Loading...
559, "Construct a new ""Ring of ste, Correspondence0 row``" ����,� � � 0 City O L" RO•n JUL INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 v NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com June 1, 1998 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Robinson 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 559 1 GEORGEFF ROAD (LOT 57-A-1-MS) RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Robinson: This letter is to inform you that it has been almost one year since the approval of Zoning Case No. 559. Approvals will expire on July 15, 1998. You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning Commission in writing to request an extension prior to the expiration date. The filing fee for the time extension is $200 to be paid to the City of Rolling Hills. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA UNG PLANNING DIRECTOR cc: Mr. William Howe Printed on Recycled Paper. • • • City 0/ /OIfifl INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 CERTIFIED MAIL July 17, 1997 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mr. and Mrs. Frank Robinson 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM ZONING CASE NO. 559, 1 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-1-MS) RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Robinson: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted a resolution on July 15,1997 to approve your request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable that requires grading in Zoning Case No. 559 at 1 Georgeff Road (Lot 57-A-1-MS), Rolling Hills. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on July 28,1997. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the subject resolution in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 97-18, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Once you have reviewed the Resolution, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of the Resolution to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $7.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. so Printed on Recycled Paper. • • The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of the Resolution required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR ENC: RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFF1UAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. cc: Mr. William Howe RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX Recorder's Use Please record this form with the Registrar -Recorder's Office and return to: City of Rolling Hills, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills, CA 90274 (The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation). AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) § § CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 559 SITE PLAN REVIEW • VARIANCE 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0 I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 1 GEORGEFF ROAD (LOT 57-A-1-MS) This property is the subject of the above numbered case. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 559 SITE PLAN REVIEW • VARIANCE 0 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 0 I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Print Print Owner Owner Name Name Signature Signature Address City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary nublic. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On before me, Address City/State personally appeared [ ] Personally known to me -OR- [ ] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof • • lX/46ir ';� RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AREA THAT REQUIRES GRADING IN ZONING CASE NO. 559. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1., An application was duly filed by Mr. and Mrs. Frank Robinson with respect to real property located at 1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills (Lot 57-A-1- MS) requesting Site Plan Review approval for a stable with loft and corral area that requires grading. Section 2. A. In 1990, requests for a Conditional Use Permit for a pavilion/cabana, Site Plan Review to construct a pavilion/cabana, and a Variance to install kitchen/cooking facilities at a pavilion cabana were approved for Mr. and Mrs. Craig Caldwell along with a lot line adjustment between 1 and 3 Georgeff subject to certain conditions in Zoning Case No. 416. B. In 1991, the lot line adjustment was revoked due to lack of compliance with conditions of Resolution No. 91-9 in Zoning Case No. 416. Those conditions required removal. of the residence and trellis at 3 Georgeff Road within a set time period. The residence at 3 Georgeff was removed by the the Robinsons in 1996. C. The tennis court was completed in October, 1990 and an exterior trellis and patio roof were completed in February, 1991. Building permits expired for a pavilion/cabana with kitchen in 1987, 1990, 1992, and 1994 and for a barn/court in 1992. The barn/court was not constructed. Therefore, permits for the existing pavilion, according to Building & Safety records, are incomplete. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application for Site Plan Review on May 20, 1997 and June 17, 1997, and at a field trip visit on June 14, 1997. Section 4. Section 17.46.030 requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than 25% in any 36-month period. Section 5. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 PAGE 1 • • A. The proposed development is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structure complies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements. The lot has a net square foot area of 196,592 square feet. The proposed stable (1,152 sq.ft.), existing residence (7,221 sq.ft.), garage (880 sq.ft.), existing swimming pool (791 sq.ft.), tennis court (7,200 sq.ft.), pavillion (350 sq.ft.) and existing service yard (96 sq.ft.) will have 17,590 square feet which constitutes 8.9% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 34,415 square feet which equals 17.5% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. Coverage on the lower stable pad will be 8.1% which is similar in size to several neighboring developments. B. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the structural, and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project on a lower pad will have a buildable pad coverage of 8.1%°. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain trail access near the eastern property line and scenic vistas across the northeasterly portions of the property. C . The proposed stable and corral is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of other structures in the neighborhood. Grading shall be permitted only to restore the natural slope of the property. The ratio of the proposed structure to lot coverage is similar to the ratio found on several properties in the vicinity. D. The proposed development on the lower pad preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed stable and corral, existing residence and existing neighboring residences. E. Grading has been designed to follow natural contours of the site and to minimize the amount of grading required to create the building area because grading will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed stable and corral, existing residence and existing neighboring residences, and the grading will be limited to 788 cubic yards of cut soil and 788 cubic yards of fill, soil. RESOLUTION NO.97-18 PAGE 2 0 0 F. Grading will not modify existing drainage channels nor redirect drainage flow because grading after development will follow the natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyon which exists along the eastern side of this lot. G. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible and, with the conditions attached to this approval, supplements it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. The project preserves surrounding native vegetation and mature trees and is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community. Existing landscaping provides a buffer or transition area between properties. The area proposed for development of the stable and corral is gently sloped and without significant vegetation. Thus, this project will not have a significant effect on natural topographic features and native vegetation. H. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize Georgeff Road for access. Also, the existing driveway is approached within an easement as a flag lot and will therefore create little interference with traffic. I. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 6. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for Zoning Case No. 559 for a proposed stable with loft and corral development as indicated on the development plan incorporated herein as Exhibit A and subject to the conditions contained in Section 7. Section 7. The Site Plan Review for a stable with loft and corral that requires grading approved in Section 6 is subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.46.080(A). B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, the Permit shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. C. All requirements of the Building and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise approved by Variance. RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 PAGE 3 D. The stable, loft and corral shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file marked Exhibit A except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. Grading shall not exceed 788 cubic yards of cut soil and 788 cubic yards of fill soil. F. The stable loft shall have no glazed openings and the loft area shall be limited in use to the storage of feed, tack, and stable equipment. G. All free-standing retaining walls incorporated into the project shall not be greater than 5 feet in height at any one point. H. The building pad coverage for the stable and corral shall not exceed 8.1%. I. Prior to the submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes must conform to the City of Rolling Hills standard of 2 to 1 slope ratio. J. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. K. Permits for the existing pavilion shall be completed, reviewed and finalled by the County of Los Angeles prior to plan check approval. L. The working drawings submitted to the County Department of Building and Safety for plan check review must conform to the development plan approved with this application. M. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review, or the approval shall not be effective. N. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 15TH DAY OF JULY,1997. RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 PAGE 4 ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: • __ ?�^ g.1,?,01/1,) MARILYNERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 97-18 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS GRANTING SITE PLAN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STABLE WITH LOFT AND CORRAL AREA THAT REQUIRES GRADING IN ZONING CASE NO. 559. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on July 15,1997 by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta and Chair Roberts. None. ABSENT: Commissioner Witte. ABSTAIN: Commissioner Sommer. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CITY' CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 97-18 PAGE 5 • 1734.010 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. All actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 17.54.020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 34, 1993 • • 17.34.030 If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 1730.030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 1734 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. ROLLING HILLS ZONING '77 MAY 24, 1993 • 1734.060 C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 78 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24.1993 • PS Form 3800, June 1985 Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee r i � An S u n '. ce pa;.ho¢,�jni., �.J a onrdnd`D'ate'Delivered fa ,4n Receipt showing to whom, tb, and lA,dldress of Delivery TOTAL PO kUe ar F-es� . P "8"52 865 218 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent t /7/'2 JOb ,,sCn-, Street aAd No. and ZTP de Postage ' Sj 6/7 1, 3S P°81`0oc.i?atriotu;Y vr. HILLS By ����1d , 0 ' 411 June 19, 1997 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Robinson 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 E-mail: cltyofrh@aol.com Zoning Case No. 559, a request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable that requires grading at a single family residential development for property at 1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 57-A-1-MS. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Robinson: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on June 17, '1997 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to approve your request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable that requires grading at your property in Zoning Case No. 559 and shall be confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting and make its final decision on your application at that subsequent meeting. The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before being signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. The Planning Commission's action taken by resolution approving the development application is tentatively scheduled for July 15, 1997. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on July 28,1997. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerel de, LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. William Howe Printed on Recycled Paper. • Ci o/ led/69 Jhft FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION May 29, 1997 R INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mr. and Mrs. Frank Robinson 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 559, a request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable that requires grading at a single family residential development for property at 1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 57-A-1-MS. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Robinson: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view a silhouette of the proposed stable on Saturday, Tune 14, 1997. The Planning Commission will meet at 7:30 AM at 4 Buggy Whip Drive, go on to 5 Sagebrush Lane and then, proceed to your property. Do not expect the Planning Commission at 7:30 AM but be assured that the field trip will take place before 9:30 AM. The site must be prepared according to the enclosed Silhouette Construction Guidelines and the following requirements: • A full-size silhouette must be prepared for ALL STRUCTURES of the project showing the footprints, roof ridges and bearing walls; • Stake the limits of stable building pad including the adjacent corral area; and • Delineate areas to be graded showing finished floor or grade elevations. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER Enclosure: Silhouette Construction Guidelines cc: Mr. William Howe Mr. Douglas McHattie :1, Panted on Recycled Pat),•, Ct1f 0/ INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377-7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. The Silhouette shall not remain erected for a period longer than one week unless directed by the Planning Commission or City Council. • 2.,. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. 3. Bracing should be provided where possible. 4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. 5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. 6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. 7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (213) 377-1521. • 11 et et / :: �\ PLAN SECTION • • Ca ofieofena _WA INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING May 7, 1997 Mr. and Mrs. Frank Robinson 1 Georgeff Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: Zoning Case No. 559, a request for Site Plan Review to construct a stable that requires grading at a single family residential development for property at 1 Georgeff Road, Rolling Hills, CA; more precisely, Lot 57-A-1-MS. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Robinson: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 559 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, May 20, 1997. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, May 16,1997. Please arrange to pick up the staff report to preview it prior to the hearing. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, (7eett LOLA M. UNGAR PRINCIPAL PLANNER cc: Mr. William Howe co Printed on Recycled Paper.