Loading...
951, New raised deck of 420 sq ft, CorrespondenceolttoOEngineering Corporat e 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA 90717 tel (310) 325-5580 fax (310) 325-5581 September 18, 2018 Planning Department City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 RECE VED OCT) 12018 City of Rolling Hills By Subject: Re: Request for SPR, Variance- 26 Middleridge Lane South RH Julia, Below are responses to John Signo's preliminary review of the project for 26 Middleridge Lane South in Rolling Hills. Please review and let me know if you have any additional questions. 1. Provide owners signatures and initials on application See revised / signed applications 2. On the Overall Site Plan (Sheet CO.0): a. Indicate the structures in the northwestern corner of the property. There appears to be a staircase leading to a patio area and a trellis (to be removed as identified on Sheet C1.0). Correct; staircase and concrete patio along with trellis to be removed. All shown on CO.0 and Enlarged plans b. Label the small rectangular structure in the northwestern corner abutting the roadway easement and property line. Concrete Catch Basin c. Identify the walls in the front yard. Are these walls existing? If proposed, are they higher than 3 feet? All walls in front yard are existing. Driveway wall is -30" and other walls are close to the same height. Only proposed walls are below raised deck and future walls for stable set - aside. d. Identify the structure east of the garage. It is labeled as an 82 s.f. shed on Sheet C1.0 but must also be labeled on Sheet CO.0. Structure is a shed. Now labeled on CO.0 e. Label the 57 s.f. shed next to the new raised deck (it is labeled on Sheet C1.0). Added label on CO.0 f. Show and label the following (if applicable): i. Service yard Behind garage ii. Air conditioning unit In Service yard iii. Utility panels Attached to garage iv. Above -ground utility lines (if existing) Unknown 3. Make sure the Enlarged Site Plans (C0,1, C1.0, and C1.1) are consistent with the Overall Site Plan (Sheet CO.0). Noted see updated sheets 4. On Sheet C1.1: a. Label both future retaining walls (only the southern wall is labeled "2.5' max height See revised plan for "future" callout b. The northern wall appears to have a maximum height of 3.0'. Is this correct? Yes- all future walls for stable set -aside are 3' max and 2.5' average c. Label the dashed line that encompasses the future stable and corral set -aside. Does this depict the pad area and disturbance? Limit of grading 5. On Sheet CO.2 a. Label all structures as described above so that all sheets are consistent. Boit° 'Engineering Cor oralpn Noted; see updated sheets b. The legend seems to be incorrect (possibly wrong colors or overlapping lines). The existing disturbance and existing pad are not shown. c. The cut and fill areas are not shown. See updated plan showing cut / fill 6. Pad 1: House Pad calculations a. The calculations show the House Pad to be expanding by 595 square feet. However, the disturbed area for the property does not change. How can this be? Existing disturbed area extended past existing house pad so even though we are adding the deck which increases the house pad, there is no new disturbance. 7. Roof elevation: a. Correct the ridgeline height on all elevations to show existing and proposed. Currently, the plans show the maximum ridgeline to be 804.27' on both the existing and proposed plans (Sheets A-3 to A-8). Please see revised plans which show corrected new ridge elevation of 805.08'. 8. Calculation of Lot Coverage: a. The calculations show an existing 545 s.f pool/spa, 100 s.f. pool equipment, and 1,300 pool decking. Show these on the site plan. Currently shown on the enlarged site plan but now added to CO.0. b. On the "Grading and Excavation Information" page at the bottom, it gives elevations for a guest house. This seems to be in error since there is no guesthouse. This was in fact an error and has been removed 9. Provide photos Will email photos of deck as requested 10. Pay the fee: $2,325 Owner will come down and pay fee Feel free to contact me directly with any questions / concerns regarding the project. Regards, Tavisha.Ales, P.E. 1 Bolton Engineering Corp. 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA 90717 P: (916) 790-8550 (Sacramento) • • 2(0 kick\er id € Lain-e S . ?lay p& cov-ate arch. ?luNs �. Q vermkl S Vr-e_pla11S September 18, 2018 B®01 Erie�gor'1eerhii CX l�'porai 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA 90717 tel (310) 325-5580 fax (310) 325-5581 RECE cf, D Planning Department City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SEP 1 9 2018 City of Roiling Hills Subject: Re: Request for SPR, Variance- 26 Middleridge Lane South RH Julia, Below are responses to John Signo's preliminary review of the project for 26 Middleridge Lane South in Rolling Hills. Please review and let me know if you have any additional questions. 1. Provide owners signatures and initials on application See revised / signed applications 2. On the Overall Site Plan (Sheet CO.0): a. Indicate the structures in the northwestern corner of the property. There appears to be a staircase leading to a patio area and a trellis (to be removed as identified on Sheet C1.0). Correct; staircase and concrete patio along with trellis to be removed. All shown on CO.0 and Enlarged plans b. Label the small rectangular structure in the northwestern corner abutting the roadway easement and property line. Concrete Catch Basin c. Identify the walls in the front yard. Are these walls existing? If proposed, are they higher than 3 feet? All walls in front yard are existing. Driveway wall is -30" and other walls are close to the same height. Only proposed walls are below raised deck and future walls for stable set - aside. d. Identify the structure east of the garage. It is labeled as an 82 s.f. shed on Sheet C1.0 but must also be labeled on Sheet CO.0. Structure is a shed. Now labeled on CO.0 e. Label the 57 s.f. shed next to the new raised deck (it is labeled on Sheet C1.0). Added label on CO.0 f. Show and label the following (if applicable): i. Service yard Behind garage ii. Air conditioning unit In Service yard iii. Utility panels Attached to garage iv. Above -ground utility lines (if existing) Unknown 3. Make sure the Enlarged Site Plans (C0,1, C1.0, and C1.1) are consistent with the Overall Site Plan (Sheet CO.0). Noted see updated sheets 4. On Sheet C1.1: a. Label both future retaining walls (only the southern wall is labeled "2.5' max height See revised plan for "future" callout b. The northern wall appears to have a maximum height of 3.0'. Is this correct? Yes- all future walls for stable set -aside are 3' max and 2.5' average c. Label the dashed line that encompasses the future stable and corral set -aside. Does this depict the pad area and disturbance? Limit of grading 5. On Sheet CO.2 a. Label all structures as described above so that all sheets are consistent. BolltowEnsiraeering Corporally Noted; see updalgE sheets • b. The legend seems to be incorrect (possibly wrong colors or overlapping lines). The existing disturbance and existing pad are not shown. c. The cut and fill areas are not shown. See updated plan showing cut / fill 6. Pad 1: House Pad calculations a. The calculations show the House Pad to be expanding by 595 square feet. However, the disturbed area for the property does not change. How can this be? Existing disturbed area extended past existing house pad so even though we are adding the deck which increases the house pad, there is no new disturbance. 7. Roof elevation: a Correct the ridgeline height on all elevations to show existing and proposed. Currently, the plans show the maximum ridgeline to be 804.27' on both the existing and proposed plans (Sheets A-3 to A-8). Please see revised plans which show corrected new ridge elevation of 805.08'. 8. Calculation of Lot Coverage: a. The calculations show an existing 545 s.f pool/spa, 100 s.f. pool equipment, and 1,300 pool decking. Show these on the site plan. Currently shown on the enlarged site plan but now added to CO.0. b. On the "Grading and Excavation Information" page at the bottom, it gives elevations for a guest house. This seems to be in error since there is no guesthouse. This was in fact an error and has been removed 9. Provide photos Will email photos of deck as requested 10. Pay the fee: $2,325 Owner will come down and pay fee Feel free to contact me directly with any questions / concerns regarding the project. Regards, Tavisha Ales, P.E. I Bolton Engineering Corp. 25834 Narbonne Ave. Suite 210 Lomita, CA 90717 P: (916) 790-8550 (Sacramento) • Bo ton Engineering Corp.J J August 9, 2018 City of Rolling Hills 2 Portuguese Bend Road Rolling Hills, CA 90274 Attn: John Signo & Julia Stewart Subject: 26 Middleridge Lane South 1st Planning Submittal All, Please find included in this submittal package a Site Plan Review Application, Variance Application, Lot Coverage Calculations, Site Plan Set, and Color Plan. We request that we be placed on the first available Planning Commission Agenda, which with our submittal timeline we believe to be the October 23rd meeting. I will submit a copy of the architectural plans when our office receives them from the designer. While you review these plans I will begin the process of obtaining mailing labels, per my conversation with Julia earlier this week, and I will have the owner sign the applications after your first review. I will be in LA August 21-23 if you would like to meet to discuss the project at that time or you can call me at my office at your convenience at (916) 790-8550. Regards, BOLTON ENGINEERING CORP. -raahi 1011-e6 Tavisha Ales Bolton Engineering Corp RECEIIVED AUG 0 9 2018 City of Rolling Hills By 25834 Narbonne Ave., Suite 210, Lomita, CA 90717 tel (310) 325-5580 fax (310) 325-5581 eat,/ Rollie, ge614 INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CA 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 STATUS OF APPLICATION & NOTIFICATION OF MEETING September 6, 2018 Jeff Manquen & Camille Cripps-Manquen 26 Middleridge Lane South Rolling Hills, CA 90274 SUBJECT: Request for SPR. Variance - 26 Middleridge Lane South Dear Mr. and Mrs. Manquen: City staff has reviewed your application for a new residential addition/demolition, covered porch addition/demolition, new raised deck, roofline changes, and a future stable set -aside. Pursuant to state law the City finds that the information submitted is: X Incomplete as of the date indicated above to allow the application to be processed. The following items must be addressed: • Provide owners signatures and initials on application • On the Overall Site Plan (Sheet CO.0): o Indicate the structures in the northwestern corner of the property. There appears to be a staircase leading to a patio area and a trellis (to be removed as identified on Sheet C1.0). o Label the small rectangular structure in the northwestern corner abutting the roadway easement and property line. o Identify the walls in the front yard. Are these walls existing? If proposed, are they higher than 3 feet? o Identify the structure east of the garage. It is labeled as an 82 s.f. shed on Sheet C1.0 but must also be labeled on Sheet CO.0. o Label the 57 s.f. shed next to the new raised deck (it is labeled on Sheet C1.0). o Show and label the following (if applicable): • Service yard ■ Air conditioning unit • Utility panels • Above -ground utility lines (if existing) • Make sure the Enlarged Site Plans (CO.1, C1.0, and C1.1) are consistent with the Overall Site Plan (Sheet CO.0). • On Sheet C1.1: o Label both future retaining walls (only the southern wall is labeled "2.5' max height wall"). • • o The northern wall appears to have a maximum height of 3.0'. Is this correct? o Label the dashed line that encompasses the future stable and corral set -aside. Does this depict the pad area and disturbance? • On Sheet CO.2 o Label all structures as described above so that all sheets are consistent. o The legend seems to be incorrect (possibly wrong colors or overlapping lines). The existing disturbance and existing pad are not shown. o The cut and fill areas are not shown. • Pad 1: House Pad calculations o The calculations show the House Pad to be expanding by 595 square feet. However, the disturbed area for the property does not change. How can this be? • Roof elevation: o Correct the ridgeline height on all elevations to show existing and proposed. Currently, the plans show the maximum ridgeline to be 804.27' on both the existing and proposed plans (Sheets A-3 to A-8). • Calculation of Lot Coverage: o The calculations show an existing 545 s.f. pool/spa, 100 s.f. pool equipment, and 1,300 s.f. pool decking. Show these on the site plan. • On the "Grading and Excavation Information" page at the bottom, it gives elevations for a guest house. This seems to be in error since there is no guesthouse. • Provide photos • Pay the fee: o Site Plan Review: $1,500 o Variance: $625 o Environmental: $200 o TOTAL: $2,325 Please note that the City may require further information in addition to the above mentioned in order to clarify, amplify, correct, or otherwise supplement the application. If the City requires such additional information, it is strongly suggested that you supply that information promptly to avoid any delay in the processing of the application. Your application has been tentatively set for public hearing consideration by the Planning Commission at their meeting on Tuesday, October 23, 2018, at 6:30 PM in the Council Chambers, Rolling Hills City Hall Administration Building, 2 Portuguese Bend Road, Rolling Hills. You or your designated representative must attend the meeting to present your project and to answer questions. Please call me at (310) 377-1521 if you have any questions. Sincerely, John F. Signo, AICP Contract Planner cc: Tavisha Ales, Bolton Engineering -2-