Loading...
416, Construct a new tennis court, CorrespondenceC1iy ol leo lrnq JJ.// September 11, 1991 Mr. Craig E. Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 416, RESOLUTIONS NO. 91-9 & 90-32 Dear Mr. Caldwell: This letter shall serve as official notification that your request for a modification to a condition of approval for lot line adjustment in Zoning Case No. 416 is now null and void. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 91-9 and RESOLUTION NO. 90-32. As you will note in Section 4 of Resolution No. 91-9, the trellis structure mentioned should have been removed by June 30, 1991, and has not been removed to date. Therefore, the extension to the time period for the removal of the existing residence at 3 Georgeff Road, and the permit to issue the Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment have been nullified and hereby revoked. You may call me at (213) 377-1521 if you have any questions. SINCERELY, PRINCIPAL PLANNER ENCLOSURES: RESOLUTIONS NO. 91-9 and 90-32 cc: Ms. Rhea S. Shedden, Attorney at Law • • RESOLUTION NO. 91-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A • MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 90-32 APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE- NO.„. 4t"6 _THE .PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS —'DOES -HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A request has been filed by Mr. and Mrs. Craig Caldwell with respect to real property located .at 1 GeorgeffRoad-(Lot 57-A-1-MS) and real property located at ceorgerr Road (Lot 57-A-MS) in the City of Rolling Hills requesting a modification to a condition of approval for lot line adjustment. The modification requested is to extend the allow- able time period to remove the existing structure on 3 Georgeff Road. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at its meeting on April 6, 1990 at which time information was presented indicating that the extension of time is necessary so as to formalize documents evidencing the adjustment and was caused in part due to a change in the original timetable for the sale of 3 Georgeff Road. Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend paragraph C of Section 8 of Resolution 90-32 to read as follows, subject to the condition contained in Section 4: "C. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until the existing residential structure located at 3 Georgeff Road is removed. Removal of such structure shall occur within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Resolution." Section 4. The approval of the extension to the time period of paragraph C of Section 8 of Resolution 90-32 as specified in Section 3 of this Resolution is subject to the condition that the trellis structure constructed on Lot 57-A-1-MS for purposes of screening parked vehicles be removed by June 30, 1991 (as previously. required by paragraph B of Section 8 of Resolution 90-32) or the extension to the time period of paragraph C as specified in Section 3 of this Resolution shall automatically be withdrawn and shall cease to have any effect. 03/27/91 eeh 1680468 pection 5. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution 90-32 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 16 day of April, 1991. ATTEST: CN ns.43r--- ITY CLERK Allan Roberts, Chairman 03/27/91 eeh 1680468 —2— • • RESOLUTION NO. 91-9 PAGE 3 The foregoing Resolution•No. 91-9 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO RESOLUTION NO. 90-32 APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 416. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on April 16, 1991 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS FROST, LAY, RAINE AND CHAIRMAN ROBERTS NOES: NONE ABSENT: HANKINS ABSTAIN: NONE DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 9n-1__ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A VARIANCE TO THE MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS AND APPROVING A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT IN ZONING CASE NO. 416 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOW$: section 1. An application was filed by Mr. and Mrs. Craig Caldwell with respect to real property located -at 1 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-1-MS) and real property -located -at 3 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-MS) in the City of Rolling Hills requesting a variance to reduce the required lot frontage for the two lots created by the proposed lot line adjustment and request- ing a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Line Adjustment to move the side lot line dividing these two lots so that a portion of existing Lot 57-A-MS (3 Georgeff Road) is placed into Lot 57-A-1-MS (1 George!! Road). Sect&on 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly - noticed public hearing to consider the applications on January 16, 1990, February 20, 1990, April 18, 1990, June 19, 1990, July 17, 1990, August 21, 1990, September 15, 1990 and September 18, 1990, and conducted a field site review on February 10, 1990 and June 30, 1990. - Section_1. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit approval of a variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or. extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the name zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar prop- erties. Section 16.16.040 requires each lot to have.a minimum frontage of 150 feet along a street easement line. findings: section 4. The Planning Commission makes the following A. Special circumstances exist in that the total street easement frontage for the two lots combined is less than 25 feet, thereby making it impossible to comply with the zoning ordinance even for one lot. The two lots were created in 1956 to permit two (2) residences on the original larger parcel. Number 1 Georgeff, as it exists today, has no direct access to any street making it unique in the immediate area. i City. B. Application of the 150-foot lot frontage require- ment would deny the owner all use of both lots. The condition constituting a variance to the Code already exists. C. The granting of a variance would not constitute a special privilege because the configuration of the lots as originally approved is unique. The variance would permit the owner the use and enjoyment of his property in a manner consis- tent with -the present use of the property. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing-findings.=t e = Planning Commission hereby approves the variance -to -the -minimum lot frontage requirement to permit a 22.5 foot frontage for Lot 57-A-1-MS (1 Georgeff Road) and no frontage for Lot 57-A-MS (3 Georgeff Road) as indicated on the lot line adjustment map attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to the-conditions_set______ forth in Section 8 of this Resolution. Section 6. California Government Code Section 66412(d) authorizes minor lot line adjustments without requiring a tenta- tive map, parcel map or final map if: A. the lot line adjustment involves two or more existing adjacent parcels, where land is proposed to be taken from one parcel and added to an adjacent parcel; B. a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created; C. the lot line adjustment will create parcels that conform to local zoning and building ordinances; and D. the lot line adjustment is approved by the Section 7. The Planning Commission finds that: A. The proposed lot line adjustment will create two lots that will comply with the minimum lot size requirements. Lot 57-A-1-MS (1 Georgeff Road) will cover a net 7.61 acres after excluding easements and Lot 57-A-1-MS (3 Georgeff Road) will cover a net 2.06 acres after excluding easements. The lots comply with Section 17.16.020, imposing a minimum lot size of 2 acres excluding easements. B. The two parcels created by the lot line adjustment will conform to local zoning and building ordinances because Lot 57-A-MS and Lot 57-A-1-MS have been granted a vari- ance pursuant to Section 5 of this Resolution with regard to the minimum lot frontage requirements. -2- 900918 lei 1680276 (2) • • C. Conditions have been imposed upon approval of this lot line adjustment to ensure that the parcels created will conform to local zoning and building ordinances. These condi- tions require that the existing trellis structure constructed for recreational vehicle parking and which is located on Lot 57-A-1-MS will be brought into compliance with local zoning and building ordinances, and that each lot will have lawful vehicular access off of Georgeff Road. Bection J. Based upon the foregoing findings, the - Planning Commission hereby approves a Certificate of Compliance fbr a lot line adjustment for Lots 57-A-rss-and-57-A=1=M5-pursuant to California Government Code Section 66412(d) as indicated on the attached lot line adjustment map attached hereto as Exhibit A, subject to the following conditions: A. A Grant of -Driveway -Easement -shall -be prepared and recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's Officer with respect to Lots 57-A-1-MS (1 Georgeff Road) and 57-A-MS (3 Georgeff Road) to reserve for the benefit of Lot 57-A-MB a non-exclusive appurtenant easement for driveway purposes over a portion of Lot 57-A-1-MS. A conformed copy of the recorded easement shall be filed with the City's Principal Planner prior to the issuance of the City's Certification of Lot Line Adjustment. The easement shall be configured in such a manner as to ensure that the intersection of the driveway access for Lot 57-A-MS and the street easement is located upon Lot 57-A- 1-MS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Easement referred to above may be removed by the owners of the subject property if the Rolling Hills Community Association provides written notice to the City of its approval of driveway access to Lot 57-A-MS directly to that Lot from the street easement. B. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the Rolling Hills Community Association, the County of Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety and all other necessary permits and approvals required by law to legally maintain the existing trellis structure constructed for purposes of screening parking vehicles, which are located on Lot 57-A-1-MS. If all required approvals are not obtained within 90 days of the approval of this Resolution, the structure shall be removed within 30 days thereafter. C. The Certificate of Lot Line Adjustment shall not be issued until the existing residential structure located at 3 Georgeff Road is removed. Removal of such structure shall occur within six (6) months of the approval of'this Resolution. D. The variance approval shall expire if not used in one year from the effective date of approval as defined and specified in Section 17.32.110 of the Municipal Code. -3- 900916 1*1 1680276 (2) s • E. Any modifications to the lot line adjustment approved by the Planning Commission shall require the filing of an application for modification of the lot line adjustment and must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. F. The applicant shall execute an affidavit of acceptance of all ,conditions pursuant to Section 17.32.087 or this variance and lot line adjustment shall not be effective. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this Gth f)r-t•nher , 1990. ----Allan-Roberts, Chairman ATTEST: 1l 1�` `DUN1 ' City Clerk -4- 900918 Isj 16110276 (2) day of U.l. U1;U1 1t):U5 • JEROMC L. AMANTc JOHN P.OTCR GYBGN MSIDI KNAPP Li1.NDGRj Si -EVEN M,LI12OK PAUL -, PARILLA RPoCA 5. 5MCOOEN MARC ETTINGCR 8kAr3LCY N. GARISCP MOLLY A I.UNT EARL K. KNLCKMEYER 6AYMONO P- MULLIGAN PARILLA & MIL1TZOK ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE Bb0 18400 VON ?CARMAN AVCNUE 1RVINE, CALIFORNIA 92?IS (714) SO3-1O10 Or GOUN5CL- CLINTON L MUSBARo TELCCORIER N6 t7141 Ao1.9T.» IN t2m2LY i+EPCR TO: April 1, X991 3121.000 Via Telefax (213) 377-7288 Lola Ungar City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 RE: Lot Line Adjustment Nos. 1 and 3 Georaeff Road Dear Ms. Ungar: Pursuant to the request of Kevin Ennis, this letter is written to, set forte my clients' (Mr. and Mrs. Craig Caldwell) request that they be granted an extension of time for demolition of the residence at No. 3 Georgeff Road pursuant to paragraph C of Section 8 of Planning Commission Resolution 90-24. My clients request a six (6) month extension of the April 6, 1991 deadline in order to provide adequate time to formalize the appropriate documentation prior to proceeding with said demolition. I understand that this item will be addressed at the April 6, 1991 Planning Commission field trip. Thank you in advance for your consideration of this matter. Very truly yours, PARILLA & MILITZOK RHEA S. SHEDDEN RSS:is cc: Mr. Kevin Ennis Mr. Craig Caldwell )3‘4 tri • • City ./ leollinv _AA Mr. & Mrs. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 October 31, 1990 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 416; Request for approving a Variance to to the Minimum Lot Frontage Requirements and Approving a Certificate of Compliance for Lot Line Adjustment at properties located at #1 Georgeff Road and #3 Georgeff Road. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Caldwell: This is to inform you that the City Council, at their meeting on October 29, 1990, received and filed the Planning Commission's approval of the above referenced planning/zoning case application. Pursuant to Section 17.32.087, Ordinance No. 207, an Affidavit of Acceptance form must be executed before the above approval becomes effective. A copy of the Resolution of Approval, specifying conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission, is enclosed for your information. Once you have reviewed the Resolution of Approval, please complete the enclosed Affidavit of Acceptance form, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the Affidavit to the Office of the County Recorder, Room 15, 227 North Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012, with a check in the amount of $ 7.00. When the Affidavit of Acceptance has been returned to the City, duly executed and recorded, the Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety will be notified that a permit can be issued. Please feel free to call Mr. Ray Hamada, Principal Planner, at 377-1521, if you have any questions. /jr Encls. Very truly, 44 R Hamada P incipal Planner • • £'i, O/ /0//tfl v filth INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 October 10, 1990 Mr. & Mrs. Craig Caldwell #1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 416; Request for Variances to reduce the required lot frontage for a proposed Lot Line Adjustment; Request for a Certificate of Compliance for a Lot Line Adjustment Dear Mr. & Mrs. Caldwell: Pursuant to Section 17.32.090 (enclosed) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, this letter shall serve as official notification that the above -stated Zoning Case application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting of September 18, 1990. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted to approve the request for Variances to reduce the required Lot frontage for a proposed Lot Line Adjustment; Request for a Certificate of Compliance for a lot line Adjustment. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on October 29, 1990. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed pursuant to Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 (enclosed) of the Municipal Code. A copy of Resolution 614, establishing the fee for filing an appeal, is also enclosed for your information. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, CIY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray 1iamada Principal Planner Encls /jr CC: Mr. Robert Cardoza, Landscape Architect Mr. Douglas McHattie, South Bay Engineering Ms. Peggy Minor, RHCA Manager • Ciiy 0/Rolling Jd,•PP, Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377.7288 September 13, 1990 Re: Zoning Case No. 416 - Request for Conditional Use Permit for a pavilion/cabana; Site Plan Review for proposed pavilion/cabana; Request for Variance to install kitchen/cooking facilities in the proposed pavilion/cabana; Lots 57A-MS & 57-1-MS Dear Mr. Caldwell: This is to inform you that the City Council, at their meeting on September 10, 1990, voted to ratify the Planning Commission's approval of the above referenced planning/zoning case application. Pursuant to Section 17.32.087, Ordinance No. 207, an Affidavit of Acceptance form must be executed before the approval becomes effective. A copy of the Resolution of Approval, specifying conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission, is enclosed for your information. Once you have reviewed the Resolution of Approval, please complete the enclosed Affidavit of Acceptance form, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the Affidavit to the Office of the County Recorder, Room 15, 227 North Broadway, Los Angeles, CA 90012, with a check in the amount of $7.00. When the Affidavit of Acceptance has been returned to the City, duly executed and recorded, the Los Angeles County Department of Building and Safety will be notified that a permit can be issued. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Encl. Very tru Ye Ray amada Principal Planner /jc • • RESOLUTION NO. 90-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING A VARIANCE FOR COOKING/KITCHEN FACILITIES IN A PAVILION/CABANA, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PAVILION/CABANA, AND A SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR A PAVILION/CABANA IN ZONING CASE NO. 416 THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mr. Craig Caldwell with respect to real property located at 1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 57-A-1-MS) requesting a variance to install Cooking/Kitchen facilities in a Pavilion/Cabana, a Conditional Use Permit to construct and maintain a detached Pavilion/Cabana on said property and for Site Plan Review approval of the proposed Pavilion/Cabana. Section 2. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on January 16, 1990, February 20, 1990, April 18, 1990, June 19, 1990 and July 17, 1990 and conducted a field site review on February 10, 1990 and June 30, 1990. Section 3. Sections 17.32.010 through 17.32.030 permit approval of a variance form the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties. Section 17.16.012 (G) prohibits cooking or kitchen facilities in a cabana. The applicant is requesting to install cooking/kitchen facilities in the proposed Pavilion/Cabana. Section 4. The Planning Commission makes the following findings: A. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or the intended use that do not apply generally to the other property or class or use in the same vicinity and zone because due to the development pattern of the property, the location of the pavilion/cabana structure is far removed from the residence. B. The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because granting of the variance will not be a special privilege since the subject site is large and can accommodate detached accessory structures that have been commonly constructed in the neighborhood. • • C. The granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the improvements will not visually impact the surrounding properties, and other conditions have been incorporated to addresspotential impacts. Section 5. Based on the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Variance for Zoning Case No. 416 to permit installation of cooking/facilities within a detached pavilion/ cabana structure which is accessory to an existing tennis court as indicated in the Development Plan submitted with this application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A, subject to the conditions set forth in Section 11 of this Resolution. Section 6. Section 17.16.012 (G) of the Municipal Code requires a Conditional Use Permit to construct and maintain a detached 1,164 square foot, one story pavilion/cabana structure which is accessory to an existing tennis court. Section 7. The Planning Commission makes the following findings: A. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan; and be desirable to the public convenience and welfare because the proposed pavilion/cabana would have minimal impact to the site and surrounding properties since the pavilion/cabana will be secluded from the house, surrounding residences and the roadway. Further, existing landscaping that provides screening will remain. B. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would be consistent with the purposes and objectives of the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan, because the proposed project will be mostly an open structure, comply with the height and setback requirements, and its size will not cause the total lot coverage of all structures on the site to exceed the twenty percent maximum structural lot coverage. Further the project required minor grading to create a grading pad that is cut into the ground , and thereby will be compatible with the site and surrounding properties. Section 8. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Conditional Use Permit for Zoning Case No. 416 to construct and maintain a pavilion/cabana as indicated on the development plan submitted with the application and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A subject to the conditions set forth in Section 11 of this Resolution. Section 9. Section.17.34.010 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five (25%) in any thirty-six (36) month period. Section 10. The Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. .The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 203,369 square feet. The proposed pavilion/cabana existing residence, garage, swimming pool, future stable, service yard and tennis court will have 20,909 square feet which constitutes 10.3% of the lot, which is substantially less than the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 39,989 square feet which equals 19.7% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is similar and compatible with neighboring development patterns. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because extensive grading for the pavilion/cabana structure was not required and no further mature trees will be removed. Further, the applicant will be undertaking restorative landscaping requirements that have been mandated by the Planning Commission. Further, additional conditions of approval have been imposed accordingly. C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading because the project will be constructed upon an existing building pad, thereby requiring no extensive grading. D. The development plan preserves surrounding native vegetation and supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. The applicant, as part of this approval, shall restore compatible landscaping on the property as prescribed by the Commission through conditions of approval. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because construction will occur at a secluded place on the site and as indicated in paragraph A, the structural lot coverage is substantially less than that is permitted. F. The proposed development is harmonious in scale and mass with the site and as indicated in paragraph A, lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded since the subject property is very large and can accommodate the proposed pavilion/cabana structure. G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the pavilion/cabana will be secluded and removed from the roadway beyond required setbacks. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 11. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 416 for a proposed pavilion/cabana on the property located at 1 Georgeff Road as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A and subject to the following conditions: A. The variance for the cooking/kitchen facilities within the pavilion/cabana structure shall expire if not used in one year from the effective date of approval as defined and specified in Section 17.32.110 of the Municipal Code. B. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire unless used within one year from the date of the Permit is granted. This approval, as indicated on "Exhibit A", is for an open pavilion/cabana, with exception of the cooking/kitchen and bathroom areas that are enclosed. As agreed by the owner, should the pavilion/cabana be fully enclosed without approval from the City, said structure shall be removed by the owner and the Conditional Use Permit shall be void. C. If any provision of the Conditional Use Permit is held or declared to be invalid, the permit shall be void and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse. D. It is declared and made a condition of the Permit that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. E. All requirements -of the Zoning Ordinance and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an approved plan. F. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these conditions. G. Renting, leasing or any commercial use of the pavilion/cabana is prohibited. H. A landscaping plan must be submitted to the City of Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for approval. The plan submitted must comply with the purpose and intent of the Site Plan Review Ordinance. A bond in the amount of the cost estimate for the landscaping plus 15% may be required to be posted and retained with the City for not less than two years after landscape installation. The retained bond will be released by the City after the City Manager (or the landscape Committee of the Rolling Hills Community Association, if appointed to act for this purpose in place of the City Manager) determines that the landscaping was installed pursuant to the landscaping plan as approved, and that such landscaping is properly established and in good condition. I. The "Rosea" ground cover on the easterly slope shall be within five (5) years from the approval date of this Permit, be covered with landscaping consistent with the rural character of the community or be removed, and subject to approval from City Staff. J. The walk way lights on the easterly slope, as indicated on "Exhibit A", shall be removed, and all other exterior lighting must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association and City Staff. K. The applicant shall offer an easement for equestrian use to the Rolling Hills Community Association over the southeasterly corner area of the subject property. L. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the Development Plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. The "as graded" plan and required reports shall be reviewed by the County of Los Angeles prior to the issuance of a grading permit. M. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building permit for the proposed pavilion/cabana. N. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the Development Plan approved with this application. O. Any modifications to the, project which would constitute a modification to the Development Plan as approved by the Planning Commission, shall require the filing of an application for modification of the Development Plan pursuant to Section 17.34.070 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code. P. Applicant shall execute an affidavit of acceptance of all conditions pursuant to Section 17.32.087 or this Permit shall not be effective. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of August , 1990. ATTEST: City Clerk Allan Roberts, Chairman .City 0/ /O//i,& iliff3 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 August 27, 1990 Mr. & Mrs. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Subject: ZONING CASE NO. 416 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Caldwell: The Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of August 21, 1990, continued the above stated application to an adjourned meeting on Saturday, September 15, 1990, 7:30 A.M. The purpose of the future meeting will be to conduct a field inspection of the subject site and surrounding properties. The property must be prepared to exhibit the proposed project, and the owner and/or representative should be present. Any further questions, please contact the undersigned at (213) 377-1521. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray Hamada Principal Planner RH:jr CC: Mr. Robert Cardoza, Landscape Architect Mr. Douglas McHattie, South Bay Engineering • Ci1y 0/ ie0m Jhfh • August 16, 1990 Mr. Marvin Chiong Supervisor, Engineer II Land Development Division County of Los Angeles 900 South Fremont Avenue Alhambra, CA 91803-1331 SUBJECT: Plan Check for rough grading certification 1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills; Applicant: Mc Hattie INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 for project located at Craig Caldwell/Doug Dear Mr. Chiong: The City has received a request from Mr. Doug Mc Hattie of South Bay Engineering and representing Mr. Craig Caldwell, to have the City of Rolling Hills confer with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works on expediting their plan check for rough grading certification. The City's Planning Commission has currently reviewed and continued Mr. Caldwell's zoning application request for further information. Mr. Caldwell has been discussing this and related matters with the Commission since January 1990. The matter is scheduled for the next Commission meeting on August 21, 1990 and I would anticipate that the item will be continued again without the requested information. I would respectfully request that your review, if all possible, can be expedited to receive the County reports by Friday, August 17, 1990, 12:00 P.M. This short time frame is required so that I may include the information in the Commission's agenda packet. Should you have any further questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me at (213) 377-1521. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray 1'Iamada Principal Planner CMG HILL, 1 a �.� City O� D �It� INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 August 16, 1990 (213) 377.1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 Mrs. Elizabeth Frudenfeld 1 Buckboard Lane Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Dear Mrs. Frudenfeld: Thank you for having the telephone conversion with me on the afternoon of August 16, 1990 regarding the proposed project under Zoning Case No. 416 (#1 and #3 Georgeff Road, Owner: Caldwell). As I advised you, the proposed project for a lot line adjustment and variance includes a new driveway for #3 Georgeff Road which would be developed within the roadway easement for Georgeff Road, but over a small portion of your property within said easement. Further, as per my advisement, our records show that you have received public notification regarding this matter and other recent requests for #1 Georgeff Road. These public notices serve to identify and provide information to neighboring properties that may be affected by the project, and allow the owners of those properties to present their opinions on the matter at a public forum setting. Your comments, in favor or opposition, of the project are optional, but input from the general public is valuable to the Planning Commission in their gathering of facts to make decisions on zoning applications. For your information, the Planning Commission will hear the continued application at their regular meeting of August 21, 1990, 7:30 P.M., at City Hall. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray Himada Principal Planner O/ /1?0f.Fifl INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 August 6, 1990 Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 416 - RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL FOR PAVILION/ CABANA Dear Mr. Caldwell: The Planning Commission, at their adjourned meeting of August 3, 1990, made revisions to the Resolution of Approval for Zoning Case No. 416. Correspondingly, the Commission continued the matter to their regular meeting of August 21, 1990 to review the final Resolution. The property owner and/or representative may wish to be present at this meeting. At this time, the matter cannot be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting of August 13, and must be rescheduled to the meeting of August 27, 1990. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray Ramada Principal Planner cc Doug Mc Hattie, South Bay Engineering Bob Cardoza Ciiy e/ Ro lf,.q JJ,•fP, July 27, 1990 Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 416 Dear Mr. Caldwell: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 As you have been notified, the Planning Commission, at their regular meeting of July 17, 1990, approved your request for a variance to install cooking/kitchen facilities in a proposed detached pavilion/cabana, a conditional use permit for the pavilion/cabana and site plan review for the said structure. Please be advised, however, that the remainder of the application to include the lot line adjustment and variances for the lot frontage and setback of the trellis structure was continued until the applicant submits the additional information specified by the Commission. You and/or representative will be notified in the future regarding the status of your application. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at City Hall. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray Hamada Principal Planner cc Rolling Hills Community Association Doug Mc Hattie, South Bay Engineering Robert Cardoza 41011 400 Nil DD�� a I (j _JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 o City T L July 19, 1990 Mr. & Mrs. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 416; Request for Conditional Use Permit for a pavilion/cabana; Site Plan Review for proposed pavilion/cabana; Variances to install kitchen/cooking facilities in the proposed pavilion/cabana at the properties located at 1 & 3 Georgeff Road Dear Mr. & Mrs. Caldwell: Pursuant to Section 17.32.090 (enclosed) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code, this letter shall serve as official notification that the above -stated Zoning Case application was reviewed by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting of July 17, 1990. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted to approve the request for the Conditional Use Permit and a Site Plan Review for a pavilion/cabana; Variances to install kitchen/cooking facilities in the proposed pavilion/cabana. The Planning Commission's decision will be reported to the City Council at their regular meeting on August 13, 1990. The decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed pursuant to Sections 17.32.140 and 17.32.150 (enclosed) of the Municipal Code. A copy of Resolution 614, establishing the fee for filing an appeal, is also enclosed for your information. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, CITY OF LING HILLS Ray amada Principal Planner Encls /jr cc: Mr. Robert Cardoza, Landscape Architect Peggy Minor, RHCA Manager SWN SOILTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Geotechnical Engineering 3140 West Main Street, Alhambra, Califomia 91801 Tel: (818) 282-6838 Project Ref. 3303-90 July 10, 1990 Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, California 90274 SUBJECT: AS -GRADED COMPACTION REPORT LANDSCAPE GRADING LOT 57-A-1, ROLLING HILLS TRACT 1 GEORGEFF ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIFORNIA Dear Mr. Caldwell: In accordance with your request, we are pleased to submit a report of a soil engineering investigation of the landscape grading of the subject site. The accompanying report has been substantiated by surface and subsurface exploration and mathmatical analysis made in accordance with generally accepted engineering practice, including those field and laboratory tests considered necessary in the circumstances. This report has been prepared for you and your design consultants to be used for evaluation of the existing subsurface soil conditions at the subject site. This report has not been prepared for the use by other parties or for other purposes, and may not contain sufficient information for other than the intended use. Services performed by this facility at the subject site were conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. No other warranties are expressed nor implied. It is the professional opinion of the undersigned that this report presents fairly the information requested by you. Respectfully submitted, SWN Soiltech Consultants,__Inc. tip1112 7 Stephen W. GE 637 SWN/sn Ng t 199Q k ilEefive•� 11E1vEll c.??zzEZCI 2 41 • KEITH W. EHLERI T Consulting Engineering Geologist July 10, 1990 Project No. 2464-90 Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA ' 90274 SUBJECT: AS -GRADED GEOLOGIC REPORT TENNIS COURT LANDSCAPE GRADING 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA REFERENCES: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT, PROPOSED TENNIS COURT, BARN, AND SUBTERRANEAN RACQUETBALL COURT, ,1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills, CA, by American Geotechnical (File No. 1515.01) , dated July 15, 1986. REPORT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING GRADING, 111 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills, CA, by American Geotechnical (File No. 1515.01) , dated July 29, 1988. Dear Mr. Caldwell: Pursuant to your request, this as -graded geologic report has been prepared. Services performed in preparation of this report included review of the referenced reports by American Geotechnical, excavation of .six exploratory trenches, geologic mapping within the site area, preparation of cross -sections based on topographic maps showing conditions before and after grading, meetings with Doug McHattle at South. Bay Engineering, on -site meetings with SWN Soiltech Consultants (project soils engineer), analysis of data, and preparation of this report. 316 Tejon Place • Palos Verdes Estates, CA 90274 •. (213) 378-4146 ;V1 , s ems'.,, 4r ,\ 0 lb JUL 1990 10 (,0; RECM [11 1J trro G;',S71 7 CSC r -zc., 416, P.N. 2464-90 Page 2 The referenced geotechnical engineering report by American Geotechnical indicates that the site was geologically stable and suitable for the proposed improvements. It is understood the proposed subterranean racquetball court will not be constructed. Information obtained from maps provided by South Bay Engineering, site observations performed during mapping of the site area, and information obtained from the trenches, indicates that grading performed in conjunction with the proposed improvements essentially consisted of placing relatively minor amounts of landscape fill on the site. The estimated thickness and distribution of the landscape fill is shown on Plates 1, 2, 3 and 4 (in pocket at back of this report) . Plate 1 is a map showing the estimated distribution of the fill. Plates 2, 3 and 4 are cross -sections showing the estimated thickness of the landscape M. Geologic information has also been included on the, cross -sections. The purpose of the test trenches was to evaluate the thickness of the fill, obtain geologic information, and allow the soils engineer to sample and test the fill. Logs of the trenches are included in. the Appendix of this report. No geologic hazards (i.e. active faults, landslides, etc.) are known by this consultant to underlie the site. No features were observed during our site visits which indicate the site is undergoing, or has recently undergone, any major gross instabilities. Site geologicconditions are considered favorable P.N. 2464-90 Page 3 for the proposed improvements. Geologic information obtained from the referenced reports by American Geotechnical indicates that bedding within the bedrock underlying the site area is somewhat variable. Information obtained from the recently excavated trenches and mapping confirms that bedding is somewhat variable and generally favorably oriented with regard to gross stability of the bedrock underlying the site. At the time of our site visits, the tennis court was completed and a pavillion adjacent to the tennis court was under construction. No structures should be placed on the landscape fill materials. As such, the areas underlain by landscape fill are designated as "restricted use areas". The areas shown on Plate 1 as being underlain by landscape fill were delineated based on review of topographic conditions prior to and after completion of grading, observations performed during geologic mapping .of the n site area, information obtained from the trenches, and topographic considerations. if you have any questions regarding the information presented in this as -graded geologic report, please call my office. Respectfully submitted, • s C1i 0/ RJf4 TO: Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 FROM: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS The plan for: Zoning Case #416 Applicant: Address: Mr. Craig Caldwell INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (a) Complies with City Zoning requirements (b) Needs Variance ( ) Contact City for application and submittal requirements. (c) Needs Conditional Use Permit Contact City for application and submittal requirements. (d) Needs Site Plan Review Contact City for application and submittal requirements. (e) xx Other (see below) The Planning Commission at their regular meeting held June 19, 1990, continued the above -stated application to an adjourned meeting to be held Saturday, June 30, 1990, at 7:30 A.M., So as to conduct a field inspection of the Site and surrounding properties. The property must be prepared to exhibit the proposed project, and the owner and/or representative should be present. Should you have any further questions please contact the undersigned at this office. June 21.. 1990 CC: Mr. Douglas licHattie, South Bay Eng. Mr. Robert Cardoza, Landscape Arch. Ray Hamada Principal Planner COUNTY OF LOS ANGLES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (818) 458-5100 THOMAS A. TIDEMANSON, Director June 11, 1990 Mr. Ray Hamada Principal Planner City of Rolling Hills #2 Portuguesee Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90279 Dear Mr. Hamada: GRADING AND DRAINAGE AT AT #1 GEORGETTE ROAD ROLLING HILLS ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: L-3 Upon a field inspection of the above site it has been determined that a grading and drainage plan be submitted for review. These plans shall show all proposed grades and existing grades and drainage systems. Include in these plans the volume of earth to be moved and the hydraulics showing design calculations for the drainge devices. These plan must be signed by a California Registered Civil Engineer. If there are any questions regarding these requirement please contact Mr. James Sykes, Regional Drainage Engineer at (818) 458-4921. Very truly yours, T. A. TIDEMANSON Director of Public Works AMES SYKES Civil Engineer I Land Development Division JS:al DISK?/JS cc: Mr. Craig Calpwell Ci44 o� Rolling Jh/h June 5, 1990 Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 416 Dear Mr. Caldwell: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX: (213) 377-7288 This letter shall provide you with notice that the public hearing on Zoning Case No. 416 will be conducted at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 19, 1990, 7:30 p.m., at City Hall. City Staff is at the understanding that your consultants are presently conducting studies to address the information requested by the Commission from the previous meetings on the matter. The Commission may take action on the evidence submitted up to said meeting date. As you will recall, your application for a Conditional Use Permit was originally filed on December 26, 1990 and amended on March 30, 1990 to additionally request a Variance and Lot Line Adjustment. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Ray Hamada Principal Planner cc Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering Robert Cardoza (213) 377-1521 i cRo/ring Community of GRanaI2o Po o1 (Vetriel 1 Iodation NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND RD. • ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 ROLLING HILLS May 23, 1990 Mr. Craig Caldwell 1 Georgeff Rolling Hills, CA. 90174 Dear Mr. Caldwell: CALIFORNIA 7,C. It has been observed that excessive exterior landscape lighting has been installed in the rear of your property without a permit and prior approval from the Architectural Committee. Please refer to Architectural Minutes dated October 7, 1986 which reads as follows: "Resubmit outdoor lighting with picture or design specifications. All garden lights must be designed or equipped with umbrella -type shade to cast light downward." Please submit an "as located" lighting plan with a fixture brochure for the Committee's review in an effort to obtain a permit. Refer to Architectural Committee minutes dated February 17, 1987 regarding entry trellis which reads as follows: "Entry trellis approved as submitted. Trim to match residence." It appears that the trellis was constructed without an Association Building Permit and not inspected by the Architectural Inspector. Please submit "as built" plans for the Committee's review in an effort to obtain a permit and clear the violations on your property. Very truly yours, Pen7qx77,-, Peggy R. Minor Manager do cc: Ray Hamada, City Planner 3% ',,,,kh ell dar 8.P64 • ,Tlls eac,4 ra/Oxnraa 90809 61.1) 485.7655 May 8, 1990 Mr. Ray Hamada Principal Planner City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 RE: #1 GEORGEFF Dear Mr. Hamada: This is in reply to your conversation with Bob Cardoza, regarding check #252 in the amount of $2,250.00 issued on March 29, 1990. Please note that after the check was not negotiated for quite some time, a stop payment was put on it after the April 18, 1990 planning commission hearing. It was believed to be either lost or that the city was not going to entertain my application. Per Bob Cardoza's conversation with you today, enclosed please find a check in the amount of $2,250.00. Please proceed immediately. My sincere appreciation. Very truly yours, rai, .''aldw 11 Enclosure CEC:ab cc: Bob Cardoza Doug McHattie ri►ai f 6. valhcell . 1'.+• .7 64 • Acre rI/ablirnia stiffs (n.0 4t5.76J5 March 14, 1990 Mr. Terrence L. Belanger City Manager City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 RE: TENNIS COURT FACILITY #1 GEORGEFF Dear Mr. Belanger: This is to verify the request of the statement that there is no artificial lighting of the tennis court in place. Respectfully, Agor'---- _.4‘,/e 4 .1.°-'''''''" - .ifg Aiget dwell CEC:ab cc: Doug McHattie, South Bay Engineering Bob Cardoza, Cardoza Dilallo Harrington Jocelyn Mackay, ICAP Development Corp. 1-1Ia7 seD MAR 15 1990 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS By..._.._.._.........._.......'...........