Loading...
588, for development and grading fo, Correspondence• s Ci4, ol Roiling Jij/ December 20, 2000 Mrs. Tamara Torino 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 588 STABLE WITH GRADING 6 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH Dear Mrs. Torino: This letter is to inform you that it has been almost one year since a time extension was approved by the Planning Commission for Zoning Case No. 588. Note that these approvals will expire on February 16, 2001 and unless you acquire permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must refile based upon the same. criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lola Ungar Planning Director Printed on Recycled Paper • Ci1y ` Rolling February 16, 2000 Mrs. Tamara Torino • 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hilts, CA 90274 • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION APPROVAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 588 6 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH (LOT 255-UR). Dear Mrs. Torino: This letter shall serve as official notification that a one year time extension was APPROVED by the Planning Commission at their regular meeting on February 15, 2000 for the subject case. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2000-03, specifying the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission. Note that this approval will expire on February 16, 2001 and unless you acquire permits before then, under Section 17.46.080(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code you must refile based upon the same criteria as for the issuance of a new permit. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, , Lola Ungar Planning Director cc: Mr. Richard Huddleson, Architect Printed on Recycled Paper. • RESOLUTION NO. 2000-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BARN AND TO AUTHORIZE PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONDUCTED AND LIMITED GRADING FOR A CORRAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A request has been filed by Mrs. Tamara Torino with respect to real property located at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR), Rolling Hills, requesting an extension to a previously approved Site Plan Review for the development of a barn and to authorize previously illegally conducted and limited grading for a corral. Section 2. The Commission considered this item at a meeting on February 15, 2000 at . which time information was presented indicating that the extension oftime is necessary is necessary in order to comply with Los Angeles County requirements. Section 3. Based upon information and evidence submitted, the Planning Commission does hereby amend Paragraph A, Section 5 of Resolution No. 99-5, dated February 16, 1999, to read as follows: "A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within two years of the approval of this Resolution." Section 4. Except as herein amended, the provisions of Resolution No. 99-5 shall continue to be in full force and effect. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 15TH DAY O ATTEST: red-ru4,:reN , k MARILYN KE , DEPUTY CITY CLERK 2000. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2000-03 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 AND APPROVING AN EXTENSION TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BARN AND TO AUTHORIZE PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONDUCTED AND LIMITED GRADING FOR A CORRAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. was approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 15, 2000 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CITY CLERK Cu,• • a� Ro llin9 January 13, 2000 Mrs. Tamara Torino 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 588 6 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH (LOT 255-UR). RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 Dear Mrs. Torino: We received your request for an extension of time to obtain permits for the proposed barn and grading prior to the expiration date of February 16, 2000. A fee receipt is attached. Your request will be placed on the agenda of the Tuesday, February 15. 2000 Planning Commission meeting that will take place at 7:30 PM. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Thank your for your cooperation. Sincerely, G'7a Gr Lola Ungar Planning Direct Printed on Recycled Paper. JAN 1 2 2000 CITY OF ROLLING H!LLS uy LOLA UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DEAR MRS UNGAR I AM REQUESTING A ONE YEAR EXTENDTION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF MY BARN AT 6 MIDDLERIDGE SO THIS DELAY WAS DUE TO L.A. COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED MY CHECK FOR TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS, ($200.00). SINCERELY H\-7-77,26391-714041-4, TAMARA TORINO Ci1y feollin S JUL December 16, 1999 Mrs. Tamara Torino ' ' 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377.1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E mall: cltyofrheaol.com SUBJECT: EXPIRATION OF APPROVALS FOR ZONING CASE NO. 588 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR). RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 Dear Mrs. Torino: This letter is to inform you that it has been almost one year since the approval of Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property at 6 Middleridge Lane South in Zoning Case No. 588. Approvals will expire on February 16. 2000. You can extend approvals for one year only if you apply to the Planning Commission in writing to request an extension prior to the expiration date. The filing fee for the time extension is $200 to be paid to the City of Rolling Hills. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Lola Ungar Planning Director cc: Mr. Richard Huddleson, Architect Printed on Recycled Paper. • • City 0/!2l! s Jd.PI March 3, 1999 Ms. Lata Thakar, District Engineer Mr. Rafael Bernal, District Engineering Associate L.A. County Dept. of Public Works Building and Safety Division 24320 S. Narbonne Avenue Lomita, CA 90717 SUBJECT: 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR) Owner: Mrs. Tamara Torino Dear Lata and Rafael: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com At the March 8, 1999 regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rolling Hills, the Council directed staff to withhold issuance of permits for the proposed stable approved by Resolution No. 99-5 at the subject address unless and until the trellis within the south side yard setback is removed. In accordance with Resolution No. 99--4 which denies a Variance to retain an illegal trellis in the south side yard setback and Resolution No. 99-5, the trellis is required to be removed within 60 days of the approved Resolution No. 99-5, by April 19, 1999. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Your cooperation is appreciated. Sincerely, Lola Ungar Planning Director cc: Mr. Craig Nealis, City Manager Mrs. Tamara Torino Mr. Richard Huddleson, Architect %a Printed on Recycled Paper. • City oyleoefin9 _Afro February 23, 1999 Ms. Lata Thakar, District Engineer Mr. Rafael Bernal, District Engineering Associate L.A. County Dept. of Public Works Building and Safety Division 24320 S. Narbonne Avenue Lomita, CA 90717 SUBJECT: 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR) Owner: Mrs. Tamara Torino Dear Lata and Rafael: • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com At the February 16, 1999 regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rolling Hills, the Commission adopted the attached Resolution Nos. 99-4 and 99-5 denvina a Variance to retain an illegal trellis in the south side yard and granting Site Plan Review approval for a barn and corral to authorize previously illegally conducted and limited grading. There is a special condition unique to this case as noted in Condition R of Section 5 of Resolution No. 99-5 related to grading and drainage plan check. We would be most appreciative if the grading and drainage plan check takes into consideration the improvement of grading and drainage at the north section of 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR) and also takes into consideration any potential effects on property at 4 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 256-UR) as well as the attached Los Angeles County Flood Control District Plan No. 6650-RW2 and the Middleridge Lane South roadway between Lots 255-UR and 256-UR. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Your cooperation is appreciated. Lola Ungar Planning Director cc: Mr. Craig Nealis, City Manager Mrs. Tamara Torino Mr. Richard Huddleson, Architect Printed on Recycled Paper. RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE RETENTION OF A PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONSTRUCTED TRELLIS THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mrs. Tamara Torino with respect to real property located at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR), Rolling Hills requesting a Variance to permit a previously constructed illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback. Section 2. On September 30, 1998, staff was informed that the hillside on the north side of the subject property was being graded. Upon inspection by Senior Building Engineering Inspector Rafael Bernal and staff, it was observed that there was a cut in the hillside and a wood, railroad tie retaining wall had been constructed in that area. The application was submitted after staff determined that a new trellis was observed attached to the south side of the residence within the side yard setback. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on November 17, 1998, December 15, 1998, and January 19, 1999, and at a field trip visit on December 12,1998. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15303 (e)] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.120(B) requires a side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-2 zone to be thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is requesting to maintain a 262 square foot trellis that encroaches a maximum of twenty-eight (28) feet into the south side yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are no exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 PAGE 1 OF 3 generally to the other property in the same vicinity and zone. The variance is not necessary because authorization of the illegally constructed trellis would not allow sufficient setbacks and easements to provide buffers between residential uses. In addition, the building pad coverage for this project would be 35.3% which the Commission finds excessive and exceeds the building pad coverage of most properties in the vicinity so that the proposed expansion is not appropriate for the property. B. The Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because a portion of the residence, garden walls and a water feature already encroach into the south side yard setback, and additional encroachments would exacerbate the amount of residential structure within setback areas, and further construction within setbacks is not required to use the site for residential uses. C. The granting of the Variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed project does not minimize structural coverage on the pad, leaves little open space between property lines, would result in further overdevelopment of the building pad and exceeds the recommended coverage of 30%. The encroachment also makes the illegally constructed trellis more visually prominent on the building pad than appropriate for the existing development pattern of the City. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby denies the request for a Variance to authorize the retention of a previously constructed illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback in Zoning Case No. 588. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 16 DAY, RUARY, 1999. • ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN RN, DEPUfiY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 PAGE2OF3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-4 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE RETENTION OF A PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONSTRUCTED TRELLIS THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 16, 1999 by the following roll call vote: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. AYES: NOES: None. ABSENT: None . ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 PAGE 3 OF 3 RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BARN AND TO AUTHORIZE PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONDUCTED AND LIMITED GRADING FOR A CORRAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mrs. Tamara Torino with respect to real property located at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR), Rolling Hilts requesting a Variance to permit a previously constructed illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback and Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which had been illegally graded, at a single family residence. During the hearing process, the Planning Commission denied the request for a Variance to authorize the retention of a previously illegally constructed trellis that encroaches into the south side yard setback. Section 2. A. On September 30, 1998, staff was informed that the hillside on the north side of the subject property was being graded. Upon inspection by Senior Building Engineering Inspector Rafael Bernal and staff, it was observed that there was a cut in the hillside and a wood, railroad tie retaining wall had been constructed in that area. B. On October 1, 1998, staff discussed the illegal grading and construction that took place without the benefit of permits with Mr. Richard Huddleson, Architect, and forwarded a letter to Mrs. Torino. The letter stated that all grading work must be stopped immediately until appropriate permits/Planning Commission approvals have been obtained. Required applications were filed on October 20,1998. C. Previously, on June 16, 1998, the Planning Commission granted Site Plan Review approval to authorize previous illegally conducted and limited grading for an on -site guest driveway and parking area at the residence. A permit to legally grade the guest driveway and parking area was issued on November 6, 1998. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on November 17, 1998, December 15, 1998, and January 19, 1999, and at a field trip visit on December 12, 1998. Concerns expressed by neighbors involving the proposed barn included grading, drainage, proximity to the northern neighbors' residence, and odors. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 1 OF 6 Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15303 (e)] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit and any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period. The applicant requests Site Plan Review for the construction of a barn and corral that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which had been illegally graded on a lot developed with an existing single family residence, an attached garage, guest house, swimming pool, and trellises. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development of a barn and corral is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structurecomplies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements with the conditions approved in Section 5 of this Resolution. The lot has a net square foot area of 154,899 square feet. The residence (3,878 sq.ft.), attached garage (806 sq.ft.), swimming pool (800 sq.ft.), guest house (450 sq.ft.), future barn (450 sq.ft.), and trellises (689 square feet) will total 7,073 square feet which constitutes 4.7% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 14,715 square feet which equals 9.5% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most of the proposed structure located above and away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The 950 square foot building pad proposed for the new barn and corral will be 450 square feet or 47.4%. The total building pad coverage will be 33.5%. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed barn, residence and existing neighboring residences. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 2 OF 6 C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the northeastern side (rear) of this lot. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves several mature trees and shrubs. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project is designed to minimize grading. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across the northeasterly portions of the property. F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this irregular -shaped lot. Grading shall be permitted only to restore the natural slope of the property. G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize an existing driveway at the southwestern portion of the property off Middleridge Lane South for access. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for the development of a barn that requires grading and to authorize previously illegally conducted and limited grading for a corral, as indicated on the Development Plan dated January 12, 1999 and marked Exhibit A, that is subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.46.080. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE3OF6 C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an • approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated January 12, 1999 and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The 3-rail fence at the northern property line shall be relocated to the 25-foot easement line. F. Any garden or retaining walls shall not exceed 3 feet in height. • G. Any structures within required setbacks require a Variance and Planning Commission review and approval. H. The 262 square foot trellis within the southern side yard setback shall be removed within 60 days of the approval of this resolution if the denial of the Variance in Zoning Case No. 588 becomes effective. I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 4.7% and total lot coverage shall not exceed 9.5%. J. Disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 27,484 square feet or 17.7%. K. Completion of grading for the proposed barn and corral shall not exceed 45 cubic yards of cut soil and 45 cubic yards of fill soil and shall not be permitted unless and until barn plans are approved and a permit is issued by the County of Los Angeles. L. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 33.8%, pool pad coverage shall not exceed 24.0%%, guest house pad coverage shall not exceed 59.3%, and the building pad coverage for the barn shall not exceed 47.4%. The total building pad coverage shall not exceed 33.5%. M. The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall be retained to the greatest extent possible. N. Landscaping with rye grass or other suitable native vegetation shall be provided in a 7± foot wide strip to attempt to contain loose material within the corral area following the 3-rail fence relocation to the 25-foot easement line as shown on the site plan on file dated January 12, 1999 and marked Exhibit A. O. Landscaping to obscure any garden walls, retaining walls, or residence shall be maintained so as not to block views in the northeastern and western corridors of the lot. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE4OF6 P. Landscaping to obscure retaining walls and residence shall be maintained so as not to exceed the ridge line of the residence. Q. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the proposed barn and corral building pad. R. Plans to be submitted for grading and drainage plan check shall include Los Angeles County Flood Control District Plan No. 6650-RW2, dated 5/21/73, this Resolution No. 99-5, and shall take into consideration improvement of grading and drainage and that includes effects on property at 4 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 256- UR) as well as the Middleridge Lane South roadway between Lots 255-UR and 256- UR. S. Prior to submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio. T. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. U. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review or the approval shall not be effective. V. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 16 r DAY FE RUARY, 1999. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE5OF6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-5 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BARN AND TO AUTHORIZE PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONDUCTED AND LIMITED GRADING FOR A CORRAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. was approved and adopted.at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 16, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices P. k� DEPUTY CI CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 6 OF 6 • • • ••7P:-• - . d 1"7-41/111OSOS".'!C:---- Vile 10 u Aloledst•ZRZIlior- - • - s • - ;11-111 tg,, ,110 0.:1„ t• tsso fllittNE _- 11GOISs tie Me tite.lie AND - INONESI 100 coess • ra.s. it& • • 'AP,. •_ Ala. - • , • troksvv...1 tee • c, 0 A"firli.1-014 -114"M 1.05 PALOS V5.0,5.5 " MC 2313 C.f. el eta. kat (Verna OE. .2617 *am :moo ono ..A.2.60:f 261; taas--33— /093 too! 6.t0 AAA' • sss'AStievi OAP 111 stAeteLt VISE poorest ttfe.est et oe:100% Olt.47097-3.1* Steettit CA. het% 01 riSTS-ils ileSte COPPAPte.04... ....," , i effeepe - tpent.- (Pi ifilit-is3 -saittePlalieteeP Oa 4iPSP-107 WISet 1.,:i.Vx ,,•-•, ---,,:. - - WO* tiotOsisp! fa pritp-ge egStitOcte,.1, .,. :;,••••••-:::_:. Steeli:fligertE . op tetb.-10 you tot --,.:. trPtee arig---:. , .. . itossif ,?„,-"'•-.. - - • . - cs.tvisada WO di tetiterp tteitee Wyatt Oseist.:-.• sit Aes3463 tdAtes Pt 6 ;!..,'. CP 21617.0 toe. Vt. .„..c• ,,,........-•-• , _ tOolt P . ,; OP oii0-916 114E- C-'---.1".—ri Cf PCP1.016 t411.3,3 .. . PlAt tie •• fell tie. et • • PLC P. • CPARCEL zsa tatail!" 152 Al.lo S.Saisitv1,-,,, 0, N./. Si.afisykaitel," >41,...*. ti kl'ils ' A 061. 11.60 .ne N. `... Pe.St V/. LIWV " • -.,;-:- -- - sittlittIl A 4:- '.' • --t- --- - • ..-. MAP NO. 611. t 43Za* .56 4 Cal. tPAStal.) 20S 00 SOME IN FEET to0 Stood distant-0.0A [0 . lig...10 Cy----000 e area af parcel. . - 00000 . arts of total Itoleliwg,. - '' Denotes set NAV* feet. • . . far totaiett resting title report..t.PARCW2S3 Derates caverre {trate old artertemmt structures. : •- . . areatO 11111.166.1a1S 1•ASie Acctpit 100-6693-00 ID .9 .A."*. 1.11-13 t.I. 21 I.;. SIND . a .01111116, for:loos s bbAstotatyps_Sit____ftv [omits:A e1sts$C1 140WWG .1 1316 I 200 Cal eliet1faS40t 1110011.10Gt a61,0 ,600 cat %WM.* tatallta 100 til -Ts As ssovnt •••••-t .444s_ Ho% -6650-RW 2 • • aiy .1) Ieoffin JUL VIA CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL February 17,1999 Mrs. Tamara Torino 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hilis, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377.7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: APPEAL PERIOD AND AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, ZONING CASE NO. 588, 6 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH (LOT 255-UR) RESOLUTION NOS. 99-4 AND 99-5 Dear Mrs. Torino: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission adopted two separate resolutions on February 16, 1999 (1) to deny your request for a Variance to authorize the retention of a previously illegally constructed trellis that encroaches into the south side yard setback and (2) to approve your request for Site Plan Review for the development of a barn and to authorize previously illegally conducted and limited grading for a corral at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR), Rolling Hilis, CA in Zoning Case No. 588. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission will be reported to the City Council on February 22, 1999. The Planning Commission's decision in this matter shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the resolution by the Commission, unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (301 day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. If no appeals are filed within the thirty (30) day period after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution, the Planning Commission's action will become final and you will be required to cause to be recorded an Affidavit of Acceptance Form together with the Resolution No. 99-5 only in the Office of the County Recorder before the Commission's action takes effect. We have enclosed a copy of RESOLUTION NOS. 99-4 and 99-5 and the approved Exhibit A Development Plan to keep for your files. Resolution No. 99-5 specifies the conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission. Once you have reviewed the resolutions, please complete the enclosed AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM, have the signature(s) notarized, and forward the completed form and a copy of Resolution No. 99-5 only to: Los Angeles County Registrar -Recorder Real Estate Records Section 12400 East Imperial Highway Norwalk, CA 90650 Include a check in the amount of $9.00 for the first page and $3.00 for each additional page. Printed an Recycled Paper • • The City will notify the Los Angeles County Building & Safety Division to issue permits only when the Affidavit of Acceptance is received by us and any conditions of Resolution No. 99-5 required prior to issuance of building permits are met. Please feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, 't1?-c- LOLA UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR Enc: AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM RESOLUTION NOS. 99-4 and 99-5 (Record only 99-5) EXHIBIT A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPEAL SECTION OF THE ROLLING HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE. cc: Mr. Richard Huddleson • RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE RETENTION OF A PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONSTRUCTED TRELLIS THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mrs. Tamara Torino with respect to real property located at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR), Rolling Hills requesting a Variance to permit a previously constructed illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback. Section 2. On September 30, 1998, staff was informed that the hillside on the north side of the subject property was being graded. Upon inspection by Senior Building Engineering Inspector Rafael Bernal and staff, it was observed that there was a cut in the hillside and a wood, railroad tie retaining wall had been constructed in that area. The application was submitted after staff determined that a new trellis was observed attached to the south side of the residence within the side yard setback. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the application on November 17, 1998, December 15, 1998, and January 19, 1999, and at a field trip visit on December 12, 1998. Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15303 (e)] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Sections 17.38.010 through 17.38.050 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code permit approval of a Variance from the standards and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance when exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property and not applicable to other similar properties in the same zone prevent the owner from making use of a parcel of property to the same extent enjoyed by similar properties in the same vicinity. Section 17.16.120(B) requires a side yard setback for every residential parcel in the RA-S-2 zone to be thirty-five (35) feet. The applicant is requesting to maintain a 262 square foot trellis that encroaches a maximum of twenty-eight (28) feet into the south side yard setback. With respect to this request for a Variance, the Planning Commission finds as follows: A. There are no exceptional and extraordinary circumstances and conditions applicable to the property or to the intended use that do not apply RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 PAGE 1 OF 3 • • generally to the other property in the same vicinity and zone. The variance is not necessary because authorization of the illegally constructed trellis would not allow sufficient setbacks and easements to provide buffers between residential uses. In addition, the building pad coverage for this project would be 35.3% which the Commission finds excessive and exceeds the building pad coverage of most properties in the vicinity so that the proposed expansion is not appropriate for the property. B. The Variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, but which is denied to the property in question because a portion of the residence, garden walls and a water feature already encroach into the south side yard setback, and additional encroachments would exacerbate the amount of residential structure within setback areas, and further construction within setbacks is not required to use the site for residential uses. C. The granting of the Variance will be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located because the proposed project does not minimize structural coverage on the pad, leaves little open space between property lines, would result in further overdevelopment of the building pad and exceeds the recommended coverage of 30%. The encroachment also makes the illegally constructed trellis more visually prominent on the building pad than appropriate for the existing development pattern of the City. Section 9. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby denies .the request for a Variance to authorize the retention of a previously constructed illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback in Zoning Case No. 588. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 16 DAY, RUARY, 1999. J ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN I N, DEPU CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 PAGE 2 OF 3 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-4 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DENYING A VARIANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE RETENTION OF A PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONSTRUCTED TRELLIS THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. was approved and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 16, 1999 by the following roll call vote: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer,. Witte and Chairman Roberts. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: None. None. None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices =lell( RN DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-4 PAGE 3 OF 3 • • RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND MAIL TO: CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 (310) 377-7288 FAX The Registrar -Recorder's Office requires that the form be notarized before recordation. AFFIDAVIT OF ACCEPTANCE FORM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) §§ CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) ZONING CASE NO. 58$ SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I (We) the undersigned state: I am (We are) the owner(s) of the real property described as follows: 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR), Rolling Hills, CA. This property is the subject of the above numbered case. I am (We are) aware of, and accept, all the stated conditions in said ZONING CASE NO. 588 SITE PLAN REVIEW VARIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT I (We) certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. L Z. T Recorder's Use Only Signature Signature Name typed or printed Name typed or printed Address Address City/State City/State Signatures must be acknowledged by a notary public. State of California ) County of Los Angeles ) On before me, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies) and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness by hand and official seal. Signature of Notary SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF • exN,$/T " ., RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BARN AND TO AUTHORIZE PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONDUCTED AND LIMITED GRADING FOR A CORRAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS DOES HEREBY FIND, RESOLVE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An application was duly filed by Mrs. Tamara Torino with respect to real property located at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR), Rolling Hills requesting a Variance to permit a previously constructed illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback and Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which had been illegally graded, at a single family residence. During the hearing process, the Planning Commission denied the request for a Variance to authorize the retention of a previously illegally constructed trellis that encroaches into the south side yard setback. Section 2. A. On September 30, 1998, staff was informed that the hillside on the north side of the subject property was being graded. Upon inspection by Senior Building Engineering Inspector Rafael Bernal and staff, it was observed that there was a cut in the hillside and a wood, railroad tie retaining wall had been constructed in that area. B. On October 1, 1998, staff discussed the illegal grading and construction that took place without the benefit of permits with Mr. Richard Huddleson, Architect, and forwarded a letter to Mrs. Torino. The letter stated that all grading work must be stopped immediately until appropriate permits/Planning Commission approvals have been obtained. Required applications were filed on October 20,1998. C. Previously, on June 16, 1998, the Planning Commission granted Site Plan Review approval to authorize previous illegally conducted and limited grading for an on -site guest driveway and parking area at the residence. A permit to legally grade the guest driveway and parking area was issued on November 6, 1998. Section 3. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the applications on November 17, 1998, December 15, 1998, and January 19, 1999, and at a field trip visit on December 12, 1998. Concerns expressed by neighbors involving the proposed barn included grading, drainage, proximity to the northern neighbors' residence, and odors. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 1 OF 6 • • Section 3. The Planning Commission finds that the project qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption [State CA Guidelines, Section 15303 (e)] and is therefore categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 4. Section 17.46.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code requires a development plan to be submitted for site plan review and approval before any grading requiring a grading permit and any building or structure may be constructed or any expansion, addition, alteration or repair to existing buildings may be made which involve changes to grading or an increase to the size of the building or structure by at least 1,000 square feet and has the effect of increasing the size of the building or structure by more than twenty-five percent (25%) in any thirty-six month period. The applicant requests Site Plan Review for the construction of a barn and corral that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which had been illegally graded on a lot developed with an existing single family residence, an attached garage, guest house, swimming pool, and trellises. With respect to the Site Plan Review application, the Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact: A. The proposed development of a barn and corral is compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses because the proposed structurecomplies with the General Plan requirement of low profile, low density residential development with sufficient open space between surrounding structures. The project conforms to Zoning Code setback and lot coverage requirements with the conditions approved in Section 5 of this Resolution. The lot has a net square foot area of 154,899 square feet. The residence (3,878 sq.ft.), attached garage (806 sq.ft.), swimming pool (800 sq.ft.), guest house (450 sq.ft.), future barn (450 sq.ft.), and trellises (689 square feet) will total 7,073 square feet which constitutes 4.7% of the lot which is within the maximum 20% structural lot coverage requirement. The total lot coverage including paved areas and driveway will be 14,715 square feet which equals 9.5% of the lot, which is within the 35% maximum overall lot coverage requirement. The proposed project is on a relatively large lot with most of the proposed structure located above and away from the road so as to reduce the visual impact of the development. The 950 square foot building pad proposed for the new barn and corral will be 450 square feet or 47.4%. The total building pad coverage will be 33.5%. B. The proposed development preserves and integrates into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls) because a minimum amount of grading is proposed and will only be done to provide approved drainage that will flow away from the proposed barn, residence and existing neighboring residences. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 2OF6 • • C. The development plan follows natural contours of the site to minimize grading and the natural drainage courses will continue to the canyons at the northeastern side (rear) of this lot. D. The development plan incorporates existing large trees and native vegetation to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, the development plan preserves several mature trees and shrubs. E. The development plan substantially preserves the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage because the new structure will not cause the structural and total lot coverage to be exceeded. Further, the proposed project is designed to minimize grading. Significant portions of the lot will be left undeveloped so as to maintain scenic vistas across the northeasterly portions of the property. F. The proposed development, as conditioned, is harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences. As indicated in Paragraph A, the lot coverage maximum will not be exceeded and the proposed project is consistent with the scale of the neighborhood when compared to this irregular -shaped lot. Grading shall be .permitted only to restore the natural slope of the property. G. The proposed development is sensitive and not detrimental to the convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles because the proposed project will utilize an existing driveway at the southwestern portion of the property off Middleridge Lane South for access. H. The project conforms with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and is categorically exempt from environmental review. Section 5. Based upon the foregoing findings, the Planning Commission hereby approves the Site Plan Review application for the development of a barn that requires grading and to authorize previously illegally conducted and limited grading for a corral, as indicated on the Development • Plan dated January 12, 1999 and marked Exhibit A, that is subject to the following conditions: A. The Site Plan Review approval shall expire within one year from the effective date of approval as defined in Section 17.46.080. B. It is declared and made a condition of the Site Plan Review approval, that if any conditions thereof are violated, this approval shall be suspended and the privileges granted thereunder shall lapse; provided that the applicant has been given written notice to cease such violation and has failed to do so for a period of thirty (30) days. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 3 OF 6 • • C. All requirements of the Buildings and Construction Ordinance, the Zoning Ordinance, and of the zone in which the subject property is located must be complied with unless otherwise set forth in the Permit, or shown otherwise on an • approved plan. D. The lot shall be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the site plan on file dated January 12, 1999 and marked Exhibit A, except as otherwise provided in these conditions. E. The 3-rail fence at the northern property line shall be relocated to the 25-foot easement line. F. Any garden or retaining walls shall not exceed 3 feet in height. • G. Any structures within required setbacks require a Variance and Planning Commission review and approval. H. The 262 square foot trellis within the southern side yard setback shall be removed within 60 days of the approval of this resolution if the denial of the Variance in Zoning Case No. 588 becomes effective. I. Structural lot coverage shall not exceed 4.7% and total lot coverage shall not exceed 9.5%. J. Disturbed area of the lot shall not exceed 27,484 square feet or 17.7%. K. Completion of grading for the proposed barn and corral shall not exceed 45 cubic yards of cut soil and 45 cubic yards of fill soil and shall not be permitted unless and until barn plans are approved and a permit is issued by the County of Los Angeles. L. Residential building pad coverage shall not exceed 33.8%, pool pad coverage shall not exceed 24.0%%, guest house pad coverage shall not exceed 59.3%, and the building pad coverage for the barn shall not exceed 47.4%. The total building pad coverage shall not exceed 33.5%. M. The existing topography, flora and natural features of the lot shall be retained to the greatest extent possible. N. Landscaping with rye grass or other suitable native vegetation shall be provided in a 7± foot wide strip to attempt to contain loose material within the corral area following the 3-rail fence relocation to the 25-foot easement line as shown on the site plan on file dated January 12, 1999 and marked Exhibit A. O. Landscaping to obscure any garden walls, retaining walls, or residence shall be maintained so as not to block views in the northeastern and western corridors of the lot. RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 4 OF 6 • • P. Landscaping to obscure retaining walls and residence shall be maintained so as not to exceed the ridge line of the residence. Q. Landscaping shall incorporate and preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, the existing mature trees and shrubs and the natural landscape screening surrounding the proposed barn and corral building pad. R. Plans to be submitted for grading and drainage plan check shall include Los Angeles County Flood Control District Plan No. 6650-RW2, dated 5/21/73, this Resolution No. 99-5, and shall take into consideration improvement of grading and drainage and that includes effects on property at 4 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 256- UR) as well as the Middleridge Lane South roadway between Lots 255-UR and 256- UR. S. Prior to submittal of an applicable final grading plan to the County of Los Angeles for plan check, a detailed grading and drainage plan with related geology, soils and hydrology reports that conform to the development plan as approved by the ,Planning Commission must be submitted to the Rolling Hills Planning Department staff for their review. Cut and fill slopes shall not exceed a steepness of a 2 to 1 slope ratio. T. The project must be reviewed and approved by the Rolling Hills Community Association Architectural Review Committee prior to the issuance of any building or grading permit. U. The applicant shall execute an Affidavit of Acceptance of all conditions of this Site Plan Review or the approval shall not be effective. V. All conditions of this Site Plan Review approval must be complied with prior to the issuance of a building or grading permit from the County of Los Angeles. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE 16 W DAY * FE$RUARY,1999. ALLAN ROBERTS, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: MARILYN KERN, DEPUTY CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE5OF6 • • STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) §§ I certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-5 entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BARN AND TO AUTHORIZE PREVIOUSLY ILLEGALLY CONDUCTED AND LIMITED GRADING FOR A CORRAL IN ZONING CASE NO. 588. was approved and adopted .at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission on February 16, 1999 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Hankins, Margeta, Sommer, Witte and Chairman Roberts. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None. and in compliance with the laws of California was posted at the following: Administrative Offices DEPUTY CI CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 99-5 PAGE 6 OF 6 17.54.010 • • 17.54 APPEALS 17.54.010 Time for Filing Appeals A. A11 actions of the Planning Commission authorized by this Title may be appealed to the City Council. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk. B. All appeals must be filed on or before the 30th calendar day after adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution on the project or application. Application fees shall be paid as required by Section 17.30.030 of this Title. C. Within 30 days after the Planning Commission adopts a resolution which approves or denies a development application, the City Clerk shall place the resolution as a report item on the City Council's agenda. The City Council may, by an affirmative vote of three members, take jurisdiction over the application. In the event the City Council takes jurisdiction over the application, the Planning Commission's decision will be stayed until the City Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter. 17.54,020 Persons Authorized to File an Appeal Any person, including the City Manager, may appeal a decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council, in accordance with the terms of this Chapter. 17.54.030 Form, Content, and Deficiencies in an Appeal Application A. All appeals shall be filed in writing with the City Clerk on a form or forms provided by the City Clerk. No appeal shall be considered filed until the required appeal fee has been received by the City Clerk. B. The appeal application shall state, at a minimum, the name and address of the appellant, the project and action being appealed, and the reasons why the appellant believes that the Planning Commission erred or abused its discretion, or why the Planning Commission's decision is not support by evidence in the record. 76 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • • 17.54.030 C. If the appeal application is found to be deficient, the City Clerk shall deliver or mail (by certified mail), to the appellant a notice specifying the reasons why the appeal is deficient. The appellant shall correct the deficiency with an amendment to the appeal form within seven calendar days of receiving the deficiency notice. Otherwise, the appeal application will be deemed withdrawn, and the appeal fee will be returned to the applicant. 17.54.040 Request for Information Upon receipt of a written and complete appeal application and fee, the City Clerk shall direct the Planning Commission Secretary to transmit to the City Council the complete record of the entire proceeding before the Planning Commission. 17.54.050 Scheduling of Appeal Hearing Upon receiving an appeal, the City. Clerk shall set the appeal for a hearing before the City Council to occur within 20 days of the filing of the appeal. In the event that more than one appeal is filed for the same project, the Clerk shall schedule all appeals to be heard at the same time. 17.54.060 Proceedings A. Noticing The hearing shall be noticed as required by Section 17.30,030 of this Title. In addition, the following parties shall be noticed: 1. The applicant of the proposal being appealed; 2. The appellant; and 3. Any person who provided oral testimony or written comments to the Planning Commission during or as part of the public hearing on the project. B. Hearing The City Council shall conduct a public hearing pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 17.34 of this Title. The Council shall consider all information in the record, as well as additional information presented at the appeal hearing, before taking action on the appeal. 77 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24,1993 1734.060 • • C. Action The Council may act to uphold, overturn, or otherwise modify the Planning Commission's original action on the proposal, or the Council may remand the application back to the Planning Commission for further review and direction. The Council shall make findings to support its decision. D. Finality of Decision The action of the City Council to approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application shall be final and conclusive. E. Record of Proceedings The decision of the City Council shall be set forth in full in a resolution or ordinance. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the applicant or the appellant. 17.54.070 Statute of Limitations Any action challenging a final administrative order or decision by the City made as a result of a proceeding in which by law a hearing is required to be given, evidence is required to be taken, and discretion regarding a final and non -appealable determination of facts is vested in the City of Rolling Hills, the City Council, or in any of its Commissions, officers, or employees, must be filed within the time limits set forth in the California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6 78 ROLLING HILLS ZONING MAY 24, 1993 • Ci4f ofieof�'..y January 21, 1999 Mrs. Tamara Torino 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com ZONING CASE NO. 588, Request for a Variance to permit an existing illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback and Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which has been illegally graded at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR). Dear Mrs. Torino: This letter shall serve to notify you that the Planning Commission voted at their regular meeting on January 19, 1999 to direct staff to prepare a resolution to deny your request for a Variance to permit an existing illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback and approve your request for Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which has been illegally graded at a single family residence in Zoning Case No. 588 and shall be confirmed in the draft resolution that is being prepared. The Planning Commission will review and consider the draft resolution, together with conditions of approval, at an upcoming meeting and make its final decision on your application at that subsequent meeting. The findings and conditions of approval of the draft resolution will be forwarded to you before being signed by the Planning Commission Chairman and City Clerk. The decision shall become effective thirty days after the adoption of the Planning Commission's resolution unless an appeal has been filed or the City Council takes jurisdiction of the case within that thirty (30) day appeal period. (Section 17.54.010(B) of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code). Should there be an appeal, the Commission's decision will be stayed until the Council completes its proceedings in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code. The Planning Commission's action taken by resolution denying the illegal trellis and approving the proposed barn and grading is tentatively scheduled for February 16, 1999. That action, accompanied by the record of the proceedings before the Commission, is tentatively scheduled to be placed as a report item on the City Council's agenda at the Council's regular meeting on February 22, 1999. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions regarding this matter. Sincerely, LOLA M. UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR cc: Mr. Richard Huddleson Printed on Recycled Paper. • L]gE{IYE-[Thi JAN 1 9 1999 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS qv Mr. Allan Roberts Planning Commission Chairman 1 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 4 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 January 15, 1999 Dear Mr. Roberts; Mrs. Unger, Planning Director, suggested I write you concern- ing this matter for documentation. One of the issues with 6 Middleridge Lane South is drainage from the corral area. While this has not been accomplished nor, as far as we know, no plans have been submitted and approved, a horse has been quartered on this illegally graded and undrained area. The horse has been there off and on prior to the December meeting and subsequent to that meeting, there full time to the present. The easement has been used for ingress and egress to facilitate. equestrian management and the loose soil is being moved about. En- closed please find pictures of some of the problems that will have to be addressed as to the use of the easement in this manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, /1:414406A) Ra'lph chmoller • LANCO ENGINEERING Ms. Lola Unger, Planning Director City of Rolling Hilis Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hilis, CA 90274 RE: NO. 6 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH January 12, 1999 Dear Ms Unger: As the Civil Engineer retained by Tamara Torino to prepare the necessary grading and drainage plans for the corral and barn improvements, I have purposely designed the grading of the area to minimize the blockage of the original flow pattern. This minimizes the amount of concentrated runoff exiting the barn pad and continuing downhill offsite.. As runoff that does leave the pad will do so at a point where the Uniform Building Code require no special measures to de -energize the flow in order to prevent the possibility of erosion, and as the concentrated flow is minimal, it is my opinion that there will be minimal erosion due to the grading as it is planned and that there will be no adverse effect on any downstreamproperty. After a recent site visit by the planning commission, concern was based about the need for drainage modified by the work performed by the original landscape contractor in the site. I compared my current topographic survey with the old South Bay Engineering grading plan. I determined that no substantial changes occurred, except for the recently approved turnaround grade and the minimal grading shown on the application. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any questions or require further information. Sincerely, LANCO ENGINEERING Michael A. Nichols President (WP.LOLAUNGER) 1010 CRENSHAW BLVD.' • SUITE 200 • TORRANCE, CA 90501 (310) 533-4955 • FAX (310) 533-0320 • LANCO ENGINEERING Mr. Craig R. Nealis City of Rolling Hills No. 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 RE: NO. 6 MIDDLERIDGE LANE SOUTH December 31, 1998 OE11VE JAN041999 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS Dear .Mr. Nealis: qv In removing and replacing existing soilin order to. create the guest parking area per the approved and permitted plan, the soil apparently shrank. This is' typically 'caused, by the in situ soil being in a lesser state of compaction.that'the compaction of the finished grading. In order to complete the grading per the approved plan, the volume of material lost due to shrinkage must be replaced by material from elsewhere on the site or must be imported from off -site. As there is no, work currently approved for elsewhere on the site from which to generate the necessary material, I am hereby requesting that you allow the importation of up to 140 cubic yards of material on the site. Assuming that the trucks to be used will carry approximately 9 cubic yards per load, this will necessitate approximately 16 round trips to the property. Please do not hesitate to call me if you have any questions or I can be of further assistance to you. Sincerely, LANCO ENGINEERING Michael A. Nichols President (WP.CRAIGRNEALIS) 1010 CRENSHAW BLVD. ' • SUITE '200 • TORRANCE, CA '90501 • (310) 533-4955 a FAX (310) 533-0320 December 10, 1998 DEC• 2E@EllY9 1 1 1998 CITY OF ROLLING HILLS 13Y Mr. Allan Roberts Planning Conunission Chairman Rolling Hills City Hall #1 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, Ca. 90274 Dear Mr. Roberts, We have just become aware of Mrs. Torino's proposal to construct a barn on the north side of her property, although we did not receive a public notice in the mail. Our property is located across the street and one house down from Mrs. Torino. We were most concerned with grading on the north side of her property as we have had severe drainage problems in the past eight years plus, that we have resided here. The water comes down Middleridge South with such force that it crosses the street and floods us out every year. The Association has, on two occasions, hired Hawthorne Paving to try to direct more of the flow into the drain, which is above the proposed grading site. Grading on the north side of the subject property will cause more of a down flow towards our property. We are not opposed to horse keeping on the subject property as we have horses ourselves, but the selected barn site does not enhance the aesthetics of our larger parcels in this area. The barn site is far too close to the neighbors on the north side. Being horse owners, we are aware of the disadvantage of uncontrollable odors and flies. The proposed site for the barn would make feed deliveries and manure removal accessible only through the easement, which could be difficult during the winter months. We strongly feel by allowing this structure to be built so close to the edge of the property, and so close to the neighbors on the north side, that the beauty and rural feeling on our two acre minimum zoned area would be diminished and endangered. Sincerely, Robert and En9ireigliano #1 Middleridge(S ith Rolling Hills, Ca 90274 • • City ofieolling fidio November 30, 1998 Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Schmoller 4 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 588, Request for a Variance to permit an existing illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback and Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which has been illegally graded at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR). Dear Mr. and Mrs. Schmoller: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of the subject property to view the trellis, the "as built" grading and proposed barn on Saturday. December 12. 1998. The Planning Commission will meet at 7:30 AM at 91 Crest Road East and then proceed to 6 Middleridge Lane South. Do not expect the Commission at 7:30 AM but, be assured that the field trip will take place before 9:00 AM. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LLO reet A M. UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR Printed on Recycled Paper • City 0/ A/finf Jhfid • FIELD TRIP NOTIFICATION November 20, 1998 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mrs. Tamara Torino 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 588, Request for a Variance to permit an existing illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback and Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which has been illegally graded at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR). Dear Mrs. Torino: We have arranged for the Planning Commission to conduct a field inspection of your property to view the "as built" grading and proposed barn on Saturday. December 12. 1998. The Planning Commission will meet at 7:30 AM at 91 Crest Road East and then proceed your property. The site must be prepared in accordance with the following requirements: • A full-size silhouette in conformance with the attached guidelines must be prepared for the barn showing the footp rint, roof ridge and bearing walls and • Stake .the limits of the proposed grading. The owner and/or representative should be present to answer any questions regarding the proposal. Feel free to call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, LOLA UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR cc: Mr. Richard Huddleson Printed on Recycled Paper. • • City ot Ailing.J L//6 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS. CALIF. 90274 (213) 377-1521 FAX (213) 377.7288 SILHOUETTE CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES 1. When required by the Planning Commission or City Council, a silhouette of proposed construction should be erected for the week preceding the designated Planning Commission or City Council meeting. 2. Silhouettes should be constructed with 2" x 4" lumber. Printed boards are not acceptable. 3. Bracing should be provided where possible. 4. Wire, twine or other suitable material should be used to delineate roof ridges and eaves. 5. Small pieces of cloth or flags should be attached to the wire or twine to aid in the visualization of the proposed construction. 6. The application may be delayed if inaccurate or incomplete silhouettes are constructed. 7. If you have any futher questions contact the Planning Department Staff at (213) 377-1521. .. • • •1Y/• • • • • • SECTION 41 • • C,ry �l2PP.,.yJJ.•PG INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING November 5, 1998 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Mrs. Tamara Torino 6 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: ZONING CASE NO. 588, Request for a Variance to permit an existing illegal trellis to encroach into the south side yard setback and Site Plan Review Modification to permit the construction of a proposed barn that requires grading at the north side of the property, a portion of which has been illegally graded at 6 Middleridge Lane South (Lot 255-UR). Dear Mrs. Torino: Pursuant to state law the City's staff has completed a preliminary review of the application noted above and finds that the information submitted is: X Sufficiently complete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. Please note that the City may require further information in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application for Zoning Case No. 588 has been set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, November 17,1998. The meeting will begin at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend to present your project and to answer questions. The staff report for this project will be available at the City Hall after 3:00 PM on Friday, November 13, 1998. We will forward a copy to you. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, ,, LOLA M. UNGAR PLANNING DIRECTOR cc: Mr. Richard Huddleson, Architect Printed on Recycled Paper