appellant shall. correct the deficiency with an
amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of
receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal
application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee
will be returned to the applicant.
17.54.040 Request for Information
Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee,
the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to
transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire
proceeding before the Planning Commission.
17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing
Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a
hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing
of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for
the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard
at the same time.
17.54.060 Proceedings
A. Noticing
The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30.030 of
this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed:
1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed;
2. The appellant; and
3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written
comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of
the public hearing on the project.
B. Hearing
The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall
consider all information in the record, as well as additional
information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action
on the appeal.
77
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24, 1993
•
1734.060
C. Action
The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the
Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the
Council may remand the application back to the Planning
Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall
make findings to support its decision.
D. Finality of Decision
The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or
deny an application shall be final and conclusive.
E. Record of Proceedings
The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a
resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the
applicant or the appellant.
17.54.070 Statute of Limitations
Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by
the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing
is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and
discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of
facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in
any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within
the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure,
Section 1094.6
78
ROLLING HILLS ZONING
MAY 24. 1993
•ofieolYing
September 22, 1994
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Mr. and Mrs. Yale Gieszl
5 Flying Mane Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: Request for a Variance to construct a workshop addition that will
encroach into the front yard setback, request for a Variance to construct
a painted wood fence that will encroach into the front yard setback, and
request for a Variance to construct a garden wall and painted wood
fence that will encroach into the side yard setback at an existing single
family residence at 5 Flying Mane Road (Lot 50-SF).
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gieszl:
This letter shall serve as official notification that Zoning Case No. 517 was
APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on September 20,
1994.
The final Resolution and conditions of APPROVAL will be forwarded to you after
they are signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk.
The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their
regular meeting on October 24, 1994. You should also be aware that the decision of
the Planning Commission may be appealed within thirty (301 days after adoption of
the Planning Commission's Resolution (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills
Municipal Code).
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 to arrange an appointment or if you have any
questions regarding this matter. Your cooperation is appreciated
SincereL
tea �.
LOLA M. UNGAR
Z6y-ltr
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Mr. Thomas Blair, Blair Associates
Panted on Recycled Paper.
•City (Pelting ilitto
August 17, 1994
Mr. and Mrs. Yale Gieszl
5 Flying Mane Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SUBJECT: Request for a Variance to construct a workshop addition that will
encroach into the front yard setback, request for a Variance to construct
a painted wood fence that will encroach into the front yard setback, and
request for a Variance to construct a garden wall and painted wood
fence that will encroach into the side yard setback at an existing single
family residence at 5 Flying Mane Road (Lot 50-SF).
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gieszl:
We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of
your property to view a silhouette of the proposed project on Tuesday, September
13,1994.
The Planning Commission will meet at 6 PM at 12 Outrider Road and then proceed
to your project site. Do not expect the Planning Commission at 6 PM but, be assured
that the field trip will take place before 8:00 PM.
The site must be prepared with a full-size silhouette of ALL STRUCTURES of the
project showing the roof ridges and bearing walls and in accordance with the
enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines. The owner and/or representative
should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal.
Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
Enclosure: Silhouette Construction Guidelines
cc: Mr. Thomas Blair, Blair Associates
®Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
City Roiling
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(213) 377.1621
FAX: (213) 377.7288
SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES
1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a
silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the
week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City
Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for
a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning
Commission or City Council.
2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber.
Printed boards are not acceptable.
3. Bracing should be provided where possible.
4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to
delineate roof ridges and eaves.
5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire
or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed
construction.
6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete
silhouettes are constructed.
7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning
Department Staff at (213) 377-1521.
00
0.
SECTION
•
40
14
1.
_
00
4 lit
•
W.
PLAN
•
City o/ Rolling Jilin
STATUS OF APPLICATION
July 26, 1994
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
Mr. and Mrs. Yale Gieszl
5 Flying Mane Road
Rolling Hills, CA 90274
SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 517, a request for a Variance to construct a workshop
addition that will encroach into the front yard setback at an existing
single family residence for property at 5 Flying Mane Road (Lot 50-SF).
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Gieszl:
Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the
application noted above and finds that the information submitted is:
X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application
to be processed.
Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify,
amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such
additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information
promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application.
Your application for Zoning Case No. 517 has been set for public hearing
consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, August 16,
1994.
The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall
Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your
designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer
questions.
The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on
Friday, August 12, 1994. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior
to the hearing.
Printed on Recycled Paper.
• •
PAGE 2
Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions.
Sincerel
LOLA M. UNGAR
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
cc: Thomas A. Blair
NOTIFLET