588, for development and grading fo, Application•
Cuy ,,/aPe�ns wee,
PROPERTY OWNER;
OWNER'S ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ASSE
AGENT'S NAME:
AGENTS ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NO.:
VARIANCE
REOUEST FOR HEARING
T4M42.N 1121 1A 0
i-ilt OD LE OCroe
9l{). .217r1
S44-11e
LOT NO. 2 S5
•
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
SSOR'S BOOK NO. 1'S PAGE 02) PARCELOO5
SIG � 4-\O )LESD-I
? t •ct L22 Uzi 3 40.E-- 6 zs
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project
require a Variance.
Tt2ELUS 2 4 Tr -n- (maT cu o -ram Cl\ M 1-°?
6,1\1-111,tuflrg0 wk114fM, T1-4e �S SIPEL-06a3 S?1? CV
Criteria to be satisfied for grant of Variance
Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary
circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same
vicinity and zone.
--rl2%I,S 1IT i S OQ.t lm ► of " TC E i-d4 2 .
4P ' I DP of T' -ca .t_ii 15 AT -f l`_. A laptitx (04 . EQIA
kiD
• •
Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the
property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because
TakilS I S off! i c J M 0
FILING FEE
A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS.
CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMIT L
The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills
Planning Commission for:
1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements).
2. Variance (including grading requirements).
3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements).
4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments
Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following:
1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone
number of architect and civil engineer.
2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor.
3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property
line and residences of all contiguous properties.
4. North arrow and scale of plans.
5. Existing contours of the entire lot.
6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot.
7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in
accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached).
8. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form
attached).
9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed
a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade.
(Municipal Code Title 15).
10. Shade all cut and fill slopes. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals,
and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15).
11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show
height for all buildings.
12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas.
13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan
Review is requested.
14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must be
physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing.
A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements.
14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must
be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown
on drawing. A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements.
15. Show a graded area of not less than 450 square feet for the construction of
a stable, 550 square feet for a corral, and a graded road of not more than
25% grade for vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17).
16. Sections should be shown through highest slope and through other areas
where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly
delineate land contours with existing ground.
17. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils, geology,
hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the property, with their
distance from property lines delineated, will be required in applications where
the requested change is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or
where there is to be significant grading on the property.
18. Note distances from the center line of all existing and proposed streets
adjacent to the subject property.
19. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes
the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN
REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent
(10%) or less. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall
mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope
of ten percent (10%) or less.
• •
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING
HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely
independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and
the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the
RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its
admonition is completely understood.
Executed at ga.. M::, {-it(.CA , California
this ?...cap day of G of `- 19 .
By:
lCo t-z(l000PRA . LP
Address
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at
this
7�7
.jAt-14iIL,
, California,
day of QC:f l , 19 q '
By:
By:
t gat(012 0 (Yl S
Address
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California.
If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before
a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that
State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property
described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best
of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: 1-4.1440, "f 2 fr DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: Ric. P 17/(041 FEE:
COMPANY NAME:. 4-4,0(004 04204 I(t RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
4-1 V Pksu LA-4.L ZONING CASE NO:
Ap1rcu: - ciTENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. () 343 .cnrlZ
PROJECT ADDRESS: ke,1-idikrzaVaP
14'\ S. VA1 o idl(, k((Cth
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
, declare under penalty
of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom
all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County
within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior
boundaries of property legally described as:
Leer r 2 5 5 , I5a - 02.E PitY1,C. , Ob.
Executed at 120 U1-4-1(1 , California, this
7-10 day of a.�Y-71 , 19 1 .
SIGNATURE
•
City O/ /E0f/i Jvhfri INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE
LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17)
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards
(enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction
of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%)
of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas
included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of
any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover
more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude: a) the entire area within a recorded
roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the
roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c)
any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip
portion of a flag lot.
COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF
A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA".
Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence,
garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable
area."
For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot
that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN
ALLOWABLE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT
(10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within
allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
December 12, 1996
y.`
Printed on Recycled Paper.
•
Property Line
Easement Line
Setback Line
///
Aia 1IJIII1.. . I ii.. 1.61 iim il i 16. nn,
Residence\
i4111 uuin 11 n.n �� i� a • �.
NET LOT AREA
ROADWAY
EASEMENT
EXCLUDE
10 FEET AT PERIMETER
PLUS ROADWAY EASEMENTS
DATE ApING CASE NO. ADDRE.
APPLICAN
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE
1, KAA
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL
COVERAGE % % %
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE % % %
DRIVEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL DECKING sq.ft. sq.ft.
sq.ft.
sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE % % %
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE % % %
DATE
•ING CASE NO. ADDRAlp
APPLIC
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
sq.ft.
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( • ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE %
PROPERTY OWNER:
REOUEST FOR HEARING
FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
" N-A.Aa2A 1 Ue1 Nem
OWNER'S ADDRESS: ►-j( Oak- toQP, so .
TELEPHONE NO: 1,() ZED
PROPERTY'S ADDRESS:��
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. 2,5-eS
ASSESSORS BOOK NO. 'I-S(‘Pi PAGE . U7r PARCEL 00
AGENT'S NAME: 'R I 1-k 2C)I SO+J
AGENT'S ADDRESS: Lt I fQ JS UIi i lAfW
TELEPHONE NO:
NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT
Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require
a Site Plan Review:
I OcL Cbap2 Ct;7evA . ou PAD 4- 14,ess e U(a s
6t24e)(r cat- 4-S cep `-(Os �� 4"S - pi F-LL. . Two
Ll S wan OY 91.1tn + 4- AN) CAYAZ f JJ(
•
,SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding.
Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below:
A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it
compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses.
142;c 1-C A vV\AP -//4/tr otfAvcr 1 S Tt)
B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural
topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land
forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features.
LItitrr p 6,ttt tvl2, t-OXIS t_er 4S Cu. LtAi
w c, (,_
C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading
and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be
rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect
drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and'extent of the impact of grading
and proposed minimization on lots. •
/Sk TeZi1P0 4426..1i, CO AINID C C'c "li►t'D 4"S- �-1
R t-L A 1r,(0.u04QL Ifg5431fLulz
D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with
landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should
provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native
vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers.
kt> vcv2,MTILYI i 3 70 e 4 Pc -- ,
•
E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building
coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage
permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed
compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots.
idttI kp CrWi.R> TI-EL. lEIi OnVeei 2P ;tr. E3.ct
F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding
residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where
necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the
existing setbacks of neighboring properties.
1 YYla-ie 1, filkktTh 7 E(f th A# 7g&D S!C AriD < r k
G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians
and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data,
landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas.
Tth 0 i Denfoo NL 44am 02 T> - 064114 / ..
H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act?
Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures.
"rttt. 1-102 't Ott G cogir I M 1 rAAD C Ft.e Jfi(,S GU 114
12t✓QQUIVrytVl,> L l R It 4 LA %t acKl stt6 1L
Ct`. F7�1 kt'
• •
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and
information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that
the facts, statements and other information presented are true and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief.
Date: 0.7,e) . qp, .( .( _
gnature
A PP p cant
tilk
ECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITI'
The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills
Planning Commission for:
1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements).
2. Variance (including grading requirements).
3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements).
4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments
Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following:
1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone
number of architect and civil engineer.-- - -
2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor.
3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property
line and residences of all contiguous properties.
4. North arrow and scale of plans.
5. Existing contours of the entire lot.
6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot.
7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in
accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached).
8. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form
attached).
9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed
a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade.
(Municipal Code Title 15).
10. Shade all cut and fill slopes. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals,
and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15).
11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show
height for all buildings.
12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas.
13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan
Review is requested.
14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must be
physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing.
A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements.
15. Show a grade area of not less than 450 uare f • the
sq eet fort e construction of a stable,
550 square feet for a corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for
vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17).
16. Sections should be shown through highest slope and through other areas where
ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate
land contours with existing ground.
17. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils, geology, hydrology/drainage
reports, showing all structures on the property, with their distance from property lines
delineated, will be required in applications where the requested change is close to
easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading
on the property.
18. Note distances from the center line of -all existing and proposed streets adjacent to
the subject property. _ = - -
19. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the
existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN REQUIRED
MINIMUM SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If
there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of
a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or
less.
r '130
00.
•
Cry `l? fl s ildh
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX (310) 377-7288
E-maik cityofrh@aol.com
LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17)
Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards
(enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction
of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%)
of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas
included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of
any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover
more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area.
For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude: a) the entire area within a recorded
roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the
roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c)
any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip
portion of a flag lot.
COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF
A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA".
Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence,
garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable
area."
For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of
the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot
that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN
ALLOWABLE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT
(10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within
allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less.
December 12, 1996
®Panted on Recycled Paper
•
Property Line
Easement Line
Setback Line
NET LOT AREA
vmmmezei
ROADWAY
EASEMENT
EXCLUDE
10 FEET AT PERIMETER
PLUS ROADWAY EASEMENTS
• 0
DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE —i' - PfAO
BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL
NET LOT AREA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
BUILDING PAD(S) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SWIMMING POOL/SPA sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
STABLE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
SERVICE YARD sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
% STRUCTURAL % % %
COVERAGE
% TOTAL PAD
COVERAGE % % %
DRIVEWAY sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
PAVED WALKS AND
PATIO AREAS sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
POOL DECKING sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
TOTAL FLATWORK sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
% TOTAL FLATWORK
COVERAGE
TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK
COVERAGE sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft.
% TOTAL COVERAGE % % %
•
DATE
ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS
APPLICANT
CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 1
BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE
PAD NO. 2
BUILDABLE PAD AREA sq.ft.
RESIDENCE sq.ft.
GARAGE sq.ft.
STABLE (BARN) sq.ft.
POOL sq.ft.
RECREATION COURT
( ) sq.ft.
OTHER sq.ft.
TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 sq.ft.
% BUILDING PAD COVERAGE %
• •
OWNER'S DECLARATION
I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at
this 'Do
vou.I Pt10 L&
day of enclaWL
By:
, California,
,19 cij°,
t- MU? 2t0(0 I So
Address
I4tWN r,h
NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California.
If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before
a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that'
State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property
described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best
of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here.
APPLICANT: DATE FILED
REPRESENTATIVE: D lisUDnl FEE:
COMPANY NAME: t?..14u0c O /4204ritCr WG RECEIPT NO:
COMPANY ADDRESS: BY:
41?Ao 'S V I eu..) (-161,a ZONING CASE NO:
t_rz Art&.. c4 4W0"S TENTATIVE HEARING DATE:
COMPANY PHONE NO. (31.3134? .q IZ2
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1-4.(0DLg7I f !4- S
INvCe. 44((_5-
OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF
ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING
HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA").
The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely
independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and
the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the
RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other.
The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first.
I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read
and its admonition is completely understood.
Executed at geda U C11 E , California
this 2v day of oc..T j
By:
Address
ozwi run HaLS
City
,19.
•
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS
ZONING CASE
CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss
CITY OF ROLLING HILLS )
I, 12Skotifscgo&—CCYLE I�Wb
declare under penalty
of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom
all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County
within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior
boundaries of property legally described as:
L. r 256S FAX6L '15G I ddb Olga. cri
Executed at
Conditional Use Permit
✓Variance
✓bite Plan Review
Zone Change
gOlLl AAku S , California, this
day of p C;r0eArit—
,19 9/'
SIGNATURE
Date Filed
f/Ac/f.,
• •
Ci,y ` Roiling ihild
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
(To Be Completed By Applicant)
GENERAL INFORMATION
la-00C) {-iug0 32 3 3 -3.9 (22
1. Applicant(s) Tel. ( ) 1.1 .21 et,
Address % SA VIAL I-f�S P.l'S�L
INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957
NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD
ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274
(310) 377-1521
FAX: (310) 377-7288
E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com
Zoning Case No. __,,,4Xe"
2. Legal Owner(s) 17S246.0.11.. Tel. ( 54.0 )
Address , M.(0014 a21aoE $ 9011-td6 4{(Ij ctorl
3. Project Address 1— L. 1XL/.61711?
Assessor's Book No. 1 '51 - (Ze2 - fa0Lot No. 255
4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required
by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
t ivosiCIATT . /.., tJR7 'peon (T Ott_
5. Existing zoning district JfiM12 A 5 —2.
6. Proposed project/use of site riAl L
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
7. Site size I S 4 _ f4)F321
8. Net lot area (4-6 I (.7 Q- . "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot
lines of a lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway
easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway
easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any
private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip
portion of a flag lot."
9. Total square footage of structures , (052
10. Number of floors of construction DI
11. Basement square footage 14(7%iIZ
12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage 7 G%Ccv 5
13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? &40
14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? d-10
15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? N.(i
5-05-98
-1-
A
ii
Panted on Recycled Paper
16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? # L Ac-
17. Grading quantites shall be balanced. Amount cut IFS GM . Amount fill c C1'i .
(Include any basement cut in grading quantities.)
18. Area of disturbance. 40% maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded
slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or
are proposed to be added. Square feet Percentage of Net Lot Area
19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet WI\
20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented,
square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities.
21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities.
22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy,
loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project.
O�lA
23. Attach plans.
24. Proposed scheduling.
25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required.
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach
additional sheets as necessary).
na
❑ 19'' 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or
substantial alteration of ground contours.
❑ 121V 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or
roads.
0 fd' 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
-2-
YE.$ HQ
❑ Ur 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
❑ 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity.
❑ 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or
alteration of existing draining patterns.
❑ 137 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
❑ [i" 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
❑ Gir 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives.
❑ 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage,
etc.).
❑ 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
❑ ❑✓ 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil
stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing
structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
SITE 1-4-AS 19-e_zrafizt, O is TW \ 1 TLfZ '51 _N
17-44S UJOC2- L co ,t_sLsrs t-70 RO , ( AO(t1 , O L Valvi
'St1 Cgort,-tri. 19)n ,r4 W.T[(14 OF 66124 Arno C2.aA0-0
62anA, _ -tut) vhliAUL (L MiJ t4 —114,4A 3011 c44(,LL An
ate-!)C ANJA7ti4ts PLt.r
39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity
of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid
photos will be accepted.
Li lAceyvvr U Ate- , l -TiALU 14 NA47-itze
-112P v CD, -t--(ALS•
-3-
1
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
VI. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No
Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply
does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No
Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general
standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific
screening analysis).
VI I. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site,
cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
VIII. 'Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is
significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made,
an EIR is required.
IX. 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant
Impact.' The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the
effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V, "Earlier Analysis," above may be
cross-referenced).
X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above.
XI. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside
document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is
substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be
cited in the discussion.
Issues (and Supporting Information Sources):
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or
polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project
c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the
vicinity?
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community (including a low-income
or minority community)?
I. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal:
Incorwated
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 C33N
population projections?
-4
•
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an
undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 111
housing?
III. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal
result in or expose people to potential impacts
involving:
a) Fault rupture? 0 0 0 Q/
b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 0/
c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 El—
d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 0 13}/
e) Landslides or mudflows? 0 0 0 IV
f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 0 0 IV
conditions from excavation, grading, or fill?
g) Subsidence of the land? 0 0 0
h) Expansive soils? 0 0 0 61/
i) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 0 0 0'
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 I]Y
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related . 0 0 0 Ill -
hazards such as flooding?
c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration 0 0 0 or
of surface water quality (e.g. temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? /
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 D7
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 0 9-
water movements?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 8'
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations or through substantial Toss of
groundwater recharge capability?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 p-
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 IV
groundwater otherwise available for public water
supplies?
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
❑ ❑ ❑ lv/
-5-
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 07
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 CV
cause any change in climate?
d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0 G'
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 ❑ 0 lir
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 131''
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 11
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? 0 0 0 q.
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 GK.
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 Br-
aftemative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? /
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 lE
VI I. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal
result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 0 0 Et —
habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds)?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 E1Y
trees)?
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., 0 0 0 Eir
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vemal 0 0 • 0 fJ
poop?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 LY
VI II. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 M/
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0
inefficient manner?
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of future value to
the region and the residents of the State?
Q'
❑ ❑ ❑ CtY
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 [9�
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 t°1'
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
-6-
•
Potentially
Significant
Potencaly Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 Li
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 Cif
potential health hazards? /
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 WI
brush, grass, or trees?
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 Er
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 Ci/
XI. PUBUC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 !Tr
b) Police protection? 0 0 0 C1/
c) Schools? 0 0 0 IP'
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 0 liia'
e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 p-
XI I. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the
proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies,
or substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 L-
b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 V'
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 fp-
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 EY
e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 Cd'
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 Il'
g) Local or regional water supplies? 0 0 0 u'
XI II. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 0 0 DK
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 OV
c) Create light or glare? 0 0 0 CiV
XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? 0 0 0 Ca-
b) Disturb archaeological resources? 0 0 0 EV
c) Affect historical resources? 0 0 0 Er
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 0 0 a
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? /
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within 0 0 0 IR"
the potential impact area?
-'7-
•
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0
regional parks or other recreations facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 12(
XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. /
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 El
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important example of the
major period of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 (07
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 l21/
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable`
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other
current projects and the effects of probable
future projects.)
d) Does the project have environmental effects 0 0 0
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
XVII. EARIJER ANALYSES.
Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the
tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or
more effects have been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section
15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. In this
case a discussion should identify the following on
attached sheets.
a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses 0
and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which 0 0 0 EV
effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were
addressed by mitigation measures based on the
earlier analysis. /
c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less 0 0 0 p/
than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," VVV
describe the mitigation measures which were
incorporated or refined from the earlier document
and the extent to which they address site -
specific conditions for the project.
-S-
NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the
lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Govemment Code and submit a signed statement
indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list,
and shall specify any list.
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT
The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists
compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is
required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information:
1. Name of applicant:—('QQl(`LAD
2. Address: t(O HcIDDLEQ-cYd_ Lti21L- C6Luvu,m.aifi,
t. - 40II4
3. Phone Number: 4°,4sd (10..-
4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code):
5. Local Agency (city/county): u,l vt(o 1-41.1)S (ric . ,(D f1
6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: -1J0•Ct 620 —Od Lor 2's5
7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at City Hall), Kook&
8. Regulatory identification number:
9. Date of List: JULY 1992
Date td.W���
For
Signature
t eApplieannl
-9-
NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to
Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below.
I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby
certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are no contained on
these lists.
Date L .2.1) .45V6
Signature
For ' '. A.AeL.. 7177,1 Clh
Applicant
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits
present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date 1 0 .20.4,9
For
forms\environm. 1998app
Sig -nature
Applicant
A
- 10 -