Loading...
590, Enlarge the entry to SFR 42 SF, Application•City ofieliny VARIANCE REOUEST FOR HEARING • INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 PROPERTY OWNER: 1w42 M fa .A 9 A 112-ab v-Lr OWNER'S ADDRESS: ,7) 8 4J C r-c Y 12.(9 A c) R t Pc V, C t' TELEPHONE NO.: OW) ) 4 ar ` 4101 (44o 6-c t=. ) PROPERTY ADDRESS: ag. 1(") 'PAST. = VELD !Z O L L nJ ( .L( 1 C1_ C (--5) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. A POT/TM t•1 o LOY Co `e 65 ASSESSOR'S BOOK NO. `je PAGE ( PARCEL 13 &c, AGENTS NAME: "FS�'),1 k O L t -rp-n AGENTS ADDRESS: 1-27C9 (c) ' ? FA c O`tit S Y. C) p G6� g073( TELEPHONE NO.: 10 NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310),377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 Describe in detail the nature of the proposed use, including what aspects of the project require a Variance. \v-6 E is4 LA cc t P � "-az O % t C �CT� C ct2 so-c A5 tc S CDZ14( P - (cMs-5, \ T C j t9c E d2 . t-S . C rC S 0 (- C 1-� S--1, et Zo�c-C SC-C 66.cK LSNE 0 'e-kSfs EL'j F 4 3o r to 565i P-0 5,P' �71 j 31)1 T i c' h 1 t o Pi r..nc a 7 t c i- c c` rn 14 -O S 4 c, 1-Skz \Tei2 WSJ tT►,4 � F.9 `C' i'�e9vAaDa2 -S cs F ��e$ $ fl1.f C� c SE Criteria to be satisfied for giant of Variance Such change is based upon the following described exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions that do not apply generally to other property in the same vicinity and zone. Tt-SC E %ST fzc? 7 CT (O 1,1 IS t o (`Iv -cox e-c5TT N 0141' QOfLc-I �s415-flj- d oef T4E nr-&S NC 2M D71(-retN1 is oHflZ A S-ANY( R©b•V i310T iy, E S -"L C t) "h` ENT r -`( cr ,A b`z b lam( tp j; T 1-D o r-S 146Y Pt'2c91 CC BE`r©Me$ 5T5NC L9/LLE- eRr-,tod e•, �xor j,-k,d Paper • • Such change will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone where property is located because ADS VTI O'N t.S 1 E57el) to 9�"z4( )1,I c PCs CO FS‘,SC-E 6 32 C.. t ©T Off' t c n- B C, 'lfC AS-Cv-)1 & -t AVD (-7r c9056,i tc1CCC. s"t7P C>ekt7,( 14_00 600 '�A CGS �C-� Cep s- AM). FILING FEE A filing fee must accompany the application. Make check payable to: THE CITY OF ROLLING HILLS. CHECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITIR The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements). 2. Variance (including grading requirements). 3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following: 1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone number of architect and civil engineer. 2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. 3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property line and residences of all contiguous properties. 4. North arrow and scale of plans. 5. Existing contours of the entire lot. 6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot. 7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 8. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade. lilA (Municipal Code Title 15). 10. Shade all cut and fill slopes. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15). Lo Li t. M•,• 4 ;,,�,. •�'. * 11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show height for all buildings. 12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas. u, 13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review is requested. 14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing. A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements. 14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing. A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements. 15. Show a graded area of not less than 450 square feet for the construction of a stable, 550 square feet for a corral, and a graded road of not more than 25% grade for vehicular access to the stable site. (Title 17). 16. Sections should be shown through highest slope and through other areas where ground is steep, and as many additional sections as necessary to clearly delineate land contours with existing ground. 17. A current survey and grading plan, with related soils, geology, hydrology/drainage reports, showing all structures on the property, with their distance from property lines delineated, will be required in applications where the requested change is close to easements, close to other properties, and/or where there is to be significant grading on the property. 18. Note distances from the center line of all existing and proposed streets adjacent to the subject property. 19. Show the existing buildable area which is that portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN REQUIRED MINIMUM SETBACKS that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. If there is not an existing building pad, the buildable area shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. • • OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed,,by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at L('-Y 5-L� this day ofC` By: By: California Address '3 6,.5 Ciz.- T 11.0>D 12.. P, A. CIS - OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at I U s Oopcji c_ S this day of I) C�-C, By: By: 12- 3 � �5 Address California, , 19c ,!,.4 P Eg212,, huLT eA2.; r A71) F2.P.ic, c � NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: Fie A N k p(7'L1 T E-0 DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: +P& -4 i T L' C. FEE: COMPANY NAME: ALA K' 4�C� Ls t C-0' 41 iN RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: I (hO S Si', ZONING CASE NO: S' r4 ) PC—DA2.(j 6 TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. (-'O F 3 1 -0 5 I PROJECT ADDRESS: I#Io Websirktw.c06 20 z c.“ice cc- c • • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFI DAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) I, fR Li PE RR A U , declareunderpenalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Po 12 T1 'NJ ©. Lo`r c 9 'LND cp- Executed at LU S A ,1.5 C,E L day of 17• California, this ,19 cc . DATE ZING CASE NO. ADDRE APPLICANT'''. CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 39,0() sq.ft. 3 9- p p sq.ft. •3 (fI G-17 -0) sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) j3500 sq.ft. 1 cjp sq.ft. (?,1c p0 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 2 O g [2, sq.ft. P 24 sq.ft. 2, 4 0 6 sq.ft. GARAGE G gp,(o sq.ft. ✓ sq.ft. 686, sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 580 sq.ft. -, sq.ft. t.;11 6 sq.ft. STABLE 45(D sq.ft. / sq.ft. 4-5D sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) ' sq.ft. / sq.ft. i sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 70 sq.ft. sq.ft. 70 sq.ft. OTHER P6KZcc4i�--s 8(1, sq.ft. sq.ft. 8 (\ sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE DRIVEWAY 3 c'3 5 2 sq.ft. 3�7% 2_9 , 2`] % 2.61e3 sq.ft. B 2c4 sq.ft. 8 'QS % 6A D % 30 sq.ft. 4576 sq.ft. 33,9n % '2 8 4 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS q 0 0 sq.ft. ) I' ® sq.ft. 1 570 sq.ft. POOL DECKING ( q(r)sq.ft. ✓ sq.ft. ) 40 4 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 4 $ 2.2 sq.ft. 1'52. 0 sq.ft. 5 4-2 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 1 0, 9'O % 3 (6'3 % 14174 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 8274 sq.ft. 2 3 44 sq.ft. 10 4-1/3 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 'Zd a 'f,' % 51 cei % .2C, 22 % DATE *TING CASE NO. ADDR APPLIC CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 'a On sq.ft. RESIDENCE 29 (9 sq.ft. GARAGE a 8 (, sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) sq.ft. POOL /' sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) sq.ft. OTHER 00_e_14tS 8 41 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PADNO.2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ( ) OTHER TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 3 C�7c, sq.ft. % 7 2.0 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 4-50 sq.ft. Ito sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. ) Q b sq.ft. PROPERTY OWNER OWNER'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PROPERTY'S ADDRESS: REOUEST FOR HEARING FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW M rt. ce Y`'t tZ5 P / SJ (--7 38 4 - cn r 0 D A-1) 1.2. 7 \f, «, , R D 27 Lo > g-4-4 -- 44 o c. C (> 565r (D D42-(cl` LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT NO. A PO d2 yj co IN( (9-5 LOr (d 4 Q 6 ASSESSORS BOOK NO. PAGE . G AGENT'S NAME: AGENT'S ADDRESS: TELEPHONE NO: PARCEL I >�a (4. 9C9L( taco £ P���CON. 5saP) POD cx.- ( .2V91 6`221 --�o2E 1 NATURE OF PROPOSED PROTECT Describe in detail the nature of the proposed project, including what aspects of the project require a Site Plan Review: P V Pip®5G) Pr7f03' CT oSr i9 E -E PG>(2f AR 0 p: 'r( s 51-J j' 2© &F - T t4 F T p 6-6/C4a 1-ciS 12a4 J- I (1) 3 G is - r � Zip C 1,- 5 -J Cc Rola F D} J Q gl&k-11 617S7 t7(0-6._5 rAS-Zr-(l TM' DS?ST013 ! �-e r LC E V S)C�-tt- dzoor • r t p(9 p 9 rzm 92 1)14S) elk-- ' VJ PC t2-ws T' •c" RSA (_ / 1 1"L fi-c 5S4 Z" 5ccuo -is4.3 440U-5(5 Ltv%c. v C c(5`CWQ POOL 1�LL XCiavA'T'ED DikT WILL 33c OS D tZ L FtLLYNG 0 1%4 T4 P-Y i SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA Site plan review criteria upon which the Planning Commission must make an affirmative finding. Describe in detail the project's conformance with the criteria below: A. Is the project compatible with the General Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and surrounding uses? Explain how it compares to the sizes, setbacks and other characteristics of neighboring houses. T C pa2.r), cr 4s co1--1 colt(-1- lR p cM--N czoNlpO C9 f'a J J b 1J C , 6) 0-0-2 CSc t,i t'7) ( I O S 'C--S "� t� ,� la(p i 'r (i 2 d2 N ESCLc c (.o 1 ` 4.4 fit r p ced2S41 r4t12 -rac k-o vs; R B. How does the project preserve and integrate into the site design, to the maximum extent feasible, existing natural topographic features of the lot including surrounding native vegetation, mature trees, drainage courses, and land forms (such as hillsides and knolls)? Explain how the project preserves and integrates existing natural features. T14.6 pan 'Pccr \- - t Cc ice( c> Y r-S'TU 2 \" (5iCf 9Tr N G v- C-aATCvty F. Lh9cQ Nq EsCC.pr C tL -care poP.,T40N CQ (4 LE 1-4-F D -)I PC. 1 S A(j&). TY-4( �"�=42I2IsGE FAai,1.iq `e•(7(-G- P>A-c TA 0z C. How does the site development plan follow natural contours of the site to minimize grading? Extensive grading and recontouring of existing terrain to maximize buildable area shall not be approved. Graded slopes shall be rounded and contoured so as to blend with existing terrain. Grading shall not modify existing drainage redirect drainage flow unless into an existing drainage course. Explain the nature and'extent of the impact of grading and proposed minimization on lots. • T• 1-(5 L8cc S Tt N c c Q.r> D c 1\1 i 9 Fp14- 7'u Silo sr pier T ($ 5)a ' E 1 EX apt- .t.) 4-(- T/74 T Alto `1 E ta12 f(16 w r fit- 'C 1- C r' 4-aLi4. C`C AP V t 4-F COngh.L, D. To what extent does the site development plan preserve surrounding native vegetation and supplement it with landscaping that is compatible with and enhances the rural character of the community? Landscaping should provide a buffer and transition zone between private and public areas. Explain how the project preserves native vegetation, integrates landscaping and creates buffers. 779-5 400str7 Apprrftyl) /7&Nor F(T ( 'SsZ,f►,Jee L Y)-0 S c p 'Co OS iq Y i C T N T P T4 c r3Cs s rt tic LPND9CS('Jc c.WJLL 1E M.o2)(eA iN FJ2 Nr n> JI34 2H b uD ,6fZ2ouNP T -c: 4.--ia PC( [ xa • • E. How does the site development plan preserve the natural and undeveloped state of the lot by minimizing building coverage? Lot coverage requirements shall be regarded as maximums and the actual amount of lot coverage permitted should depend upon the existing buildable area of the lot. Explain how the lot coverage proposed compares with lot coverage square footage and percentages on neighboring lots. Lo-r C e v4rg CNr1 S V &fur N1--t .r_ CYG-T- T44 G '11 f T tryi,JS F. Is the site development plan harmonious in scale and mass with the site, the natural terrain and surrounding residences? Setbacks shall be regarded as minimums and more restrictive setbacks shall be imposed where necessary to assure proportionality and openness. Explain how the proposed project setbacks compare with the existing setbacks of neighboring properties. Ti C3 C) S ) S GDC (9T( c, 7,v) 4 ZC -T,C- kSS)s)c(f ) WcLC 497 1-Sd62voNtoC)S rtx) (ST IJ co t-( V. 1 z'TF4-E Fdz®N r aeT ew1 OF- T •6 1-4-c v ag Nov 0+4N G. E-1 ot, - 'f4 E 5I7 - 00-- G. Is the site development plan sensitive and not detrimental to convenience and safety of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles? Explain how the number and types of vehicles relate to the driveway location, design, trip data, landscaping and other on -site parking or storage areas. ?- — HOC ( 57n' Q Pai V r-- C) L--i4 3`t S CQ p f ,S-IG � M l- T(74-C gf4.N'S'A C I\CQ) H. Does the site development plan conform with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act? Explain how the project impacts the environment, e.g. significant impact, proposed mitigation measures. -ter,&- /mac c 5 7 r (�, 5 s -r F/ PCC- c�.r �s F cr T l' $`Zc (N VfI2-o ME t$T IAALL- j26T•2AiN `Z;(-CC 14h2'&- • • • I hereby certify that the statements furnished above, and in attached exhibits, presents the data and information required for the site plan review criteria evaluation to the best of my ability; and, that the facts, statements and other information pryseuted p an orrect to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date: Signatur For: f2p C-d242c.) (.Y Applicant tiltECKLIST FOR PLAN SUBMITTF The following information must be included on any plan submitted for checking to the Rolling Hills Planning Commission for: 1. Conditional Use Permit (including grading requirements):- _ _ 2. Variance (including grading requirements). 3. Site Plan Review (including grading requirements). 4. Subdivisions and Lot Line Adjustments Provide fifteen (15) sets of plans that show the following: 1. Name, address and telephone no. of applicant, and name, address and telephone number of architect and civil engineer.- — - - . -.. . 2. Plot plans must be stamped by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor. 3. Vicinity map drawn to scale with requested improvements dimensioned to property line and residences of all contiguous properties. 4. North arrow and scale of plans. 5. Existing contours of the entire lot. 6. Show setbacks, easements, horse trails on entire lot. 7. Outline and show square footage of building pads within allowable setbacks in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). S. Computation of lot coverage in accordance with Municipal Code Title 17 (form attached). 9. All slopes shall not be steeper in slope than two horizontal to one vertical, or exceed a vertical height of thirty feet (30'). All slopes shall be marked with grade. (Municipal Code Title 15). 10. Shade all cut and fill slopes. Show shaded area square footage, cut and fill totals, and the percentage of lot to be disturbed. (Title 15). 11. Show all retaining walls and sections through walls, height and elevations. Show height for all buildings. 12. Show proposed drainage pattern of graded areas. 13. Designate the area(s) for which the Variance, Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan Review is requested. 14. Show outline of residence and any additional structures. All structures must be physically measured and square footage of each structure must be shown on drawing: A note must be on the drawing certifying to those measurements. • • City ofi2le.�na INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 COMPUTATION OF LOT COVERAGE LOT COVERAGE (TITLE 17) NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com Main buildings, accessory buildings, structures, tennis courts, swimming pools, service yards (enclosed or unenclosed), stables, or an area of not less than 1,000 square feet for the construction of a stable and corral (with vehicle access thereto) shall not cover more than twenty percent (20%) of the net lot area, provided further that in addition to the above described improvements, the areas included within driveways, parking space, walks, patios, decks and asphalt or concrete paving of any kind excepting roads maintained by the Rolling Hills Community Association, shall not cover more than thirty-five percent (35%) of the net lot area. For the purposes of this Section "net area" shall exclude: a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot. COMPUTATION OF BUILDABLE AREA AND COVERAGE THEREOF A policy of the City is to address coverage of an identified "EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA". Coverage thereof is based upon the calculation of the "footprint" square footage of the residence, garage, stable (barn), and other accessory structures proposed and/or developed on said "buildable area." For purposes of this calculation, "buildable area" shall be defined as stated in Section 17.12.020 of the Rolling Hills Municipal Code which declares existing "buildable area" as the portion of a lot that constitutes the existing building pad and any other contiguous portion of the lot WITHIN ALLOWABLE SETBACKS THAT HAS AN AVERAGE SLOPE OF TEN PERCENT (10%) OR LESS. If there is no existing building pad, it shall mean that portion of a lot within allowable setbacks that has an average slope of ten percent (10%) or less. December 12, 1996 Pnraed on Recycled Paper Property Line Easement Line Setback Line I .1i I 1.4 .11J • . I.. I, i 11,1 I • I. 1 I I •:.‘..\\''.:Ns I imlv (14.. • • \\\ `)\\\ \A\:. Residence 3, 11,414/014 111 ROADWAY EASEMENT j, i.11:11. ...lid...111i 4i 1..1. I • ..11•11.da•-•111iim iltika.t ....no e. .L3.1.11 1,11 NET LOT AREA vzrzzezizzzze EXCLUDE 10 FEET AT PERIMETER PLUS ROADWAY EASEMENTS OWNER'S DECLARATION I (We) declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at L.. 4 : , California, this *` 5 - ', r' day of /ter 2 , 19 c(3 BY: _'" 1... ). /I C By: f2-4tf p Z oS-VLT Address C°/S._ Ri0 226- NOTE: The Owner's Declaration can only be used if this application is signed in California. If this application is signed outside of California, the applicant should acknowledge before a Notary Public of the State where the signature is fixed, or before another officer of that State authorized by its laws to take acknowledgements, that he (it) owns the property described herein, and that the information accompanying this application is true to the best of his (its) knowledge and belief. Attach appropriate acknowledgment here. APPLICANT: ROC, PERO-6-V ( DATE FILED REPRESENTATIVE: -tv S6- I2C.7C_,i t UO FEE: COMPANY NAME: ri ?trc.t G A IA 1 6cror RECEIPT NO: COMPANY ADDRESS: BY: 0,-C9 s 97,66. sZONING CASE NO: c(4 Io c46 - 'i 67.7 I TENTATIVE HEARING DATE: COMPANY PHONE NO. (zj(i9) 5-1r>3,� PROJECT ADDRESS: Ocy O 545Y* Fla_ b-(J�' . . RA%C,k.tOce \4Ccc9 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Property development in Rolling Hills is governed by ordinances of the CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ("City") and by private deed restrictions enforced by the ROLLING HILLS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("RHCA"). The land development permit process of the City and the RHCA are completely independent and separate. Both must be satisfied and approval given by both the City and the RHCA to develop property in Rolling Hills. An approval by either the City or the RHCA does not mean or imply or ensure approval by the other. The suggested sequence of property development is to obtain City approvals first. I, (We), the undersigned, acknowledge that the above statement has been fully read and its admonition is completely understood. Executed at this I S L. 5 C, mac. C' , California day of o(. By: BY: r `-f P c-"(R-A'L) U (.- ( orb Address RC) p, U'm Coy ?oazb--- City • • CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ZONING CASE CERTIFIED PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST AFFIDAVIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ss CITY OF ROLLING HILLS ) 1, Rib U C..`t , declare under penalty of perjury that the attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is assessed as they appear on the latest available assessment roll of the County within the area described and for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the exterior boundaries of property legally described as: Executed at Conditional Use Permit Variance Site Plan Review Zone Change LDS PO cei S-c. S , California, this day of l r ,19 q', CO GTiJNARE DATE ZONING CASE NO.579 ADDRESS I a EitSrf tEL D DR iz .u, c4 , APPLICANT POL1TEd / P tgRiSULT CALCULATION OF LOT COVERAGE BUILDING AREAS EXISTING PROPOSED TOTAL NET LOT AREA 39630 sq.ft. 39630 sq.ft. 39630 sq.ft. BUILDING PAD(S) 11142 sq.ft. 160 sq.ft. 11302 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 2082 sq.ft. 824 sq.ft. 2906 sq.ft. GARAGE 686 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 686 sq.ft. SWIMMING POOL/SPA 58o sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 580 sq.ft. STABLE 66 sq.ft. 384 sq.ft. 450 sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. SERVICE YARD 70 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 70 sq.ft. OTHER 89 sq.ft. _5 sq.ft. 84 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES 3573 sq.ft. 1203 sq.ft. 4776 sq.ft. % STRUCTURAL COVERAGE 9.01 To 3.04 % 12.05 % % TOTAL PAD COVERAGE 32.06 % 10.64 • To 42.25 % DRIVEWAY 2518 sq.ft. 330 sq.ft. 2848 sq.ft. PAVED WALKS AND PATIO AREAS 400 sq.ft. 1190 sq.ft. 1590 sq.ft. POOL DECKING 1404 sq.ft. 0 sq.ft. 1404 sq.ft. TOTAL FLATWORK 4322 sq.ft. 1520 sq.ft. 5842 sq.ft. % TOTAL FLATWORK COVERAGE 10.90 % 3.83 % 14.74 % TOTAL STRUCTURAL & FLATWORK COVERAGE 7895 sq.ft. 2723 sq.ft. 10618 sq.ft. % TOTAL COVERAGE 19.92 % 6.87 % 26.79 To DATE ZONING CASE NO. ADDRESS IC) EASEFIELD OR, 12,14 CA APPLICANT POLITEO / REPP&UL.T CALCULATION OF BUILDING PAD COVERAGE PAD NO. 1 BUILDABLE PAD AREA RESIDENCE GARAGE STABLE (BARN) POOL RECREATION COURT ( SERVICE YARD ) OTHER 4306 2906 686 0 0 sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. sq.ft. 70 sq.ft. 84 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 1 3746 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 86.99 % PAD NO. 2 BUILDABLE PAD AREA 6836 sq.ft. RESIDENCE 0 sq.ft. GARAGE 0 sq.ft. STABLE (BARN) 450 sq.ft. POOL 580 - sq.ft. RECREATION COURT ( ) 0 sq.ft. OTHER 0 sq.ft. TOTAL STRUCTURES ON PAD NO. 2 1030 sq.ft. % BUILDING PAD COVERAGE 15.06 oJo Date Filed • City 0/ Rollin +WiLLo INCORPORATED JANUARY 24, 1957 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (To Be Completed By Applicant) Zoning Case No. NO. 2 PORTUGUESE BEND ROAD ROLLING HILLS, CALIF. 90274 (310) 377-1521 FAX: (310) 377-7288 E-mail: cityofrh@aol.com GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Applicant(s) Fdd S'4(( P©LS Z LSO Tel. (3J(5 ) S� ZiC— 920 zip Address (?)c36) 5 P7C1 cO J St.. 2. Legal Owner(s) & V12S ¶2.- PE 128 . bOLT Tel. (1)10) 4-1 O Address e45 crzeEZ.O PI) R G� 3. Project Address 1() t= o�S-r w 1 1 .') Rc Lcit4 4 5 (C S CA P O �Tc o O.� Assessor's Book No. Lot No. L -f t 05. 4. Other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: COuliTt Q c)' 'T $ G Aiir~+ D.C-p`Ct- 5. Existing zoning district 6. Proposed project/use of site Ile 5 i n E $.X C .4NC. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7. Site size 43t'330 S 8. Net lot area 2 9 r (- 0 S•IF. "Net Lot Area" means the total area included within the lot lines of a lot or parcel of property, exclusive of: (a) the entire area within a recorded roadway easement plus the area within ten (10) feet measured perpendicular to the edge of the roadway easement; (b) the ten (10) foot perimeter of the lot perpendicular to the property lines; (c) any private drive or driveway that provides access to any other lot or parcel; and (d) the access strip portion of a flag lot." 9. Total square footage of structures 4576 at-, 10. Number of floors of construction c,1- 11. Basement square footage 7 13 4 12. Total combined flatwork and structural lot coverage Os 41 '6 51 Y %�iJTR'-(I 'D61�t)9Cc, s2M • 13. Will any exterior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? v ipc4 14. Will any interior walls be removed or relocated? Which walls? V3 YJ Ri.n 1�l °i -1,ANA Pi 15. Will the entire building structure require a new roof? IA () 5-05-98 -1- Printed on Recycled Paper. • • 16. Will the existing roof remain intact, with less than 200 square feet added? I 17. Grading quantites shall be balanced. Amount cut 4100 . Amount fill 4-1-Z(r) (Include any basement cut in grading quantities.) 18. Area of disturbance. 40% maximum; any remedial grading (temporary disturbance), any graded )0 (\ slopes and building pad areas, and any nongraded area where impervious surfaces will remain or are proposed to be added. Square feet Percentage of Net Lot Area . 19. If residential, include the unit size. Square feet 20. If commercial, indicate the type of project, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, estimated employment per shift and loading facilities. IN1/11 21. If industrial, indicate the type of project, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. ,JJ /,4 22. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. 23. Attach plans. 24. Proposed scheduling. 25. If the project involves a site plan review, variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. DO-5 to oE o FT Try D y°C P- AcK `1'I�� r V+-6QJ NC6 1S 2ISIO ^(��j� oV 1 IS?� v V(0-�> 1 J �� (� -(J\V 50 '1' \. 5�r =5 C_Se: Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). ES ❑ X. 26. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. ❑ 27. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. ❑ 28. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. -2- • . YES NO ❑ 29. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. ❑ 30. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes, or odors in vicinity. 31. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or alteration of existing draining patterns. 32. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. ❑ K 33. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more. ❑ 1:2( 34. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic flammable or explosives. ❑ la 35. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, etc.). ❑ 36. Substantially increased fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 37. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. quantity, or ❑ substances, water, sewage, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 38. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. "TitMs2 C-s S o Et,.) C.0 Fps 5T S ON' p4 44- f o I s M DIZ.E LE -SC L OS-G (ADA Z(-( ST 2\ E Pbb 441 5(s9c>'-e ®F 2; i 4'2 ON t,A--4 t C L r1-1- 7 f S Pea t MO LE: 39. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, guest house, office use, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. "T.44 - 3uOft % 1Nc (10? Tc rS sa-c: LL D E-v 1= L_o p G-D eE-S k,L)) z' t_j D e lreop 0 Li-) ND (--.SP 1)-1 a O U n aes (TJ X CC i s &c c, p y.=cuLLY e-e_91,1'74 /) 1-z.c 12.E !-'e DIL)Qr i T t-G6 o tr-_ y0 ,.-z: W s.LL 114' i'-1> U s 2E /S L. so h p 60 j' ' Q gJ-c 15G ,,pt, EKCrbvttCPc U1-gDC (5TsAQc 340c-'5E •i �l� %,- PJ as 5 C- 5-1- l� ` . Q32`� 24-`) 1 L L s C s JJ )7-266L •1ODD • EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: VI. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). VII. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. VIII. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. IX. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a Tess than significant level (mitigation measures from Section V, "Earlier Analysis," above may be cross-referenced). X. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section V, above. XI. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? 0 0 0 b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 ❑ polices adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project c) Be incompatible with existing land use in the 0 0 ❑ vicinity? d) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g. 0 0 0 impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an 0 0 0 established community (including a low-income or minority community)? II . POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 population projections? • . Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 X directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 ❑ 0 housing? I11. GEOLOGICAL PROBLEMS. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Fault rupture? 0 0 0 b) Seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 d) Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? 0 0 0 e) Landslides or mudflows? 0 0 0 t f) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil 0 0 0 `C conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? g) Subsidence of the land? 0 0 0 h) Expansive soils? 0 0 0 0 i) Unique geologic or physical features? 0 0 0 IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related ❑ 0 0 hazardssuch as flooding? c) Discharge into surface water or other alteration 0 0 0 of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any ❑ 0 ❑ 3 water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of 0 0 ❑ ..X water movements? f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? 0 0 0 X h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 Pfs- i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 groundwater otherwise available for public water supplies? V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 '1/ an existing or projected air quality violation? -5- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 1 c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or 0 0 0 cause any change in climate? d) Create any objectionable odors? 0 0 0 .)`� VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ❑ 0 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on -site or off -site? 0 0 0 e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 0 0 f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 7, alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ❑ 0 0 VI I. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 0 0 habitats (including but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g., 0 ❑ 0 oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 ❑ C pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 VI I I. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 Y inefficient manner? c) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 mineral resource that would be of future value to the region and the residents of the State? IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 response plan or emergency evacuation plan? -6- Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 071 brush, grass, or trees? X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ❑ 0 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 ❑ 0 XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 `j b) Police protection? 0 0 0 c) Schools? 0 0 0 X d) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? 0 0 0 e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 XI I. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution ❑ 0 0 facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 ❑ e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 ❑ A g) Local or regional water supplies? 0 0 0 XIII. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? 0 0 0 a"" b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 c) Create light or glare? 0 0 0X. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? 0 0 0 b) Disturb archaeological resources? 0 0 0 10) c) Affect historical resources? 0 0 0 d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 0 0 which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within 0 0 0 the potential impact area? -7- • • Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 regional parks or other recreations facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 ❑ 0 the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important example of the major period of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects ❑ 0 0 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? XVII. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier Analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. See Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines. In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a) Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses 0 and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which ❑ effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less ❑ than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. ❑ ❑ 0 ic -8- • • NOTE: Before the Lead Agency can accept this application as complete, the applicant must consult the lists prepared pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and submit a signed statement indicating whether the project and any alternatives are located on a site which is included on any such list, and shall specify any list. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES STATEMENT The development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are contained on the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. Accordingly, the project applicant is required to submit a signed statement which contains the following information: 1. Name of applicant: F[2. 4-. . 7 6 2. Address: 27C9a S ?e-A C »O F•t Sr, 3. Phone Number: (3 I/0 - 3 0 ✓ 4. Address of Site (street name and number if available, and ZIP code): Co E s'FCC- L) Z Lc.) 5. Local Agency (city/county): coo C`C-L ' 6. Assessor's book, page, and parcel number: 7. Specify any list pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code: STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCES SITES LIST (available at Citv Hall). 8. Regulatory identification number: 9. Date of List: JULY 1992 Date j --Y,5 19 Signature For )Fae1. < \D©LitC� Applicant -9- • • NOTE: In the event that the project site and any alternatives are not listed on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code, then the applicant must certify that fact as provided below. I have consulted the lists compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code and hereby certify that the development project and any alternatives proposed in this application are not contained on these lists. Date t )t5 For Sig natur Applicant CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date t'Z�-- i �" �� (V�Q�-) Signature � For Applicant forms\environm. 1998app - 10 -